HE was Vicar General of Dublin, Kildare, and Ferns, ‘a good and pious man, who has great influence in the ecclesiastical concerns of this kingdom.’1 His capture is spoken of in a letter of Chichester to the Earl of Salisbury, of 26th Feb, 1606 : ‘They have taken one Lawler, a priest, whose name is well known to the Lord Lieutenant. They got him by the endeavour of Sir Oliver Lambert, who set his lieutenant, who was then one of their provost marshals, to watch him, & he was quietly taken, with some papers, and divers popish trinkets. He is a notable seducer of the people and called himself Vicar General of Dublin and Kildare, & so reputed throughout Leinster.’2 On Mar 7th, the Lord Deputy3 wrote to the Privy Council from Dublin : On the 26th of last month, by intelligence from Oliver Lambert, there was apprehended by him in this city, one Robert Lalor, a priest, and a dangerous instrument for these many years, who by his own confession acknowledges that he has for the last twelve years occupied the place of Vicar General in the three principal dioceses of the Pale, to wit, Dublin, Kildare, and Ferns; first, by a commission from two Popish bishops and Bishop Cranagh,4 authorized by Bulls from Rome, & since by a like confirmation to him by Mathias de la Vega,5 a Spaniard, who came to Kinsale with Don John,6 & who after the composition made at Kinsale, sent a commission by Don Pedro under his hand and seal to the said Lalor, which he now confesseth he received. They now in examination of him.’7 He was indicted under 2 Eliz. c.i., for advancing and upholding foreign jurisdiction. If we believe Cox, he humbled himself to the Court, and voluntary and upon oath made a recognition, - 1. That he wasn't lawful Vicar General in the dioceses of Dublin, Kildare, and Ferns. 2. He doth acknowledge King James to be his supreme governor in all causes, as well ecclesiastical as civil. 3. That all bishops ordained by the King’s authority within any of his dominions are lawful bishops. 4. He professeth himself willing to obey the King as in all his lawful commandments, either concerning his function of priesthood or any other duty belonging to a good subject.’ He was indulged with more liberty, & would undoubtedly have been enlarged if he had not privately protested that his confession did not extend to the King’s authority in Spiritual causes but in temporal only. And this being told the Lord Deputy, it was resolved to try him upon the statute of præmunire.1 Upon this indictment he was found guilty, & Justice Sarsfield pronounced the sentence of the law against him. On April 23rd, the Deputy and Council wrote to the Lords of the Council, that ‘they had advertised them in their last of the apprehension of one Lalor, a priest. They could not then write anything more particularly of him, but having twice since examined him, they find by his own confession that he hath incurred the old statute of præmunire, & of the first offence of the statute of the second of the late Queen in this kingdom.’ 1 Cox says that he did not hear that the sentence was ever executed on him2. 1 Ibid., p. 448 2 Hib. Angl.., ii, ll 1 See preface to C.S.PI. (1606-8), p. lxxv. 1 Hib. Angi., ii.II 1 Letter of F. Holywood, S.J., in Dist. irishmen, p. 171 2 C.S.P.I. (1603-1606) p. 406 3 Sir Arthur Chichester 4 Dermot Creagh, appointed Bishop of Cork and Cloyne in 1560. The date of his death is uncertain. See Brady’s Epis. Succ., ii.90 5 Matthew de Oviedo, Archbishop of Dublin from 1600 to 1609. See Moran’s Archbishops, p. 193 6 The commander of the Spanish forces which came to assist the Irish in 1601 7 C.S.Rl. (1606— 1608), p.416