If Netflix acquires Warner Bros. Discovery, it eliminates one of the largest buyers of independent content in the industry. This is the story nobody's talking about. For independent producers, showrunners, and filmmakers, consolidation means fewer buyers, less leverage, and compressed deal terms.

Wall Street stopped caring about subscriber counts. In 2026, the metrics that matter are ARPU—average revenue per user—and free cash flow. This is a fundamental shift in how streaming companies are valued. The subscriber growth era is over. The profit extraction era has begun.

David Ellison launches a $108 billion hostile takeover bid for Warner Bros. Discovery, offering $30 per share to crash Netflix's $82.7 billion acquisition. WBD's board rejected it. Here's what's really happening: this isn't about who loves HBO more. It's about whether one company controls enough content to dictate terms to everyone else in the industry.

The Oscars cost studios $15-20 million per campaign. The Golden Globes are a pay-to-play operation.

This episode explains the business function of awards: they're customer acquisition tools for streaming platforms, talent retention mechanisms, and prestige signals that justify premium pricing. Why Netflix spends more on awards than any traditional studio.

The hidden incentive: awards extend content shelf life and justify catalog valuations.

The takeaway: This isn't about art—it's about asset appreciation.

]]>

Netflix paid $15 billion for Paramount's back catalog access. Disney's real asset isn't Marvel—it's the vault.

This episode explains why legacy content libraries are now the most valuable assets in media. The economics: library content has zero marginal production cost, generates perpetual licensing revenue, and provides catalog depth that reduces churn.

The streaming wars are really a library acquisition war. Studios that sold their libraries in the 2010s made a catastrophic error.

The takeaway: What this means for content strategy going forward.

]]>

AT&T-Time Warner. Viacom-CBS. Discovery-Warner Bros. The pattern is clear: media mergers destroy value more often than they create it.

This episode explains the business logic that makes these deals look good on paper—synergies, cost cuts, content libraries—and why execution fails. Culture clashes, integration costs, debt loads, and the fundamental problem: content businesses don't scale like tech.

The takeaway: The real reason private equity and tech billionaires keep trying anyway: control of distribution and IP is the prize, not operational efficiency.

]]>

Why do Netflix and streamers cancel shows after 2-3 seasons even when audiences love them?

The public narrative is always "creative direction" or "viewership." The business reality is different: it's about license fees, backend obligations, and balance sheet optimization.

This episode explains how shows can be profitable for producers but unprofitable for the platform. Cancellation decisions are made by finance, not creative. It's cheaper to launch new IP than pay escalating talent costs.

The takeaway: This signals the shift from audience-building to cost management.

]]>

Netflix, Disney+, and Max all now have ad-supported tiers. The original streaming thesis—pure subscription, no ads, unlimited content—is dead.

The economics: subscriber growth has plateaued, price increases face resistance, and pure subscription models can't achieve the scale Wall Street demands. Ad-supported streaming is essentially a return to the broadcast television model—just with better targeting data.

The second-order implication: this changes what content gets made. Ad-supported tiers favor broad, brand-safe programming over prestige niche content.

The takeaway: The streaming revolution is quietly becoming cable 2.0.

]]>

The search for Bob Iger's successor is down to two candidates: Josh D'Amaro (parks) and Dana Walden (content). There's even talk of a co-CEO structure, similar to Michael Eisner and Frank Wells.

The business logic: Disney's profit engine is parks and experiences, not streaming. Disney+ loses money. ESPN is being spun off. The studio is volatile.

This episode explains why the next CEO choice will reveal whether Disney sees itself as a content company or an experiences/IP licensing company. What this means for talent deals, theatrical strategy, and Disney's relationship with streaming.

The takeaway: This only makes sense if you understand where Disney's actual cash flow comes from.

]]>

The WGA sued major talent agencies over packaging fees in 2019, framing it as a victory for writers. But CAA, WME, and UTA are more powerful now than they were before the lawsuit.

This episode explains how agencies adapted—expanding into gaming, sports, branded content, and producing. The core conflict remains: agencies collecting fees from studios rather than standard 10% client commissions creates misaligned incentives.

But the real power shift is that agencies now control access to talent ecosystems across multiple verticals. The streaming era actually increased agency leverage because platforms need content volume.

The takeaway: The headline missed the incentive—agencies didn't lose, they diversified.

]]>