Summary:

In this episode, Jim Robbins, the host and Dean of Academics at the Institute of World Politics (IWP) in Washington, DC, examines the ongoing conflict in Gaza and potential post-conflict scenarios. The discussion covers Israel's stance on demilitarization and deradicalization in Gaza, the challenges of achieving a two-state solution, the role of the US in conflict resolution, and the potential for peace and prosperity in the region.

Topics discussed:

1. Israel's Post-Conflict Plans for Gaza
2. Challenges of the Two-State Solution
3. Feasibility of Two-State Solution Implementation
4. Gaza's Potential for Peace and Prosperity
5. Path to Peace in Gaza

References:

- Institute of World Politics (IWP): [iwp.edu](https://www.iwp.edu/)

In this episode, Dean of Academics Jim Robbins converses with Dr. Christopher Harmon on the complexities surrounding terrorism, Islamophobia, guerrilla warfare, and the current situation in Yemen.

Topics discussed:

1. The Challenge of Discussing Terrorism

2. Addressing Extremism Through Education

3. Distinguishing Terrorism and Guerrilla Warfare

4. The Situation in Yemen

References:

- Institute of World Politics (IWP): [iwp.edu](https://www.iwp.edu/)

- Geneva Convention: [Article 4 of Geneva Convention III](https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/Article.xsp?action=openDocument&documentId=F0C6A1E0A9A8D030C12563CD0051C2CD)

Summary

In this podcast episode, Jim Robbins discusses the recent Iranian proxy attack on a US installation in Jordan and the Biden administration's response. He critiques the administration's approach to dealing with Iran's provocations and proposes a more assertive strategy.

Topics discussed:

• Iranian proxies' attack on a US installation in northeast Jordan
• Biden administration's reported plans for a campaign in response
• Statements from National Security Council spokesman John Kirby and an unnamed US official regarding the attack
• Proportionality as deterrence strategy

References:

The Institute of World Politics (https://www.iwp.edu/)

Summary:

In this episode, Dean of Academics at the Institute of World Politics, Jim Robbins, is joined by Dr. Chris Harmon, an expert on terrorism and counterterrorism. They discuss the topic of defining terrorism and its application to the Houthi group. The conversation covers various definitions of terrorism, including state-sponsored terrorism, and the implications of these definitions in government policies and international law.

Topics discussed:

- The Houthi group and its terror designation by the Biden administration

- Defining terrorism and its various aspects

- The United Nations' stance on terrorism and its enforcement provisions

- State-sponsored terrorism and its inclusion in the definition of terrorism

- Different definitions of terrorism in the US government and their impact

- Historical perspectives on terrorism and its acceptance by terrorist groups

- Al Qaeda's magazine, Inspire, and its content

References:

- Institute of World Politics: [https://www.iwp.edu](https://www.iwp.edu)

- United Nations: [https://www.un.org](https://www.un.org)

In this podcast episode, Jim Robbins, the Dean of Academics at the Institute of World Politics in Washington DC, discusses the recent airstrikes against the Houthi rebels in Yemen. He delves into the implications of the attacks, the responses from the Houthi rebels, and the geopolitical context of the conflict. The episode sheds light on the asymmetric nature of the conflict, the role of Iran, and the potential for escalation.

Key takeaways:

- The conflict in Yemen involving the Houthi rebels has significant geopolitical implications and is not just a regional issue.

- The asymmetric nature of the conflict and the determination of the Houthis pose challenges for traditional conflict management strategies.

- The technological advances in warfare pose a significant risk to maritime security, and there is a need for comprehensive strategies to protect ships in conflict zones.

References:

- The Institute of World Politics - www.iwp.edu

- UN Security Council Resolution 2722

Summary:

In this episode of THE IWP PODCAST, Jim Robbins, Dean of Academics at the Institute of World Politics, discusses the escalating conflict between Israel and the Lebanon-based terrorist group Hezbollah. He explores recent events, including targeted strikes and retaliatory attacks, and analyzes the potential for a full-scale war between the two parties. While it is not in the interest of either side to engage in a war, history has shown that crises can lead to conflict regardless of rationality. Robbins also examines the potential consequences and involvement of other actors, such as Iran and the United States, in the event of a war.

Topics discussed:

1. Background on the conflict: A low-intensity conflict has been ongoing along Israel's northern border since the Hamas attacks in the south in 2023. Hezbollah has been carrying out small-scale attacks, and Israel has responded with counterstrikes. Israeli civilians have been evacuated from the north to protect them from possible rocket attacks.

2. Recent events: The conflict escalated on January 2nd when a senior Hamas official was assassinated in Beirut. Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah threatened revenge, and the next day, Hezbollah struck an Israeli air base, causing severe damage. Israel warned Hezbollah that no terrorist is immune and took out a senior member of Hezbollah's elite force. Hezbollah retaliated with a drone attack on an IDF headquarters, but there was no significant damage.

3. Hezbollah's intentions: Nasrallah and Hezbollah's deputy leader have stated that they do not want to expand the war beyond Lebanon. They are signaling that they want to deter Israel rather than engage in a wider conflict.

4. Potential consequences: Hezbollah is a powerful force with a large arsenal of rockets, missiles, anti-tank and anti-aircraft weapons, and drones, many of which are supplied by Iran. A war with Hezbollah would be costly for Israel. However, Hezbollah would also face the effects of war on Lebanon itself, and Iran may be more interested in keeping Hezbollah in reserve for future conflicts.

5. United States involvement: While the Biden administration does not want to see a wider war develop, the US might conduct limited airstrikes against critical Hezbollah targets to help end the conflict quickly. Iran would have to consider the possibility of US intervention on behalf of Israel.

Key takeaways:

- The conflict between Israel and Hezbollah has been escalating, with targeted strikes and retaliatory attacks.

- Neither side wants a full-scale war, but history has shown that crises can lead to conflict regardless of rationality.

- Hezbollah wants to deter Israel rather than engage in a wider war.

- The potential consequences of a war include significant damage and casualties, as well as involvement from other actors such as Iran and the United States.

- The situation is fluid, and the outcome is uncertain.

References:

- Institute of World Politics: ( https://www.iwp.edu/ )