Imagine your identity is your computer’s operating system—the foundational architecture that tells you how to process the world. Now, consider what happens when the state steps in, completely wipes that hard drive, installs a fictional operating system, and legally forbids you from ever accessing your original source code again.
“Adoption is the ontological and epistemological fault line of colonial psychology.”
It is a system that enforces a profound, lifelong spiritual and experiential neurodivergence upon its survivors. The staggering irony of this system is perfectly distilled in a single reality: experiencing total, legally mandated identity erasure and state-sanctioned severance while simultaneously being biologically linked to monumental cultural history—like being the biological son of Mark Moffatt, the producer of the Yothu Yindi anthem ‘Treaty’.
Exposing the Architecture of Silence
LISTEN TO MY NEW AUDIO DEEP DIVE PODCAST EPISODE ABOVE
In our latest long-form Deep Dive podcast episode, we strip away the PR-friendly fairy tales and expose the architecture of institutional silence that protects the family separation industry. We name the specific actors, the bureaucratic mechanisms, and the theoretical frameworks that maintain this continuous line of state-sanctioned harm.
We dismantle the deliberate bureaucratic deflection that characterises the government’s response to this crisis. We specifically break down how the Attorney-General’s Department utilises the existing mandates of National Children’s Commissioner Deb Tsorbaris and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner Katie Kiss to effectively wash their hands of adult care leavers. While celebrating the vital, unassailable logic championed by advocates like Sue-Anne Hunter—who rightly secured independent oversight for First Nations children—we expose the hypocrisy of a state that refuses to extend that same fundamental human right to hundreds of thousands of others.
The episode also calls out the glaring political hypocrisy of leaders like Queensland MP Joan Pease. We dissect how the progressive state will rightfully streamline identity rectification for some marginalised groups, yet actively block, silence, and delete the comments of adult adoptees begging for that exact same right to self-determination.
To understand why the state guards this legal fiction so fiercely, we ground our investigation in rigorous clinical and sociological truths. We explore Dr. Allan Schore’s neurobiological evidence of pre-verbal trauma, Michel Foucault’s concept of biopower—the state’s desperate assertion that it owns your kinship —and Johan Galtung’s definitions of structural and cultural violence, which perfectly explain why our national training curricula systematically erase the words “forced adoption”.
The Micro-Level Reality of the “Clean Break”
Policy does not exist in a vacuum. The macro-level “clean break” theory breeds micro-level domestic coercive control. In this episode, we discuss the mechanics of what happens inside the pressure cooker of a secretive adoptive home. We expose the weaponisation of inverted maternal grief, the use of financial blackmail as a tool to suppress the search for biological truth, and the devastating “rupture of reunion”.
The Imperative of Adoptee Sovereignty
The fight for truth demands more than just acknowledging the data deficits; it requires a structural transition from “legal permanence” to lifelong “relational permanence” and the strict enforcement of UNCRC Article 8. It demands a dedicated National Social Justice Commissioner for Family Separation and Reconnection.
Most importantly, it demands Adoptee Sovereignty.
Dismantling this system requires engaging with these themes on a deeper, narrative level. To explore the systemic analysis and the soul-led resistance against these colonial mechanisms, I invite you to read my published works.
Explore the full catalogue of works, including The Bridge Walker series, here:
https://books2read.com/ap/nEJggv/Shane-Bouel
https://medium.com/thoughtless-delineation/the-memoir-was-never-the-beginning-db5c25f769e9
A Final Confession to the Listener:
The systemic analysis presented in this episode covers the mechanics of colonial psychology, and the horrifying intimate realities of the adoption system discussed within it are not merely abstract academic concepts or disconnected case studies.
The lifelong financial coercion, the ultimatums and psychological abuse, being actively blamed for an adoptive mother’s breast cancer, the adoptive father who couldn’t look me in the eye when I found my biological mother, the weaponized inverted grief that orchestrated the estrangement of my own children, and the letters of polite bureaucratic deflection—every single instance mentioned in this podcast happened to me directly.
Here is the Full Proposal.
This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
I have escalated this to the United Nations
Dear Members of the Committee,This letter serves as a formal notification that the Commonwealth of Australia is in active, ongoing violation of Article 8 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC). The involuntary separation of families constitutes one of Australia’s most profound human rights deficits, directly or indirectly affecting over one million citizens across three generations. Despite its international obligations, the Australian government systematically obstructs the right to identity and utilizes bureaucratic deflection to maintain a permanent “policy vacuum” for hundreds of thousands of adult survivors of forced adoption and out-of-home care (OOHC).1. Violation of UNCRC Article 8: The Positive Obligation to Re-establish IdentityUnder UNCRC Article 8, States Parties have a positive obligation: “Where a child is illegally deprived of some or all of the elements of his or her identity, States Parties shall provide appropriate assistance and protection, with a view to re-establishing speedily his or her identity”. Australia actively obstructs this re-establishment process through fragmented state-level secrecy legislation and inadequate support for post-care reconnection.2. The “Continuity Gap” and Age-Based DiscriminationThe Australian government defends its systemic inaction by pointing to existing oversight bodies, specifically the National Children’s Commissioner and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Commissioner. This is a textbook example of “bureaucratic absorption”. The National Children’s Commissioner’s mandate strictly ends at age 18, artificially terminating the state’s human rights responsibility the moment a separated child reaches the age of majority. By failing to provide lifelong oversight, Australia abandons adult adoptees to severe, lifelong psychosocial disabilities caused by state-sanctioned severance, including Enduring Personality Change After Catastrophic Experience (EPCACE) and Complex PTSD.3. State-Sanctioned Erasure and the “Legal Fiction” of the Amended Birth CertificateAustralia enforces identity erasure through the physical sealing of Original Birth Certificates (OBC) and the issuance of Amended Birth Certificates (ABC). **This amended certificate acts as a “legal fiction,” legally laundering the individual’s true identity by falsely listing adoptive parents as the biological parents who gave birth to the child**. This system is heavily guarded by archaic state secrecy laws, such as Victoria’s *Adoption Act 1984*, which explicitly prohibit general access to original adoption records. The state subjugates the human right to know one’s origins to outdated domestic “clean break” theories.4. Institutional Hypocrisy and the Disparity of Legal RecognitionThe Australian system demonstrates profound institutional hypocrisy in how it applies identity rights. While Australian states have progressively streamlined birth certificate rectification for trans and gender-diverse individuals to reflect their authentic selves, they aggressively deny this exact right of self-determination to adoptees. **Adult adoptees in full reunion are legally prohibited from obtaining “no-fault, no-fee” discharges of their adoption contracts to restore their original familial truth**. This disparity is enforced by political gatekeeping; for example, a Queensland Member of Parliament, Joan Pease, actively deleted comments and blocked adoptees who simply requested equal rights to identity rectification.5. Systemic Data Omission as a Tool of ErasureThe Australian government masks the true scale of this crisis through deliberate statistical omission. The primary national data report, AIHW’s “Adoptions Australia,” narrowly tracks only current legal adoptions (fewer than 1,500 per year). **This national data strategy purposefully excludes the estimated 250,000+ victims of historical forced adoptions, as well as the tens of thousands of children currently experiencing kinship disruption in OOHC**. By refusing to measure longitudinal adult outcomes—such as identity restoration, access to records, and long-term mental health impacts—the state ensures this human rights violation remains structurally invisible.Core Demands to the United NationsAustralia will remain in violation of international law until it confronts the lifelong impacts of its family separation policies. We urgently request that the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child issue a formal directive requiring the Australian Government to:1. Establish a National Social Justice Commissioner for Family Separation and Reconnection with a comprehensive, lifelong mandate that bridges the current 0–18 continuity gap.2. Empower this Commissioner to override state-level secrecy provisions, legally mandating equitable access to Original Birth Certificates and implementing accessible, “no-fault, no-fee” adoption discharge processes.3. **Enforce national data reform** to track the long-term outcomes of family separation, explicitly measuring the speedy re-establishment of identity as mandated by UNCRC Article 8.We ask for your immediate intervention to hold Australia accountable to its international human rights obligations.Part 2 Dear Members of the Committee, this is directed to you
This communication serves as an urgent escalation regarding the Commonwealth of Australia’s active and ongoing violation of Article 8 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC).While we have previously highlighted Australia’s failure to establish adequate human rights oversight, asking the Australian government to investigate itself is no longer sufficient. Australia actively utilizes the institution of adoption as a mechanism of “biopower” and “colonial psychology” to socially engineer families and assert authority over the biological continuity of its citizens.We are calling on the United Nations to directly address and formally condemn the core legal mechanisms of adoption in Australia, which fundamentally strip individuals of their sovereignty and cause profound, lifelong psychosocial harm.1. Demand for the UN to Formally Condemn the “Amended Birth Certificate” (ABC) The core of the Australian adoption apparatus relies on the “legal fiction” of the Amended Birth Certificate (ABC). When an infant is adopted, the state physically seals the Original Birth Certificate (OBC) and issues a fraudulent document that falsely lists the adoptive parents as the biological parents who gave birth to the child. This is state-sanctioned historical revisionism and acts as a primary tool for “systemic identity erasure” and “legal laundering”. We demand the UN officially declare the issuance of the ABC an ongoing violation of UNCRC Article 8, which guarantees the right to preserve one’s true identity and family relations.2. Demand a UN Directive for “No-Fault, No-Fee” Adoption Discharges It is a profound violation of fundamental contract law and human rights to permanently enforce a legally binding identity contract upon an individual who was days or weeks old when it was signed on their behalf. Currently, adult adoptees in full reunion are legally trapped; they are forced into grueling, re-traumatizing Supreme Court battles to dissolve these contracts, as “no-fault, no-fee” administrative discharges are functionally impossible. We demand the UN direct Australia to immediately implement a “no-fault, no-fee” administrative pathway for adult adoptees to discharge their adoptions and legally restore their original identities.3. Demand International Recognition of State-Sanctioned Adoption Trauma (EPCACE) The UN must formally recognize that Australia’s historical “clean break” theory—which mandated total secrecy and the suppression of the child’s birth identity—has caused catastrophic psychological damage. Foundational pre-verbal separation trauma, combined with the societal expectation of “gratitude” and disenfranchised grief, leads to severe psychosocial disabilities like Complex PTSD. Crucially, the psychological profile of isolated adoptees mirrors that of prisoners of war or hostages, fitting the clinical diagnosis of Enduring Personality Change After Catastrophic Experience (EPCACE). The UN must publicly acknowledge that state-sanctioned identity erasure actively manufactures this trauma.4. Demand a Direct UN Special Inquiry into Adoption as “Biopower” Australia’s systemic reliance on fragmented state laws ensures an accountability vacuum, allowing the state to use adoption to define “who belongs” and transfer the un-costed societal debts of trauma directly onto the adoptee. We petition the UN to launch its own Special Inquiry into Australia’s adoption framework, investigating it as the “ontological and epistemological fault line of colonial psychology”. This inquiry must examine the state’s biopolitical ownership of human identity and the structural inequalities that enable intergenerational harm.Australia will remain in violation of international law until the institution of adoption itself is recognized as a fundamental human rights breach. We urge the Committee to intervene immediately, bypass Australia’s domestic bureaucratic deflection, and hold the state accountable for the lifelong ontological destruction of its citizens.
To further understand the lived mechanics of this colonial psychology, I direct the Committee to the detailed analysis and multimedia resources available on my public dossier at https://thoughtlessdel.substack.com/p/the-case-for-a-national-commissioner. The depth of this systemic erasure is highlighted by the staggering irony of my own existence: I am a white, stolen adoptee who is simultaneously the biological son of Mark Moffatt, the producer of the iconic First Nations land rights and sovereignty anthem “Treaty”
https://thoughtlessdel.substack.com/p/the-case-for-a-national-commissionerSincerely,
Shane Bouel
This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit thoughtlessdel.substack.com/subscribe
