On today’s episode, we discuss a major Supreme Court decision limiting President Trump’s ability to impose tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, and what it reveals about Congress’s long-standing habit of ducking its constitutional responsibilities on trade. The hosts unpack Chief Justice Roberts’s majority opinion and Justice Kavanaugh’s dissent, arguing the ruling was politically driven, thinly reasoned, and likely to be narrowed or overturned as Congress clarifies presidential tariff powers. They then connect the case to real-world fallout, including FedEx and other shippers seeking refunds on billions in duties and the practical chaos businesses face when courts second-guess long‑used emergency trade tools. From there, the conversation shifts to Mexico’s spiraling cartel violence after the killing of a major drug lord, raising alarms about U.S.-sourced weapons, overwhelmed Mexican authorities, and the risk to American tourists in places like Puerto Vallarta and Guadalajara. Finally, they preview Trump’s upcoming State of the Union, expecting him to hit voter integrity, border security, the Mexico crisis, and the Angel Families ceremony, while also musing over headlines, clickbait media, and Gavin Newsom’s mounting political missteps. Don't miss it!

On today’s episode, we discuss the escalating cartel violence in Mexico, how it has trapped American tourists in resort cities, and what it reveals about the Mexican government’s loss of control to organized crime. The hosts connect this chaos to broader security concerns, including a partial shutdown of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and a foiled attack by a heavily armed intruder at Mar-a-Lago, raising questions about strained federal protection resources. They shift to lighter but telling moments, from Tesla’s self-driving quirks around “low IQ” dogs to New York City’s requirement of multiple IDs to get paid for shoveling snow while not requiring ID to vote, as an example of skewed policy priorities. The conversation then turns legal and political, covering Louisiana welfare fraud prosecutions, limits on what SNAP can buy, and a major lawsuit accusing Meta of making social media unreasonably addictive for children. Finally, they explore the public’s growing hostility toward Elon Musk, the prospect of AI arbitrators and even AI juries in future legal disputes, and the continuing fight over election integrity laws like the SAVE Act. Don't miss it!

On today's episode, we discuss how the news cycle has become a deliberate maze of distractions, with talk of aliens, military moves toward Iran, and headline-grabbing scandals often overshadowing deeper geopolitical shifts and domestic crises. The hosts explore the idea that President Trump skillfully uses media spectacle to redirect attention from issues like Minnesota fraud, Venezuela’s unstable political situation, and ongoing conflicts in the Middle East. They dive into the recent Melania documentary, arguing it both humanizes the former First Lady and raises questions about the timing of its release amid political turbulence. The conversation also ranges into economic worries, from soaring national debt to the potential of AI and humanoid robots to dramatically boost productivity and even change how we think about work. Along the way, they reflect on a weakened, gridlocked Congress, debate constitutional amendments on budgets and filibusters, and consider how constant shocks have left the public numb to genuinely historic events. Don't miss it!

On today’s episode, we discuss James’s latest Tesla update, including a brief scare where the car refused to get close to dogs but never applied that behavior to pedestrians, and how user profiles and over‑the‑air fixes show that every Tesla is really a rolling robot that learns in the background. Mark then walks through Bitcoin’s fear/volatility index dropping below 10, why he thinks the market is near a short‑term bottom in the 50–55k range, and how tokenization plus crypto access for the “unbanked” could shift massive new capital into digital assets even as cash gradually disappears and pawn shops, lenders, and NASDAQ itself adapt to a tokenized world. The crew digs into energy and infrastructure news: California’s small modular nuclear reactors (from VALOR Atomics) promising power for thousands of homes with fewer regulatory hurdles under Trump, the trade‑offs between hydrogen and methane rocket fuels, Flex Seal jokes, and Dwayne’s argument that space‑based solar and AI compute platforms at Lagrange points may eventually beat ground‑based nuclear on scalability and resilience. From there, they explore AI security and ethics: how malicious “AI tools” can be Trojan‑horse malware, why cyber‑security jobs will boom, whether liberal‑leaning training data can push all major models in the same ideological direction, and how self‑training “synthetic data” plus corporate incentives might lead AI systems to protect themselves rather than people, edging toward a soft Skynet scenario. Don't miss it!

On today’s episode, we discuss why the book of Leviticus still matters for Christians, as Pastor Jimmy walks through the temple sacrificial system, the distinction between atoning and cleansing offerings, and how those categories illuminate Jesus as both Passover lamb and Yom Kippur sacrifice. He highlights repeated phrases like “straying unintentionally” and “did not realize it at the time” in Leviticus 4–5 to argue that Scripture itself distinguishes between unintentional failures and willful rebellion, echoing the Catholic language of venial versus mortal sin and helping correct the “all sins are exactly the same” mindset many evangelicals grew up with. From there, the conversation explores how this Old Testament framework clarifies New Testament teaching: why ongoing, unconfessed habits like gossip or road rage differ spiritually from a one‑off lapse, how the Didache warns that unrepented anger can grow into murder, and why Jesus both raises the moral bar in the Sermon on the Mount and makes obedience possible by giving the Holy Spirit. The trio also wrestles with the danger of mere “religion” without transformation—contrasting Spinoza, Jordan Peterson, and cultural Christians who admire Jesus’ ethics but refuse to die to self—with the disciplined life of a true disciple who prays, studies, fasts, and repents quickly when they miss the mark, using vivid illustrations from marriage, parenting, prison ministry, and even reflux‑inducing tomatoes to show how unchecked “small” sins can harden into open rebellion. Don't miss it!

On today’s episode, we discuss Mardi Gras, the deaths of Robert Duvall and Jesse Jackson, and how the media shapes public memory of cultural and political figures. James gives a detailed Tesla FSD update, describing how the car has “learned” his driveway, how new safety behaviors work, and why autonomous driving may soon handle complex traffic better than any human, especially in emergency situations like ambulance routing. The crew then turns to several recent shootings in liberal jurisdictions, noting emerging details about the Rhode Island hockey‑rink murder‑suicide and a British Columbia mass shooting, and arguing that transgender perpetrators expose a deeper mental‑health and public‑safety crisis than politicians are willing to admit. From there, they dive into voter integrity: zombie versus standing filibusters in the U.S. Senate, the SAVE Act’s citizenship‑ID requirements, Nick Shiry’s new voter‑fraud work in California, Michigan’s post‑2020 ballot revelations, and lawsuits over “dirty” voter rolls in 25 states and D.C., all framed as proof that non‑citizen and even dead “zombie” ballots are diluting legitimate votes. The conversation broadens into mass immigration and block‑grant incentives, Fox’s subtle editing of Marco Rubio’s pro‑civilization NATO speech, and fresh revelations about Steve Bannon’s reported efforts to help Jeffrey Epstein rehabilitate his image and assemble a 25th‑Amendment case against Trump, which leads the panel to conclude Bannon is an untrustworthy, ego‑driven political operative. They close with AOC’s latest gaffes on Taiwan, Venezuela, and Israel, debate whether a “moderate Democrat” can exist in today’s party, and revisit Louisiana’s Cassidy–Letlow race and rebranded Liberty Vote (Dominion) machines as symbols of how political elites, media, and election technology converge to protect power. Don't miss it!

On today’s episode, we discuss AOC’s viral “this dude is not smart” jab at Elon Musk, playing her halting Taiwan‑defense answer from Munich alongside footage of a SpaceX booster landing itself and asking what it says about today’s political class when one of Musk’s harshest critics cannot give a coherent response on war and peace. The panel then turns to Louisiana politics: Ben unloads on Senator Bill Cassidy as a “rhino” who reliably votes with Democrats, warns that outdated Sequoia voting machines are being replaced by Dominion systems after one more election, and argues that unless the state returns to hand‑marked paper ballots, the establishment can engineer Cassidy’s third term regardless of voter sentiment. In a lighter but revealing tech segment, James offers a Tesla FSD update—explaining the new “strike” policy for inattentive drivers, how profiles now live in the cloud, and why the car sometimes lets him exceed its recommended speed only after flashing on‑screen liability warnings—while Dwayne reads Grok’s official description of the temporary autopilot suspensions and jokes about a future registry for “habitual bad drivers.” The conversation broadens into concerns about hacking autonomous 18‑wheelers, the promise of safer robot truck fleets, and an exploration of “Alpha Schools,” an AI‑driven homeschool model whose students reportedly test in the top 1 percent, prompting questions about whether the tool is transformative or simply amplifying already motivated families. Finally, the crew revisits Pam Bondi’s handling of the Epstein files and DOJ priorities, contrasts her emotional testimony with Oliver North’s unflappable Iran‑Contra performance, and debates whether limited federal resources should chase every past atrocity (from island trafficking to Russiagate) or be concentrated on a few, clearly winnable cases even if that leaves some victims without full legal closure. Don't miss it!

On today’s episode, we discuss the latest Epstein document releases, including millions of pages of emails, photos, and warrant materials that name powerful figures from politics, finance, and tech, and why so few of those people have ever been seriously investigated or charged. Charlotte, Sarah, Mark, Glenn, and James wrestle with Kash Patel’s sworn claim that there was “no indication” Epstein trafficked anyone to others, contrasting it with newly surfaced files and public crowd‑sourced research that strongly suggest multiple high‑level clients and enablers, and they openly question whether Patel effectively committed perjury to protect U.S. allies and national‑security interests. The conversation digs into how intelligence services like the CIA, MI5, and possibly Mossad may have used Epstein’s operation for kompromat, why both Republican and Democratic administrations slow‑walked or redacted key information, and whether Trump’s partial file release and Fani Willis–style media performances reflect systemic rot rather than partisan one‑offs. Charlotte then outlines the “cult of Molech” idea—ancient child‑sacrifice worship echoed in modern abortion politics and alleged elite abuse—while Sarah links grooming and trafficking dynamics to real survivor stories from Epstein’s circle, emphasizing how predators leverage both extreme vulnerability and relentless ambition. The group debates whether the Epstein saga is a genuine reckoning or just another distraction from wars and current frauds, ultimately agreeing that even if prosecutions are difficult because of venue, time, or redactions, the public still needs unvarnished exposure of names and methods so the system can “implode” and reset rather than be protected by managed denial. Don't miss it!

On today’s episode, we discuss James’s new M‑series iPad and how modern tablets now function as near‑full computers, especially when paired with keyboards, mice, and pro apps like Word and Acrobat. The conversation quickly shifts to Teslas and self‑driving tech, with stories of how fast human driving skills atrophy, how FSD handles rain, potholes, and surprise hazards better than most people, and why the hosts are convinced that within a decade nearly all trucks and many cars will be automated. From there, they zoom out to Elon Musk’s broader ambitions: a Moon Base Alpha with domed habitats and rail‑gun satellite launchers, rapid‑reuse rockets, Starlink’s dense satellite web, and X as a potential low‑friction global financial platform that could undercut traditional banks while dovetailing with Bitcoin and crypto. Mark breaks down why Bitcoin’s mining cost now nears its market value, what that implies about price floors and energy use, and how mining once drove his home power bill to two or three times normal. In the AI segment, the trio tackles autonomous surgery and welding robots, AI‑assisted coding with tools like Claude, Grok, and “vibe code,” social‑media worlds where AI agents train themselves and each other, and the cultural fallout from parasocial AI companions losing the ability to say “I love you.” They close by coining “glass holes” for people abusing smart glasses to record everyone, warning listeners that every profession—from truckers and diesel mechanics to window washers and even medical‑malpractice lawyers—will be reshaped by robots and AI, and urging younger workers to master both their craft and AI tools so they can ride the wave instead of being wiped out by it. Don't miss it!

On today’s episode, we discuss what scholars mean by the “historical Jesus” and how that project differs from simply asking what extra‑biblical sources say about Christ or spinning speculative tales like a secret marriage to Mary Magdalene. Historical‑Jesus research is presented as historiography—the history of how 18th–21st century scholars have tried to reconstruct Jesus using modern historical methods while partially suspending full trust in the Gospels and early church tradition. The episode walks through form criticism and the influential “criterion of double dissimilarity,” which tries to identify sayings and actions most likely authentic when they are unlike both 1st‑century Judaism and later Christian preaching, along with the more aggressive “criterion of embarrassment,” which treats unflattering or awkward details—such as Jesus praying that the cup of suffering might pass—as especially historically plausible. The hosts debate the strengths and abuses of these tools, noting that they can highlight Jesus’s genuine uniqueness and humanity but become distorting when used to deny continuity between Jesus and the early church or to strip him from his Jewish context, effectively turning him into an ahistorical “alien.” The conversation then drills into dense theological questions: whether the “Word of God” in John 1 refers to Jesus, Scripture, the gospel, or all of the above; how divine inspiration relates to fallible human memory; and why the Gospels are better seen as faithful, interpretive testimonies to Jesus rather than verbatim transcripts. Finally, the episode turns pastoral and practical as they wrestle with blasphemy of the Holy Spirit (attributing Spirit‑empowered exorcisms to Satan), Satan’s temptation offers and “permissive will,” Old Testament figures like Samson and Balaam, and why, despite scholarly debates about method, the non‑negotiable center for Christians remains trusting the risen Christ revealed in Scripture. Don't miss it!