
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
What does it mean to build infrastructure that goes beyond causing or just avoiding friction with the policy side of the table? In this episode, David Ho—former lawyer, infrastructure strategist, and seasoned capital program and project manager—joins Riccardo to discuss how major projects are shaped not only by procurement models but by the complex, nuanced world of policy-making.
David has experience in helping stakeholders understand the limits of doing everything at once and the possibilities that emerge when we confront different questions. From collaborative contracting models to data governance in healthcare infrastructure, he challenges them to think beyond technical fixes and ask, What’s the real problem we’re solving for? The relationship between infrastructure professionals and policymakers should involve informing policy, not just executing it.
David and Riccardo explore why infrastructure can struggle to keep pace with need and the role risk aversion plays in enacting change.
”It's like we didn't examine what were the original root cause problems that were driving us to what we've been feeling and seeing in the last few years. And by that I mean what are both the political and market dynamics that are bigger than just us, uh, in the infrastructure space? I'll speak for what I see in Ontario, in Canada, because I obviously know that best. But I, I have a suspicion this is very, very similar in other places around the world. If you ask people, you know, why are we going into a collaborative model, by the way? You know, whatever your working definition of collaborative or progressive actually means, I think you would get a lot of different answers of what people are trying to solve for. And none of them are necessarily wrong. But if you add them together,sometimes we try and be too intellectually precise. We talk about risk, actually we talk about risk a lot, but we don't talk about market forces and dynamics and we don't talk about political pressures other than to just be really negative about them, but they're actually real.” - David Ho
Key Takeaways:
The conversation doesn’t stop here—connect and converse with our community via LinkedIn:
Music: "A New Tomorrow" by Chordial Music. Licensed through PremiumBeat.
What does it mean to build infrastructure that goes beyond causing or just avoiding friction with the policy side of the table? In this episode, David Ho—former lawyer, infrastructure strategist, and seasoned capital program and project manager—joins Riccardo to discuss how major projects are shaped not only by procurement models but by the complex, nuanced world of policy-making.
David has experience in helping stakeholders understand the limits of doing everything at once and the possibilities that emerge when we confront different questions. From collaborative contracting models to data governance in healthcare infrastructure, he challenges them to think beyond technical fixes and ask, What’s the real problem we’re solving for? The relationship between infrastructure professionals and policymakers should involve informing policy, not just executing it.
David and Riccardo explore why infrastructure can struggle to keep pace with need and the role risk aversion plays in enacting change.
”It's like we didn't examine what were the original root cause problems that were driving us to what we've been feeling and seeing in the last few years. And by that I mean what are both the political and market dynamics that are bigger than just us, uh, in the infrastructure space? I'll speak for what I see in Ontario, in Canada, because I obviously know that best. But I, I have a suspicion this is very, very similar in other places around the world. If you ask people, you know, why are we going into a collaborative model, by the way? You know, whatever your working definition of collaborative or progressive actually means, I think you would get a lot of different answers of what people are trying to solve for. And none of them are necessarily wrong. But if you add them together,sometimes we try and be too intellectually precise. We talk about risk, actually we talk about risk a lot, but we don't talk about market forces and dynamics and we don't talk about political pressures other than to just be really negative about them, but they're actually real.” - David Ho
Key Takeaways:
The conversation doesn’t stop here—connect and converse with our community via LinkedIn:
Music: "A New Tomorrow" by Chordial Music. Licensed through PremiumBeat.