Keith and Jake finish up the second section of PrepTest 140. Inferences and assumptions dominate as they navigate the simplest path leading to success.

In the heat of summer, Jake and Keith battle a section and the heat it's bringing as well: grammar, reasoning, and charity all come into play.

Jake and Keith welcome veteran tutor and LSAT Hacks Founder Graeme Blake on to discuss our histories with the LSAT, how our outlooks have changed, and what we see in the future for test prep.

Triple Review (LSAT Prep): ⁠www.triplereview.online⁠

Nexus Academics (Jake): ⁠www.nexusacademics.com⁠

Last Call Bar Academy (Keith): ⁠www.lastcallbaracademy.com

The distinction between claims of correlation and those of causation, a new take on paradoxes, and much more!

In this special rebroadcast, Jake joins Eirik Gislason on Shear Line: Negotiation Mastery to explore how principles of logical reasoning and argument analysis—tools often honed through LSAT preparation—can be effectively applied to the art of negotiation.

They discuss the parallels between constructing logical arguments and negotiating positions, and how understanding these connections can lead to more persuasive and strategic interactions.

Triple Review (LSAT Prep): www.triplereview.online

Nexus Academics (Jake): www.nexusacademics.com

Last Call Bar Academy (Keith): www.lastcallbaracademy.com

Keith and Jake tackle a set of problem whose analyses reveal new ways to consider Causation, Paradoxes, and Assumptions/Flaws.

Tune in to find out how to refine your process!

Keith and Jake wrestle a nasty conditional question to the ground. They also discuss principles, causation, and agreement in debate!

Jake and Keith get to the end of their first section, addressing the critical skills of finding flaws, articulating principles, and using contrapositives.

An episode about principles, negations, and a tough paradox. Keith and Jake also fondly remember the days of Logic Games and the benefits of studying them.

Jake and Keith tackle some interesting implicit and referential conclusions. Also, we focus in on causation, ensuring that we seek out relevant and salient information.