Ah, group work!
For some of us, that phrase induces PTSD from projects in which we knew that we would have to drag our group members along, hoping they would carry their share of the load, only to take it all on the day before the due date and making sure we all don’t fail Mr. Smith’s American History class and ruin our lives forever.
Yeah, this one is personal for me.
Collaboration, the fourth of the 4 C’s we’ve discussed here on The Greater Educator Podcast, can easily be checked off the list by even the most reflective educator. Anytime we put students into groups of any kind, it’s easy to check collaboration off our list and start focusing on the thousands of other learning objectives we’ve prepped for our students.
Collaboration can take on so many different forms. We can obviously see it in our classrooms, but it’s also possible online. We can pick the groups our students work in randomly, or based on data, or we can just let students form their own groups. We can establish formal rules for collaboration, or we can allow it to develop organically.
Digging even deeper, collaboration can be an integral part of the learning experience...or not. I think that of the 4 C’s, communication, creativity, critical thinking, and collaboration, it is this last one that can seem so easy to implement incorrectly. It’s important for us to take a second to admit that, sometimes, asking students to work together on something doesn’t necessarily add to the learning process - it can actually detract from it.
Take, for example, the aforementioned group project - the kind in which 4 or 5 students are asked to prepare a presentation for the class. Without a strict rubric, and sometimes, even with one, we know what happens. Our motivated students take control of the project while our less motivated ones passively go along for the ride. Not only do we have some students doing more than their fair share of work, but we also have some students minimally engaging with the content. Worse yet, we just taught our students to dread working with others.
So, before we talk about becoming a greater educator in this regard, we need to take a good hard look in the mirror and ask ourselves if we’re putting our students in the same painful situations we were forced into when we were in school.
So, what’s collaboration look like done right?
The answer lies in the pedagogy - what do we want our students to learn and how can that be facilitated by having students work with each other?
We want our students to be prepared to take on the challenges of life after graduation - challenges that are too big for them to solve on their own and require working with others. Without effective collaboration, this podcast wouldn’t exist right now.
In order for The Greater Educator to exist, Rachael and I have had to apply our personal, different sets of skills to the project. Our personal opinions about the direction the podcast should go, the design of the logo, even the name itself, needed to be checked off of each other. Strong feelings about a particular topic were met with critical review, negotiation, and compromise. We have worked together, in person and sometimes not. We have engaged in writing, recording, designing, organizing our materials and our schedules, deciding which pieces of business were able to be done in person, and which could be done on our own time. We've also learned together and from each other through this process. In the end, what we have here is something that could not have existed without each others input.
This collaborative effort has been necessary because of the work that needed to be done, the limited resources we have, and the value that is gained by each of us bringing our talents and skills to a project we are both passionate about.
Does this sound like the kind of group work that is being done in our classrooms?
---
Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/the-greater-educator/support