"The MIT 95% AI Enterprise Failure Rate Report: True or False?" discusses the high failure rate of generative AI pilot projects in businesses, claiming 95% do not reach production with measurable impact. The report, titled "The GenAI Divide: State of AI in Business 2025," scrutinises the methodologies and findings of this controversial MIT study, which involved a multi-method research design including interviews and surveys. It highlights key reasons for these failures, such as messy workflows, the "verification tax" on employees, and a lack of governance and strategic planning. Conversely, the article also identifies strategies employed by the successful 5%, which include a workflow-first methodology, investment in foundational data infrastructure, and systems thinking over isolated experimentation. Ultimately, the piece asserts that the high failure rate is not a condemnation of AI technology itself, but rather an indictment of flawed enterprise adoption strategies that neglect fundamental data engineering principles. It concludes by offering strategic recommendations for data engineering teams to increase their success rates.

• Join the Data Innovators Exchange for free at https://www.skool.com/data-management-innovators-4116/about
• Sign up for the free Data Pro Newsletter at https://www.datapro.news/subscribe