The digital revolution isn't just changing how we work—it's fundamentally reshaping workplace safety and health in ways both promising and concerning. This deep dive explores the complex duality of workplace digitalization: the unprecedented potential to enhance worker protection alongside the emergence of entirely new risks.

Discover how advanced robots are removing humans from hazardous environments like deep mining and disaster recovery, while exoskeletons reduce physical strain by over 50% in demanding jobs. Learn about smart monitoring systems that enable real-time hazard detection and predictive risk assessment—shifting safety management from reactive to anticipatory.

But these benefits come with significant challenges. Algorithmic management systems reduce worker autonomy and increase surveillance stress. Remote work arrangements introduce overlooked ergonomic and psychosocial risks. Extended reality training, while powerful, brings concerns from eye strain to "cyber sickness" affecting up to 80% of users.

Perhaps most sobering is the revelation about the hidden workers powering our digital world. Content moderators review hundreds of traumatic posts daily, developing PTSD and secondary trauma. Data annotators perform repetitive tasks under strict surveillance. Miners extract essential minerals for our devices in dangerous conditions with minimal protections.

As regulatory frameworks struggle to keep pace with these rapid changes, this episode makes a compelling case for human-centered technology development. Worker consultation, comprehensive training, and maintaining human expertise remain essential as digital tools reshape our workplaces.

The critical question remains: how do we ensure that the pace of worker protection keeps up with technological innovation? And what role can each of us play in our own work environments? Join us for this fascinating exploration of the human element in our increasingly digital workplaces.

Support the show

𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗰𝘁 my team and I to get business results, not excuses.

☎️ https://calendly.com/kierangilmurray/results-not-excuses
✉️ [email protected]
🌍 www.KieranGilmurray.com
📘 Kieran Gilmurray | LinkedIn
🦉 X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/KieranGilmurray
📽 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@KieranGilmurray

What happens when artificial intelligence meets national security? The United States Air Force is navigating this crucial intersection with a comprehensive strategy outlined in their Air Force Doctrine Note 25-1. This document provides a roadmap for harnessing AI's tremendous potential while acknowledging its inherent limitations and risks.

TLDR:

• AI represents the latest chapter in warfare's technological evolution, following WWII computing advances and precision capabilities demonstrated in Operation Desert Storm
• The Air Force distinguishes between narrow AI (specialized tools), artificial general intelligence (which doesn't currently exist), and expert systems that complement human expertise
• Human-machine teaming places humans in various oversight roles: in-the-loop (approving machine recommendations), on-the-loop (allowing machine action unless vetoed), or up-the-loop (machine decides independently)

At its core, the Air Force approach centers on human-machine teaming rather than replacement. AI serves as an amplifier for human capabilities, combining machine strengths (rapid data processing, pattern recognition) with uniquely human qualities (judgment, intuition, ethical reasoning). This partnership manifests across all core functions – from enhancing early warning systems and targeting in air superiority missions to optimizing logistics and maintenance for global mobility operations.

The strategy makes crucial distinctions between different AI applications. It differentiates narrow AI (specialized tools) from artificial general intelligence (which doesn't currently exist), and carefully delineates human oversight roles in various scenarios. Perhaps most importantly, it recognizes that while AI excels at complicated problems with consistent patterns (like logistics optimization), it struggles with complex "wicked problems" that require deep human understanding of context and consequences.

Building this AI-enabled force isn't simply about acquiring technology. It demands creating an AI-fluent workforce, establishing robust data management practices, securing sufficient computing power, and recruiting diverse talent across technical and ethical domains. All while adhering to strict ethical principles: responsible, equitable, traceable, reliable, and governable.

The document acknowledges a profound tension: the United States commits to ethical AI development while potential adversaries like China and Russia aggressively pursue military AI applications without similar constraints. This raises fundamental questions about balancing technological advantage with core values – questions that will shape not just military strategy but our broader relationship with increasingly autonomous systems.

Support the show

𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗰𝘁 my team and I to get business results, not excuses.

☎️ https://calendly.com/kierangilmurray/results-not-excuses
✉️ [email protected]
🌍 www.KieranGilmurray.com
📘 Kieran Gilmurray | LinkedIn
🦉 X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/KieranGilmurray
📽 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@KieranGilmurray

Fear often dominates the conversation around artificial intelligence in education, but what if AI could actually bridge gaps we've struggled with for decades? Professor David Brown, a pioneering researcher in AI accessibility at Nottingham Trent University, offers a refreshing perspective that challenges mainstream anxiety.

TLDR:

• AI for accessibility means using technology ethically with a human-centric approach that puts students, parents, carers, and teachers at the centre
• Professor Brown's team uses AI to monitor students' emotional states during learning by analyzing facial expressions, eye gaze, and body language
• A digital divide exists for marginalized communities, requiring prioritization of equity of access through good internet and appropriate devices
• Young people have already embraced AI; policymakers and educators risk being left behind if they don't adopt it ethically
• AI should augment teaching practice rather than replace teachers, handling routine tasks to free up time for creative education
• AI should be inclusive and explainable, making life better for everyone. This will only happen if we intentionally design it to be so, putting vulnerable communities at the center of development processes.

Professor David Brown reveals how AI can positively transform education for students with disabilities when developed ethically and inclusively, challenging the fear narrative often portrayed in media.

When most people think about AI, they picture complex algorithms making incomprehensible decisions.  Brown reframes this narrative by showcasing how thoughtfully designed AI systems can transform educational experiences for students with learning disabilities, autism, and other challenges. 

His ground breaking work includes developing systems that monitor emotional states during learning—detecting when students are engaged, bored, or frustrated—and automatically adjusting educational content to maintain optimal learning flow. 

"Without engagement for these students, there will be no deep learning or meaningful outcome," Brown explains, pinpointing why this technology matters so profoundly.

The conversation explores the critical concept of explainable AI - the principle that while algorithms don't need to make the same choices humans would, people should be able to understand how those decisions are reached. 

This transparency builds essential trust, particularly when working with vulnerable populations. Brown's human-centric approach prioritizes inclusive design, placing students with disabilities and their support networks at the center of development processes rather than as afterthoughts.

Perhaps most compelling is Brown's discussion of the digital divide affecting marginalized communities. Rather than developing expensive specialist equipment, his team focuses on creating accessible applications for mainstream devices, training their algorithms on appropriate data that represents the communities they serve. 

From social robotics that engage students with profound learning disabilities to VR rehabilitation systems that provide AI-guided therapy, the potential applications are transformative.

Connect with David here.

Support the show

𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗰𝘁 my team and I to get business results, not excuses.

☎️ https://calendly.com/kierangilmurray/results-not-excuses
✉️ [email protected]
🌍 www.KieranGilmurray.com
📘 Kieran Gilmurray | LinkedIn
🦉 X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/KieranGilmurray
📽 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@KieranGilmurray

The evolution of artificial intelligence has reached a pivotal moment where AI systems are no longer just responding to our prompts - they're acting with autonomy. This shift from reactive to agentic AI introduces powerful capabilities but also creates entirely new security challenges that traditional testing methods simply cannot address.

TLDR:

• The core difference between standard generative AI (reactive, single-turn interactions) and agentic AI (autonomous planning, reasoning, and action)
• New security challenges including emergent behaviour, unstructured interactions, and interpretability problems
• The expanded attack surface spanning agent control systems, knowledge bases, and external system connections
• Twelve specific threat categories for red teaming agentic AI systems

We dive deep into what makes agentic AI fundamentally different: while generative AI operates on a single request-response basis, agents can plan steps, reason through problems, and take independent actions across digital (and potentially physical) environments without constant human supervision. This autonomy creates complex security risks requiring specialized assessment approaches.

Drawing from the comprehensive framework developed by the Cloud Security Alliance and OWASP AI Exchange, we examine twelve distinct threat categories unique to autonomous AI systems. From agent authorization hijacking to memory manipulation, hallucination exploitation, and multi-agent vulnerabilities - each category represents novel attack vectors requiring specialized testing methods. We explore practical examples of how red teams can probe these systems, including testing for emergent behaviors, context amnesia, orchestrator state poisoning, and economic denial of service attacks.

The security landscape is evolving rapidly, with fascinating developments like autonomous red teaming agents - AI systems specifically designed to probe and attack other AI systems. As both defensive and offensive capabilities increasingly leverage artificial intelligence, the traditional cat-and-mouse game between attackers and defenders will accelerate dramatically. For organizations deploying or developing agentic AI, understanding these nuances represents the critical first step toward building secure, trustworthy systems ready for this new era.

Are you prepared for the security challenges of truly autonomous AI? The time to update your security playbook is now, before these systems become ubiquitous.

Support the show

𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗰𝘁 my team and I to get business results, not excuses.

☎️ https://calendly.com/kierangilmurray/results-not-excuses
✉️ [email protected]
🌍 www.KieranGilmurray.com
📘 Kieran Gilmurray | LinkedIn
🦉 X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/KieranGilmurray
📽 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@KieranGilmurray

The world isn't experiencing artificial intelligence uniformly, and our groundbreaking exploration of the University of Melbourne's massive global AI survey reveals surprising patterns that challenge conventional wisdom about technology adoption.

TLDR:

• Emerging economies like India and Nigeria report 92% AI adoption rates, while advanced economies lag behind
• About half of people in emerging economies have received AI training compared to less than a third in advanced economies
• Healthcare AI is the most trusted application in 42 of 47 countries surveyed
• 83% of people globally believe AI will bring benefits, but 79% express concerns about risks
• Two in five people globally have experienced negative outcomes from AI use
• 70% believe AI regulation is necessary, but 83% are unaware of existing AI laws
• Nearly half of employees admit uploading sensitive company information to public AI tools
• 83% of students regularly use AI, with widespread inappropriate use raising concerns about critical thinking skills

Across 47 countries and 48,000 respondents, my Google Notebook LM AI agents uncover a stark divide: emerging economies are embracing AI with significantly higher enthusiasm than advanced economies. Nations like India and Nigeria report staggering 92% AI adoption rates, while developed nations show more hesitation. 

This pattern extends beyond mere usage emerging economies demonstrate higher AI literacy, with about half receiving some form of AI training compared to less than a third in advanced economies.

Trust follows similar geographic contours. While global trust in AI sits at 58% overall, the confidence gap between regions is substantial. People generally trust AI's technical capabilities more than its safety or ethics, with healthcare applications earning the highest trust globally. When weighing benefits against risks, half of respondents in emerging economies believe the advantages outweigh concerns, while advanced economies remain deeply divided.

In workplaces worldwide, concerning patterns emerge despite high adoption rates. Nearly half of employees admit uploading sensitive company information into public AI tools, two-thirds rely on AI output without proper evaluation, and over half try to hide their AI use. Educational settings show similar trends, with 83% of students regularly using AI but often inappropriately, raising serious questions about impacts on critical thinking skills.

This research identifies trust as the central foundation for AI acceptance, with literacy, perceived benefits, and confidence in governance systems as key drivers. The striking regional contrasts suggest potentially divergent futures: emerging economies positioned to accelerate innovation through enthusiastic adoption versus advanced economies exercising what might be rational caution.

What responsibilities do we each hold in shaping an AI future that's not just powerful but truly trustworthy? How might we bridge the identified gaps in understanding and trust? We encourage you to reflect on what these findings mean for your world as AI continues its rapid evolution.

Support the show

𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗰𝘁 my team and I to get business results, not excuses.

☎️ https://calendly.com/kierangilmurray/results-not-excuses
✉️ [email protected]
🌍 www.KieranGilmurray.com
📘 Kieran Gilmurray | LinkedIn
🦉 X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/KieranGilmurray
📽 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@KieranGilmurray

The world of artificial intelligence is undergoing a seismic shift. Tech leaders like Sam Altman and Mark Benioff aren't just making bold predictions about AI agents – they're signaling a fundamental transformation in how AI systems interact with our world. These aren't just chatbots anymore; they're autonomous systems that can act independently in both digital and physical environments.

TLDR:

• Half of all AI agents listed in research indices appeared just in second half of 2024
• Major AI companies rapidly building agent capabilities (Anthropic's Claude, Google's Project Mariner, OpenAI's Operator)
• Agents amplify existing AI risks through autonomous planning and direct real-world interaction
• Potential harms include financial manipulation, psychological exploitation, and sophisticated cyber attacks
• EU AI Act provides potential governance framework but wasn't specifically designed for agents

Our AI agent deep dive examines The Future Society's timely report "Ahead of the Curve: Governing AI Agents Under the EU AI Act," which tackles the complex challenge of regulating these emerging technologies. The acceleration is striking – roughly half of all AI agents appeared just in the latter half of 2024, with companies like OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic rapidly building agent capabilities that can control screens, navigate websites, and perform complex online research.

What makes agents particularly concerning isn't just that they introduce new risks – they fundamentally amplify existing AI dangers. Through autonomous long-term planning and direct real-world interaction, they create entirely new pathways for harm. An agent with access to financial APIs could execute rapid transactions causing market instability. Others might manipulate vulnerable individuals through sophisticated psychological techniques. The stakes couldn't be higher.

While Europe's landmark AI Act wasn't specifically designed for agents, it offers a potential governance framework through its value chain approach – distributing responsibility across model providers, system providers, and deployers. We unpack the four crucial pillars of this governance structure: comprehensive risk assessment, robust transparency tools, effective technical controls, and meaningful human oversight.

Yet significant challenges remain. How do you effectively monitor autonomous systems without creating privacy concerns? Can technical safeguards keep pace with increasingly sophisticated behaviors? How do you ensure humans maintain meaningful control without creating efficiency bottlenecks? These questions demand urgent attention from regulators, developers, and users alike.

As AI agents become increasingly integrated into our lives, understanding these governance challenges is crucial. Subscribe to continue exploring the cutting edge of AI policy and technology as we track these rapidly evolving systems and their implications for our shared digital future.

Support the show

𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗰𝘁 my team and I to get business results, not excuses.

☎️ https://calendly.com/kierangilmurray/results-not-excuses
✉️ [email protected]
🌍 www.KieranGilmurray.com
📘 Kieran Gilmurray | LinkedIn
🦉 X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/KieranGilmurray
📽 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@KieranGilmurray

From academic curiosity to business transformation - Peter van der Patten's journey through AI spans decades, beginning in 1989 when he first explored the fundamental nature of intelligence. As Lead Scientist and Director of Pega's AI Lab, Peter brings a unique perspective that bridges theoretical understanding with practical implementation.

[Sponsored]

The conversation reveals how AI has evolved from isolated research projects to become deeply integrated into enterprise operations. Peter articulates a vision where intelligence isn't merely a technological overlay but woven into every customer interaction. This philosophy has guided Pega's approach: creating a horizontal platform where different AI technologies - from process mining to speech recognition, decisioning engines to generative models - work in concert within broader business ecosystems.

What emerges is a nuanced view of enterprise AI implementation. The most successful deployments blend multiple AI approaches, combining the predictability of traditional decisioning with the flexibility of generative capabilities. Take insurance claims processing: automated systems can assess approval likelihood or fraud risk while agentic components gather information and synthesize findings - all within structured workflows that maintain regulatory compliance.

This orchestrated approach addresses one of generative AI's central challenges: hallucination. By embedding large language models within established decisioning frameworks and governance structures, organizations can harness creative capabilities while maintaining accuracy and accountability. Peter emphasizes that ethical principles like explainability and transparency become even more critical as AI systems grow more complex and autonomous.

Looking toward the horizon, Peter identifies research agents as an early "sweet spot" for agentic implementation - tools that gather and synthesize information across sources while posing relatively low risk. The next frontier? Multi-agent collaboration, where AI systems must negotiate, understand each other's goals, and work cooperatively across organizational boundaries. Join us for this fascinating exploration of AI's past, present and emerging future - and discover why effective implementation demands more than just advanced technology.

🌎 Watch Peter's interview on YouTube - https://youtu.be/W01zmYX-K8A

#PegaWorld2025 #AI #AgenticAI #PegaWorld  #AILiteracy Pegasystems #ad #Sponsored

Support the show

𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗰𝘁 my team and I to get business results, not excuses.

☎️ https://calendly.com/kierangilmurray/results-not-excuses
✉️ [email protected]
🌍 www.KieranGilmurray.com
📘 Kieran Gilmurray | LinkedIn
🦉 X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/KieranGilmurray
📽 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@KieranGilmurray

The distinction between AI agents and agentic AI might sound like semantic hair-splitting, but it represents one of the most significant evolutionary leaps in artificial intelligence development. While interest in both has exploded since late 2022, understanding their fundamental differences unlocks a clearer vision of where AI technology is heading.

TLDR:

• AI agents are autonomous software programs designed for specific tasks with minimal human supervision
• Agents leverage powerful foundation models like LLMs and LIMs as their cognitive engines
• Agentic AI represents a leap forward through coordinated teams of specialized agents
• Multiple agents working together can tackle complex problems through goal decomposition
• Real-world applications range from customer support to medical decision support
• Current limitations include lack of causal understanding and difficulties with long-horizon planning
• The evolution from single agents to collaborative teams mirrors human approaches to complex tasks

AI agents function as autonomous software programs designed for specific tasks in digital environments. They operate independently with minimal human oversight, excel at narrowly defined jobs, and can adapt to changing conditions. Powered by foundation models like GPT-4 and DALL-E, these digital workers become even more capable when "toolmented" – connected to external tools and APIs that expand their abilities beyond their internal knowledge.

Agentic AI takes this concept to an entirely new level. Rather than a single agent juggling everything, agentic systems deploy teams of specialized agents collaborating toward shared complex goals. Think of it as the difference between a lone smart thermostat managing temperature and an orchestrated smart home ecosystem handling everything from weather forecasting to security, energy optimization, and scheduling through coordinated specialist agents.

Both approaches are already transforming industries. Individual AI agents excel at customer service automation, email management, personalized recommendations, and scheduling assistance. Meanwhile, agentic AI systems tackle significantly more complex challenges – coordinating robotics in automated warehouses, providing collaborative medical decision support, automating research processes, and managing adaptive workflows for legal or cybersecurity applications.

Despite their impressive capabilities, significant challenges remain. From limited causal understanding and planning difficulties in individual agents to amplified complexity and unpredictable emergent behaviors in agentic systems, researchers are actively pursuing solutions through improved memory architectures, better coordination frameworks, and stronger ethical guardrails. The potential implications for scientific discovery, global project management, and human-AI collaboration are profound – if we can navigate the technical hurdles responsibly.

What aspects of this collaborative AI evolution do you find most promising or concerning? Join the conversation and share your thoughts on the future of AI agent technology.

Research: AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challenges 

Support the show

𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗰𝘁 my team and I to get business results, not excuses.

☎️ https://calendly.com/kierangilmurray/results-not-excuses
✉️ [email protected]
🌍 www.KieranGilmurray.com
📘 Kieran Gilmurray | LinkedIn
🦉 X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/KieranGilmurray
📽 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@KieranGilmurray

Legacy transformation just got a whole lot faster. In this fascinating conversation with Matt Healy, who leads go-to-market for the Pega platform, we explore the remarkable evolution of Pega's Blueprint - a revolutionary SaaS product that's redefining how enterprises approach workflow automation and legacy system migration.

[Sponsored]

Blueprint has become the fastest-adopted capability in Pega's history, with over 150,000 applications generated in just 12 months. The latest advancement? AI agents that analyze legacy assets - from screen recordings to documentation - and transform them into cloud-ready applications. The results are staggering: Vodafone Networks has compressed their workflow deployment timeline to just 40 hours, dramatically accelerating their digital transformation journey.

At the heart of Pega's approach is what Healy describes as "center-out business architecture," allowing enterprises to define processes once and deploy them across all channels. This unified approach ensures consistency as customers navigate between mobile, web, and contact centers, while maintaining full context throughout their journey.

We also dive deep into Pega's unique approach to agentic AI, balancing innovation with enterprise requirements for governance and compliance. While research shows fewer than 20% of enterprises are realizing ROI from agentic AI investments, Pega's "predictable AI agents" wrap structured workflows with AI layers, ensuring compliant, auditable processes that deliver measurable value.

Looking ahead, Healy predicts 2025 will be "the year of adoption" as enterprises integrate AI agents into core operations. Through partnerships with cloud providers and system integrators, Pega is focused on helping organizations escape legacy constraints and embrace an AI-powered future. Ready to transform your legacy systems? Try Blueprint today at pega.com/blueprint and experience the difference for yourself.

🌎 Watch the full interview on YouTube - https://youtu.be/rD-HKW6m00g

#PegaWorld2025 #AI #AgenticAI #PegaWorld  #AILiteracy Pegasystems #ad #Sponsored

Support the show

𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗰𝘁 my team and I to get business results, not excuses.

☎️ https://calendly.com/kierangilmurray/results-not-excuses
✉️ [email protected]
🌍 www.KieranGilmurray.com
📘 Kieran Gilmurray | LinkedIn
🦉 X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/KieranGilmurray
📽 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@KieranGilmurray

The relationship between artificial intelligence and marketing has reached a fascinating inflection point. Rather than sparking fear about job displacement, AI presents an unprecedented opportunity for collaboration—enhancing human capabilities while handling data-intensive tasks that previously consumed valuable time.

Tara DeZeo, Pega's product marketing leader for customer decision hub, frames this shift perfectly: "If we think about AI as a collaboration partner versus a replacement for marketers, that's more how it's being used in marketing organizations and that's how it should be used." This view resonates with forward-thinking marketers who recognize that automation of routine tasks creates space for more strategic, creative work.

The conversation delves into one-to-one marketing—an approach that personalizes experiences at scale using real-time data signals. Unlike traditional segmentation that places customers into predetermined buckets, this AI-powered approach delivers contextually relevant communications when they matter most. Consider the banking app that recognizes when you've entered a wildfire zone and offers emergency resources instead of credit card promotions. That's not just smart marketing; it's empathetic engagement that builds lasting trust.

As third-party cookies fade into obsolescence, marketers face a critical inflection point. The solution isn't to abandon personalization but to reimagine it through first-party and "zero-party" data—information willingly shared by customers. This shift demands transparency about how data will be used, creating a foundation for more meaningful relationships. As DeZeo notes, "We weren't very transparent about how we were using third-party cookies... we just obfuscated that from the consumer to the point where it became a problem."

Looking ahead, Pega's Customer Engagement Blueprint represents a significant advancement in visualizing AI-powered marketing journeys, helping even traditional marketers evolve their approaches while identifying gaps in current programs. The vision for tomorrow centers on "scaling personalization without complexity"—activated data, unified experiences, and genuine connections that feel helpful rather than intrusive. 

Try Blueprint for yourself at pega.com/blueprint and discover how AI can transform your marketing from merely transactional to truly transformational.

🌎 Watch Tara's interview on YouTube - https://youtu.be/pGg_S9h5mIk

Support the show

𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗰𝘁 my team and I to get business results, not excuses.

☎️ https://calendly.com/kierangilmurray/results-not-excuses
✉️ [email protected]
🌍 www.KieranGilmurray.com
📘 Kieran Gilmurray | LinkedIn
🦉 X / Twitter: https://twitter.com/KieranGilmurray
📽 YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@KieranGilmurray