
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
In today's episode of the Passing Judgment podcast, we explore the intricacies of the legal realm and examine the most recent developments in the ongoing civil case against the former president. Our guest is Elie Honig, a CNN senior analyst and the bestselling author of 'Hatchet Man.' Together, we delve into the allegations of fraud, witness tampering, and their potential implications for our justice system. From analyzing the judge's ruling to questioning the validity of guilty pleas, this episode leaves no stone unturned. We also delve into the power dynamics, legal strategies, and potential solutions within this captivating case, which could have significant, far-reaching consequences.
Here are three key takeaways from the episode:
1️⃣ The judge's summary judgment ruling in favor of the attorney general has raised concerns about bias and prematurely determining the case's outcome without considering genuine disputes of material facts.
2️⃣ Gag orders can limit speech and expression, but they are important tools to ensure a fair trial. Maybe it's time to rebrand them to be less restrictive while maintaining their purpose.
3️⃣ Powerful individuals often pay for co-defendants' legal representation, making it harder for them to cooperate with authorities. These dynamics can complicate prosecutions, highlighting the need for DOJ policies that discourage such practices.
Follow Our Guest:
On X formerly known as Twitter: @ElieHonig
Follow Our Host:
On X formerly known as Twitter: @LevinsonJessica
4.7
212212 ratings
In today's episode of the Passing Judgment podcast, we explore the intricacies of the legal realm and examine the most recent developments in the ongoing civil case against the former president. Our guest is Elie Honig, a CNN senior analyst and the bestselling author of 'Hatchet Man.' Together, we delve into the allegations of fraud, witness tampering, and their potential implications for our justice system. From analyzing the judge's ruling to questioning the validity of guilty pleas, this episode leaves no stone unturned. We also delve into the power dynamics, legal strategies, and potential solutions within this captivating case, which could have significant, far-reaching consequences.
Here are three key takeaways from the episode:
1️⃣ The judge's summary judgment ruling in favor of the attorney general has raised concerns about bias and prematurely determining the case's outcome without considering genuine disputes of material facts.
2️⃣ Gag orders can limit speech and expression, but they are important tools to ensure a fair trial. Maybe it's time to rebrand them to be less restrictive while maintaining their purpose.
3️⃣ Powerful individuals often pay for co-defendants' legal representation, making it harder for them to cooperate with authorities. These dynamics can complicate prosecutions, highlighting the need for DOJ policies that discourage such practices.
Follow Our Guest:
On X formerly known as Twitter: @ElieHonig
Follow Our Host:
On X formerly known as Twitter: @LevinsonJessica
8,506 Listeners
38,189 Listeners
36,931 Listeners
3,521 Listeners
2,522 Listeners
111,917 Listeners
2,321 Listeners
32,390 Listeners
6,992 Listeners
9,597 Listeners
6,751 Listeners
4,624 Listeners
15,335 Listeners
854 Listeners
1,284 Listeners