If the death penalty is about providing vengeance and/or closure to crime victims and their families, are those needs being served by the existing California death penalty system? Many people would answer no, based on the fact that the State hasn't killed anyone sentenced to death in 10 years. As each case drags on and on, costing tax payers millions and millions of dollars, the pervasive question is, "Can it be fixed? If so, how?" I wanted to explore these ideas, so I spoke with Gwen Freeman (http://www.kpclegal.com/freeman-gwen). She's an attorney who has
(https://theenthusiasmenthusiast.files.wordpress.com/2016/08/img_0414.jpg?w=680)Self portrait by Gwen Freeman
represented several death row inmates filing habeas corpus proceedings. Though our approach is different, our conclusion is the same. The California death row system must be eliminated. Voters will have an opportunity to decide this issue in November by voting on a pair of propositions. Yes On 62 (https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_62,_Repeal_of_the_Death_Penalty_(2016)) will end the death penalty and replace it with life in prison without parole. No On 66 (https://ballotpedia.org/California_Proposition_66,_Death_Penalty_Procedures_(2016)) will prevent the already failed system from getting worse.
If you want more info on Troy Davis' case, please go here (http://www.amnestyusa.org/our-work/cases/usa-troy-davis).