
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


When the New York Times declared it was "the end of work as we knew it" for Gen X, it did not feel fine. The story called the generation obsolete, irrelevant, and even likened them to candlestick makers in the age of electricity. Seriously? The article sparked a firestorm, prompting host Jonathan Small to write a viral Substack response that only raised the temperature. Now, Dana DuBois—fellow Gen X-er, writer, alt-rock aficionado—joins the show to talk about why the article sparked so much rage, what it got dead wrong, and how Gen X is not just surviving but reinventing midlife on their own terms.
Read Jon's response on Substack here.
Read the original NYT story here.
All things Dana DuBois can be found here.
By Jonathan Small4.9
163163 ratings
When the New York Times declared it was "the end of work as we knew it" for Gen X, it did not feel fine. The story called the generation obsolete, irrelevant, and even likened them to candlestick makers in the age of electricity. Seriously? The article sparked a firestorm, prompting host Jonathan Small to write a viral Substack response that only raised the temperature. Now, Dana DuBois—fellow Gen X-er, writer, alt-rock aficionado—joins the show to talk about why the article sparked so much rage, what it got dead wrong, and how Gen X is not just surviving but reinventing midlife on their own terms.
Read Jon's response on Substack here.
Read the original NYT story here.
All things Dana DuBois can be found here.

43,816 Listeners

32,003 Listeners

38,498 Listeners

43,582 Listeners

38,827 Listeners

16,121 Listeners

2,846 Listeners

11,779 Listeners

13,240 Listeners

8,483 Listeners

8,557 Listeners

15,272 Listeners

41,566 Listeners

19,745 Listeners

89 Listeners