John Rapley, contributing columnist for The Globe and Mail, joins Stephen LeDrew to discuss one of the biggest economic questions surrounding artificial intelligence: is the AI boom actually a bubble? Rapley argues that enormous amounts of money are flowing into AI infrastructure, data centres and technology companies, but the productivity gains needed to justify today’s valuations still haven’t clearly materialized. He says AI is already useful in many everyday tasks and can improve individual productivity, but questions whether those gains are large enough across the broader economy to support the scale of investment now taking place. The conversation also turns to data centres, credit, corporate losses and what could happen if the current AI investment boom slows sharply. Rapley’s view is not that AI disappears. Quite the opposite. He argues that a bursting bubble could ultimately redirect money toward more practical and commercially useful applications of the technology. LeDrew and Rapley also discuss another unexpected consequence of AI: as synthetic, created content and misinformation become more sophisticated, could trusted media organizations become more valuable again? Become a member to support the show and get access to longer interviews and additional content. TOPICS COVERED<ul><li>The AI investment boom</li><li>Whether AI valuations are sustainable</li><li>Productivity gains from artificial intelligence</li><li>Data centre investment</li><li>Credit and financing</li><li>What happens if the bubble bursts</li><li>AI mistakes and quality control</li><li>Practical uses of AI</li><li>Whether capital is being misallocated</li><li>The future of AI startups</li><li>Trust in news and legacy media</li><li>Synthetic content and misinformation</li></ul><hr> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

John Rapley, contributing columnist for The Globe and Mail, joins Stephen LeDrew to discuss one of the biggest economic questions surrounding artificial intelligence: is the AI boom actually a bubble? Rapley argues that enormous amounts of money are flowing into AI infrastructure, data centres and technology companies, but the productivity gains needed to justify today’s valuations still haven’t clearly materialized. He says AI is already useful in many everyday tasks and can improve individual productivity, but questions whether those gains are large enough across the broader economy to support the scale of investment now taking place. The conversation also turns to data centres, credit, corporate losses and what could happen if the current AI investment boom slows sharply. Rapley’s view is not that AI disappears. Quite the opposite. He argues that a bursting bubble could ultimately redirect money toward more practical and commercially useful applications of the technology. LeDrew and Rapley also discuss another unexpected consequence of AI: as synthetic, created content and misinformation become more sophisticated, could trusted media organizations become more valuable again? Become a member to support the show and get access to longer interviews and additional content. TOPICS COVEREDThe AI investment boomWhether AI valuations are sustainableProductivity gains from artificial intelligenceData centre investmentCredit and financingWhat happens if the bubble burstsAI mistakes and quality controlPractical uses of AIWhether capital is being misallocatedThe future of AI startupsTrust in news and legacy mediaSynthetic content and misinformation Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

John Rapley, contributing columnist for The Globe and Mail, joins Stephen LeDrew to discuss one of the biggest economic questions surrounding artificial intelligence: is the AI boom actually a bubble? Rapley argues that enormous amounts of money are flowing into AI infrastructure, data centres and technology companies, but the productivity gains needed to justify today’s valuations still haven’t clearly materialized. He says AI is already useful in many everyday tasks and can improve individual productivity, but questions whether those gains are large enough across the broader economy to support the scale of investment now taking place. The conversation also turns to data centres, credit, corporate losses and what could happen if the current AI investment boom slows sharply. Rapley’s view is not that AI disappears. Quite the opposite. He argues that a bursting bubble could ultimately redirect money toward more practical and commercially useful applications of the technology. LeDrew and Rapley also discuss another unexpected consequence of AI: as synthetic, created content and misinformation become more sophisticated, could trusted media organizations become more valuable again? Become a member to support the show and get access to longer interviews and additional content. TOPICS COVERED<ul><li>The AI investment boom</li><li>Whether AI valuations are sustainable</li><li>Productivity gains from artificial intelligence</li><li>Data centre investment</li><li>Credit and financing</li><li>What happens if the bubble bursts</li><li>AI mistakes and quality control</li><li>Practical uses of AI</li><li>Whether capital is being misallocated</li><li>The future of AI startups</li><li>Trust in news and legacy media</li><li>Synthetic content and misinformation</li></ul> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Is The AI Bubble About To Burst?

Catherine Swift joins Stephen LeDrew for a pointed discussion about political appointments, government spending and whether Canadians are demanding enough accountability from Ottawa. The conversation begins with Diana Fox Carney, the Prime Minister’s wife, who he has named Canada’s Ocean Envoy and Chair of the 2027 Our Ocean Conference ! The Carney Government says the position is volunteer and unpaid and describes Fox Carney as an economist with experience in climate policy, business and non-profit organizations. LeDrew and Swift nevertheless question the optics of appointing the Prime Minister’s spouse to a government role and argue that the decision deserves greater public and parliamentary scrutiny. They also discuss recent federal spending on ocean protection. Ottawa announced more than $740 million over four years for a range of marine conservation, safety, Indigenous stewardship, habitat and ocean-science initiatives; that funding is broader than Fox Carney’s role or the conference itself. The conversation then widens to healthcare benefits for asylum claimants, government spending and whether Canadians have become too accustomed to decisions that once would have produced much greater political controversy. The federal Interim Federal Health Program provides temporary coverage to eligible asylum claimants, including basic healthcare, prescriptions and some supplemental services that the average Canadian doesn’t receive! Since May 2026, co-payments apply to prescriptions and many supplemental benefits. Topics Covered:<ul><li>Diana Fox Carney’s Ocean Envoy appointment</li><li>Political appointments and perceptions of nepotism</li><li>The role being volunteer and unpaid</li><li>Federal ocean-protection spending</li><li>Parliamentary scrutiny</li><li>Government transparency</li><li>Healthcare for asylum claimants</li><li>Federal spending priorities</li><li>Political double standards</li><li>Why Swift says Canadians should demand more accountability</li></ul><hr> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Catherine Swift joins Stephen LeDrew for a pointed discussion about political appointments, government spending and whether Canadians are demanding enough accountability from Ottawa. The conversation begins with Diana Fox Carney, the Prime Minister’s wife, who he has named Canada’s Ocean Envoy and Chair of the 2027 Our Ocean Conference ! The Carney Government says the position is volunteer and unpaid and describes Fox Carney as an economist with experience in climate policy, business and non-profit organizations. LeDrew and Swift nevertheless question the optics of appointing the Prime Minister’s spouse to a government role and argue that the decision deserves greater public and parliamentary scrutiny. They also discuss recent federal spending on ocean protection. Ottawa announced more than $740 million over four years for a range of marine conservation, safety, Indigenous stewardship, habitat and ocean-science initiatives; that funding is broader than Fox Carney’s role or the conference itself. The conversation then widens to healthcare benefits for asylum claimants, government spending and whether Canadians have become too accustomed to decisions that once would have produced much greater political controversy. The federal Interim Federal Health Program provides temporary coverage to eligible asylum claimants, including basic healthcare, prescriptions and some supplemental services that the average Canadian doesn’t receive! Since May 2026, co-payments apply to prescriptions and many supplemental benefits. Topics Covered:Diana Fox Carney’s Ocean Envoy appointmentPolitical appointments and perceptions of nepotismThe role being volunteer and unpaidFederal ocean-protection spendingParliamentary scrutinyGovernment transparencyHealthcare for asylum claimantsFederal spending prioritiesPolitical double standardsWhy Swift says Canadians should demand more accountability Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Catherine Swift joins Stephen LeDrew for a pointed discussion about political appointments, government spending and whether Canadians are demanding enough accountability from Ottawa. The conversation begins with Diana Fox Carney, the Prime Minister’s wife, who he has named Canada’s Ocean Envoy and Chair of the 2027 Our Ocean Conference ! The Carney Government says the position is volunteer and unpaid and describes Fox Carney as an economist with experience in climate policy, business and non-profit organizations. LeDrew and Swift nevertheless question the optics of appointing the Prime Minister’s spouse to a government role and argue that the decision deserves greater public and parliamentary scrutiny. They also discuss recent federal spending on ocean protection. Ottawa announced more than $740 million over four years for a range of marine conservation, safety, Indigenous stewardship, habitat and ocean-science initiatives; that funding is broader than Fox Carney’s role or the conference itself. The conversation then widens to healthcare benefits for asylum claimants, government spending and whether Canadians have become too accustomed to decisions that once would have produced much greater political controversy. The federal Interim Federal Health Program provides temporary coverage to eligible asylum claimants, including basic healthcare, prescriptions and some supplemental services that the average Canadian doesn’t receive! Since May 2026, co-payments apply to prescriptions and many supplemental benefits. Topics Covered:<ul><li>Diana Fox Carney’s Ocean Envoy appointment</li><li>Political appointments and perceptions of nepotism</li><li>The role being volunteer and unpaid</li><li>Federal ocean-protection spending</li><li>Parliamentary scrutiny</li><li>Government transparency</li><li>Healthcare for asylum claimants</li><li>Federal spending priorities</li><li>Political double standards</li><li>Why Swift says Canadians should demand more accountability</li></ul> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Carney’s Wife Has A Government Role — Where’s The Scrutiny?

Former Conservative MP Michelle Ferreri joins Stephen LeDrew to ask whether Canadians are becoming overwhelmed — and increasingly numb — to controversies surrounding government spending, transparency and accountability. The conversation begins with the appointment of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s wife, Diana Fox Carney, as Canada’s volunteer Ocean Envoy and chair of the 2027 Our Ocean Conference, alongside Ottawa’s separate $82-million commitment to expand international ocean observation. Ferreri and LeDrew also discuss the loss of tens of $Millions$ in Sustainable Development Technology Canada and a much larger problem: when Canadians are confronted with a constant stream of political stories, spending announcements and controversies, do they eventually stop paying attention? Ferreri argues that information overload is contributing to political exhaustion, mistrust and apathy. This is the first Three Minutes. Become a member to watch the full 10-minute conversation with Michelle Ferreri — including Carney’s popularity, media coverage, online regulation and why she believes Canadians need to start demanding measurable results from government. Topics Covered:<ul><li>Government accountability</li><li>Diana Fox Carney’s Ocean Envoy appointment</li><li>Ottawa’s ocean-monitoring investment</li><li>The SDTC controversy</li><li>Political information overload</li><li>Why voters become numb</li><li>Trust in government</li><li>Carney’s continued popularity</li><li>Accountability versus personality</li></ul><hr> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Former Conservative MP Michelle Ferreri joins Stephen LeDrew to ask whether Canadians are becoming overwhelmed — and increasingly numb — to controversies surrounding government spending, transparency and accountability. The conversation begins with the appointment of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s wife, Diana Fox Carney, as Canada’s volunteer Ocean Envoy and chair of the 2027 Our Ocean Conference, alongside Ottawa’s separate $82-million commitment to expand international ocean observation. Ferreri and LeDrew also discuss the loss of tens of $Millions$ in Sustainable Development Technology Canada and a much larger problem: when Canadians are confronted with a constant stream of political stories, spending announcements and controversies, do they eventually stop paying attention? Ferreri argues that information overload is contributing to political exhaustion, mistrust and apathy. This is the first Three Minutes. Become a member to watch the full 10-minute conversation with Michelle Ferreri — including Carney’s popularity, media coverage, online regulation and why she believes Canadians need to start demanding measurable results from government. Topics Covered:Government accountabilityDiana Fox Carney’s Ocean Envoy appointmentOttawa’s ocean-monitoring investmentThe SDTC controversyPolitical information overloadWhy voters become numbTrust in governmentCarney’s continued popularityAccountability versus personality Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Former Conservative MP Michelle Ferreri joins Stephen LeDrew to ask whether Canadians are becoming overwhelmed — and increasingly numb — to controversies surrounding government spending, transparency and accountability. The conversation begins with the appointment of Prime Minister Mark Carney’s wife, Diana Fox Carney, as Canada’s volunteer Ocean Envoy and chair of the 2027 Our Ocean Conference, alongside Ottawa’s separate $82-million commitment to expand international ocean observation. Ferreri and LeDrew also discuss the loss of tens of $Millions$ in Sustainable Development Technology Canada and a much larger problem: when Canadians are confronted with a constant stream of political stories, spending announcements and controversies, do they eventually stop paying attention? Ferreri argues that information overload is contributing to political exhaustion, mistrust and apathy. This is the first Three Minutes. Become a member to watch the full 10-minute conversation with Michelle Ferreri — including Carney’s popularity, media coverage, online regulation and why she believes Canadians need to start demanding measurable results from government. Topics Covered:<ul><li>Government accountability</li><li>Diana Fox Carney’s Ocean Envoy appointment</li><li>Ottawa’s ocean-monitoring investment</li><li>The SDTC controversy</li><li>Political information overload</li><li>Why voters become numb</li><li>Trust in government</li><li>Carney’s continued popularity</li><li>Accountability versus personality</li></ul> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Why Aren’t Canadians More Disappointed With Ottawa’s Failures?

In this Friday rant, Stephen LeDrew asks a question he does not ask very often: could Canada finally be starting to move in the right direction? LeDrew remains deeply critical of the federal government, including Prime Minister Mark Carney, government spending, bureaucracy and what he sees as continuing problems with accountability. But this rant is also about something bigger. After years of political division, a worsening drug crisis, battles over Canadian history and identity, frustration with immigration policy and a growing sense that the country had lost some of its social cohesion, LeDrew says he is beginning to hear something different from Canadians. People want accountability. They want responsible government. They want their communities to work. And they want to feel proud of Canada again. LeDrew points to municipal candidates, provincial leaders, MPs and ordinary Canadians who are increasingly demanding better government and stronger communities. Canada cannot simply turn the clock back. The country has changed. But LeDrew argues that it can move forward with more responsibility, more accountability and a renewed sense that Canadians still have something worth rebuilding together. Become a member to support independent discussion like this and help keep the show on the air. TOPICS COVERED<ul><li>Whether Canada is starting to turn a corner</li><li>The legacy of the Trudeau years</li><li>Government accountability</li><li>The federal heat-pump rebate program</li><li>Canada’s drug crisis</li><li>Immigration policy</li><li>Restoring social cohesion</li><li>Municipal and provincial leadership</li><li>Pride in Canadian identity</li><li>Rebuilding trust in government</li><li>Responsibility and civic participation</li></ul><hr> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

In this Friday rant, Stephen LeDrew asks a question he does not ask very often: could Canada finally be starting to move in the right direction? LeDrew remains deeply critical of the federal government, including Prime Minister Mark Carney, government spending, bureaucracy and what he sees as continuing problems with accountability. But this rant is also about something bigger. After years of political division, a worsening drug crisis, battles over Canadian history and identity, frustration with immigration policy and a growing sense that the country had lost some of its social cohesion, LeDrew says he is beginning to hear something different from Canadians. People want accountability. They want responsible government. They want their communities to work. And they want to feel proud of Canada again. LeDrew points to municipal candidates, provincial leaders, MPs and ordinary Canadians who are increasingly demanding better government and stronger communities. Canada cannot simply turn the clock back. The country has changed. But LeDrew argues that it can move forward with more responsibility, more accountability and a renewed sense that Canadians still have something worth rebuilding together. Become a member to support independent discussion like this and help keep the show on the air. TOPICS COVEREDWhether Canada is starting to turn a cornerThe legacy of the Trudeau yearsGovernment accountabilityThe federal heat-pump rebate programCanada’s drug crisisImmigration policyRestoring social cohesionMunicipal and provincial leadershipPride in Canadian identityRebuilding trust in governmentResponsibility and civic participation Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this Friday rant, Stephen LeDrew asks a question he does not ask very often: could Canada finally be starting to move in the right direction? LeDrew remains deeply critical of the federal government, including Prime Minister Mark Carney, government spending, bureaucracy and what he sees as continuing problems with accountability. But this rant is also about something bigger. After years of political division, a worsening drug crisis, battles over Canadian history and identity, frustration with immigration policy and a growing sense that the country had lost some of its social cohesion, LeDrew says he is beginning to hear something different from Canadians. People want accountability. They want responsible government. They want their communities to work. And they want to feel proud of Canada again. LeDrew points to municipal candidates, provincial leaders, MPs and ordinary Canadians who are increasingly demanding better government and stronger communities. Canada cannot simply turn the clock back. The country has changed. But LeDrew argues that it can move forward with more responsibility, more accountability and a renewed sense that Canadians still have something worth rebuilding together. Become a member to support independent discussion like this and help keep the show on the air. TOPICS COVERED<ul><li>Whether Canada is starting to turn a corner</li><li>The legacy of the Trudeau years</li><li>Government accountability</li><li>The federal heat-pump rebate program</li><li>Canada’s drug crisis</li><li>Immigration policy</li><li>Restoring social cohesion</li><li>Municipal and provincial leadership</li><li>Pride in Canadian identity</li><li>Rebuilding trust in government</li><li>Responsibility and civic participation</li></ul> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

LeDrew Rant - Are Canadians Finally Waking Up?

Economist and Globe and Mail columnist John Rapley joins Stephen LeDrew to ask why the war involving the United States and Iran is still dragging on months after it began. Rapley argues that Washington entered the conflict with powerful military capabilities but without a sufficiently clear political endgame.The United States and its allies have inflicted substantial damage on Iran’s military infrastructure, while Iran has suffered enormous economic pressure. Yet the government in Tehran remains in power and continues to pose a regional threat. Rapley argues that this illustrates an important difference between tactics and strategy: winning individual battles does not necessarily tell you how to end a war. The conversation also turns to Iraq, Afghanistan and Vietnam, the reluctance of American allies to become more deeply involved, and the role of China and Russia, which have their own strategic reasons for preventing Iran from simply falling into Washington’s orbit. The fundamental question is simple: what outcome is the United States actually trying to achieve — and how does it get there? Become a member to support the show and get access to longer interviews and additional content. TOPICS COVERED<ul><li>The continuing U.S.-Iran conflict</li><li>Why Iran’s government has not collapsed</li><li>Military tactics versus political strategy</li><li>Whether Washington had a clear endgame</li><li>The Strait of Hormuz</li><li>Iran’s military and economic damage</li><li>Iraq, Afghanistan and Vietnam</li><li>Why American allies are reluctant to join</li><li>China and Russia’s interests in Iran</li><li>Regime change versus containment</li><li>What it takes to actually end a war</li></ul><hr> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Economist and Globe and Mail columnist John Rapley joins Stephen LeDrew to ask why the war involving the United States and Iran is still dragging on months after it began. Rapley argues that Washington entered the conflict with powerful military capabilities but without a sufficiently clear political endgame. The United States and its allies have inflicted substantial damage on Iran’s military infrastructure, while Iran has suffered enormous economic pressure. Yet the government in Tehran remains in power and continues to pose a regional threat. Rapley argues that this illustrates an important difference between tactics and strategy: winning individual battles does not necessarily tell you how to end a war. The conversation also turns to Iraq, Afghanistan and Vietnam, the reluctance of American allies to become more deeply involved, and the role of China and Russia, which have their own strategic reasons for preventing Iran from simply falling into Washington’s orbit. The fundamental question is simple: what outcome is the United States actually trying to achieve — and how does it get there? Become a member to support the show and get access to longer interviews and additional content. TOPICS COVEREDThe continuing U.S.-Iran conflictWhy Iran’s government has not collapsedMilitary tactics versus political strategyWhether Washington had a clear endgameThe Strait of HormuzIran’s military and economic damageIraq, Afghanistan and VietnamWhy American allies are reluctant to joinChina and Russia’s interests in IranRegime change versus containmentWhat it takes to actually end a war Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Economist and Globe and Mail columnist John Rapley joins Stephen LeDrew to ask why the war involving the United States and Iran is still dragging on months after it began. Rapley argues that Washington entered the conflict with powerful military capabilities but without a sufficiently clear political endgame.The United States and its allies have inflicted substantial damage on Iran’s military infrastructure, while Iran has suffered enormous economic pressure. Yet the government in Tehran remains in power and continues to pose a regional threat. Rapley argues that this illustrates an important difference between tactics and strategy: winning individual battles does not necessarily tell you how to end a war. The conversation also turns to Iraq, Afghanistan and Vietnam, the reluctance of American allies to become more deeply involved, and the role of China and Russia, which have their own strategic reasons for preventing Iran from simply falling into Washington’s orbit. The fundamental question is simple: what outcome is the United States actually trying to achieve — and how does it get there? Become a member to support the show and get access to longer interviews and additional content. TOPICS COVERED<ul><li>The continuing U.S.-Iran conflict</li><li>Why Iran’s government has not collapsed</li><li>Military tactics versus political strategy</li><li>Whether Washington had a clear endgame</li><li>The Strait of Hormuz</li><li>Iran’s military and economic damage</li><li>Iraq, Afghanistan and Vietnam</li><li>Why American allies are reluctant to join</li><li>China and Russia’s interests in Iran</li><li>Regime change versus containment</li><li>What it takes to actually end a war</li></ul> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Eight Months Into The Iran War — Is This War Permanent?

According to Stephen LeDrew - Canada is not broken - but Government is broken. Bruce Pardy is a law professor who agrees with Stephen that the government is broken. They unpack how big government is the source of many of the problems in society - even though many people think that it is here to help.<hr> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

According to Stephen LeDrew - Canada is not broken - but Government is broken. Bruce Pardy is a law professor who agrees with Stephen that the government is broken. They unpack how big government is the source of many of the problems in society - even though many people think that it is here to help. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

According to Stephen LeDrew - Canada is not broken - but Government is broken. Bruce Pardy is a law professor who agrees with Stephen that the government is broken. They unpack how big government is the source of many of the problems in society - even though many people think that it is here to help. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Canada Is Not Broken - But Big Government Is Trying To Break It!

Justin Trudeau is headed to New York to party like a rock star. Meanwhile, in Ottawa there are 150 000 PSAC workers on the picket line. While we don't expect the Prime Minister to personally handle the bargaining - does he not have an obligation to remain in Ottawa while the lights are flickering? Dan McTeague is a former Liberal MP, he joins Stephen LeDrew for Three Minutes to discuss what should be done in Ottawa.<hr> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Justin Trudeau is headed to New York to party like a rock star. Meanwhile, in Ottawa there are 150 000 PSAC workers on the picket line. While we don't expect the Prime Minister to personally handle the bargaining - does he not have an obligation to remain in Ottawa while the lights are flickering? Dan McTeague is a former Liberal MP, he joins Stephen LeDrew for Three Minutes to discuss what should be done in Ottawa. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Justin Trudeau is headed to New York to party like a rock star. Meanwhile, in Ottawa there are 150 000 PSAC workers on the picket line. While we don't expect the Prime Minister to personally handle the bargaining - does he not have an obligation to remain in Ottawa while the lights are flickering? Dan McTeague is a former Liberal MP, he joins Stephen LeDrew for Three Minutes to discuss what should be done in Ottawa. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Ottawa Is On Strike - So Justin Trudeau Has Decided To Party In New York

150,000 Federal Public Servants are on Strike Across the Country, Receiving FULL PAY from the Feds. Rather than deal with the chaos at home, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has decided this is a great opportunity to head to New York. He is proving once again that he is more interested in building his own brand rather than doing what's best for Canada. When will Canadians stand up and demand better from Ottawa?  <hr> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

150,000 Federal Public Servants are on Strike Across the Country, Receiving FULL PAY from the Feds. Rather than deal with the chaos at home, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has decided this is a great opportunity to head to New York. He is proving once again that he is more interested in building his own brand rather than doing what's best for Canada. When will Canadians stand up and demand better from Ottawa? Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

150,000 Federal Public Servants are on Strike Across the Country, Receiving FULL PAY from the Feds. Rather than deal with the chaos at home, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has decided this is a great opportunity to head to New York. He is proving once again that he is more interested in building his own brand rather than doing what's best for Canada. When will Canadians stand up and demand better from Ottawa? &nbsp; Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

LeDrew Rant - Justin Trudeau Is Proving Once Again That He Is Unfit For High Office

The LeDrew Three Minute Interview is a daily podcast featuring insight on the news that matters to you, with views you won't hear anywhere else. Stephen LeDrew is a lawyer, broadcaster, responsible father, and a believer in fairness and good manners and liberalism(in the best sense of the word), and good government and civic responsibility.Stephen LeDrew is an enemy of bureaucratic busybodies, know-it-all “idealogues”, pontificating politicians who tell everyone else how to run their lives, woke idiots, and politically correct, milquetoast, sanitized media outlets.<hr> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

The LeDrew Three Minute Interview is a daily podcast featuring insight on the news that matters to you, with views you won't hear anywhere else. Stephen LeDrew is a lawyer, broadcaster, responsible father, and a believer in fairness and good manners and liberalism(in the best sense of the word), and good government and civic responsibility.Stephen LeDrew is an enemy of bureaucratic busybodies, know-it-all “idealogues”, pontificating politicians who tell everyone else how to run their lives, woke idiots, and politically correct, milquetoast, sanitized media outlets. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

The LeDrew Three Minute Interview is a daily podcast featuring insight on the news that matters to you, with views you won't hear anywhere else. Stephen LeDrew is a lawyer, broadcaster, responsible father, and a believer in fairness and good manners and liberalism(in the best sense of the word), and good government and civic responsibility.Stephen LeDrew is an enemy of bureaucratic busybodies, know-it-all “idealogues”, pontificating politicians who tell everyone else how to run their lives, woke idiots, and politically correct, milquetoast, sanitized media outlets. Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.

Share The LeDrew Three Minute Interview

Sign up to save your podcasts

The LeDrew Three Minute Interview

The LeDrew Three Minute Interview episodes

About The LeDrew Three Minute Interview

Best of The LeDrew Three Minute Interview

More shows like The LeDrew Three Minute Interview

The Alex Pierson Show

kinsellacast

Rebel News Podcast

Canadian Taxpayers Podcast

No Nonsense with Pamela Wallin

The Elevate Report

Western Standard Shows

Shaye Ganam

Full Comment

The Daily Brief

The Line

Hub Podcasts

The Jerry Agar Show

The Ben Mulroney Show

The Jasmin Laine Show