Meet Dr Judy Mikovits, who stars in the film Plandemic

One of the more gruesome stories from the world of medicine concerns an American researcher Dr Judy Mikovits. Her story begins in 1982-1983, shortly after French virologist Luc Montagnier managed to make progress with the HIV virus. Dr Mikovits is part of a team that will confirm Montagnier's progress. The team will conduct a scientific study to confirm Luc Montagnier's discovery, and then both studies will be published to benefit other professionals in the scientific world and ultimately help save a lot of lives among those infected with HIV. So it's a race against time.

But along the way, Dr Mikovits' team is pressured to let Anthony Fauci from the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) into the study they are working on. In the end, Fauci and his collaborators simply steal the information, or copy the study, and later publish their own study, which is a copy of the original. In doing so, Fauci also succeeds in delaying the most important discovery about HIV - which incidentally earned Luc Montagnier the Nobel Prize in 2008. According to Mikovits, Fauci's delay has caused the death of millions of people, especially in Africa. Fauci also succeeded in securing important patents relating to the HIV virus. The fact that a government official both owns patents on HIV and also works with HIV as a government official is an illegal conflict of interest, which, for some unfathomable reason, he will (apparently) never be convicted of.

Anthony Fauci was part of the HHS management team that delayed the announcement of the discovery of the HIV virus. At the same time, Fauci was appointed head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) in 1984, a position he still held at the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic until the end of 2022.

Dr Judy Mikovits has been called one of the most successful scientists of her generation. Her 1991 doctoral thesis revolutionised the treatment of HIV/AIDS and at the height of her career, she published a blockbuster article in the scientific journal Science. The controversial article sent shockwaves through the scientific community as she demonstrated how the fairly common use of human and animal foetal tissue in scientific experiments unleashes a plague of chronic diseases on humanity.

The revelation of this controversial truth sent an army of Big Pharma's little minions after her, destroying her privacy, career and good name.

Almost coinciding with the rise of the coronavirus pandemic, Dr Mikovits came forward to reveal the names of those behind the plague of corruption ravaging the pharmaceutical industry and humanity here on earth. And her story is terrifyingly hair-raising.

The powerful pharmaceutical industry had Dr Mikovits arrested and muzzled, preventing her from telling the public the truth for 5 years. She was told that her tormentors would ‘find new evidence’ if she came forward, and so they would continue the destruction of her professional and personal life.

Although she was imprisoned and her home was ransacked, no charges were ever brought against Judy Mikovits and she was never convicted in a court of law. Even when she was arrested, no arrest warrant was officially issued. The allegations that she did anything illegal are meaningless. On the other hand, Dr Mikovits has the names of 97 witnesses she wanted to testify, including Anthony Fauci, which would mean the truth would come out in an American trial. Instead, she was silenced.

Or she was silenced for a period of time, because now she has come forward and pointed out that the coronavirus pandemic that hit the world in late 2019/early 2020 is just as manipulated by the same Anthony Fauci who was involved in the 1991 plot against the truth, which, among other things, caused the dark forces of the pharmaceutical industry to push her out of the good company.

Her book ‘Plague of Corruption - Restoring Faith in the Promise of Science’ was published in April 2020 after her 5-year gag order expired. With life and health at stake, Dr Mikovits has now sacrificed everything to promote the truth that Anthony Fauci orchestrated the entire cover-up that, among other things, tried to destroy Mikovits when she told how millions of people have died from this great deception, which basically started with Luc Montagnier's otherwise amazing discovery of the HIV virus.

Among the key backers, she names Anthony Fauci, who has been head of the NIAID since 1984, and Robert Redfield, who was head of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) from 2018-2021. These were the two most influential positions at the time when the US was responding to the coronavirus pandemic declared by the WHO in March 2020. And probably the two people who have had the greatest official influence on the entire world's response to the pandemic, with the possible exception of WHO Secretary-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, who is discussed at lengt in other parts of this book.

Shortly after her book is published, she is featured in the documentary film ‘Plandemic: The Hidden Agenda Behind COVID-19’. Dr Mikovits is interviewed by Mikki Willis and she tells her whole story and shows the connection to the coronavirus pandemic. YouTube has removed the film, but it can be found on the Odyssey video service.

Despite the heavy censorship, the film ‘Plandemic’ won a Gold Award for Best Documentary at the European Independent Film Award (EIFA) in spring 2021.

After its release, the film spread so quickly on social media that the pharmaceutical industry's minions, in a feeble attempt to stop the spread, had to make new fact checks that tried to refute and misinform about some of the claims in the film. Thus, the media PolitiFact made a fact check where 8 specific claims made in the book were criticised by PolitiFact. As is typical of these so-called fact checks, there is more misinformation than real information, which is especially the case here.

What's interesting about PolitiFact's fact check being so effective in casting doubt on an award-winning documentary film is that you can find out who is behind PolitiFact. The Poynter Institute owns PolitiFact, and Poynter has received huge grants from Google and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which adds more than a little bias to PolitiFact's fact check.

I have to warn against swallowing all of Judy's revelations uncritically, as she seems to miss a number of important points about viruses and vaccines. Omissions that raise my suspicion. But her story was part of the alternative media landscape in 2020 and therefore her story needs to be told here in this book.

Mikki Willis and his otherwise critical Plandemic film should also be warned against. His approach to critical journalism seems to be limited to revealing only part of the limited, which could indicate that he consciously or unconsciously works as a so-called ‘limited hangout’.

Mikki Willis‘ production company Elevate wasn't done helping to get Judy Mikovits’ story out there, as we'll see in the next section.

Meet PhD David E. Martin, who stars in the film Plandemic II

Mikki Willis, who interviewed Judy Mikovits in the Plandemic documentary, made a slightly longer follow-up to the award-winning film 4 months later, which was dubbed ‘Plandemic 2’ or ‘Plandemic: Indoctornation’.

In Plandemic 2, Mikki Willis interviews PhD David E. Martin, a National Intelligence Analyst, who has previously developed analytical tools to detect patent fraud.

In the 45-minute documentary, David Martin explains how the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has been involved in building an industrial complex around the coronavirus since a previous coronavirus outbreak in Asia in 2003 until 2018. Anthony Fauci of NIAID (part of the CDC), Ralph Steven Baric, professor from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and a long list of others affiliated with the CDC have taken out patents on the coronavirus and developed proprietary ownership of the coronavirus, the associated disease (COVID-19) and the detection tools to detect the virus/disease.

But Dr David Martin's cardinal point in the arguments put forward is that you cannot patent a virus created by nature. This is against the rules on patents. Nature cannot be patented. And the CDC has just patented the coronavirus that has spread to humans. So either they have illegally patented a virus or they have violated international laws on biochemical weapons, which state that viruses that have the potential to attack humans cannot be developed in a laboratory.

Since the tools to detect the coronavirus and the SARS-COV-2 virus itself are patented by the same group of people with Fauci and Baric at the centre, the coronavirus that has been fought since 2019 must have been developed in a laboratory.

And again, for some unfathomable reason, the press and the one-sided fact-checkers seem uninterested in debating the different sides of the story. Despite the fact that Nobel Prize winner Luc Montagnier stuck his neck out and unequivocally stated that the Wuhan coronavirus originated in a laboratory. PolitiFact did an even lower quality fact check of the new documentary Plandemic 2 shortly after its release. This fact check didn't even touch on the fact that the CDC has been granted an illegal patent on a human-borne coronavirus, whether it was made in a lab or not!

Plandemic 2 continues to shine a light on the great deception that citizens are subjected to by a media that fills them with untruths and attempts to claim the truth they are supposed to believe. There are very few companies that own a huge percentage of the media that create the news, and these companies include Comcast, News Corporation, Disney, TimeWarner, Viacom, and CBS Corporation. Their behind-the-scenes communication enables them to sell messages that unsuspecting citizens are indoctrinated with.

Halfway through Plandemic 2, the documentary touches on the organisation that has been most pivotal on a global scale, the WHO, and how it could go so wrong for the organisation in 2020-2022. And how the People's Republic of China helped install a former Ethiopian minister who a wide range of African human rights organisations believe should be punished for the genocides he was involved in when he held a key position in the Ethiopian government. WHO Secretary-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus has longstanding ties to Bill Gates and his so-called philanthropic activities in Africa.

Just as with Judy Mikovits and Mikki Willis, I must also warn against relying too much on information coming from David E. Martin. He too seems to be limited in his criticism of the overall medical fraud, which could also indicate that he also acts as a ‘limited hangout’, spreading valid critical information while avoiding mentioning some key points about vaccines and the pharmaceutical industry. A lot of his successful career is based on his key leadership roles for 3 or 4 different mosaic organizations and key roles for the World Bank, which all-in-all is pointers towards his affiliation with the underlying (crypto-)Jewish bankmafia.

Links:

* Dr Judy Mikovits' book “Plague of corruption - Restoring faith in the promise of science” on Amazon: https://www.amazon.com/Plague-Corruption-Restoring-Promise-Science/dp/1510752242

* The documentary ‘Plandemic: The Hidden Agenda Behind COVID-19’ is available on Odysee: https://odysee.com/@UNCENSORED:c/PLANDEMIC:77

* Plandemic won an EIFA gold award in spring 2021 for best documentary: https://www.imdb.com/title/tt12745644/awards

* On 7 May 2020, PolitiFact publishes a fact check that ‘debunks’ 8 ‘facts’ from ‘Plandemic’: https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/may/08/fact-checking-plandemic-documentary-full-false-con

* Plandemic 2 was a somewhat longer documentary film released in August 2021: https://odysee.com/@UNCENSORED:c/PLANDEMIC2:1

* PolitiFact fact check on 18 August 2020 of Plandemic 2: https://www.politifact.com/article/2020/aug/18/fact-checking-plandemic-2-video-recycles-inaccurat

Gene Therapy gone wrong!

When you mess with things on the level of DNA and RNA, far-fetched theories of bodily chemistry (of which you may not have a clue), and your experiments with injections in human bodies, it would be quite predictable that there is a considerable chance that you’d do harm and make irreversible damage is it not? If you made enquiries (quite understandably, as these injections might hurt you) online on social media about this in 2021, there was a great chance that you'd be censored. Why? If mRNA jabs are not doing lasting damage (gene therapy gone wrong), they could just have refuted any doubts by presenting the evidence that the jabs were safe, and let the debate unfold. Truth should be able to manage and overcome critique, shouldn’t it? If we all have to be jabbed, the whole world and all, with a new technology, which are not tested extensively like other vaccines, really, it must be of the utmost importance to have the debate first and turn every stone. True? NO! Not according to the world's power elite and the health authorities that seemingly are controlled by this elite. You must understand that ‘they’ do this for your granny and grandpa and your safety. So that the contagion does not spread. So that we, as a population can ride off the pandemic without too many deaths. So that people should not suffer lasting consequences of corona. So that the hospitals should not become overwhelmed with other horrific consequences for the entire health system. Like the National Socialists, or Nazis, said during the second World War and the period leading to it: “Für ihre sicherheit!”. This phrase was used in a "Oprop" (High Alert) flyer which the Germans cast out over the cities in the days when they invaded Denmark. It was for the safety of our country. We were asked to understand that the Germans wanted to protect the Danes against the English. It is the same logic that Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen used in 2020-2022: "It is for your own safety", and the variants “It is for the sake of the elderly and the weak” and “Show a social mindset”. The Oprop flyers’ indisputable message is summarised in the last sentence: "For the safety of the country the German Army and Fleet will from now on secure against an English attack". If you replace "the safety of the country" with "the safety of the elderly" and "English attacks" with "Corona pandemic" and "the German Army and Fleet" with "restrictions and vaccinations", then, you will feel the fascist breath of history and probably even feel the shivers down your spine:

"Restrictions and vaccinations will from now on ensure the safety of the elderly during the pandemic"

Life is dangerous to live and there is enough to worry about. Except that the so-called vaccines would do more damage than they do good. There has never been much focus on the damage they can inflict. Those who do focus on this are excluded from the debate, both on social media and by the press in general. However, this question is the most pressing of all.

Even doctors were censored on social media, however only the doctors who spoke out against the pandemic narrative. Anybody else, doctors, virologists and others could join the panel of 'experts', and were used industriously to make us wear masks, let ourselves be tested, or make us take a COVID-19 jab.

The global COVID Summit (GCS) is an organisation, which on 17th May 2022 published its fourth declaration to the world. The event was filmed as a press meeting and broadcasted live via "The High Wire", as the mainstream media were strangely enough not interested. Seven doctors and scientists represented GCS at the press meeting and were in turn supported by 17,000 doctors and scientists. Dr Robert Malone was one of them who represented the declaration, and he spoke very clearly about the COVID-19 jabs.

Eight minutes into the video from the press meeting, you can see and hear him conclude on the basis of the scientific investigations of the jabs. The scientist, who was at the centre when he invented the mRNA technology, explains that the mRNA-jabs will cause more damage than good and that they will not protect against contagion, as they were intended. He calls the jabs 'quasi-vaccines' and refers to these jabs being intended as a form of gene therapy, meaning that the recipient will have their genes altered. He is, as mentioned, backed by 17,000 doctors and scientists from around the world, so not just a small group of mad conspiracy-theorists then!

Meet one of the Inventors of the mRNA Technology….

By the end of the 1980s Dr Robert Malone and his colleague Philip Felgner stated that they were able to add RNA to living cells. This is why the scientist Malone is credited with having invented the mRNA technology. It demands special attention when an inventor of a technology warns the public that its application in a vaccine is dangerous and furthermore says that he suspects that this is gene therapy. Added to this 17,000 doctors and scientists back the statements. His warnings go directly against the narrative of the mainstream media where 'experts' state that the RNA material that is injected in the body disappears after a short while. But how do they know, we might ask, seeing as there was no long term testing done to document this? Dr Malone has his own Substack website with lots of informing articles and videos. Unfortunately I have later on had to revise my impression of Dr Malone and the two other doctors from the Global COVID Summit, Dr Peter McCollough and Dr Ryan Cole. This has to do with the jabs, 5G and the so-called 'Internet Of Things' (IOT) because all three of them apparently ignore essential facts in this regard. Towards the end of this book I will expand more about these technologies, and how they are related to COVID-19.

Dr Charles Hoffe warns of Myocarditis after the Jab….

Another doctor, who is also warning us against the so-called vaccines, is Canadian, Dr Charles Hoffe. After administering about 900 Moderna mRNA jabs to local Canadians of North American Indian origin, he learned that a lot of them had subsequently suffered injuries directly from the jab and therefore he pulled the emergency brake. Already in April 2021, he wrote a message to the local community in the village of Lytton to warn the population, and he addressed the county doctor for British Columbia at the same time. Dr Charles Hoffe's prompt reaction to help his patients had disappointing results. His practice was closed by the health authorities for the reason that he was causing 'vaccine hesitancy' in the population. This has happened to a lot of doctors, and other highly skilled medical practitioners all over the world.

I remember having a conversation with a Danish doctor, who has a practice in the Copenhagen area and this person did not wish to enter into a discussion with me about the jabs, presumably because he knew I was correct about several or all of my claims. Instead he told me that it was up to me to solve this problem, referring to me being a politician, as he knew I participated in politics at that time. I was a little surprised by his way of how problems should be solved, but I also knew that doctors will do everything to keep their jobs.

A few months after Dr Charles Hoffe's open letters to the locals and the authorities, the whole village mysteriously burned down including the hospital practice where Hoffe worked. It happened as a forest fire hit the area and wiped the village out on 30th June 2021. All of Hoffe's reports regarding the vaccine injuries were lost. The fire hit the world headlines, among which the ‘Guardian’ newspaper in England. The paper wrote a longer article about the catastrophe albeit a whole month later. The ‘Vice’ - an American Research Media - also wrote an article about the fire linking it to Dr Hoffe's reports of the vaccine injuries. Although I do not in general regard The Vice trustworthy, finding it a bit over the top and eager to create a good story at least they reported the catastrophic fire. The article rather strangely focuses on 'a grey bearded man without a shirt' who was ‘walking around’ and proclaiming that ‘a laser had caused the fire’. On the background of my experience as an electronics engineer, as previously mentioned, who has conducted a great deal of research into 5G, I know that Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) do exist. I just don’t know how often it is used by the authorities. It is certainly not beyond possibility that DEW-like technology could be used in the way the shirtless man tells us - that a giant laser would have set the village on fire. But the story seems to have been invented for the occasion, which I base on the fact that the shirtless man is suspiciously unnamed.

But what I find really strange is that cars are completely burned down and their tyres melted, while smaller wooden structures closer than 10 metres from the cars are completely intact. Such fires do indeed indicate the use of DEW, which would at least explain why the cars caught fire and not the wooden fences standing right next to the cars. However, it would be a conspiracy theory if I claimed that DEW was used and that the fire in the village was man-made. Suffice it to say that there are circumstances in the story reported by the mainstream media that have some loose ends. Such fires point at the use of a Directed Energy Weapon. However, I am sure that it would be called a conspiracy theory if I claimed that a DEW set the village in question on fire and that the fire was man-made just because the people living there had suffered wholesale as the result of falling ill from side-effects of the Death Jab. It wouldn’t be too good for Big Pharma if that suddenly reached the world stage. Far better to nip it in the bud, surely…. I will content myself in pointing out circumstances and loose ends in this story from the mainstream media reports.

Dr Charles Hoffe has carried on his activism and made several examinations of people jabbed with the so-called vaccines. Among other things he has made use of D-dimer tests to confirm that 62% of the patients had experienced a small blood clot four to seven days after they were jabbed. The blood clots in questions are so small that the patients in most cases do not notice them. Unfortunately the examinations also point to a large part of the jabbed later do go on to suffer side effects and damage, and the more jabs a person has received, the higher the risk. As the heart's tissue does not regenerate, like the tissue in the liver and kidneys, the jabbed person will have a much higher risk of developing myocarditis. Dr Hoffe also points out that this risk is possibly better illustrated with the many elite sports stars who have suddenly collapsed since the so-called vaccination programme began worldwide. Here in Denmark, we have also seen elite sports stars collapse during competitions or elsewhere. The most prominent, televised throughout the world is the unfortunate footballer, Christian Eriksen, the greatest player on the Danish national football team, who suddenly collapsed on the pitch on 12th June 2021 during a game against Finland. Christian Eriksen has not wished to confirm if he has received the COVID-19 jab and he will not discuss his disease. We do know that after this ‘episode’, he will never enjoy quite that great salary that goes with international soccer stardom, as he used to get, even if he has continued his career as an international footballer. No doubt he has ‘insurance’ to keep him and his family going for the rest of their lives; It is also rather worrying to note that most, if not all established insurance companies will not cover people against the ‘experimental’ Covid-19 jab side-effects. I wonder which ‘insurance company’ is keeping Eriksen going for the rest of his, and his families’ lives? It could be insurances issued by someone or some company affiliated with Mr Gates’, but then again, I am just speculating.

Almost every Danish mainstream media has portrayed the ‘Eriksen’-episode, among others, TV2 with an article shortly after the unfortunate event. It is highly regrettable that Christian Eriksen will not take the responsibility and inform all his followers if he was jabbed or not and what caused his collapse. Especially, since this could have eased the uncertainty around the so-called vaccines, or - if he had taken the jab and it caused his collapse - by informing his followers which could in turn have saved many from being jab injured and some from dying. After all, these international soccer stars are multi-million pound investments and a lot of people stand to lose an awful lot of money if they fail to perform, especially health-wise. We know that even their sex lives are scrutinised along with their diets, medical requirements and exercise régimes. Indeed, it is certainly completely reasonable to suggest that if there was any problem with their health – especially as fundamental as a ‘heart problem’ - it would have been spotted immediately at the many medical advanced tests to which they are submitted, hours or even minutes before the game takes place. These tests are performed by doctors and other medical professionals employed by the football club, who are paid very high salaries to spot the slightest cardiac anomaly, and intense scrutineering as to a player’s general physique and health. It is also reasonable to ask why, under a stress test, Eriksen presumably reported no ill-effects and furthermore why was nothing picked up in the days and hours before the match started and he nearly died on the field?

Dr Charles Hoffe produced a video update in November 2021 with a critical analysis of the COVID-19 pandemic from a medical perspective. The video was recorded in Lytton Creek a year and a half after the fire and it tells us that what identifies as symptoms following Sars-Cov-2 can easily be treated with antiviral medication. He recommends Ivermectin, vitamin D and C, zinc and lots of fresh air and sunshine—all of which is either cheap or easily obtainable, or both - which would relieve the symptoms of what is named ‘COVID-19’. The more deep-seated problems with myocarditis and other heart defects will be examined later in this book as it is now beyond any doubt as the days and weeks go by that it is a serious side effect of the COVID-19 jabs, now being increasingly acknowledged by even the mainstream doctors in Denmark. Unfortunately, there are still a great many doctors and authorities who are still maintaining that these are just harmless side effects, which they are certainly not. However, as I write this, in the middle of 2023, it would seem that, over this issue, far from the cat having just popped its head out of the bag; it is now running around the playground mewling and squealing.

The Danish Illusion is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

If you do not feel like becoming a paid monthly subscriber, but want to support my work, you can buy me a cup of coffee for aprrox. 5 USD/35 DKK(click HERE!):

Links:

* German flyer from the 1940-invasion of Denmark: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SzPBssnEqGClP6T1-AeZQJFnJ70KWNeT/view

* Global COVID Summit’s fourth declaration on May 11th, 2022 (from WayBack Machie): https://globalcovidsummit.org/news/declaration-iv-restore-scientific-integrity

* The description of Dr. Charles Hoffe on Wikispooks: https://www.wikispooks.com/wiki/Charles_Hoffe#cite_note-1

* The Guardian brought this article on the 25th of July, 2021 on the forest fire that burned Lytton down to the ground: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/25/lytton-canada-heat-wildfire-record-temperatures

* The conspiracy media The Vice wrote a report about the forest fire on 20 July, 2021: https://www.vice.com/en/article/epnmja/conspiracy-theorists-think-a-lytttown-burned-by-wildfire-wasdecimated-by-a-laser

* Video on Odysee where Dr Charles Hoffe reviews the so-called mRNA vaccines:

https://odysee.com/@TheAgeofAquariusPI4PSI2:1/mRNAvaccines:d

* TV2 article about Christian Eriksen's collapse on the football pitch:https://sport.tv2.dk/fodbold/2021-06-12-eriksen-falder-om-i-danmarks-em-kamp

* Video on Odysee where Dr Charles Hoffe sharply criticises the COVID-19 narrative and vaccines: https://odysee.com/@bonniesmit:0/230-Heroes-No-Longer—Episode-2—Dr-Charles-Hoffe:0

Close ties between vaccine industry stateholders

By the end of 2022 there were two approved COVID-19 vaccines in Denmark. Or rather, two approved 'so-called vaccines' for as I said before, they are not vaccines in the true sense that we normally understand by the term vaccines. These so-called vaccines do not make use of the traditional method in order to immunise the receiver, which is the established purpose of conventional vaccines. The American pharmaceutical manufacturer Pfizer has developed and produced the so-called COVID-19 vaccine, COMINARTY, (no relation to Moriaty – the baddie in the Sherlock Holmes books, surely….) in collaboration with the German pharmaceutical manufacturer BioNTech. The technology which is used in Pfizer's so-called vaccine is named mRNA technology. It was developed by Dr Robert Malone in the nineteen-eighties or, to be slightely more accurate, he set this technology in motion, and other scientists have developed it up until today. Ironically, Dr Malone himself vehemently warns us against the COVID-19 vaccines that are based on his own invention. Indeed, Wikipedia writes on their website that the inventor of the mRNA technology is spreading misinformation about his own invention…..Make of THAT what you will! I will return to Dr Malone in the next chapter.

Pfizer have created a website where they explain the difference between the conventional vaccines and these new mRNA vaccines. A conventional vaccine is about that very little, or a very weakened extant virus, is injected into the body, so that the body's immune system recognise and overcome the limited and weak attack and thereby create and mount a concerted defense against another attack in the future. It is the whole purpose of the receiver of the vaccine to become immune towards the subsequent virus attack - immunised. This is not how mRNA vaccines are thought of or designed and this is why I and many others call them so-called vaccines. The term mRNA is an abbreviation of 'Messenger Ribo Nucleic Acid'. The theory is that if DNA (named Deoxyribo Nucleic Acid) is the instruction manual of the body, RNA is a page in this book, where the instruction for the individual cell in the body is written. The messenger RNA can somehow (re)instruct the cells of the body!? Then there are the genetic sequences which they claim they have for Sars-Cov-2. However this is a far claim and presented without any scientific evidence. The claim is then that mRNA technology is used in order for them to make the body's cells produce the so-called Sars-Cov-2 spike protein which is also a computer-drawn fiction, which in the microscope, the visible spikes are an effect of the chemicals which they apply to remove the gel coating from the cell. Of course, the more shrouded in science-babble the explanation is, the more the average person a) believes “the Science” b) couldn’t care less anyway and c) assumes that the ‘scientists’ are right, because, after all, they are (Bill Gates’ and WHO funded) scientists and much more clever than they will ever be, sitting in front of the BBC watching “Eastenders” and the like. Ye Gods! How easy it is for these people to get away with murder. Literally.

This completely without evidence named ‘spike protein’, (let’s give it a fancy scientific name that people don’t understand as well!) which, according to this method gives our immune systems the ability to fight and reject the RNA virus Sars-Cov-2, corona virus, and this miraculously without the body becoming immunised….you could not make this up, could you? Oh looky here, they just did! Allegedly, by using the mRNA technology in a so-called vaccine, mRNA is injected in the body in order for the body to produce spike proteins (not proven to exist), so that the body's immune system is able to defend itself against corona virus (not proven to exist). This is the simple summary of a very long and windy explanation on Pfizer's website. Pfizer is registered on the stock exchange and the largest share owners are our familiar friends, Vanguard and BlackRock. Since 2016 The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has donated 135 million US Dollars, which is almost a billion Danish Kroner, or Crowns, to Pfizer. It's essential also to keep in mind that the BMGF makes use of both donations as well as investments in shares as their tools to get involved in an enterprise. Therefore these donations are only the tip of what we can see of the iceberg.

For example, it is very fluid how many shares BMGF have in Pfizer. It is beyond any doubt that BMGF has shares in Pfizer as the information is on their “Strategic Investment Funds” website. However, what is not known, is how many.

The other approved COVID-19 vaccine in Denmark is Moderna's “Spikevax” alleged vaccine. This is also called an mRNA vaccine. In 2021 you could read on Moderna's website that the enterprise regards mRNA technology as an operating system, like the software operating a computer. As Bill Gates has vast amounts invested in Moderna, it is a dry assumption that Bill Gates has now invested in his second operating system – this time one for humans! Whilst this may be a far-fetching statement, however I believe that it is closer to the truth than one would think. In true support of their evil intentions, Moderna has since deleted the page on their website including the statement describing the mRNA vaccine being like an operating system of the human body. But all is not lost and again, Praise the Gods and little chickens! The WayBack machine comes to our aid, as it has made a copy of the original webpage of the subterfuge for us all to see.

What is the relation of Bill Gates to Moderna? It is, as said, impossible to find out how many shares BMGF have in Moderna and we do not know why BMGF does not declare anywhere the size of their donations to Moderna. Since this this book was published in Danish in 2023, both BMGF and Moderna, and surprisingly, also the WayBack machine has all deleted their copies of a press release stating that BMGF have a non-exclusive license agreement with Moderna related to the mRNA technology in the Moderna so-called vaccines. The BMGF inform us, still today, that they have a strategic collaboration with Moderna. However, they do not mention their non-exclusive license agreement in relation to the mRNA technology evident in this now long gone press release. Why ever not? Why it is that the international press has not written more about the Bill Gates’ relations to Pfizer and Moderna, when he also has such a great influence on the WHO, and subsequently on how the whole world reacts to pandemic outbreaks, where Pfizer and Moderna are brought forward as the ones to save us all with their vaccines? And why does Moderna no longer inform us of the details of their strategic collaboration with the BMGF? Why indeed? Is this because the public should not become too closely acquainted with the truth, which reveals that the regulating authorities in the different countries are influenced by donations? And that the same sponsors have, at the same time, have large investments in the companies that profit from the decision-making of the regulatory bodies during a pandemic? Anyway, we know that BMGF donates large sums to both the Danish Health Authority and to the State's Institute for Medicines, and that Bill Gates was also deeply involved in the (scandalous) sale of the vaccine factory of the Danish state. It has also surfaced in the UK that Bill Gates is the prime sponsor of the British vaccine approving authority, The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). The alternative media, The Exposé wrote an article on 2nd September 2021 about the connection using a Freedom of Information request that they learned about. As described and documented in my previous chapter, Bill Gates has great influence on the WHO, who declared the pandemic in 2020. Could it be that the global elite wants to avoid the public learning about their plans to gain even more control over the populations and governments around the world? And that these so-called vaccines, with mRNA technology, are part of this power grab? This is irrefutably my own conviction and, in the coming pages and books - as if you needed any further persuasion - you will see a truck-load more evidence to back this 'conspiracy' up. Please note the difference between a conspiracy and a conspiracy theory! It is only a conspiracy theory if it has not yet been proven to be a conspiracy. In this particular case, it is quite evident that it is no longer a theory that Bill Gates long has been involved in a conspiracy with WHO and the vaccine manufacturers, particularly Pfizer and Moderna.

The Danish Illusion is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

If you do not feel like becoming a paid monthly subscriber, but want to support my work, you can buy me a cup of coffee for aprrox. 5 USD/35 DKK(click HERE!):

Links:

* Wikipedia page on Dr. Robert W. Malone: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_W._Malone

* Pfizer explains the difference between conventional vaccines and mRNA vaccines on its website: https://www.pfizer.com/news/articles/what_makes_an_rna_vaccine_different_from_a_conventional_vaccine

* Yahoo Finance shows the ownership of the publicly listed Pfizer: https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/PFE/holders?p=PFEThe Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has donated almost a billion danish kroner to Pfizer: https://www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants?q=pfizer

* Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's Strategic Investment Fund limited information about Pfizer: https://sif.gatesfoundation.org/investments/pfizer/

* Moderna's argument on their own homepage that mRNA is a control system for humans found on WayBack Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20200501110214/https://www.modernatx.com/mrna-technology/mrna-platform-enabling-drug-discovery-development

* Moderna and BMGF press release announcing that BMGF has rights to Moderna's mRNA vaccine (now defunct): https://web.archive.org/web/20200304164329/https://www.modernatx.com/ecosystem/strategiccollaborators/foundations-advancing-mrna-science-and-research

* BMGF announces on their website a strategic collaboration with Moderna since 2016: https://www.modernatx.com/partnerships/strategic-collaborators?

* The Exposé has created an article showing evidence of BMGF's influence on the UK licensing authority MHRA: https://expose-news.com/2021/09/03/investigation-bill-gates-has-major-shares-in-moderna-and-an-foi-has-revealed-he-is-the-primary-funder-of-the-mhra/

Meet Dr. Luc Montagnier

Dr Luc Montagnier received the Nobel Prize for discovering the HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) in 2008. He is also the co-founder of the World Foundation for AIDS Research. So, he was not a Dr. Anybody. He claimed, until his death in 2022, that the coronavirus that broke out in China was man-made in a laboratory, and that he was one of the first Western scientists to examine samples of the corona virus from China.

His analyses were subdued by the main-stream media in spite of him being Nobel Awarded. An Indian media, CRUX, produced a fact-check divided into two separate stories about the statements of Montagnier, where they ‘corrected’ his probably most quoted statement during the pandemic: “The vaccines will produce new variants more deadly than the original.”

Mass Vaccination is a Medical Error.

By the end of this fact-check, CRUX quotes an Indian virologist Dr Kang who said that Nobel Awarded Luc Montagnier was spreading false news.

This fact-check of Luc Montagnier has been re-distributed by many media outlets around the world, with other ‘virologists’ as experts over-ruling the Nobel-awarded doctor. It does seem that they have embarked upon an orchestrated effort in order to make the doctor as untrustworthy as possible.

The BBC made a short obituary about Luc Montagnier when he died at the beginning of 2022. At ninety seconds long, the video mentions that, whilst Montagnier was a celebrated scientist, at the end of his life he had increasingly supported unscientific theories and was therefore on edge with the established medical community. However, he became popular in the anti-vax community, among others, because of his claim that the Sars-Cov-2 virus was man-made in a laboratory. But according to the BBC this is a false statement.

In a previous interview on French TV, Montagnier is quoted for mentioning that Wuhan in China, where he thinks that the virus has come from, had so many 5G mobile masts erected that the electromagnetic waves from the masts could have caused the emergence of Sars-Cov-2.

Montagnier only says that this is a possibility, not that he actually thinks that's what happened. However, he maintained to his death that the virus, which he had received from Wuhan, was man-made, as it contained sequences from the HIV virus, which could not have happened by chance in nature. Montagnier also knew that there was already research into corona-viruses going on in Wuhan. Therefore, based conveniently upon that, he presented his theory that they had been researching into an AIDS-type ‘vaccine’ and that the search had failed and that Sars-Cov-2 had escaped from the lab during the process.

Montagnier's investigations and statements have been taken seriously by a large community because of his background as identifying the HIV, which in turn is recognised for being the virus that leads to the disease called AIDS.

Please note: The above mentioned CRUX fact-check using Dr. Kang has been removed from the internet since the writing of the original book written in Danish. Other fact-checks are still available, i.e. Reuters fact-check from May 26, 2021 (se links).

Links:

Reuters fact-check of Luc Montagnier:https://www.reuters.com/article/fact-check/there-is-no-evidence-to-suggest-covid-19-vaccines-will-kill-people-by-causing-an-idUSL2N2ND0WS/

BBC Obituary of Luc Montagnier the Nobel Prize winning French virologist on the 10th of February 2022:https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-60340504

A “Crazy Deal”!?

It is, of course, difficult to document that Bill Gates gives direct orders to key people in the Danish health sector but we know that the money-stream gives influence, for this is how capitalism works in the world that we have today. Let us begin by looking at the vaccine department at the state's institute of medicine. This entity was sold for nothing to someone as exotic as a Saudi Sheik back in 2016/2017, following a majority vote in the Danish parliament. Here is a translation of an analysis by the Danish mainstream tabloid ‘Ekstra Bladet’ from 2020.

“Crazy Deal”

“The Danish state sold the vaccine manufacturing output of the state in the summer 2016 for fifteen million Danish Crowns to the Saudi Sheik Abdulaziz Hamad Aljomaih, who took it over formally in January 2017. Solicitors PriceWaterhouseCooper had assessed that the state could have made a profit of up to 285 million Danish Crowns. Included in the deal the Sheik also received a discount on the rent of 200 million Danish Crowns. The state's solicitors has assessed that the cost to the state in connection with this sale will be around 1.3 to 1.8 billion Danish Crowns. They have also criticised that the conditions related to the securing of supply were not solved before the politicians created the basis for the deal. Both in 2004 and in 2011 cross-ministerial analysis concluded that Denmark was actually in a stronger position during epidemics with its own vaccine in-house manufacturing. Despite this pronoucement, Astrid Kragh, who, aided by the previous Minister of Finance, Bjarne Corydon, began setting up the sale of the state's vaccine factory in 2012. Not only did the Danish parliament, Astrid Kragh and (once more) Bjarne Corydon appear very dodgy in connection with this sale, it is also a deal which draws threads to Bill Gates. The vaccine factory was already funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in 2013. This can be seen on the website of the foundation, that 36 million US Dollars (a quarter of a billion Danish Crowns) were invested in AJ Vaccines A/S in October 2013. According to the Danish register of businesses (the CVR register) AJ Vaccines A/S was only registered for the first time in 2016. Before then the firm was called the Vaccine Department of the Danish Institute of Medicines. In 2016/2017 the department was segregated from the institute and sold as AJ Vaccines A/S to the Saudi Sheik.”

The Danish tabloid also wrote another article about the donation by Bill Gates. In fact, the paper covered the entire sale quite extensively. It is certainly not pleasant fiction to get into the selling off of state assets and it reminds me of the sale of DONG (The Danish Offshore Natural Gas Extraction Company) to Goldman Sachs in 2014, where then finance minister Bjarne Corydon (here he is again!) also played a central part. What makes me really wonder is why the tabloid, after initially uncovering the foul-smelling swamp of corruption, does not dig deeper, especially when they discover that Bill Gates is involved. Surely if this tabloid, Ekstra Bladet, had been a truly critical media, who wanted what's best for the Danish population, they would have carried on with their critical coverage involving Bill Gates. Had they done so, they would have found out how deeply involved he is in the vaccine industry and in the WHO, which is an organisation that has the power to cover the vaccine industry in 24 karat gold leaf by declaring a pandemic. But maybe there are limits to how critical this otherwise critical tabloid can be? Maybe they were ‘warned’ to lay off? One of the really (far too few) critical media outlets in Denmark is the website of health coach Per Brændgaard. On 18th September 2020 he wrote an article with the title: "Bill Gates has bought Danish scientists for 160 million Danish Kroner". His article is about the large sums of money which the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation donates or invests in Denmark. Here is the list of their ‘donations’ to different institutions in Denmark:

* The State Institute of Medicines (Statens Serum Institut), 1st July 2005: $14.889.455

* University of Copenhagen (Københavns Universitet), 1st November 2008: $100.000

* University of Copenhagen (Københavns Universitet), 18th November 2009: $3.484.384

* University of Copenhagen (Københavns Universitet), 1st November 2010: $100.000

* The State Institute of Medicines (Statens Serum Institut), 14th November 2011: $326.293

* The State Institute of Medicines (Statens Serum Institut), 2nd October 2012: $158,739

* City of Aarhus, 9th October 2012: $135,000

* University of Copenhagen (Københavns Universitet), 10th October 2012: $813,050

* The State Institute of Medicines (Statens Serum Institut), 15th November 2012: $551,049

* University of South Denmark (Syddansk Universitet), 15th January 2015: $270,147

* The State Institute of Medicines (Statens Serum Institute, 15th April 2015: $100,000

* City of Aarhus, 20th December 2015: $85,000

* University of Copenhagen (Københavns Universitet), 28th September 2017: $758,122

* Danish Technical University (DTU), 25th November 2018: $1,084,000

* The State Institute of Medicines (Statens Serum Institut), 3rd December 2019: $207,877

* Maternity Foundation, 19th September 2019: $1,900,100

* The Board of Medicines (Lægemiddelstyrelsen), 10th October 2019: $600,000

In today’s currency, we can see that the total amount of investment is $25,563,216 or DKK 160,676,571. Since the article was written in September 2020 the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has donated further eleven million US Dollars to The State Institute of Medicines, which is way above seventy-seven million Danish Crowns. The media of Peer Brændgaard is an exception. The Danish press and other media have completely avoided writing anything critical about the activities of Bill Gates in Denmark. Contrary to this, they love to portray him as a pure saint, who is donating large sums to good causes. Unfortunately the less established media, like Per Brændgaard, do not have the means to carry out their journalism as effectively as if they had the extensive state support that most Danish mainstream medias get. So the battle to expose the dirty secrets is an uneven one. In essence "The zone is flooded", to make use of the expression of the CIA director from Event 201. The narrative of the press and the media is an area which I will be dealing with separately in my next book "The 3 Fictions" in a chapter with the title: "The Democratic Fiction".

If you connect the facts explained above with the facts which I previously described about the donations of Bill Gates to the WHO in conjunction with the large sums invested in Moderna and Pfizer, you cannot stay silent. The Danes must know these facts, for these donations point out that the man is not an impartial philanthropist, as he even bragged to the CNBC that his investments in the vaccine industry had doubled his profits twenty times. These facts prove that we are caught in a vicious circle where Bill Gates and the other super-rich and their families have far far too much power. What is worse is that crises, like wars and pandemics, have (in all of history) made the richest one percent of one percent of the world's population even richer and the poor even poorer. This is often well proven. For example, Forbes Magazine wrote in July 2022 that the corona crisis has made the rich markedly richer. I find that it is an interesting and important question to ask whether or not it is likely that this rich elite make use of the financial power to grab even more wealth? Is this maybe what this corona ‘pandemic’ was really all about?

If you do not feel like becoming a paid monthly subscriber, but want to support my work, you can buy me a cup of coffee for aprrox. 5 USD/35 DKK(click HERE!):

Links:

* Danish tabloid Ekstra Bladet wrote an article on July 31st 2020 regarding the sale of the Danish State’s vaccine production unit: https://ekstrabladet.dk/nyheder/samfund/danmark-til-grin-scorer-gigant-ordre/8221406

* Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s homepage: https://www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants?q=AJ%20Vaccines

* Ekstra Bladet article on Bill Gates’s donations to AJ Vaccines A/S before the sale: https://ekstrabladet.dk/dagsorden/fik-ikke-besked-om-gates-donation-himmelraabende/8101653

* Per Brændgaard’s article “Bill Gates har købt danske forskere for 160 mio. kr.”: https://perbraendgaard.dk/2020/09/18/bill-gates-har-koebt-danske-forskere-for-160-millioner-kroner

* Bill & Melinda Gates Foundations grants for SSI 2019-2022: https://www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants?division=Global%20Health&q=statens%20serum%20institut&yearAwardedEnd=2022&yearAwardedStart=2019

* Bill Gates explains on CNBC, that his 10 million USD investment in vaccines has twenty-doubled: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/23/bill-gates-turns-10-billion-into-200-billion-worth-of-economic-benefit.html

* Forbes article from July 22nd 2022 on the rich getting richer during the pandemic: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackkelly/2020/07/22/the-rich-are-getting-richer-during-the-pandemic

Danish Health Minister Magnus Heunicke in Washington during Event 201

When you, like I have been keeping an eye on the news and real events related to the corona pandemic during the past three years, you will encounter many strange coincidences. Amongst which is the (then) Danish Health Minister Magnus Heunicke’s visit to Washington and his meeting with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation occuring on exactly the same day as Event 201 took place. On the day, Magnus Heunicke posted a picture on Facebook showing him sitting in the Danish Embassy in Washington preparing for a meeting with the foundation. You can read about Event 201 and that it was televised to several locations outside New York, including Washington, where the simulation or table-top exercise took place. Despite this, Magnus Heunicke vehemently proclaims on social media that ‘he did not take part in Event 201’.

Since then, as you might expect, he has deleted his post on Facebook. It seems completely unlikely that the Danish Health Minister was in Washington to meet the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation on the same day as their greatly planned pandemic simulation took place and that he did not take part in the exercise, or at least observed it or had a briefing about it. It appears completely illogical doesn’t it? Of course it does! However, there were many other important things on the agenda. Regardless of whether we argue over whether Heunicke took part in Event 201 or not, we do know that Bill Gates has a lot of interests invested in the Danish Health Sector. Indeed, it is worthy of further scrutiny to analyse his Foundation's ‘investments’ and ‘donations’ in Denmark in the coming chapter; but before that let us jump ahead in time to another ‘pandemic simulation exercise’, like Event 201, as a similar exercise took place in 2022.

Catastrophic Contagion

Both the BMGF and the JHU must have found Event 201 such a great success—which we must admit it was, as they, by and large, accurately predicted a pandemic, which arrived only very shortly after. So wonderfully pleased with the outcome, like children let loose with the sweet-jar, they planned another table-top exercise in 2022. A shuffle around with the ‘organisers’ revealed that, in the prime seats was found to be the WHO who replaced the WEF, and thus they embarked upon the simulation, which they named “Catastrophic Contagion.” This was rolled out on 23rd October 2022. However, the scenario was staged sometime in the future, namely in 2025. There were not as many planned deaths as in the previous exercise as this time the main focus was upon the children dropping dead during the staged pandemic. Akin to Event 201, the fictional scenario was again a pandemic.

In the simulation of this event, they estimated that there would be one billion infected and twenty million dead, of which fifteen million were children, and of the masses surviving the disease would have caused brain damage or paralysis anyway. The most successful countries to come out of the simulation were those who have invested in a preparation and rescue plan to meet the catastrophe. The simulation involved rescue and response units, which were ready constantly to counter the ensuing pandemic and which had regularly rehearsed their plans. The conclusion of the exercise was crystal clear: If only more countries had taken part in building a preparation and rescue operation..., it would not have looked as bad for them as the scripted scenario. (This is hard selling on steroids..) The organisers invited fourteen participants to carry out the table-top exercise making use of fictitious news casts and status reports. Among the participants was Bill Gates himself, together with a pot-pourri of different health experts and retired African health ministers and various vice health ministers. A video published by the organisers gave a three-minute summary of the exercise.

This time we must really hope that the WHO, BMGF and JHU are not nearly as good at predicting future world events as WEF, BMGF and JHU were in Event 201 in 2019, so that this horrible, threatening but ultimately completely fictitious scenario will not be reproduced in reality. Much points at the world population being much more wised-up and that the WHO, BMGF and JHU are no longer able to conjure up the same spell on people, who are by now, hopefully much more sceptical of the restrictions, much of which were ignored in the UK, although not reported elsewhere! Furthermore, people are now much more sceptical towards the emergency-approved vaccines which are by now causing untold side-effects and deaths, and the ability of the pharmaceutical companies to profit on such ‘pandemics’. When we get closer to 2025 and this new pandemic may appear, in whatever form it will take, we will see how much of a lesson the world's population has learned. I wonder if, by that time, people will at last understand that they are just mere pawns in the games of the globalists?

If you do not feel like becoming a paid monthly subscriber, but want to support my work, you can buy me a cup of coffee for aprrox. 5 USD/35 DKK(click HERE!):

Links:

* The organisers behind Catastrophic Contagion’s homepage for the table-top excercise: https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/exercises/2022-catastrophic-contagion/index.html

* The organisers behind Catastrophic Contagion used this informing short video in their table-top excercise:

The fortune teller Ida Auken about owning nothing and being happy

The WEF's connections to Denmark are manifold. Pretty well all the Danish prime ministers in recent times have been affiliated with the WEF and both the then Crown Prince, now King Frederik 10. and his wife Queen Mary, have long been part of the ‘Young Global Leaders’ programme of the WEF. Despite the posh competition it is still the bilderberger Ida Auken, who admittedly ranks as the greatest advocate for the WEF in Denmark. She wrote - allegedly herself - an article in 2016, which was published on the WEF's website and on social media. What made the article famous or infamous if you like, was the infamous words that have now got an entrenched reputation: “You’ll own nothing. And you’ll be happy”. The original article can be found on the Wayback Machine, as Ida Auken herself, or the WEF, or both together first ‘edited’ the article and then later completely removed it from the website. I do wonder why? Both happened at the start of 2021, when the corona-pandemic, according to later statements from Ida Auken, made ‘conspiracy theorists’ mix her predictions together with ‘The Great Reset’.

As you would expect, she has never explained why the article has been removed, and this fact alone is worthy of my further attention, later. In the edited article it can be seen that the WEF, or Ida Auken herself, or both, has done some damage control and attempted to dumb the article down, for example by changing the title from “Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better” to the less controversial “Here's how life could change in my city by the year 2030”. Auken's original article was reprinted by Forbes on 10th November 2016, so fortunately it can also be found there. You can also still find the launch page of WEFs “Eight Predictions for the World” on their official website, where Ida Auken's article was the first of the eight predictions for the world. Interestingly enough, if you click on Ida's article, you will see that it is no longer on the website. It has simply been deleted, almost certainly because of growing criticism and mounting ridicule. However, you can still view Ida Auken's “Own nothing, be happy” statement in the launch video at the bottom of the page.

The WEF removed a post on social media of which the video was part, supposedly because it went viral with negative comments about the WEF. It is interesting to realise that these eight predictions, which allegedly should have been done by eight different contributors, seems to have been coordinated quite accurately with the goals which the WEF is still working towards, now, seven years later. Either the WEF has been unbelievably lucky using accurate fortune tellers, like Ida Auken, to contribute in 2016, or it was paid work, or at the very least carefully coordinated and planned contributions from Ida Auken and the other seven. Ida Auken was at the time part of the WEF's Global Future Councils, and it is possible that the seven other writers were too. This could explain how well coordinated their future tellings were. On the day of the opening of the Danish Parliament, Folketinget, on 4th October 2022, I met Ida Auken in front of Christiansborg (the parliament building). I asked her how great the influence on Danish politics the WEF has. "Nothing!" she says and shortly after, she says the same thing about the Bilderberg group. Then I asked her the question “then, why is she part of both organisations, if they do not have any influence on Danish politics”? To this she answers that she is part of both because she can have influence on the organisations in order for her to make them do something for the climate! This is a strange backward logic that Ida is making use of here. Why would she spend time on organisations which, according to herself, have no influence on a country like Denmark? These people just lie, and lie and lie. In fact, it reminds one of the oft quoted phrase; How does one know when a politician (or, in this case a spokesperson for the WEF) is lying? The answer, of course is, when their lips are moving.

It is also slightly strange that Ida Auken had to travel to the WEF and Bilderberger meetings, and then just fire away some random points about the climate, whereby she gains influence on the climate area. Which then, after all, as she maintains, has no influence on Denmark, and therefore, I guess, not on any other country either? Unless, of course, if it was the case that all other countries are so helplessly far behind Denmark that they learn a lot from Ida Auken’s utterances about the climate. Who knows what is going on in the head of Ida Auken? I cannot fathom the logic. You can view the short interview with Ida 19 minutes and 30 seconds in a YouTube video “Folketingets åbning 4. oktober 2022” on my YouTube-channel (it's in Danish). What is the reason that the WEF and Ida Auken do not stand by their article from 2016? Is this about that there are too many critics, who have seen right through it all and realised that the WEF is a great proponent to support that the world should go through a great reset and thereafter introduce a one world government? And also that this collaboration between global institutions like the EU, UN, WHO, NATO, the World Bank institutions and many more are not playing with open cards with the world's population?

Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better

(the original quotation from the first Ida Auken-article)

During the Danish election for parliament in 2022, TjekDet (the Danish fact-checker organisation) found that they had to fact-check the leader of a new Danish political party Pernille Vermund. This new party is called ‘Nye Borgerlige’. Pernille Vermund made a post on social media that had criticised the WEF for seeking to assume the right to own property from people, on the back of Ida Aukens article. TjekDet made supposed 'experts' comment on the post in order for them to make a concerted negative fact-check of Pernille Vermund. What they did not do, which was a major journalistic blunder, was to ask the WEF. However TjekDet believe themselves to have the ammunition they need to shut Pernille Vermund down. These fact-checkers are nothing more than self-elected judges of opinion and I deem them utterly revolting. This is especially heinous considering that Danish tax payers have paid millions for their services; voicing the false narrative of the globalists, twisting and falsifying their fact-checks. Regarding this specific fact-check, Ida Auken herself was an 'expert witness' but was not even asked, which makes the whole affair even more dodgy. There are several links to her article, however not the original one from WEF's website. But on the WayBack Machine you can find copies - and TjekDet seem not in the least concerned as to why the article, that their 'fact-check' is about, is no longer on the website of the WEF where it was first published!

So it is clear to see that all this is not of any interest to TjekDet, who must have fallen into a deep journalistic slumber while they were in the process of their 'fact-check'! I think that TjekDet has, once more, contributed to a taxpayers money consuming, globalist agenda pushing, brain washing and misguiding article!

Another globalist-friendly media Politi-fact did a fact check in English, as did Reuters and a lot of other fact-check medias. All of them totally obfuscating simple facts and adding total confusion to the mix of Globalistic Social Liberalism, which is the actual political ideology of the globalists.

Ida Auken's bare-faced cheek that she uses to massage the globalistic social liberalism into the minds of the population, leaves me disgusted. It seems to only spellbind a fast falling number of the population, falling as the total population slowly begin to realise how these actor politicians are caught in the game of the globalist marionette theatre. I wonder, if politicians, like Ida Auken, know that they are being played? I sometimes wonder even more, because she sometimes plays her part so well, as the politician who wants a lot of good things for her country and for the climate. I further wonder that, if she is so into playing her part, she actually believes in the spin herself? It would be truly frightening, if that were the case.

Founder of WEF, Klaus Schwab, is more direct in his communication in his “penetrate (s)the cabinets”-interview from September 20, 2017 at Harvard Kennedy School:

Links:

* Wayback Machine’s copy of Ida Auken’s original WEF article regarding owing nothing but being happy: https://web.archive.org/web/20161125135500/https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/11/shopping-i-can-t-really-remember-what-that-is

* Wayback Machine’s copy of Ida Auken’s edited WEF article (later it was completely erased): https://web.archive.org/web/20210427224934/https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/11/how-life-could-change-2030/

* Magasinet Forbes also made a copy of Auken’s original article on the 10th of November, 2016 (the original article, but it has been deleted, so below is the copy from Wayback Machine!): https://web.archive.org/web/20161111145258/https://www.forbes.com/sites/worldeconomicforum/2016/11/10/shopping-i-cant-really-remember-what-that-is-or-how-differently-well-live-in-2030/#7da0a5ee1735

* WEF’s homepage when launching “8 predictions for the world” on Wayback Machine.: https://web.archive.org/web/20161125144156/https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/11/8-predictions-for-the-world-in-2030

* TjekDet fact-check of Pernille Vermund on the 27th of October, 2022, regarding WEF: https://www.tjekdet.dk/faktatjek/pernille-vermund-vaekker-konspirationsteoretikerne-midt-i-valgkampen

* PolitiFact fact-check on Ida Auken’s statements and WEF “World Economic Forum “elites” are pushing the Great Reset, which aims to control people by taking all their possessions.”: https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2023/sep/28/instagram-posts/world-economic-forum-elites-are-pushing-the-great/

“Event 201”

Event 201 took place on 18th October 2019 and the organisers were the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum and John Hopkins University. Besides these, the George Soros controlled firm, ‘Open Philanthropy’ also donated considerable funding. Although fact- checkers (who it would seem are funded by the very organisations they purport to ‘fact-check) categorically deny that Event 201 was an exercise which predicted the corona virus outbreak and the following pandemic, is it close to mind to suggest exactly that. Later on, we will look at the role which the press and the media played in relation to the three fictions used to brainwash the people. There is great humoristic value in looking at the Danish fact-checking institution ‘Tjek Det’ and their fact-checking of the rumour that Event 201 indeed predicted the pandemic. Their fact-check was issued on 27th of April 2020. It first drew in the wildest accusations from the side of the critics, to then produce a complete debunk of the very idea that Event 201 by any means predicted the pandemic, so that the reader is left with the impression that ‘there is nothing to see here’. There is, of course, plenty to see here!

It was put forward that Event 201 was a so-called ‘table top exercise’, a simulation if you like, of a scenario that 60 million people die from a ‘pandemic outbreak’. Of course, even the most dim-witted individual cannot possibly ignore that this simulation was all too similar in so many ways to the corona virus ‘outbreak’ which the media reported took place in China only just a few months later. So much so, that the organisers have had to distribute a press release to assure everyone of the opposite. That Event 201 receives so much critisism from the corona sceptic faction in different countries around the world, is connected to the fact that the organisers are from the same organisations who rolled in the gold during the pandemic and at the same time were the ones to predict it. Besides this damning situation, several experts have presented further evidence supporting that the corona virus is made in a laboratory. Yet still others have questioned the very existence of the virus at all, one individual offering anybody a million euros to actually provide proof of the isolation and make-up of this supposed ‘virus’. To date, this has not been claimed as not one individual or company has ever actually done this. Amongst these nay-sayers was the now deceased Nobel Price awarded virologist Luc Montagnier. I will get back to him, as he is not just Mr anybody, since he actually received the Nobel award for identifying the HIV ‘virus’ and the related disease ‘AIDS’. Indeed, this ‘Event 201’ was only just one way in which the prediction and the carrying out of this so-called Corona Virus Outbreak came to fruition.

Bill and Melinda Gates likewise predicted the pandemic during an interview, where they are seen to be even smiling, both of them, as Bill reveals his ‘news’. During a meeting at the World Economic Forum, Prince Charles, the Prince of Wales, now King Charles, has threatened the world's population that more pandemics will come, if the WEF did not build a ‘sustainable’ world. In 2017 and 2018 (before there was any mention of a ‘pandemic’) millions of PCR test kits were exported to the world's countries, including to Denmark. In 2017 Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infections Deseases (NIAID) in the USA, guaranteed that more surprising ‘outbreaks’ were on their way within the next four years. Five months ahead of the ‘pandemic’ the WHO requested that their 193/194 member states should prepare for a coming pandemic. These happenings, and many more, are described and documented in a video from Stop World Control which was published in May 2022 with the title "Proof that the pandemic was planned with a purpose". However, perhaps most clear and trustworthy evidence that Event 201 is a part of a wider conspiracy, came from no less than the nephew of (murdered) US President John F. Kennedy; Robert F. Kennedy Jr. He published a book in 2021 with the title "The Real Anthony Fauci". The book consists of some 600 pages which chronicle Anthony Fauci, who is the American equivelent of his Danish counterpart Søren Brøstrøm. Of course, Fauci naturally has a much greater responsibility than the director of the Danish Health Authority’s Brøstrœm. Besides being the director of previously mentioned NIAID, Fauci (a.k.a Dr. Death, as he is nicknamed in the UK) is also the chief medical advisor to the President of the USA. Kennedy’s book can also be viewed in a film version, lasting one hour and fifty minutes. It can be found on ‘Odysee’, as YouTube is unfortunately censoring (actually banning) it.

The film goes through Event 201 from around three and a half minutes in and, after six minutes, Robert F. Kennedy points at the peculiar fact that the second-in-command at the CIA, Deputy Director Avril Haines, is one of the ‘hosts’ at the simulation. You may well ask; ‘What is the secret service of the USA doing at a simulation of a pandemic outbreak’? You may further ask, ‘why is the CIA so interested in the training and preparation for a pandemic, that they send their second in command to co-host the event?’ Haines makes use of her hosting role at Event 201 to underline that 'misinformation' cannot be avoided, and that a 'flood zone strategy' should be applied to counter it. Every attempt was made at the event to ensure that the concerted narrative was propagated everywhere and the only one which should be heard, making it extremely hard for any normal inquisitive individuals to receive other information than what was fed to them via the established media. A line of other experts, even military experts, also take part in the simulation and add their voices to attempt to silence the vaccine sceptics. People must be forced to believe the WHO, their governments and the pharmaceutical industry, these organisations even involving their countries’ secret services to ensure that this can happen as smoothly as possible without too many complications in relation to any so-called 'misinformation'. What in the name of all that is Holy was going on?

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation

Bill Gates is one of the world's richest men because he controls a ‘foundation’ with the largest wealth in the world. He is also a man plagued by his past within the software industry and his firm Microsoft, where he made his money. However, he also had to spend a great deal of his valuable time answering court cases in relation to unethical business methods. He has avoided paying tax on his fortune and now he calls himself a philanthropist. What could possibly go wrong? One thing is clear. When you question whether or not Bill Gates is a philanthropist or a tax avoider, it is important to keep in mind that it would seem that the foundation has redefined the term philanthropy from being understood as giving money from a good heart, into investing a large part of the ‘donation’ in a company by buying up its shares. According to a CNBC article from September 2019, 60% of BMGF's assets are invested in shares and although the foundation had ‘donated’ 36 billion dollars over the last couple of decades, it has still increased its wealth.

Another CNBC article from January 2019 focusses upon the World Economic Forum meeting in Davos in January 2019, where Bill Gates explains that his best investment ever is his investment in vaccines which has increased in value by a factor of twenty(!!) in ten years. In relation to looking into what could possibly go wrong, it is lucky for us sceptics that the BMFG has a website informing us how their money is distributed. Similarly, the WHO also has a website informing us about who their sponsors are. As previously documented, the BMFG donated between 17% and 22% of the total budget of the WHO in the period 2016 to 2021. It looks like it was also carrying on in 2022. In October and November 2022 alone, BMFG donated more than 90 million U.S Dollars to the WHO. This is the same as 630 million Danish Crowns, donated in just two months! Surely they wouldn’t be making donations on a whim without expecting anything back? Remember also that the BMGF cannot buy shares in the WHO as the organisation is not a shareholder-owned company. Well, of course, Bill Gates did get it his way. Let’s go back to the candidate he wanted for the DG of the WHO, Tedros Adhanom. Let’s also go back to the fact that China was also in support and agreement for this ‘candidate’. It turned out that Tedros Adhanom has known Bill and Melinda Gates for many years. While Tedros was Health Minister in 2010 to 2014, their foundation donated 1.5 billion US Dollars (over 10 billion Danish Crowns) to a 'family planning project' in Ethiopia. Again, not something the mainstream media finds worth mentioning. The previously mentioned Fox News article from 27th March 2020 uses the bulk part of its page space to ask questions about Tedros' past and his rather too much enthusiasm for covering up China's poor handling at the beginning of the crisis. It seems that even Fox News dared not focus on the wanton corruption of the WHO by Bill Gates. We need a more alternative media for that before we can muster enough courage to challenge the inappropriate close connection between Tedros and Gates. See, for example an article from Brightwork Research & Analysis from November 2021.

Tedros Adhanom is also part of an advisory board in a Fund for Global Health which, likewise, receives potent donations from the BMGF. Besides, the CEO of the Fund for Global Health was the previous head of the department for Global Health Policy in the BMGF. Again, this is not something which the mainstream media bother (or dare) to report. It looks suspiciously like Bill Gates does not have to ask Tedros Adhanom for any favours, does he? Tedros already knows full well who’s pocket he lives in and it makes him the perfect marionette to enable Bill Gates to carry on with his nefarious ways.

The Johns Hopkins University

You may not have noticed during the corona pandemic, but Johns Hopkins’ Coronavirus Resource Center, together with the WHO, have been the central global information service. Both organisations have websites with dashboards (overviews) which tell us about the global status of COVID-19 calculated in the number of cases of infection and number of deaths. On both Johns Hopkins University's (JHU) and WHO's websites there is also information on the global vaccine rollout listed as a percentage of each country’s population that is vaccinated. For example, the status of Denmark shows that 4.8 million Danes (out of a total population of 5.8 million) are reported to having received, as a minimum, one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine. None of the websites qualify or attempt to explain that "number of deaths" does not mean the number of people who have died of COVID-19, but it means the number of people who tested positive within a certain period before they died. For example, a person could have died during heart surgery and still be included in these statistics if they were tested positive, even if it wasn’t ‘covid’ that ‘killed’ them.

To further assist the already cloudy perspective, these websites do not include any information about the side effects and deaths that these non-vaccines have caused (remember that it is by definition that an mRNA vaccine is NOT a vaccine). It is indeed very difficult to find any information about the harm caused by the mRNA jabs which have been (under) reported since their rollout. Equally, it has not been possible to find a link to either the American database for side effects (VAERS) or the European counterpart, The European Medicines’ Agency (EMA) on either of the websites of the JHU or the WHO. On the EMA you can read that on the year up to 25th December 2022 that 701 million doses of the Pfizer jabs have been given - and 971,000 suspected side effects, including deaths, have been (under) reported. With Moderna the number is 161 million doses with 274,000 suspected side effects. A very important perspective on this is that these numbers of reports have been found to be under 10% of the real numbers, according to critical scientific research.

Johns Hopkins Medicine, part of the JHU conglomerate, offers the COVID death-jab to children as young as six months in one of their clinics locally in Maryland. We can therefore see that the JHU has also invested in the distribution of the vaccine. In 2020 the New York Times wrote an article about the founder of the JHU and that he was a slave-owner despite the university having promoting itself as if he were against slavery. It was not until 1945 that the first ethnic African student was accepted at the university, even though it is situated in Baltimore, Maryland, which interestingly enough has a majority of ethnic African Americans! Again, the article is behind a pay-wall and yet again the Wackback Machine comes to our aid. Guess what? The largest donor of the JHU is BMGF who single handedly, during a three month period from October to December 2022 donated altogether 22 million US Dollars, which is about 157 million Danish Crowns. Oh dear.

The World Economic Forum and COVID-19: The Great Reset.

When you talk about the globalists, or the global elite, i.e. the very small percentage of the world's population who can actually profit from a corona pandemic or from other crises such as the ‘war in the Ukraine’, there is one prime organisation in particular that takes care of their interests, namely the World Economic Forum (WEF). One World Government (OWG) is a concept for which the WEF is probably the most outspoken advocate in the world. The implementation of the OWG means that the world will be ruled by an unified and probably unelected and unelectable world government. A world government that will gradually control all areas of local governments whose power will slowly diminish in favour of the centralised power of this new ‘one world government’. Indeed, a simple search for “Global Governance” on the World Economic Forum (WEF) website will return over 100 hits. From this simple action, then, we can deduce that are more than one hundred articles on Global Governance. This is precisely because OWG and Global Governance are enshrined terminologies that in WEF-speak mean roughly the same thing. OWG is the noun and Global Governance is the management concept or ideology behind the aim to implement OWG. One of the top search results is WEF's own strategic tool (called Strategic Intelligence), which you can also easily access by entering your email address. Here you can read, that the WEF defines Global Governance as follows:

“Global governance functions through a set of institutions, rules, and processes that aim to manage cross-border issues – like diplomatic relations, trade, financial transactions, migration, and climate change. It seeks to address collective concerns, and mediate common interests, creating both privileges and obligations for the public and private sectors. It is also essential for solving problems that cross borders: pandemics, wars, and financial crises. It is not, however, just a set of treaties and organisations; it is comprised of a vast network of collaborative processes, relationships, guidelines, and monitoring mechanisms, which are all necessary to manage our increasingly complex interdependence.”

In other words, TOTAL CONTROL. Total control of YOU!

From this, then, OWG and Global Governance sound completely as one; co-conspiratorial, if you like, especially when it comes to the above definition from which it appears that regardless of the 'management speak' that is in the language, it just seems to be a conspiracy that the WEF itself gets to define itself. They don't even attempt to hide that they promoting a conspiracy! But this isn’t just the worst of the smoking guns in terms of the WEF and conspiracy theory, or rather The WEF and the conspiracy, since it is no longer a theory, as the WEF itself presents the conspiracy on full public display. No, because the 'smoking gun' has long been the book "COVID-19: The Great Reset", which founder Klaus Schwab published at the beginning of July 2020. The book presents how the corona pandemic offers an almost perfect opportunity to restart the entire world, centralise power and give the globalists even more effective tools to rule the world as they see fit. The book can be found online as a downloadable PDF file. During a launch of "COVID-19: The Great Reset" on 13/14th July 2020, the WEF published a live recording video where founder Klaus Schwab goes over the details of the plan. This big restart, The Great Reset, according to WEF's founder, is the last of three phases related to the corona pandemic: 1. Restrain (combat), 2. Recover (back to 'a new normal'), 3. Reset (define and design the strategies to lead the world after the corona pandemic). In the launch video (6 minutes and 30 seconds in), Klaus Schwab reviews the five priorities which the WEF is focusing upon in order to implement The Great Reset during the specified third phase:

1. Reshaping the social contract

2.The green economy

3. Use of advanced technologies

4. From shareholder capitalism to stakeholder capitalism

5. Stronger global cooperation.

If you want to know what Klaus Schwab means by reshaping the social contract, the implementation of the ‘green economy’, the use of advanced technology, the move from shareholder capitalism to stakeholder capitalism and the implementation of stronger global cooperation, you must watch the video "COVID-19 The Great Reset" that the WEF has put up on their project launch page on their website. There it is; clear for all to see.

Four years previously, Klaus Schwab published the book “The Fourth Industrial Revolution” in which he focuses especially on the third point above, namely the use of technology to merge humans and machines.

It is remarkable that the entire WEF's massive institution was involved in the promotion of “COVID-19: The Great Reset” so quickly after the pandemic outbreak. Already on 15th May 2020 an article was published about The Great Reset on the WEF's website: “How the great COVID-19 reset can help firms build a sustainable future” – this came out only two months after the WHO declared the pandemic. Furthermore, the previously mentioned book “COVID-19: The Great Reset” came out only three or four months after the WHO declared the pandemic. Any critically thinking person by now must seriouly consider if it is possible for an organisation like the WEF to launch a project this big and, at the same time, publish a book about a pandemic so shortly after the world is hit by the pandemic, seemingly unprepared? Wait! This was exactly what WEF was: Prepared! For they had of course already prepared themselves in collaboration with the BMGF and the JHU during Event 201. However, had they really prepared themselves so well, that the book “COVID-19: The Great Reset” had already been written and just needed proof reading and publishing? Well, that is for you to surmise!

In the light of this, I would define it as a conspiracy (I would challenge anyone to disagree) that the WEF makes use of of multiple management terms in order to create 'swung' (manipulative language) in their wording of their work and purpose, whilst implementing OWG via The Great Reset - and it's not at all a coincidence. When Klaus Schwab founded the organisation in 1971, the original name was The European Management Forum. Its purpose was then to integrate American management principles into the European work culture and, interestingly enough, it was two primary groups of sponsors who helped Schwab start the initiative: The European Commission and the European Organisations of Industry. The latter would then over time become one collected power-centralised organisation – The European Round Table of Industrialists (ERT) founded in 1983. This organisation will be mentioned under the three fictions, as it is a very central player in the activities of the Deep State in Europe.

The WEF's strong ties to industry is all over-reaching and saturates the founder's pen in the book “The Fourth Industrial Revolution”. The book glorifies, amongst other things, the possibilities of industry to allow robots and artificial intelligence to take over large parts of the ruling and operation of world society. Exactly this desire to make use of advanced technology in order to transform society and the humans in it is an intrinsic characteristic trait of the WEF. The film ”Submitting humanity to the rule of elite cyborgs”, produced by the organisation Stop World Control, goes into detail around the desire of the WEF to transform humans into cyborgs. The correct scientific term for this is transhumanism. These cyborgs would be controlled by a smaller group of elite cyborgs, and these elite cyborgs are a result of the current global elite's trans-human transformation. Does this sound far-fetched – even crazy to you? Well, these scenarios are not from my mouth or pen, but instead, why don’t you listen to the WEF's leading scientist in the trans-humanistic area, Yuval Harari. After 28 minutes and 56 seconds into the film, he says that the global elite and humanity will follow two different trans-humanistic paths: One group of cyborgs shall control the other. Professor Harari is also involved in the UN and the WHO and a wide range of other international organisations. Who is this guy? We find that he is a professor and lecturer from the Department of History of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. What on God’s Green Earth has that to do with ‘transhumanism’, cyborgs and how does his history background give him the remotest qualification to be the ‘leading scientist’ in the WEF and (presumably) also the WHO regarding the ‘trans-humanistic’ arena?

Links:

* The Nation article on Bill Gates and his philantropy (pay-walled!): https://www.thenation.com/article/society/bill-gates-foundation-philanthropy

* Same article on Wayback Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20200318135836/https://www.thenation.com/article/society/bill-gates-foundation-philanthropy/

* Description of Event 201 by the organisers themselves: https://www.centerforhealthsecurity.org/our-work/exercises/event201/about

* Danish fact-check media Tjek Det’s fact-check of Event 201 being part of planning the corona pandemic: https://www.tjekdet.dk/faktatjek/vil-bill-gates-affolke-verden-med-vacciner-vilde-teorier-faar-nyt-liv-i-coronatiden

* Event 201 organisers had to counteract the rumours: https://centerforhealthsecurity.org/2020/statement-about-ncov-and-our-pandemic-exercise-0

* Stopworldcontrol.com video documenting WHO’s 10 year plan from 2020 to 2030: https://stopworldcontrol.com/proof/

* Robert F. Kennedy’s Wikipedia side: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_F._Kennedy_Jr.

* Real Anthony Fauci, video on Odysee.com: https://odysee.com/@drizakeo_cryptic_archive:3/Real_Anthony_Fauci_Movie_drizakeo:3

* Avril Haines’ Wikipedia profile: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avril_Haines

* CNBC article from 17th of September 2019 on Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/09/17/bill-gates-gave-away-35-billion-this-year-but-net-worth-didnt-drop.html

* CNBC article from 23th January 2019 on Bill Gates investing in vaccines: https://www.cnbc.com/2019/01/23/bill-gates-turns-10-billion-into-200-billion-worth-of-economic-benefit.html

* Brightwork Research & Analysis article from 4th of November 2021: https://www.brightworkresearch.com/how-bill-gates-bought-control-over-the-who

* EMA database on reported vaccine side-effects: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/human-regulatory/overview/public-health-threats/coronavirus-disease-covid-19/treatments-vaccines/vaccines-covid-19/safety-covid-19-vaccines

* New York Times article on Johns Hopkins and his relations to keeping slaves (pay-walled!): https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/09/arts/johns-hopkins-slavery-abolitionist.html

* Same NY Times article on WayBack Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20201209183005/https://www.nytimes.com/2020/12/09/arts/johns-hopkins-slavery-abolitionist.html

* Bill Gates is the biggest donor of Johns Hopkins, according to BMGF’s homepage: https://www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants?q=Johns%20hopkins

* WEF’s over 100 articles on Global Governance on their homepage: https://www.weforum.org/search?query=global+governance

* Klaus Schwabs book “COVID-19 The Great Reset” available as PDF-file: https://carterheavyindustries.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/covid-19_-the-great-reset-klaus-schwab.pdf

* WEF’s launch on 13/14. July 2020 of the project “COVID-19 The Great Reset”: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/07/covid-19-the-great-reset/

* WEF article from 15th May 2020 “How the great COVID-19 reset can help firms build a…”: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/05/the-covid-19-reset-sustainability/

* Stop World Control article “CRY FOR FREEDOM – Why cyborgs won’t save the world”: https://stopworldcontrol.com/cry-freedom/

Readings from the book The Danish Illusion by Flemming Blicher

The WHO Director-General Charged with Genocide

It was indeed Bill Gates who supported the election of Eritrean-born Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus for Director-General, the highest post in the organisation of the WHO.  China also supported this ex-minister from the government of Ethiopia. Dr Ghebreyesus has a Doctorate of Philosophy (PhD) in Community Health from the University of Nottinghamhy.

As a curiosity it can also be mentioned that Dr Ghebreyesus sat in the Ethiopian government as health minister representing a Marxisistic-Leninistic party, the Tigrayan People's Liberation Front (TPLF). His communist past certainly correlated well with China supporting him for the post.

As if this is not controversial enough, that the Director-General comes directly from a communist party, Adhanom is also charged at the International Criminal Court in the Hague (ICC) with committing genocide at the time when he was in government in Ethiopia. It was the Nobel's Peace Prize awarded American, David Steiman who actually managed to press the charges via the ICC. In England, The Times, The Daily Mirror and The Daily Star have all written about the court case. At the time of first writing this book (November - December 2022) the case has not yet commenced. The judge at the Hague court has demanded more expanding evidence and the case is still being prepared here in October of 2024. However, what is indisputable is that the TPLF is a terror organisation, banned by the current Ethiopian government.  This fact has been documented by many Western sources.

The British freelance journalist, Graham Peebles, who has been involved in educational programmes in Sri Lanka, Ethiopia and India since 2005, has written an article about the TPLF's terror activities published by ‘Counterpunch’. He writes that the TPLF is a terror organisation which has recently taken up terrorism again after the organisation lost power in Ethiopia in 2018. It also explains that western support for the TPLF, especially from the USA, UK and some EU countries, is the reason that this terror organisation could show enough military power to start a civil war in the country. This confirms how western countries have traditionally caused and created unrest in Africa, especially in the countries south of Sahara. It seems that they are doing this deliberately for their own gain. In one of the media channels to which the Peebles article is also referring, Voice of America (VOA), one can read an entirely different version article about the TPLF's new military offensive in Ethiopia's Tigray region. In the article, we can read that (believe it or not) it is no less than Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus who is quoted giving a verbal attack on the western countries and the Ethiopian government for not doing enough to help create peace in the country…

It is extraordinary that Adhanom is not at all critical towards the TPLF. The article also exposes how the western media twists reality. The article also fails to mention that Tedros is one of the former leaders of the TPLF. In fact, the TPLF is not specifically mentioned in the article, at all, with only an indirect reference as the "Tigray Rebel Forces". This is how the reader is misguided in getting the mistaken impression that it is the rebels in Tigray who are the good guys in the conflict, which goes absolutely against the far more trustworthy eyewitness testimony of Peebles. This type of exclusion of the facts also contributes to the majority of the populations of the WHO member states being completely unaware of the charges against Tedros at the court in the Hague. In general, not much is written about the charges he faces and whilst the case is under preparation, the TPLF continues its western-supported criminal terror activities in the Tigray province of Ethiopia. Geographically, this province has boundaries to Eritrea which also has a secondary role in the conflict.

So then, it can be seen that much points to the Director-General of the WHO and his conviction of genocide. The possibility alone that this can happen surely ought to make all the journalists in the world sharpen their pens. However this is not happening! It is still very limited as to how much is being written about the case in the mainstream media and I will get back to why this is so in a later section about the Press - the fourth state power. However, at this juncture, I will conclude this chapter by putting forward an article by Fox News from 27th of March 2020, where great doubts about Tedros Adhanom are raised, both in relation to his time as minister in Ethiopia and also to China's inadequate and dubious response at the beginning of the corona outbreak in Wuhan. The article also questions the CV of the Director-General which is found to be inflated and misguiding.

Benevolent philanthropist or cynical tax avoider?

At this juncture, let us return to the person who took part in installing Tedros Adhanom as Director-General of the WHO and who, more than any other, has had a finger in the pie in relation to the corona pandemic. It is of course no other than Bill Gates. People have been well programmed to view him as a philanthropist and to react with disbelief when so-called conspiracy theorists dare to doubt his philanthropic intentions in relation to the pandemic. However, where there’s smoke, there’s fire and in the following section, the information I propagate about Bill Gates will be completely substantiated with related links to sources in the footnotes, so that you can form an opinion of both sides of the story. Of course, I will naturally focus on the side of the story which is not told by the mainstream media.

Although most people know who Bill Gates is, for the sake of accuracy and understanding, let me draft his background anyhow. Not only is he (via his foundation) one of the world's richest men, he is also a philanthropist. That is the impression you get from reading about him online and listening to what mainstream media say about him. A philanthropist, according to the Danish dictionary, is a person who unselfishly works to help his fellow human beings, especially by making donations to good causes. Through the Microsoft empire, Bill Gates made a lot of money, especially during the 1990s and the early 2000s. Microsoft had developed a software platform which became the dominating operating system for virtually every computer, tablet, and other means of electronic communication on the planet. At the end of his time as the top executive at Microsoft he went through long, humiliating and exhausting lawsuits; in 2000, he stepped down from the position of CEO of Microsoft and finally made the decision to place the bulk of his assets from Microsoft into a ‘foundation’ which is known today as the Bill & Melinda Gates foundation. He also withdrew gradually until 2020, he finally left the board of directors, although he still spends about 10% of his time at its Redmont, Washington headquarters, meeting with product teams, he says. 

By placing these assets in a ‘foundation’, these are no longer registered as a personal fortune. It's a manoeuvre which the oil baron John D. Rockefeller paved the way with more than one hundred years previously. This means that a billionaire who makes use of this loophole or ‘trick’ is exempt from paying tax on the accumulated wealth. In the case of Bill Gates he got away with not paying tax on about 80 billion dollars! Now, by any stretch of the imagination, that is a lot of money which the tax authorities in the United States of America have failed to collect and an awful lot of money which could have gone into the public coffers to benefit the wider population in general. Maybe one could argue that the country will benefit from the money in the shape of charity, will it not? I maintain that this is far from certain! All that will happen is that this ‘foundation’ which the money has been transferred to could just end up becoming richer and richer over the years. Even though the foundation on the surface is a charitable not-for-profit organisation, shrewd investment in, e.g. the weapons industry and chocolate producers can increase the foundations assets; And this is exactly what the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is being criticised for doing; accumulating wealth from dubious industries and using this wealth to apply pressure on American legislators. A great trick exploiting a loophole for the super-rich to avoid paying tax on their profits.

In the case of the chocolate investments the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation have been criticised for their investments in the chocolate giant Mondelez, which is known for using chocolate from cocoa farms using child labour. Judge yourself how philanthropic you think Bill Gates is, when you can read in an article from 2019 in Jyllandsposten and Politiken (two Danish mainstream papers) that Bill Gates is becoming richer and richer by being a philanthropist. According to the article his fortune increased with the net value of 16 billion dollars during a period in 2019, when he was supposed to donate 35 billion to charitable causes. In the same article you can read that amongst these ‘charitable causes’, which Bill Gates has invested in over time, is GAVI, the vaccine alliance which he founded himself. This is the same alliance which donates large sums to the WHO. I wonder if this is without getting anything in return? Bill Gates says himself that he has a strategy which is about owning a large part of stocks in the companies that he donates to or invests in. The wealth which is used to surround Bill Gates with a saint-like glow in most media that write about him, is not necessarily really charity that benefits the people. It is more likely benefiting himself.

Those who achieve the greatest benefit from making use of the Rockefeller trick are primarily Bill and Melinda Gates who have enormous sums at their disposal. They use the assets of the foundation to apply pressure politically in areas that are of special interest to them. For example, they are trying to influence legislation about the taxation of USA’s segment of super rich billionaires. However, the weapons industry and chocolate are far from the only industries that the foundation invests in. Where the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has increasingly focused their investments in is the vaccine industry. It is a fact that the foundation has invested enormous sums in the vaccine manufacturer Moderna which, until 2019, had only been carrying out research on a special mRNA vaccine technology, never really producing a vaccine for commercial use. This all changed by the end of 2020 when Moderna, together with Pfizer-Biontech, were the first two vaccine manufacturers who, within a very short period of each other, launched the new mRNA ‘vaccines’. These were vaccines which were supposed to reduce sickness and death in relation to the corona ‘pandemic’, which allegedly (according to the established media) broke out in Wuhan at the end of 2019.

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has also invested large amounts of money in Pfizer-Biontech, which is the other mRNA vaccine manufacturer, which, like Moderna also received ‘temporary emergency approval’ to enable them to take their products to market in 2020. It has to be mentioned that to call mRNA a ‘vaccine technology’ is controversial, as mRNA is not a technology that is used in the same way as is generally understood as the common function of vaccines. However, I will get back to this in a later chapter. Furthermore, I mentioned earlier that Bill Gates has funded the previously mentioned organisation called GAVI, which is the ‘Vaccine Alliance’, which makes use of different means to influence legislation and other political decision making processes around the production and availability of vaccines. GAVI is one of the large sponsors of the WHO as mentioned in a previous chapter and it is controlled by Bill Gates. One of the few articles over the years, which criticises Bill Gates for making use of the Rockefeller taxation trick, is an article by Tim Schwab in the American publication The Nation. Whilst the article is unfortunately placed behind a pay wall, it can be found on the WayBack Machine. I hope you will now see Bill Gates, his ‘foundation’, his involvement with the WHO and the corona ‘pandemic’ in a much more critical light after having read this chapter, even though you may have previously perceived him portrayed as the ultimate philanthropist by the mainstream media.

Links:

* Berlingske article from 24th of March 2020 (behind paywall!): https://www.berlingske.dk/politik/nu-advarer-who-danmark-vil-vaere-lukket-ned-i-maanedsvis-uden-skifte-til

* James Roguskis substack hjemmeside, hvor han eksponerer WHOs planer om at overtage mere suverænitet fra medlemslandene:

* WHO’s own budget homepage where all donations are listed: https://open.who.int/2020-21/contributors/contributor

* Daily Star article describing the charges of Ghebreyesus at the ICC by David Steinman: https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/world-health-organisation-chief-could-23166539

* Graham Peebles, from The Create Trust, has written this article about TPLF and their terror activities: https://www.counterpunch.org/2022/09/02/renewed-tplf-terror-war-against-the-ethiopian-people

* Voice of America article which fails to mention serious details about Ghebreyesus: https://www.voanews.com/a/who-chief-calls-tigray-worst-humanitarian-man-made-disaster-on-earth-/6705674.html

* Fox News article from 27th of March 2020 on Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus: https://www.foxnews.com/world/who-chief-tedros-questionable-past-coronavirus

* Article in Danish JP/Politiken media Finans from 20th of September 2019: https://finans.dk/investor/ECE11624354/saa-aggressiv-er-bill-gates-naar-hans-milliarder-skal-investeres

* The Nation article on Bill Gates and his philantropi (behind paywall!): https://www.thenation.com/article/society/bill-gates-foundation-philanthropy

* Same article (not behind paywall!) on Wayback Machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20200318135836/https://www.thenation.com/article/society/bill-gates-foundation-philanthropy/

Readings from the book The Danish Illusion by Flemming Blicher

Will Novo Nordisk be the next vaccine giant?

The Danish Ministry of Health and the Danish Corona Corruption

(Part 2 - continued from previous section)

It can therefore be seen that one does not have to be a very critical thinker to see the pattern in this whole charade, as the cards can can be summarised as follows: 

• Per Okkels is apperantly asked to knock his health director into place, allegedly because director Søren Brostrøm is not supportive enough about the government's corona narrative, explicitly expressed in “the extreme precautionary principle”. Okkels is likely asked by one or more non-publicly known backers – possibly the prime minister, a head of department from the prime minister's office, a minister for health and the elderly or a fourth person – Or are we to believe that Okkels does the knocking completely on his own initiative?

 • Half a year later, Per Okkels gets a golden ticket to a comfortable and lucrative transition to his pension via a part-time position in the incredibly rich Novo Nordisk Foundation

 • This is a smart move to hide this wrongdoing, as the new head of department cannot be blamed for the deviation from professionalism and deviation from the 'proportionality principle', which has probably subsequently already become commonplace practice in the Ministry of Health. Per Okkels cannot be blamed either, or at least wont experience any repercussions, as he has retired.

• In addition, Per Okkels' new organisation is the Novo Nordisk Foundation which suddenly, from March 2022 and less than twelve months after Okkels joined the foundation, embarks upon major development work together with Bill Gates on the development of new antiviral medicine. Not insulin as is the company’s field of expertise, but antiviral medicine! 

• The project is called "Pandemic Antiviral Discovery" (PAD) and aims to catalyse discovery and early development of antiviral drugs for use in future pandemics. PAD is used for the development of vaccines, even though the word 'vaccines' is not mentioned at all, neither in the Novo Nordisk Foundation’s nor the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's press releases. The project raises 90 million dollars (600 million danish kroner) in 2022 for their vaccine adventure and a triple amount (1,8 billion danish kroner) in 2024.

• In the meantime, the Danish Medicines Agency's director Thomas Senderovitz has also switched to Novo Nordisk after ensuring that the first COVID-19 vaccines are approved for emergency use in Denmark. Also in that position, it offers certain advantages that there is a change of director, so that any responsibility becomes more difficult to place when the population begins to understand that these vaccines were planned right before the corona outbreak in Wuhan. The responsible backers are trying to muddy the picture, so as to make any eventual legal responsibility much more difficult to place. In this termite’s nest of deception, try to get the average Dane to think about who can be held responsible for what happened? Quite difficult, isn’t it?

Even Søren Broström has after all just followed an order from his head of department and probably got a hint with a red-hot poker to join in the charade. In addition, that same Autumn, Brostrøm was offered a top WHO position to boot. Dagens Medicin writes that, on the 28th of October 2020, Søren Brostrøm will, from May 2021 become part of WHO's global board. Even the minister who is responsible for what is going on seems to be quite happy reaping the fruits of his ill-gotten labours.

Health Minister Magnus Heunicke will be honoured by Berlingske and Kantar Gallup in July 2021 as the most popular minister in the government that sat until the general election of 1st of November 2022, more than a year and a half after the start of the corona escapade. Following this, Heunicke also secured another ministerial post in the scandalous SVM (coalition) government of December 2022.

As described above, the Danish health authorities have, from the early start of the corona pandemic, emphasised politics over professionalism. Previously I described how the responsibility for the scandal will be difficult to place, and that those involved are thus relatively well-protected against negative consequences and possible criminal charges because of their participation. Furthermore, the industry is owned by the same company-rich elite, regardless of which industry we are talking about. As long as there are pandemics, crises and wars, this elite makes a lot of money at the expense of the world's population. The corruption works so subtly in today’s Danish politics that the parties to the shady ventures do not even need to exchange suspicious thick envelopes containing large banknotes under mahogany tables. With a barely concealed ironic allusion to my previous section on the mobile networks, the described corruption can be called a type of corruption (almost second-generation corruption, if you like) where the envelopes of money may be the original first-generation corruption. Second-generation corruption is a much more subtle corruption, which I believe to be a prevailing form of corruption that is increasingly now taking place in Denmark. With regards to prime minister Mette Frederiksen’s and the then minister of health and the elderly Magnus Heunicke's roles in this case, I will return to this at the end of the next chapter.

When I touch on corruption, the pandemic and the WHO, I must also address Bill Gates' involvement in the WHO. This is because it is a deeply fascist form of corruption that is unfolding before our noses of all of us when a single person has so much power over the entire world's population. Fascism is precisely when the two factors, the political power and the economic power of industry, are mixed together to provide a power factor where it is the dictator, and in our case the government, who has the formal power. Even one of the foremost proponents of fascism, Italy's dictator Benito Mussolini, has stated that fascism could rightly be called 'corporatism'. In the case of Italy, it was primarily the trade unions and the opposition parties, who were forced to hand over all their power to the dictator Mussolini. On local-national plan here in Denmark, what the country has gone through since 2020 is precisely that corporatism has centred all power around the government.  When the citizen finds it more and more difficult to identify where the state begins and where it ends, then it indicates that fascism is ‘at it again’ to get a good hold of us after World War II and an eighty-year grace-period. Mette Frederiksen stated in her New Year's speech on 1st of January 2021: "Long live research and collaboration between public and private, long live science!”

This is clearly in total support of a fascist state, but so subtly worded as to be almost oblivious to the average Dane celebrating New Year… It is also completely in line with the agreement that Denmark entered into with the WEF in 2018 – the “Frame Agreement” which obliges Denmark to expand its private/public partnership. (PPP)

However, before I come back to the local Danish national level, let’s put a critial gaze upon just a few things; Corporatism, the WHO, the Pandemic and the involvement therein of a philanthropist called Bill Gates. Let us also ask the question: Who has the real power in the WHO? The top person in this organisation is the General Secretary and what do the stakeholders in the organisation expect from him? The stakeholders must be the 193/194 countries who are the members of the WHO and have outsourced parts of their health systems. They have handed the assessment of the whether or not there is a pandemic directly over to the WHO and together the decision as to how the agreement with the vaccine manufacturers activates. Here, enormous sums will change hands over a short period of time, because this is how the contracts with the pharmaceutical companies are written, most likely completely deliberately. It is unfortunately not the representatives of the countries who control the WHO in a democratic manner. Among the myriad of small and large sponsors, Bill Gates represents indisputably the largest share and therefore, by infererence, he controls the WHO. If one controls the WHO, like Bill Gates, and if you abuse this concentrated political power that one thereby has, then you also control the largest part of the world's population in the case of a declared pandemic. 

This is at least until the populations wise up and cancel the contract which the 193/194 countries have signed with the WHO. Denmark became a member of the United Nations (UN) at its foundation in 1945 and then automatically de facto became a member of the WHO in 1948 when this was founded as a part of the UN. In the case of a pandemic, we can now see that the WHO has enormous influence on what is going to happen in each individual country. We also saw this in Denmark, as not one single Danish authority recommended locking Denmark down following 11th of March 2020. So therefore, we must naturally surmise that the only internal Danish organisation with enough clout was the Monarchy which gave this recommendation. Indeed, this is unlikely but not entirely impossible -  except the Monarchy is not a health authority. After all, it is entirely clear and we know that neither the SSI (Medicine Institute of the State), the Health Authority or even the Medicinal Authority recommended the locking down of Denmark. So who did?

On the other hand the WHO has, since March 2020, recommended tough lock-downs and aggressive testing strategies. This was also pointed out in an article in "Berlingske" (A Danish mainstream paper) from 24th of March 2020, which has this unequivocal headline: "WHO issues warnings now: Denmark will be locked down for months without changing to aggresive testing strategy". The WHO has not had any Danish sovereign power transferred to itself as is the case with the EU. Still, mistakenly, many Danes, and politicians, have the understanding that the WHO has sovereignty over Denmark in just the same way as the EU has. However, in the case of the EU, sovereignty has been transferred legally, as the Grundlov, the Danish Constitution, prescribes. This transfer of sovereignty has even been done to such a high degree - many will despair to realise - that the EU overrules the Folketing as a law-making power in Denmark. 

It is my opinion that the politicians in the Folketing, especially those with a certain degree of power, heads of parties, spokespersons, commitee chairs and of course ministers, are controlled by powers that lie in the background. Therefore I think that it is completely deliberate that the politicians seek to influence the Danes in believing that Denmark is, in legal terms, under the control of the WHO, which Denmark is not (yet). The country has never had a referendum about membership of the UN / WHO as we have had about the EU. The Grundlov clearly rules such that in paragraph 19 and 20 a referendum is required if Denmark is to hand over any kind of sovereignty. The fact is that the WHO has attemped to take the sovereignty over Denmark, and the rest of the member states, in the case when there is, once more, declared a pandemic.  Well, that is another story which is important to keep an eye on. It is a subject which one of my American friends and collaborators James Roguski has invested countless hours, videos and interviews on informing us about. It is not a simple task he has undertaken, as the WHO is attempting two seperate strategies:

One is a completely new pandemic treaty and the other is legally binding additions to the existing IHR agreement which Denmark entered into in 2007. James Roguski writes very tangibly about the WHO's plans and progress on his Substack homepage. I have interviewed James Roguski several times about the WHO's plans. In the interviews James Roguski goes through how the WHO makes use of a pandemic treaty and amendments to the existing IHR treaty to gain greater power over the member states. 

However, let us return to Bill Gates. How can we legitimately claim that it is Bill Gates who controls the WHO? It is in fact very simple to prove for all who have access to the internet. On the website of the WHO can be found the numbers from the largest sponsors. In 2020-2021 Bill Gates donated more than 17% of WHO's entire yearly budget. In the period 2018-2019 his total donations were almost 19% and in 2016-2017 they were above 22%. This is not fiction for these figures can easily be verified by visiting the website open.who.org where you can add the donation from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation together with that from the GAVI Alliance, which is a vaccine alliance' founded and dominated by, guess who? - Bill Gates.

However, while most people are likely of the opinion that the WHO is controlled by its member states who pay donations to the organisation, the reality is that one of the world's richest, if not the richest, man has a dominating influence on the WHO as its largest sponsor. Besides which it is also worth noting that Bill Gates donated more than 22% to the organisation in the budget period when the current General Secretary Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus was elected.