
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


The Guardian arts writer Adrian Horton joins us to discuss The Report, Scott Z. Burns’s dramatization of Senate staffer Daniel J. Jones’s investigation into the CIA’s post-9/11 torture program. We follow the film’s flashbacks and committee-room battles, tracing how “enhanced interrogation” was engineered by Air Force psychologists Jim Mitchell and Bruce Jessen, sanitized by lawyers like John Yoo, and sold to White House officials while the FBI’s Ali Soufan was proving rapport-based interrogation actually worked. The movie captures both the bureaucratic slog—“just the facts” over years of reading transcripts—and the political cowardice that let CIA leaders lie to presidents of both parties, cover up deaths like Gul Rahman’s, and spin torture as having led to bin Laden.
Our conversation with Adrian turns to how the film frames institutional failure and accountability: John Brennan’s CIA spying on Senate staff, Obama’s refusal to pursue prosecutions, and the spectacle of Feinstein, Udall, and McCain trying to salvage transparency while the agency rebranded its crimes. We talk aesthetics, too, including the film’s cool tones, Adam Driver’s restrained performance, and how it stages the clash between truth-seeking and “middle ground” politics. At stake, then and now, is whether brutality gets buried by euphemism and liberal adulation of “patriotic” spies, or confronted for what it is.
Further Reading
Adrian Horton’s writing at The Guardian
The Senate Intelligence Committee’s “Torture Report”
The Black Banners: The Inside Story of 9/11 and the War Against al-Qaeda, by Ali Soufan
Reign of Terror: How the 9/11 Era Destabilized America and Produced Trump by Spencer Ackerman
Teaser from the Episode
The Report Trailer
By Van and Lyle are Bang-Bang4.3
66 ratings
The Guardian arts writer Adrian Horton joins us to discuss The Report, Scott Z. Burns’s dramatization of Senate staffer Daniel J. Jones’s investigation into the CIA’s post-9/11 torture program. We follow the film’s flashbacks and committee-room battles, tracing how “enhanced interrogation” was engineered by Air Force psychologists Jim Mitchell and Bruce Jessen, sanitized by lawyers like John Yoo, and sold to White House officials while the FBI’s Ali Soufan was proving rapport-based interrogation actually worked. The movie captures both the bureaucratic slog—“just the facts” over years of reading transcripts—and the political cowardice that let CIA leaders lie to presidents of both parties, cover up deaths like Gul Rahman’s, and spin torture as having led to bin Laden.
Our conversation with Adrian turns to how the film frames institutional failure and accountability: John Brennan’s CIA spying on Senate staff, Obama’s refusal to pursue prosecutions, and the spectacle of Feinstein, Udall, and McCain trying to salvage transparency while the agency rebranded its crimes. We talk aesthetics, too, including the film’s cool tones, Adam Driver’s restrained performance, and how it stages the clash between truth-seeking and “middle ground” politics. At stake, then and now, is whether brutality gets buried by euphemism and liberal adulation of “patriotic” spies, or confronted for what it is.
Further Reading
Adrian Horton’s writing at The Guardian
The Senate Intelligence Committee’s “Torture Report”
The Black Banners: The Inside Story of 9/11 and the War Against al-Qaeda, by Ali Soufan
Reign of Terror: How the 9/11 Era Destabilized America and Produced Trump by Spencer Ackerman
Teaser from the Episode
The Report Trailer

1,456 Listeners

8,844 Listeners

604 Listeners

1,930 Listeners

3,913 Listeners

160 Listeners

198 Listeners

2,058 Listeners

371 Listeners

66 Listeners

1,043 Listeners

584 Listeners

44 Listeners

128 Listeners

41 Listeners