Data marketplaces evolve so people can sell narrow, time-limited permissions to use discrete behaviors or signals. Think one-week location access, one-month shopping patterns, one-off emotional tags that are creating real income for those who opt in.

This market gives individuals bargaining power and an income stream that flips the usual extraction model, it can fund people who now choose what to trade. Yet turning consent into currency risks making privacy a class good, pushing the poorest to sell away long-term autonomy, while normalizing transactional consent that masks future harms and networked profiling.

The conundrum:

If selling microconsent empowers people economically and reduces opaque exploitation, do we let privacy become a tradable asset and regulate the market to limit coercion, or do we keep privacy non-transferable to protect social equality, even if that denies some people a real source of income?