In this episode of The MAT Unpacked, host Ed Nell is joined by regular co-host Chris Whiting from Academy Advisory, alongside guest Julie Price Grimshaw from B11 Education - a former Ofsted HMI with extensive experience in school improvement, governance reviews and inspection.
The conversation digs into what effective governance really looks like at trust board and local level, how Ofsted’s approach to inspecting MATs has evolved and why minute-taking, skills audits and the right people in the room all matter more than most trusts realise.
Drawing on Julie’s frontline experience as both an inspector and a trust chair, this episode is a practical and honest look at how to build governance that genuinely drives school improvement - not just governance that looks good on paper.
Key Takeaways
Governance sits in a Goldilocks zone.
Too much involvement and trustees become operational, pulling leaders away from strategic priorities. Too little and governance becomes performative tick-boxing. The goal is trustees who are eyes on and hands off.
Terms of reference must be lived, not just filed.
When subcommittees lack clarity about their remit, duplication and conflicting conclusions follow. Revisiting terms of reference regularly – and checking whether they reflect what actually happens – is essential.
Local governance is evolving, not disappearing.
Formal local governing bodies are giving way to local advisory boards and advocacy models. Each has trade-offs around quality assurance and formality. What matters is that the model chosen actually works for the trust’s context.
Ofsted is now looking at the whole trust.
Inspectors are increasingly asking trust boards to give specific examples of decisions they’ve made and the impact those decisions have had. Trusts that haven’t caught up with this shift may find themselves underprepared.
Minutes are evidence, not admin.
Vague references to “a governor asked” provide no evidence of individual participation or quality of challenge. Using initials or coded references gives trusts the data they need to identify disengagement and have productive conversations about it.
Key Moments
“You want trustees to be eyes on and hands off – and to maintain that Goldilocks zone.”
“A real risk to governance is where the terms of reference either aren’t clear or are just ignored.”
“Ofsted should not come in with a fixed idea of what good looks like – they know different things work in different contexts.”
“If the minutes are a good reflection of the discussion, then that’s fine. Ofsted aren’t in the meeting – they’ve got the minutes.”
“If you do the very best for your school, Ofsted should appreciate that. You’re not running a school to get a good judgement. You’re running it for the learners.”
About The MAT Unpacked
The MAT Unpacked explores what effective leadership and governance look like inside Multi Academy Trusts.
Hosted by Ed Nell and featuring regular co-host Chris Whiting from Academy Advisory, each episode brings together trust leaders and sector specialists to share practical insights, real experiences and lessons learned from across the education system.
The aim is simple: to open up conversations about how trusts can operate more effectively and ultimately improve outcomes for learners.
How to Get in Touch
To learn more about Academy Advisory or connect with the team:
Website: https://academyadvisory.com
LinkedIn: Academy Advisory
If you enjoyed this episode, follow The MAT Unpacked and share it with colleagues across your trust.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.