
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In the face of electoral upsets and viral black swans, Anne McElvoy asks the cofounder of the Good Judgement “superforecaster” project whether today’s future-gazers should still rely on historical precedent. As pollsters compete to predict who will win the US presidential election, what lessons have yet to be learned from 2016? And, where to spot the next black swan—or at least a dark grey one.
Please subscribe to The Economist for full access to print, digital and audio editions:
www.economist.com/podcastoffer
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
By The Economist4.3
363363 ratings
In the face of electoral upsets and viral black swans, Anne McElvoy asks the cofounder of the Good Judgement “superforecaster” project whether today’s future-gazers should still rely on historical precedent. As pollsters compete to predict who will win the US presidential election, what lessons have yet to be learned from 2016? And, where to spot the next black swan—or at least a dark grey one.
Please subscribe to The Economist for full access to print, digital and audio editions:
www.economist.com/podcastoffer
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

7,821 Listeners

4,185 Listeners

925 Listeners

299 Listeners

589 Listeners

133 Listeners

113,300 Listeners

109 Listeners

2,557 Listeners

47 Listeners

1,084 Listeners

1,411 Listeners

146 Listeners

115 Listeners

102 Listeners

37 Listeners

482 Listeners

894 Listeners

372 Listeners

497 Listeners

86 Listeners

151 Listeners

72 Listeners

100 Listeners

262 Listeners