This talk was given as part of the Oxford Transitional Justice Research (OTJR) Seminar Series. Myanmar's mass-atrocities against the Rohingya minority, qualified by UN sources as a genocide, is one of the most pressing accountability challenges of our time. This has resulted in a mass-exodus of up to 1 million refugees in neighbouring Bangladesh with harrowing stories of violence. Given the failure of the UN Security Council to make a Chapter VII referral to the ICC, what options are available for eradicating impunity?

The ICC Rohingya Case: Radical or Routine?

Oxford Transitional Justice Research (OTJR) is an inter-disciplinary network of more than 100 Oxford staff and students working broadly on issues of transition in societies recovering from mass conflict and/or repressive rule. OTJR is dedicated to producing high-quality scholarship that connects intimately to practical and policy questions in transitional justice, focusing on the following themes: Prosecutions, Truth Commissions, Local and traditional practices, Compensation and reparations, Theoretical and philosophical debates in transitional justice, Institutional reform and Archives of tribunal and other transitional justice materials. The OTJR seminar programme is held weekly and reflects these aims.

Share The ICC Rohingya Case: Radical or Routine?

Sign up to save your podcasts

The ICC Rohingya Case: Radical or Routine?

The ICC Rohingya Case: Radical or Routine?

More shows like Oxford Transitional Justice Research Seminars

Philosophy for Beginners

Approaching Shakespeare

General Philosophy

Anthropology

Aesthetics and Philosophy of Art lectures

Theoretical Physics - From Outer Space to Plasma

Critical Reasoning: A Romp Through the Foothills of Logic

The Secrets of Mathematics

Critical Reasoning for Beginners

Oxford Physics Public Lectures