BROADCASTING VS NARROWCASTING
Customer acquisition costs continue to rise aggressively, and that trend shows no signs of stopping. Today we discuss broadcasting versus narrowcasting to explore alternative strategic approaches that get more with less. Moreover, Mike Ferranti will cover five steps that you can take now to address the realities of aggressive customer growth targets.
What follows is a lightly edited transcript of Episode 5 of the Inevitable Success Podcast with Damian Bergamaschi and special guest Mike Ferranti.
Transcript
Customer Acquisition in 2018
Damian: It’s just the beginning of the year 2018. We have Q4 behind us. What are you hearing from marketers about their marketing initiatives and plans in 2018?
Mike: That’s a very timely question. I guess there are a few things: Across the board—and I’m talking to lots of folks—there are a few major themes. For one, this is the year they’re going to get their data act together, and it doesn’t matter if you’re dealing with a hundred-billion-dollar conglomerate or the 50-million-dollar middle market business. One approach is to evolve it to a level that they always wanted to be at; a lot of brands have been working on this for the last few years. It started several years ago when the term Big Data first splashed upon the scene. They want to use that data to inform their relationships with customers to grow revenue and profit.
Another thing that many brands are thinking about is customer acquisition. It was expensive last year, and the year before that, and the year before that, and the year before that. It’s expensive this year, and probably more so as bid-based systems have taken over digital, and digital has continued to take over advertising. The more bidders you have, the more expensive it gets.
Damian: There were recently a few studies—put out independently on Google—that show that the cost per acquisition in each respective industry has been going up materially.
Mike: That’s not likely to change. Competition is going to be greater as a result. The bar is higher. It’s a wonderful thing if your name rhymes with either Google or Facebook.
It’s a big challenge when we have this perfectly competitive situation, just like when there are lots of participants in the stock market, P-E multiples tend to swell. In our industry as marketers, CPA, CPO, or cost-per-customer-acquired tends to swell as there are many more participants. That’s on everybody’s mind right now because in a good economy with a lot of access to capital any brand right now is trying to become more ambitious—because of course they want to grow when things are good. Unfortunately, that means they also have higher costs of acquisition. Brands are really trying to sort that out. They’re trying to use data on things like programmatic and CRM to improve their cost per order and improve the customers that they acquire.
Budgeting for Customer Acquisition
Damian: Do you hear that they are adjusting their plan based on their ideas about where the economy is now, and where it’s going?
Mike: Going back a couple of years, there was some boardroom speculation that things are good until they’re not. I think a lot of brands that we deal with—and this is an overhang since the Great Recession—have ambition, but they’re careful. They wish to couple that ambition with discipline. In digital and in measured marketing that means having great analytics, clear targets, and clear expectations of what marketing should do. That puts some pressure on the marketers as well.
Damian: So what are some of the things that these marketers are doing to deal with that...