This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit michaelfanone.substack.com

There’s a dangerous thing happening in this country that has nothing to do with “politics” and everything to do with basic safety.

When federal agents show up in plain clothes, in unmarked cars, with no visible badge, no clear markings, and no immediate way to verify who they are, they create a vacuum. And in that vacuum, authority becomes a costume anyone can wear.

That’s not just bad optics. It’s how you get people hurt.

I spent years in law enforcement. Identification isn’t some optional courtesy. It’s the foundation of legitimate authority. It protects the public and it protects officers—because the second people can’t tell the difference between a real agent and a random guy grabbing them, everything becomes unpredictable. Fear spikes. Resistance spikes. Mistakes turn deadly.

And the public gets trained into the worst habit imaginable: accepting unidentified force as normal.

That brings us to what happened in San Diego.

A man walked into a McDonald’s wearing jeans and a t-shirt. No uniform. No badge. No credentials. He claimed he was ICE, went behind the counter, grabbed a worker by the neck, and put him in a chokehold while threatening him and invoking deportation.

Let that sink in: a civilian used the words “I’m ICE” like a weapon—and for a moment, it worked. Because if real ICE operates in ways that look unofficial, unclear, and unmarked, then an imposter doesn’t have to work hard. He just has to sound confident.

This isn’t a freak story. It’s a predictable consequence.

When an agency normalizes invisible enforcement, it trains everyone—immigrants, citizens, workers, parents—to obey first and verify never. That is exactly backwards. And it creates a perfect environment for criminals who want to intimidate, assault, extort, or abduct. All they need is two words and a hard tone.

The clip in this episode is hard to watch. Not because it’s shocking—because it’s obvious. You can see, in real time, why identification protocols exist and how quickly the situation could’ve escalated into something even worse.

The guy was arrested and charged. Good. But if we stop the story there, we miss the real point: the system made the scam believable. And that should terrify everyone, because the next imposter might not stop at a chokehold.

If you care about public safety, the fix is basic: clear markings, visible ID, verified authority, accountability on scene. Legitimacy depends on visibility. Without it, you don’t get “strong enforcement.” You get chaos.

If this is the kind of reporting you want more of—patterns, receipts, and what they mean in the real world—become a paid subscriber so we can keep doing it without a corporate leash. If you’re already paid, share this with one person who still gives a damn.

Your support keeps this show growing, keeps us on the road, and keeps these stories from getting buried.

🟧 Paid subscribers get 15% off your next merch order🟧 Founding Members get 20% off for life

You’ll get the link in your welcome email.

GET DISCOUNTS BELOW! ENJOY!

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit michaelfanone.substack.com

Most people think law enforcement is just “do what you have to do™.” It’s not. It’s rules. It’s constraints. It’s paperwork and restraint and a whole lot of don’t do the thing you feel like doing.

Because the moment you let instinct replace protocol, you stop being law enforcement and start being something else.

That’s what’s got me locked in on ICE right now. Newly released internal numbers show a staggering jump in ICE use-of-force incidents in the early stretch of Trump’s term—an increase so sharp it doesn’t read like a trend. It reads like a culture shift. And it’s happening alongside a surge in daily arrests and operations that’s pushing agents into more confrontations, more fast decisions, and more opportunities for bad judgment to become permanent damage.

Here’s the part the press usually skips: force isn’t judged by what you can do. It’s judged by what you’re allowed to do. Minimum necessary. Proportional. Justified. Escalate gradually. Respect the Fourth Amendment. That’s not “woke,” that’s policing. That’s the line between authority and abuse.

When force balloons this quickly, it raises the only questions that matter:

Are they being trained properly?

Are supervisors enforcing standards?

Or are the guardrails being treated like suggestions because “enforcement” is the only metric anyone cares about?

And we’re not talking about theoretical harms. People are getting shot. Americans are dying. Even folks on the right are starting to say out loud what they usually won’t: these federal teams aren’t meeting the standards we demand from local cops.

Then it gets worse—because the most revealing stuff isn’t the statistics. It’s the behavior.

I included two clips that show what “protocol collapse” looks like in real life: agents weaponizing human kindness to lure someone out, and agents detaining a U.S. citizen teenager while admitting they don’t even know who they’ve grabbed. That’s not “targeted enforcement.” That’s sloppiness with guns and authority.

Law enforcement only works when the public believes it’s legitimate—not because it’s feared, not because it’s unchecked. Legitimate. And legitimacy comes from discipline, not force.

If you want me to keep pulling the numbers, tracking the incidents, and putting the receipts on screen without a corporate leash, become a paid subscriber. If you’re already in, share this with one person who still gives a damn. The only thing that stops a protocol collapse is sunlight and consequences.

Your support keeps this show growing, keeps us on the road, and keeps these stories from getting buried.

🟧 Paid subscribers get 15% off your next merch order🟧 Founding Members get 20% off for life

You’ll get the link in your welcome email.

GET DISCOUNTS BELOW! ENJOY!

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit michaelfanone.substack.com

For a long time, the story always ended the same way: ICE shows up, somebody gets hurt, the agency issues a statement, and we’re told to move on.

But lately, a different kind of footage has been surfacing.

Not raids. Not press conferences. Arrests.

Agents. Contractors. People carrying federal authority—sitting in the same back seats they’ve put other people in.

And it’s not one weird headline. It’s a pattern. Different states, different incidents, same theme: the badge doesn’t mean you’re above consequences anymore.

That matters, because federal agents aren’t supposed to be the ones creating the case. They’re supposed to be the ones you can trust when the stakes are high. Their reports send people to prison. Their testimony shapes prosecutions. When that credibility cracks, it’s not “drama”—it’s the justice system getting hollowed out from the inside.

Let’s look at a couple of clips.

One where the government’s own evidence doesn’t line up with what agents claimed—so prosecutors do something rare and basically abandon the whole case. Another where a federal agent gets popped on DUI and the bodycam tells the whole story. And then the ugliest one: a DUI with kids in the car, entitlement on full display, and a scramble afterward to get the badge back like nothing happened.

I’m not going to spoil the clips here. I want you to see the body language, hear the excuses, and watch how quickly “professional courtesy” gets invoked when the tables turn.

Because this isn’t about dunking on individuals. It’s about something bigger: what happens when an agency operates for years like oversight is optional—and then reality finally catches up.

Watch the episode. Then ask the only question that matters: how many times did this not get caught?

If you want me tracking these cases and putting the receipts on screen without a corporate leash, become a paid subscriber. And if you’re already in, share this with one person who still gives a damn.

Your support keeps this show growing, keeps us on the road, and keeps these stories from getting buried.

🟧 Paid subscribers get 15% off your next merch order🟧 Founding Members get 20% off for life

You’ll get the link in your welcome email.

GET DISCOUNTS BELOW! ENJOY!

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit michaelfanone.substack.com

I just watched the body-cam evidence from the shooting of Marimar Martinez in Chicago — a U.S. citizen who was shot five times by a federal immigration agent during an enforcement operation last October. She survived. And what the footage and newly released documents show should scare the hell out of anyone who cares about basic constitutional limits.

Because the story the government initially leaned on — that she tried to “ram” agents — doesn’t hold up when you put the camera on the table. According to reporting and visual analysis, the video shows an agent’s vehicle appearing to swerve into Martinez’s car right before shots are fired, undermining the justification that she posed an imminent threat.

And it wasn’t just the shooting.

Federal officials publicly painted her as dangerous — even using language like “domestic terrorist” in the aftermath — while a judge later lifted a protective order so her attorneys could release emails, texts, and footage that undercut that narrative.

Here’s the part that really makes me see red: the internal culture. Messages released in the document cache show senior officials praising the shooter and colleagues joking about it — like a human being getting riddled with bullets is just another war story for the group chat.

I wore the badge. I know what fear looks like. I know what a tense stop looks like. I also know what it looks like when an agency starts treating civilians like props and the public like a problem to manage.

This is how legitimacy dies:

* A violent encounter happens.

* The agency rushes out a narrative that protects itself.

* Video contradicts it.

* Leadership circles the wagons.

* Nobody pays a price — and the next team learns the lesson.

That isn’t “a tough job.” That’s power without guardrails.

If you want me to keep pulling these threads — body cams, court filings, internal messages, and the patterns connecting them — become a paid subscriber. That’s what funds the records fights and the travel to where this is happening. If you can’t, share this post with one person who still gives a damn. Either way, don’t let them memory-hole Marimar Martinez behind the next shiny headline.

Your support keeps this show growing, keeps us on the road, and keeps these stories from getting buried.

🟧 Paid subscribers get 15% off your next merch order🟧 Founding Members get 20% off for life

You’ll get the link in your welcome email.

👉 Become a paid subscriber today.

GET DISCOUNTS BELOW! ENJOY!

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit michaelfanone.substack.com

On January 6th, I stood that line. I fought a mob that beat cops with flags, poles, fists—then went home and watched politicians try to turn that violence into a fairy tale. “Tourists.” “Patriots.” “Great people.” The same people who would’ve demanded a lifetime sentence if it happened to their cops.

Now here’s the part they don’t want to talk about.

One of the January 6 defendants Trump chose to pardon—someone he decided deserved forgiveness—has now been convicted of sexually abusing children. And suddenly the loudest voices celebrating the pardons have gone real quiet.

That silence isn’t confusion. It’s damage control.

When you pardon someone, you’re not just signing paperwork. You’re making a statement—whether you admit it or not. You’re telling the country: this person is worthy of restoration. You’re laundering their story. You’re giving them a halo they didn’t earn.

Street cops understand risk. Patterns matter. Escalation matters. You don’t ignore prior behavior because it’s politically useful. But that’s exactly what happened with these mass pardons: a whole category of offenders got rebranded as martyrs, and the public was told to swallow it.

And in this case, kids paid the price.

No, Trump didn’t pardon anyone for child abuse. The crimes were separate. That’s not the point. The point is what happens when you erase the moral line and sell criminals as heroes. The worst people start believing the story—and they use it as leverage.

When leaders romanticize offenders, they don’t just soften consequences. They hand predators a tool: legitimacy. A ready-made narrative. A shield they can wave at anyone who questions them.

That’s what makes this so corrosive. This isn’t just “a bad guy did a bad thing.” It’s a predictable outcome of turning accountability into tribal loyalty. You forgive “your people” no matter what, then act shocked when reality breaks through the branding.

For the officers who fought that day, this isn’t abstract. It’s personal. We were told we were exaggerating. We were told to move on. We were told the mob was misunderstood.

Meanwhile, the same politicians who claim to “back the blue” handed out mercy like it was merch—without judgment, without standards, without any willingness to own what comes next.

Leadership isn’t the pardon. Leadership is owning the consequences downstream.

You don’t get to call yourself the party of law and order while you mass-forgive people who assaulted police—then hide when one of your “symbol” cases turns into something this vile. You don’t get to rewrite January 6 into a bedtime story and then disappear when the truth shows up with a verdict.

Some of us still remember what that day looked like.

Some of us still carry the scars.

And no pardon erases that.

Your support keeps this show growing, keeps us on the road, and keeps these stories from getting buried.

🟧 Paid subscribers get 15% off your next merch order🟧 Founding Members get 20% off for life

You’ll get the link in your welcome email.

👉 Become a paid subscriber today.

GET DISCOUNTS BELOW! ENJOY!

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit michaelfanone.substack.com

In real investigations—corruption, organized abuse, violent networks—you learn to watch behavior more than rhetoric. And there’s a specific smell when institutions are trying to manage fallout instead of tell the truth: silence, delays, selective disclosure, defensive spin, “we can’t comment,” “we haven’t seen it,” “trust us.”

That’s not politics. That’s a red flag.

What’s shifting right now is who’s reacting. This isn’t just liberals yelling into the void. Conservatives are starting to get sick to their stomachs too—not because they suddenly agree with the left, but because the posture around Epstein looks like the kind of coordinated caution you see when the truth threatens the coalition. When your own side starts asking hard questions, you don’t have a messaging problem. You have a legitimacy problem.

And that’s why the Epstein files matter beyond the usual internet noise.

The Epstein network was never partisan. It was elite. Wealth, access, protection, influence—people who float above consequences until sunlight finds them. Any movement that brands itself as “anti-swamp” has a built-in vulnerability here: if the records show even peripheral proximity—donors, operatives, friendly power brokers—the hypocrisy damage is catastrophic. Movements can survive policy fights. They don’t survive “we were the moral crusade… until the names were ours.”

So when the response isn’t clean disclosure—when it’s controlled release, careful framing, redaction walls, and endless procedural fog—reasonable people start asking the obvious question: what are you protecting, and who are you protecting it for?

Now, to be disciplined: coded-language interpretations and internet decoding games aren’t evidence. Speculation isn’t proof. But here’s what is evidence: patterns of institutional behavior. In cases involving trafficking and abuse, the correct response is not secrecy. It’s aggressive forensic transparency—release what is legally releasable, preserve the record, show your work. Full exposure clears the innocent and corners the guilty. Anything less shields somebody.

That’s why this backlash is spreading across political lines. It’s not “partisan betrayal” to demand records in a child exploitation scandal. It’s the bare minimum standard of civilized government.

I’ll say it in the plainest language I know:

If you didn’t do it, prove it.

If your friends didn’t do it, prove it.

If the files clear you, release them.

No red team. No blue team. Just the truth—because when it comes to crimes against kids, there is no political shield. And the public is done accepting one.

If you want this work to stay independent—no corporate leash, no timid edits—become a paid subscriber. If you’re already paid, pull one person in and tell them why. And if you’ve got documents, firsthand knowledge, or credible leads connected to this world, reply to this post—my team will follow up.

Your support keeps this show growing, keeps us on the road, and keeps these stories from getting buried.

🟧 Paid subscribers get 15% off your next merch order🟧 Founding Members get 20% off for life

You’ll get the link in your welcome email.

👉 Become a paid subscriber today.

GET DISCOUNTS BELOW! ENJOY!

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit michaelfanone.substack.com

Picture a federal agent leaning into a citizen and saying: “You raise your voice… I erase your voice.”

That happened in Minnesota. On camera. And when Congress asked the ICE Director about it, he said he hadn’t seen the clip. That’s not accountability. That’s denial.

I wore a badge. Protocol isn’t a suggestion; it’s the guardrail that keeps power from turning into punishment. Threats like that aren’t “tough talk.” They’re red flags. In any real agency, you’d see Internal Affairs pulling files, command asking hard questions, training rolling tape, evidence units preserving every frame. You don’t “erase” someone’s voice because enforcement feels uncomfortable — you de-escalate and you follow the Constitution.

Zoom out. This isn’t one bad interaction or one bad apple. Minneapolis has seen fatal federal shootings, street protests over aggressive tactics, citizens alleging unconstitutional detentions — and leadership doubling down while pretending the evidence doesn’t exist. When a director shrugs off a viral clip in an oversight hearing, that’s not ignorance; that’s an institution protecting itself.

Command responsibility starts with awareness. If a video is public, if Congress is citing it, if communities are living with the fallout, “I’m not aware” isn’t an answer — it’s the problem. Because once you normalize threats from the badge and denial from the top, you don’t just bend protocol; you break public trust. And when trust breaks, everything gets more dangerous, for civilians and for officers who actually want to do the job right.

You’ll hear the words in the episode — the threat, the dodge, the pattern. Watch it clean, then ask yourself the only question that matters: are we looking at a rogue agent, or an agency that’s lost its compass?

If ICE wants authority, honor the protocol. If it wants legitimacy, stop pretending the camera didn’t catch what it caught. If it wants trust, tell the truth and fix it.

Your support keeps this show growing, keeps us on the road, and keeps these stories from getting buried.

🟧 Paid subscribers get 15% off your next merch order🟧 Founding Members get 20% off for life

You’ll get the link in your welcome email.

👉 Become a paid subscriber today.

GET DISCOUNTS BELOW! ENJOY!

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit michaelfanone.substack.com

Everybody in Washington says “transparency.” Almost nobody means it when the light swings toward their own side.

Here’s what’s actually happening: the loudest movement in American politics — the one built on drain the swamp / expose the elites — is suddenly flinching at full Epstein disclosure. Not rumor. Not Reddit. Files. Names, dates, wires, flight logs, call sheets. The kind of paperwork that doesn’t care about team colors.

That flinch is the tell.

This isn’t because the files are partisan. They never were. Epstein’s world wasn’t left-only or right-only — it was elite-only. Donors. Fixers. Power-sitters. The kind of people who buy tables and write laws. If that reality lands without redactions, it doesn’t just bruise MAGA’s brand; it fractures it. Movements survive policy fights. They don’t survive exposed hypocrisy.

You can see the crack opening already: public chest-thumping for “release everything,” private hesitation, deflection, delay. Message control instead of clean disclosure. And here’s the part that should make you sit up — the “inside the room” reactions from Republican members who were allowed to see more than the public. They didn’t come out saying “nothingburger.” They came out looking rattled. In tonight’s video, you’ll watch their faces and hear their words. That’s not partisan spin. That’s body language when reality hits.

Why does this matter? Because if your identity is “we’re the anti-corruption crew,” you don’t get to turn transparency into a weapon when it hurts enemies and a shield when it threatens friends. If you start managing the release to protect the coalition, you’re not anti-swamp — you’re running one.

I’ve said it a thousand times: follow the behavior, not the press releases. Behavior says the unredacted truth would blow holes in the myth that one tribe owns all the monsters. It never did. The monsters rented from everyone.

So here’s the standard, and it’s simple:

Not selective outrage.

Not filtered summaries.

Not choreographed leaks.

Everything. Names, motions, exhibits, correspondence — whatever is legally releasable, released.

If the truth burns your friends, you let it burn. That’s how you know you’re serious.

The rest — the reactions, the timelines, who’s whispering “go slow” while tweeting “release it all” — is in the episode. Watch it. Judge with your own eyes.

If you want me chasing the full record — pulling filings, calling staff, and putting the receipts on screen without a corporate leash — become a paid subscriber. That funds the boring stuff that breaks real stories: travel, records, legal review. If this landed, share it with one person who still gives a damn, and drop your take in the comments.

Truth doesn’t care which party it burns. Neither do I.

Your support keeps this show growing, keeps us on the road, and keeps these stories from getting buried.

🟧 Paid subscribers get 15% off your next merch order🟧 Founding Members get 20% off for life

You’ll get the link in your welcome email.

👉 Become a paid subscriber today.

GET DISCOUNTS BELOW! ENJOY!

This is a free preview of a paid episode. To hear more, visit michaelfanone.substack.com

How many times can the same circle brush up against sexual exploitation before we stop calling it coincidence?

If you hold federal clearance, if your job touches immigration enforcement, if you’re trusted with background checks and security screening, you’re supposed to be the firewall. You’re the one who keeps predators out. You’re not the guy getting cuffed in a sting.

I wore the badge. Background investigators aren’t bit players; they are gatekeepers. They decide who gets the keys. That’s why the arrest we dig into in today’s live matters. Not because it’s lurid. Because it’s inside the system that keeps telling you it’s the moral authority.

Zoom out. We’re still living with the fallout of the Epstein network — elite-only rot that crossed every party line — while the same crowd sells you a “protect the children” brand. Meanwhile, look at the edges of the enforcement machine around U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement: multiple stings, multiple employees, the same category of crime. Not rumor. Arrest reports. Patterns.

Here’s what elevates this one beyond hypocrisy. This wasn’t just an ICE-adjacent employee. It was a contractor tasked with running background checks for ICE and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security — the very person who helps decide who is safe to trust. The gatekeeper. And, according to police, the conduct alleged in the sting was the most disturbing they’ve handled. You’ll hear that description in their words in the episode. Let it land before you make excuses.

If you’re still telling yourself the problem lives only at the border — never inside the machine — watch the clip. Ask yourself what it means when the people who green-light power are the ones abusing it. That’s not a bad apple. That’s institutional sickness.

This is the part where defenders pivot to process. “Tough job.” “Heat of the moment.” “A few rogues.” No. The warrant rules, the ID rules, the mask rules, the sensitive location rules — those exist so culture doesn’t replace law. When leadership treats oversight like an obstacle, you get exactly this: a system that protects itself first and the public last.

Two things can be true. We need enforcement. And we need it bound by the Constitution, not by whatever a contractor thinks they can get away with.

If you’ve got documents or were part of recent Minnesota operations, reply here and my team will reach out. If you were harmed, you’re not alone. We’ll help you get your story on the record — clean, safe, and documented.

If this work matters to you, help me keep the pressure on. Become a paid subscriber so I can keep traveling to the scenes, pulling the records, and putting names and policies on camera. If you’re already in, pass this to one person who still gives a damn. The only way these systems change is when sunlight gets louder than the spin.

This isn’t about one arrest. It’s about who’s been handed the keys — and who they answer to. Not the press release. Not the brand. The law.

Your support keeps this show growing, keeps us on the road, and keeps these stories from getting buried.

🟧 Paid subscribers get 15% off your next merch order🟧 Founding Members get 20% off for life

You’ll get the link in your welcome email.

👉 Become a paid subscriber today.

GET DISCOUNTS BELOW! ENJOY!

This is a public episode. If you'd like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit michaelfanone.substack.com/subscribe