
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


AGREEING TO DISAGREE. A federal judge in California has refused to dismiss a proposed class action against an online automobile exchange for allegedly sharing the search inquiries of visitors to its website with third parties in violation of the state's wiretapping law, in a ruling that stands in stark contrast to a recent decision by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court interpreting a similar law. In this episode, David breaks down the court's reasoning, and urges insureds to check their cyber policy wording for limitations and exclusions around such claims.
By David Finz5
11 ratings
AGREEING TO DISAGREE. A federal judge in California has refused to dismiss a proposed class action against an online automobile exchange for allegedly sharing the search inquiries of visitors to its website with third parties in violation of the state's wiretapping law, in a ruling that stands in stark contrast to a recent decision by the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court interpreting a similar law. In this episode, David breaks down the court's reasoning, and urges insureds to check their cyber policy wording for limitations and exclusions around such claims.

32,283 Listeners

178 Listeners

12,845 Listeners