🎙️ Mount Rushmore Show – The Heisman Trophy Episode
Fresh off last night’s dramatic Heisman Trophy ceremony, we dive headfirst into one of the most debated awards in all of sports.
This year’s race came down to the wire, with Indiana quarterback Fernando Mendoza taking home the trophy in a tight finish that had fans arguing until the final vote. We break down what made this Heisman race so compelling, why the margin felt razor-thin, and how history may look back on the finalists very differently with time.
Before getting into the Heisman itself, we shine a spotlight on one of college football’s most meaningful traditions — the Commander-in-Chief Trophy game. Navy’s thrilling win over Army capped a historic 10-win season and secured the rivalry trophy, with a chance to reach 11 wins in the Liberty Bowl. As an Annapolis native who grew up around the Naval Academy, Joe shares firsthand insight into why this Navy team felt different and how their quarterback helped modernize an offense that had long been defined by the triple option.
From there, we zoom out and explore the history and evolution of the Heisman Trophy — from its original intention of honoring the most “outstanding” player in college football to what it has become today: a subjective, narrative-driven award shaped by campaigning, signature moments, and a massive voting pool with loose criteria. We discuss why the Heisman feels closer to winning an Oscar than an undisputed MVP, and how hindsight plays a huge role in how we judge winners and snubs years later.
That sets the stage for today’s two Mount Rushmore topics:
- One focused on legendary players who never managed to bring home the Heisman despite incredible careers
- The other centered on Heisman winners whose success didn’t fully translate at the next level
We debate criteria, expectations, context, and how difficult it is to project college dominance into professional success. Along the way, we touch on fame, pressure, system fit, and how quickly narratives can flip once players leave Saturdays behind.
We close by looking ahead — what the future might hold for this year’s Heisman winner, how runner-up narratives can fuel careers, and why college football history often looks very different in hindsight.
Plenty of strong opinions. Plenty of disagreement. And plenty of reasons this award will always spark debate.