
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


NO IF'S, AND'S OR "BUT FOR'S". A decision out of a Federal district court gives a boost to an airline's contention that its cyber insurance carrier interpreted policy wording too narrowly, keeping the airline's claim for business interruption loss alive. In this episode, David explains why this is good news not only for policyholders but for the cyber insurance marketplace's long-term viability.
By David Finz5
11 ratings
NO IF'S, AND'S OR "BUT FOR'S". A decision out of a Federal district court gives a boost to an airline's contention that its cyber insurance carrier interpreted policy wording too narrowly, keeping the airline's claim for business interruption loss alive. In this episode, David explains why this is good news not only for policyholders but for the cyber insurance marketplace's long-term viability.

32,275 Listeners

175 Listeners

12,848 Listeners