Hy and Christopher kick off the program, talking about the likely redraw of the LA congressional map, which looks amazingly like the 5-1 map that was in existence prior to Governor Jeff Landry coming to the office. There are a few minor differences, including the fact that St. Bernard Parish will no longer be divided between the First and Second Congressional Districts, but, nonetheless, the map has angered activists on the Right and the Left. Republicans wanted a 6-0 map with (mostly) undivided parishes and the 2nd District having a White plurality. Democrats were seeking two African-American majority districts.
Hy and Christopher then discuss the hundredth anniversary of Route 66, and President Cameron Henry’s warning that failure to pass Constitutional Amendment 3 on teacher pay might mean that public school educator and staff salaries are cut.
The focus of the conversation, though, centers on the spat between the Attorney General and the New Orleans City Council. As Christopher writes in The Louisiana Weekly:
Recall petition against AG as Murrill seeks to fire NOLA mayor and council over clerk’s election
On Wednesday, May 13, a little over a week after filing a petition to recall Governor Jeff Landry, Marian Gbaiwon Hills and Katilyn P. Stepter, the same residents who filed that first petition, did so against Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill. Their action occurred against a backdrop of legal action and threats against the mayor and New Orleans City Council for calling a Nov. 3 special election to fill the newly created Clerk of Court’s office. It is an election that Murrill’s nemesis—exonerated convict-turned-victorious criminal clerk of court candidate Calvin Duncan—would likely win.
Reasons for the recall listed on the petition outline Murrill’s lack of fairness and accountability, using taxpayer dollars to push personal religious and political agendas, pushing religion into public schools, undermining the voices of voters in majority-Black communities, and government overreach into women’s healthcare decisions. A spokesperson from the Secretary of State’s Office explained that the petition must be signed by at least 20 percent of the electorate, a prodigious threshold of approximately 500,000 signatures, which has not been reached in decades. The petition, signed and dated, must then be submitted to the Registrar of Voters for each parish no later than 180 days following the day of filing with the state.
The recall effort happens in the background of, and perhaps partially due to, the Attorney General’s loud objections to the decision by the mayor, the district attorney, and five members of the New Orleans City Council to call a special election this autumn for clerk of court, as well as to appoint retired Judge Calvin Johnson as interim Orleans Parish Clerk of Court. Murrill sent letters on Wednesday, May 13 to Johnson, District Attorney Williams, Mayor Moreno, and councilmembers Morrell, Willard, McCarron, King, and Hughes demanding they reverse course on the council’s resolution and the related special election on Nov. 3. Murrill argued that the council’s resolutions to appoint Johnson and call a special election were based on the false narrative that Act 15 created a new, vacant office.
According to Murrill, the law did not create a vacancy. She said it eliminated the criminal clerk’s office position won by Calvin Duncan. Act 15 did not create a vacancy. It abolished the former criminal clerk’s office, transferred its authority, duties, records, and funds to the former civil clerk’s office, and renamed that continuing office the Clerk of Court for Orleans Parish. Chelsey Richard Napoleon remains the lawful Clerk of Court for Orleans Parish and will remain so for a full four-year term. Civil Clerk of Court Napoleon has also filed suit in court claiming this.
The language of Act 15, the new law that combines the civil and criminal clerks of court in Orleans Parish, appears to support the position of Napoleon and Murrill, yet it does not preclude a special election for a new office either. As page 13 of Act 15 reads, the office of clerk of criminal district court for the parish of Orleans shall be abolished at the end of May 3, 2026, and before the term of any other criminal clerk of court begins. Immediately thereafter, the authority, functions, duties, and responsibilities of that office, along with all books, papers, records, monies, actions, and other property, shall be transferred to the clerk of the civil district court for the parish of Orleans, who shall thereafter be referred to as the Clerk of Court for the parish of Orleans.
Murrill has publicly worried that a special election for clerk would not return Napoleon to office, but instead would elect once more Calvin Duncan, the victor of the competitive criminal clerk’s race last fall. Murrill considers the exonerated one-time inmate a criminal danger.
When Duncan won the criminal clerk’s office, the Attorney General called upon Governor Landry to expend a significant amount of political capital to abolish the criminal clerk’s office, ensuring that Calvin Duncan would never take office—or so she thought.
Ostensibly, the Attorney General’s threats against the New Orleans mayor, district attorney, and the majority of the council—threatening the loss of their posts if they call an election—comes from a fear that the Orleans electorate, many of whom did not even support Calvin Duncan last autumn, would vote for him for the newly unified clerk’s office. This battle also occurs in the background of canceled congressional elections aimed at eliminating Louisiana’s second African-American U.S. House district. Local Black voters seemingly already want to send a message to the GOP administration in Baton Rouge.
In her letter to Council President J.P. Morrell, Murrill threatened that he, four of his colleagues, the district attorney, and the mayor have put their own offices in jeopardy, and that the council’s resolutions to install Johnson as interim clerk and call a Nov. 3 special election could invite serious consequences under the state’s usurper laws, implying criminal prosecution.
Mayor Moreno, replying in a video posted to her social media pages, said she will not be intimidated or threatened by the state Attorney General. Moreno added that it is surprising that the Attorney General put all of this in a letter, considering that there is a criminal law that prohibits intimidating or threatening a public official in an effort to influence a decision or change their position.
Further complicating the legal battle, the Louisiana Supreme Court has barred interim Orleans Parish Clerk of Court Calvin Johnson from performing any clerk duties while it considers legal challenges to a state law that merged the parish’s civil and criminal courts. The ruling came Thursday, two days before Louisiana’s party primary elections. Civil Clerk of Court Chelsey Napoleon handled the election process for May 16.
Murrill said no public official should try to displace Napoleon or recognize a competing claim to the office until the court rules. Praising the state Supreme Court’s order, Murrill declared that there is no interim appointee—there is only one clerk. Chelsey Napoleon has always had full control of the office, and she said she is glad the Supreme Court stepped in to ensure continuity of those ongoing operations.