The payments systems infrastructure at many traditional financial institutions — banks and credit unions — is showing its age at a time when new, nimble players are entering the space.
These lumbering systems, many of which were constructed 50 years ago for electronic funds transfers and card services, are being left behind entirely by fintechs, or they are being shored up with patchwork infrastructure additions and payments islands that can handle new authentication methods.
Whatever the case, it all adds up to an existential challenge for traditional financial institutions, one that was broken down in a conversation with PaymentsJournal by Jens Audenaert, Global Head of Payments Software at Diebold Nixdorf, and Tim Sloane, VP of Payments Innovation at Mercator Advisory Group.
PaymentsJournalUnburdening Financial Institutions from Legacy Payments SystemsPaymentsJournal Unburdening Financial Institutions from Legacy Payments SystemsPaymentsJournaljQuery(document).ready(function ($){var settings_ap24787930 = { design_skin: "skin-wave" ,autoplay: "off",disable_volume:"default" ,loop:"off" ,cue: "on" ,embedded: "off" ,preload_method:"metadata" ,design_animateplaypause:"off" ,skinwave_dynamicwaves:"off" ,skinwave_enableSpectrum:"off" ,skinwave_enableReflect:"on",settings_backup_type:"full",playfrom:"default",soundcloud_apikey:"" ,skinwave_comments_enable:"off",settings_php_handler:window.ajaxurl,skinwave_wave_mode:"canvas",pcm_data_try_to_generate: "on","pcm_notice": "off","notice_no_media": "on",design_color_bg: "111111",design_color_highlight: "ef6b13",skinwave_wave_mode_canvas_waves_number: "3",skinwave_wave_mode_canvas_waves_padding: "1",skinwave_wave_mode_canvas_reflection_size: "0.25",skinwave_comments_playerid:"24787930",php_retriever:"https://www.paymentsjournal.com/wp-content/plugins/dzs-zoomsounds/soundcloudretriever.php" }; try{ dzsap_init(".ap_idx_381720_28",settings_ap24787930); }catch(err){ console.warn("cannot init player", err); } });
In their discussion, Audenaert and Sloane advocated for a move away from dated legacy systems to a cloud-based infrastructure, focusing on these key points:
* The inherent risks of legacy systems.* The primary drivers of modernization.* How to make the transition from legacy systems.* Key features financial institutions should seek in cloud-based infrastructure.
“The pace of changes in payments has been unbelievable in the last seven to ten years,” Sloane said. Meanwhile, he said, the traditional model “has poured concrete around [traditional FIs’] payments infrastructure.”
“It’s time for everyone to start to recognize that and think, ‘How are we going to be competitive?’”
The Inherent Risks of Legacy Systems
Traditional financial institutions derive 30% to 40% of their revenue from payments, Audenaert noted. Accordingly, the risks of maintaining legacy systems that he outlined all dovetail with banks’ need to continue generating those revenues.
The risks include:
* Costs, including the technical depth required to maintain legacy systems, the duplication of effort, and the software and hardware requirements compared with the cloud.* Resilience issues, including outages of the systems. Audenaert noted that 24-hour (or longer) outages have been “a huge issue.