
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
In the face of electoral upsets and viral black swans, Anne McElvoy asks the cofounder of the Good Judgement “superforecaster” project whether today’s future-gazers should still rely on historical precedent. As pollsters compete to predict who will win the US presidential election, what lessons have yet to be learned from 2016? And, where to spot the next black swan—or at least a dark grey one.
Please subscribe to The Economist for full access to print, digital and audio editions:
www.economist.com/podcastoffer
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
4.3
363363 ratings
In the face of electoral upsets and viral black swans, Anne McElvoy asks the cofounder of the Good Judgement “superforecaster” project whether today’s future-gazers should still rely on historical precedent. As pollsters compete to predict who will win the US presidential election, what lessons have yet to be learned from 2016? And, where to spot the next black swan—or at least a dark grey one.
Please subscribe to The Economist for full access to print, digital and audio editions:
www.economist.com/podcastoffer
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
7,693 Listeners
4,256 Listeners
520 Listeners
918 Listeners
577 Listeners
219 Listeners
107 Listeners
702 Listeners
2,519 Listeners
45 Listeners
1,078 Listeners
1,378 Listeners
115 Listeners
101 Listeners
36 Listeners
889 Listeners
345 Listeners
497 Listeners
140 Listeners
81 Listeners
68 Listeners
101 Listeners