Trailer - Special Report #4 - Special Report #4 - Federal Power v. State Rights: MN Takes on ICE -The 10th Amendment Clash in MNA quick, clear breakdown of one of the most misunderstood questions in American law: Who actually has constitutional authority over immigration? In this short, we trace the power back to its source — the Constitution — and explain why immigration isn’t a state‑by‑state issue but a federal one rooted in national sovereignty.If you want civic education that’s fast, factual, and grounded in constitutional text and history, this is your channel.📡 Follow The Republic – If You Can Keep ItYouTube: https://www.youtube.com/@TheRepublic_IfYouCanKeepItInstagram: https://www.instagram.com/therepublic_ifyoucankeepitX (Twitter): https://x.com/TheRepublic4AllSpotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/3pcyn9uA9RvE0kHg0nkvvk?si=VnJvhcB6S8SkIzuv7iHeartRadio: https://iheart.com/podcast/315457972/Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-republic-if-you-can-keep-it/id1854797160Pandora: https://www.pandora.com/podcast/the-republic-if-you-can-keep-it/PC:1001112491Stitcher: https://www.stitcher.com/show/1112491Deezer: https://deezer.com/show/1002493062#ImmigrationLaw #FederalAuthority #Constitution101 #LegalExplainer #CivicEducation #KnowYourRights #HistoryIn60Seconds #GovernmentExplained #LearnOnYouTube #YouTubeShorts #foryoupage ⚖️ GLOBAL COPYRIGHT, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY & FAIR USE NOTICE© 2026 The Republic – If You Can Keep It Podcast. All rights reserved.All original audio, video, written content, branding, and educational materials associated with The Republic – If You Can Keep It are the intellectual property of the podcast and its creators. No part of this content may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means without prior written permission, except for brief quotations permitted under applicable copyright law.This content is provided for educational and informational purposes only. It does not advocate for or against any political candidate, party, referendum, ballot measure, or public policy. It is not intended to influence voting behavior or any legislative, regulatory, or electoral process at the U.S. federal, state, regional, or local level, or at the EU, national, regional, or local level.Any case law, statutes, regulatory materials, or historical documents referenced in this content are included under the Fair Use doctrine (17 U.S.C. § 107) for commentary, criticism, education, scholarship, and public interest analysis. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names remain the property of their respective owners and are used solely for identification and commentary.For permissions, licensing inquiries, or Fair Use questions, please contact The Republic – If You Can Keep It Podcast directly.

In this engaging segment, Rob and Lou delve into the intricacies of Article III of the U.S. Constitution, which establishes the judicial branch of the federal government. They explore the foundational role of the Supreme Court and its jurisdiction, highlighting how it serves as the ultimate arbiter of constitutional interpretation. The discussion covers the structure and hierarchy of the federal court system, including district and circuit courts, and the process by which cases ascend to the Supreme Court. Rob and Lou also examine the historical context and evolving role of the judiciary, emphasizing its critical function in maintaining the balance of power and protecting individual rights. This segment offers listeners a comprehensive understanding of the judiciary's place within the American constitutional framework. This conversation explores the historical evolution of the judiciary's role in government, highlighting how perceptions have shifted from viewing it as the least dangerous branch to recognizing it as a powerful and active participant in governance.Keywordsjudiciary, government, Article 3, founding fathers, judicial power, historical perspectiveTakeawaysThe judiciary was historically seen as the least dangerous branch.The founding fathers did not envision the judiciary's current power.Judicial involvement in government has significantly increased over time.The role of the judiciary has evolved with societal changes.Judicial power can influence legislation and executive actions.Public perception of the judiciary has shifted dramatically.The judiciary's decisions can have far-reaching implications.Historical context is essential to understanding current judicial power.The balance of power among branches of government is dynamic.Judicial activism is a topic of ongoing debate.

In this episode of 'The Republic, If You Can Keep It,' Rob and Lou dive into the powers granted to the President under Article II of the U.S. Constitution. They explore the historical context, the evolution of executive powers, and the modern challenges faced by the executive branch. The discussion includes the role of the President as Commander in Chief, the use of executive orders, and the constitutional debates that shaped the executive authority. The conversation delves into the complexities of executive orders, particularly focusing on the Youngstown case and its historical significance during Truman's presidency. It highlights the relationship between the executive branch and the Supreme Court, exploring how these dynamics have evolved over time.KeywordsArticle II, U.S. Constitution, executive powers, Commander in Chief, executive orders, constitutional debates, modern challenges, historical context, presidential authority, legal insights, executive orders, Youngstown case, Supreme Court, legal historyTakeawaysThe President's powers under Article II are vast and have evolved over time.Executive orders have been a significant tool for Presidents, starting with George Washington.The role of Commander in Chief grants the President substantial military authority.Constitutional debates during the founding of the U.S. were intense and led to significant compromises.The Youngstown case is pivotal in understanding executive orders.Truman's reaction to the Supreme Court's decision reflects historical tensions.The social dynamics of the Supreme Court have changed significantly.Executive orders have a complex legal history that impacts modern governance.Understanding past cases can inform current legal interpretations.The relationship between the president and the Supreme Court is crucial.Historical context is essential for analyzing current executive actions.The role of public perception in executive decisions is significant.Legal precedents shape the boundaries of executive power.The evolution of executive orders reflects broader societal changes.Modern challenges to executive authority continue to shape the interpretation of Article II.The balance of power between branches is a core principle of the U.S. Constitution.Historical context is crucial to understanding current political issues.Chapters00:00:00 Introduction and Overview00:03:00 Article II Powers and Historical Context00:06:00 Commander in Chief and Executive Orders00:09:00 Constitutional Debates and Compromises00:12:00 Modern Challenges and Interpretations00:15:00 Conclusion and Call to ActionLinks: SCHOOLHOUSE ROCK - https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLqw3mNOU8YcUdhqY9YSckDsxbWwW5n2cJ&si=ib4d_iujLiozifAB DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE - https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcriptCONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcriptDisclaimer: This video provides educational legal and historical analysis and does not advocate for any political candidate or campaign. Copyrighted materials are used under Fair Use (17 U.S. Code § 107). Opinions expressed do not constitute legal advice. See full disclaimer at TheRepublicPodcast.com LinksYouTube - http://www.youtube.com/@TheRepublic_IfYouCanKeepItInstagram - https://www.instagram.com/therepublic_ifyoucankeepitX - https://x.com/TheRepublic4AllSpotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/3pcyn9uA9RvE0kHg0nkvvk?si=VnJvhcB6S8SkIzuv7

In this special report from The Republic — If You Can Keep It, Lou and Rob break down the recent Supreme Court decisions reshaping presidential authority to mobilize National Guard units. They examine how these rulings affect the President’s ability to deploy Guard forces across state lines and why the boundaries between state and federal power are now more contested than ever. The discussion covers the Insurrection Act, the Posse Comitatus Act, and the constitutional framework governing when military forces may support law enforcement. Lou and Rob also explain the differences between state‑controlled Guard units and federally activated forces, highlighting how these distinctions drive ongoing legal battles.Key Statutes & AuthoritiesInsurrection Act (10 U.S.C. §§ 331–335) – Authorizes federalized Guard or active‑duty forces to suppress insurrections or enforce federal law when ordinary processes fail.331: https://tinyurl.com/25nrzxqx332: https://tinyurl.com/25dzxjwc333: https://tinyurl.com/28tedk5a334: https://tinyurl.com/29hxfepj335: https://tinyurl.com/22kcdmq410 U.S.C. § 12406 – Allows the President to call National Guard units into federal service to execute federal laws.https://tinyurl.com/2cd63ag732 U.S.C. § 502(f) – Permits Guard units to perform federal missions under state control (Title 32 status).https://tinyurl.com/2d46avncPosse Comitatus Act (18 U.S.C. § 1385) – Restricts federal military involvement in domestic law enforcement unless authorized by statute.https://tinyurl.com/26dwfvs6Constitutional ProvisionsArt. I, §8, cl. 15 – Congress may call forth the militia to execute laws, suppress insurrections, and repel invasions.https://tinyurl.com/22yv33z9Art. I, §8, cl. 16 – Congress organizes and arms the militia; states appoint officers and conduct training.https://tinyurl.com/252d6gxpArt. I, §8, cl. 17 – Exclusive federal authority over D.C., including the D.C. National Guard.https://tinyurl.com/25r3traaArt. II, §2 – President is Commander in Chief when the militia is federalized.https://tinyurl.com/2844odnnArt. II, §3 – President must “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed.”https://tinyurl.com/27ney6a6Historical CasesMartin v. Mott (1827) – President’s determination of an emergency justifying militia activation is conclusive.https://tinyurl.com/2blonr6jIn re Neagle (1890) – Recognized inherent executive authority to protect federal officials.https://tinyurl.com/2yx766fxIn re Debs (1895) – Affirmed federal power to prevent interference with government operations.https://tinyurl.com/2n4t4wh9Recent Litigation Over Guard DeploymentsIllinois (Chicago) – TRO upheld; Supreme Court denied emergency relief.Docket: https://tinyurl.com/23nxxpu6Opinion: https://tinyurl.com/246mblkfSCOTUS: https://tinyurl.com/26hyqj4eCalifornia (Los Angeles) – Deployment ruled unlawful under Posse Comitatus.Ruling: https://tinyurl.com/2cnygysz9th Cir.: https://tinyurl.com/2xmn3cbgOregon (Portland) – TRO and permanent injunction issued; 9th Cir. affirmed.Injunction: https://tinyurl.com/28k2888yOpinion: https://tinyurl.com/2xl47ftbWashington (Seattle) – Deployment ended by court order; 9th Cir. affirmed.Ruling: https://tinyurl.com/2ypgszhqOpinion: https://tinyurl.com/2bs5uowyDisclaimerThis content is for educational and informational purposes only. It does not advocate for or against any political candidate, party, referendum, ballot measure, or public policy. It is not intended to influence the outcome of any election or referendum, voting behavior, or any legislative or regulatory process at the U.S. federal, state, regional, or local level, or at the EU, national, regional, or local level. Copyrighted materials appearing in this content are used under Fair Use for purposes of commentary, criticism, education, and analysis (17 U.S.C. § 107). Opinions expressed do not constitute legal advice.

U.S. Actions in Venezuela — Constitutional Crisis or Foreign Policy Strategy?

In this special report from The Republic — If You Can Keep It, Rob and Lou tackle one of the most explosive developments in recent foreign policy: the arrest of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro by U.S. forces.They break down what such an unprecedented action means for constitutional authority, international law, and America’s role on the world stage.

Lou and Rob explore the legal and constitutional implications of a U.S. military operation targeting a foreign head of state, drawing parallels to the Noriega case, where the United States previously apprehended a foreign leader and brought him to trial.They examine the scope of Article II executive power, the constraints and controversies surrounding the War Powers Act, and how these tools are interpreted when the Commander in Chief orders military action without a formal declaration of war.

The conversation also dives into the legitimacy questions surrounding Maduro’s presidency, the geopolitical stakes in the region, and how this move could reshape U.S.‑Latin American relations for years to come.A sharp, accessible breakdown of the constitutional, historical, and diplomatic forces colliding in this moment — and why informed citizens need to understand the stakes.

#TheRepublicIfYouCanKeepIt #ForeignPolicy #Venezuela #WarPowers #ArticleII #CivicEducation #AmericanHistory #Geopolitics

SCHOOLHOUSE ROCKhttps://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLqw3mNOU8YcUdhqY9YSckDsxbWwW5n2cJ

DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCEhttps://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcript

CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICAhttps://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript

This video provides educational legal and historical analysis and does not advocate for any political candidate or campaign.Copyrighted materials are used under Fair Use (17 U.S. Code § 107).Opinions expressed do not constitute legal advice.See full disclaimer at TheRepublicPodcast.com

YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/@TheRepublic_IfYouCanKeepItInstagram – https://www.instagram.com/therepublic_ifyoucankeepitX – https://x.com/TheRepublic4AllSpotify – https://open.spotify.com/show/3pcyn9uA9RvE0kHg0nkvvk?si=VnJvhcB6S8SkIzuv7iHeartRadio – https://iheart.com/podcast/315457972/Apple Podcasts – https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-republic-if-you-can-keep-it/id1854797160Pandora – https://www.pandora.com/podcast/the-republic-if-you-can-keep-it/PC:1001112491Stitcher – https://www.stitcher.com/show/1112491Deezer – https://deezer.com/show/1002493062

🔖 HashtagsLinksDisclaimer🔗 Channel Links

In this episode, Rob and Lou delve into Article 2 of the U.S. Constitution, discussing the powers and limitations of the presidency. They explore the historical context of the article, the role of the president as commander in chief, the significance of the State of the Union address, and the impeachment process. The conversation highlights the evolution of executive power and the importance of understanding the Constitution in contemporary political discourse.#ArticleII#presidentialpowers #usconstitution #civiceducation #TheRepublicIfYouCanKeepItKeywordsConstitution, Article 2, Executive Power, President, Impeachment, State of the Union, Political Theater, Electoral College, Limited Government, Founding FathersTakeawaysArticle 2 speaks to the executive authority.The Constitution is a restriction of powers.The president is the commander in chief.The State of the Union is compelled by the Constitution.Impeachment has become a frequent topic.The president has limited powers granted.Executive orders are an Article Two power.The Constitution was drafted to give specific powers.Learn it, love it, live it.Links: SCHOOLHOUSE ROCK - https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLqw3mNOU8YcUdhqY9YSckDsxbWwW5n2cJ&si=ib4d_iujLiozifAB DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE - https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcriptCONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcriptDisclaimer: This video provides educational legal and historical analysis and does not advocate for any political candidate or campaign. Copyrighted materials are used under Fair Use (17 U.S. Code § 107). Opinions expressed do not constitute legal advice. See full disclaimer at TheRepublicPodcast.com LinksYouTube - http://www.youtube.com/@TheRepublic_IfYouCanKeepItInstagram - https://www.instagram.com/therepublic_ifyoucankeepitX - https://x.com/TheRepublic4AllSpotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/3pcyn9uA9RvE0kHg0nkvvk?si=VnJvhcB6S8SkIzuv7

In this episode, Rob & Lou discuss Article I of the United States Constitution, focusing on the establishment and operations of the Legislative Branch;. They outline the composition of Congress with the House of Representatives and Senate, including election processes, qualifications for members, apportionment rules, and powers such as taxation, commerce regulation, and war declaration, while also detailing limitations on both Congress and the states to ensure a balanced federal system.#usconstitution #ArticleI #legislativebranch #uscongress #senate #houseofreps #americangovernment #civics #foundingdocuments #constitutionallaw Links: SCHOOLHOUSE ROCK - https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLqw3mNOU8YcUdhqY9YSckDsxbWwW5n2cJ&si=ib4d_iujLiozifAB DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE - https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcriptCONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcriptDisclaimer: This video provides educational legal and historical analysis and does not advocate for any political candidate or campaign. Copyrighted materials are used under Fair Use (17 U.S. Code § 107). Opinions expressed do not constitute legal advice. See full disclaimer at TheRepublicPodcast.com LinksYouTube - http://www.youtube.com/@TheRepublic_IfYouCanKeepItInstagram - https://www.instagram.com/therepublic_ifyoucankeepitX - https://x.com/TheRepublic4AllSpotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/3pcyn9uA9RvE0kHg0nkvvk?si=VnJvhcB6S8SkIzuv7

In this conversation, Rob and Lou delve into the historical significance and formation of the US Constitution, discussing its origins, the challenges faced during its creation, and its lasting impact on American governance. They explore the Articles of Confederation, the Constitutional Convention, and the compromises made by the framers to establish a government that is both representative and resilient. The discussion also touches on the Bill of Rights, the Constitution as a living document, and the importance of understanding this foundational text in the context of American history.TakeawaysThe US Constitution is the oldest active constitution in the world.The Constitution was created to be ratified by the people, not by nobility.The Articles of Confederation were ineffective in governing the new nation.The Constitutional Convention was a response to the failures of the Articles of Confederation.Compromise was essential in the formation of the Constitution.The Constitution is a living document that can be amended.The framers of the Constitution aimed to prevent mob rule.The Constitution outlines what the government can do, not what it cannot do.The Bill of Rights consists of the first ten amendments to the Constitution.The Constitution was written in just 4,400 words, a stark contrast to modern legislation.KeywordsUS Constitution, Declaration of Independence, American History, Constitutional Convention, Bill of Rights, Articles of Confederation, Founding Fathers, Government Structure, Historical Context, Living DocumentChapters00:00 Introduction to the Constitution02:50 Historical Context of the Constitution05:25 The Articles of Confederation and Its Failures08:25 The Constitutional Convention11:32 The Compromise and Formation of the Constitution14:11 The Structure of the Constitution17:20 The Bill of Rights and Amendments19:58 The Living Document of the Constitution23:03 Conclusion and Future DiscussionsLinks: SCHOOLHOUSE ROCK - https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLqw3mNOU8YcUdhqY9YSckDsxbWwW5n2cJ&si=ib4d_iujLiozifAB DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE - https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcriptCONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcriptDisclaimer: This video provides educational legal and historical analysis and does not advocate for any political candidate or campaign. Copyrighted materials are used under Fair Use (17 U.S. Code § 107). Opinions expressed do not constitute legal advice. See full disclaimer at TheRepublicPodcast.com LinksYouTube - http://www.youtube.com/@TheRepublic_IfYouCanKeepItInstagram - https://www.instagram.com/therepublic_ifyoucankeepitX - https://x.com/TheRepublic4AllSpotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/3pcyn9uA9RvE0kHg0nkvvk?si=VnJvhcB6S8SkIzuv7

In this conversation, Lou and Rob jump back into the discussion of the founding documents of the United States, and delve into the significance of the U.S. Constitution, exploring its structure, historical context, and the importance of understanding its articles. They discuss the foundational principles of governance, the role of the legislative branch, and the checks and balances established by the Constitution. The conversation emphasizes the need for civic education and awareness of constitutional rights and limitations.KeywordsConstitution, legislative branch, checks and balances, founding fathers, historical context, Article 1, Preamble, governance, federalism, civic educationTakeawaysThe Constitution is the foundation of the Republic.Understanding the Constitution is crucial for civic engagement.The Preamble outlines the purpose of the Constitution.Article 1 establishes the legislative branch.Checks and balances prevent the abuse of power.The Constitutional Convention was a response to the weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation.The legislative branch is designed to represent the people.The Constitution limits government power, not individual rights.Civic education is essential for understanding governance.The Constitution's language is concise and purposeful.Chapters00:00 Introduction and Cheers02:47 The Importance of the Constitution05:38 Overview of the Constitution's Articles08:29 The Constitutional Convention and Its Significance11:34 The Preamble and Its Meaning14:26 Article 1: The Legislative Branch17:03 Checks and Balances in Government20:09 Powers Granted to Congress23:17 The Role of the Constitution in Modern Governance26:01 Conclusion and Future DiscussionsLinks: SCHOOLHOUSE ROCK - https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLqw3mNOU8YcUdhqY9YSckDsxbWwW5n2cJ&si=ib4d_iujLiozifAB DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE - https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcriptCONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcriptDisclaimer: This video provides educational legal and historical analysis and does not advocate for any political candidate or campaign. Copyrighted materials are used under Fair Use (17 U.S. Code § 107). Opinions expressed do not constitute legal advice. See full disclaimer at TheRepublicPodcast.com LinksYouTube - http://www.youtube.com/@TheRepublic_IfYouCanKeepItInstagram - https://www.instagram.com/therepublic_ifyoucankeepitX - https://x.com/TheRepublic4AllSpotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/3pcyn9uA9RvE0kHg0nkvvk?si=VnJvhcB6S8SkIzuv7

In this episode, Lou and Rob discuss the current events surrounding the presidential use of force in the Caribbean, particularly in relation to narco-terrorism. They explore the constitutional powers of the executive and legislative branches regarding military actions, the historical context of war declarations, and the implications of the War Powers Act and Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF). The conversation also delves into legal justifications for military actions, challenges in international law, and the importance of public trust in government.TakeawaysThe U.S. Constitution divides war powers between Congress and the President.The last formal declaration of war by Congress was during World War II.The War Powers Act requires the President to notify Congress of military actions.The AUMF allows the President to take necessary actions against terrorism.Military actions in international waters are subject to different legal standards.Historical precedents show both parties have used military force without formal declarations of war.The legality of military actions can be challenged in court but often upheld.International law supports actions against stateless ships involved in narcotics trafficking.Supreme Court Cases• Bas v. Tingy, 4 U.S. (4 Dall.) 37 (1800)• The Prize Cases, 67 U.S. (2 Black) 635 (1863)• Ex parte Milligan, 71 U.S. (4 Wall.) 2 (1866)• United States v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corp., 299 U.S. 304 (1936)• Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579 (1952)• Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Chadha, 462 U.S. 919 (1983)• Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 U.S. 507 (2004)• Rasul v. Bush, 542 U.S. 466 (2004)• Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, 548 U.S. 557 (2006)• Boumediene v. Bush, 553 U.S. 723 (2008)U.S. Constitution• U.S. Const. art. I, § 8 • U.S. Const. art. II, § 2 U.S. Statutes and Executive Orders• War Powers Resolution, Pub. L. No. 93-148, 87 Stat. 555 (1973) (codified at 50 U.S.C. §§ 1541-1548)• Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF), Pub. L. No. 107-40, 115 Stat. 224 (2001) (codified at 50 U.S.C. § 1541 note)• Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (MDLEA), Pub. L. No. 96-350, 94 Stat. 1159 (1980) (codified as amended at 46 U.S.C. §§ 70501 et seq.)• Immigration and Nationality Act § 219, Pub. L. No. 82-414, 66 Stat. 163 (1952) (codified as amended at 8 U.S.C. § 1189) (Foreign Terrorist Organization designations)• International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), Pub. L. No. 95-223, 91 Stat. 1626 (1977) (codified as amended at 50 U.S.C. §§ 1701 et seq.)• Exec. Order No. 13,224, 66 Fed. Reg. 49,079 (Sept. 23, 2001) (Specially Designated Global Terrorists)International Treaties and Conventions• Charter of the United Nations, June 26, 1945, 59 Stat. 1031, T.S. No. 993• Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, Mar. 30, 1961, 520 U.N.T.S. 151 (as amended by the Protocol Amending the Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, Mar. 25, 1972, 976 U.N.T.S. 3)• Convention on Psychotropic Substances, Feb. 21, 1971, 1019 U.N.T.S. 175• United Nations Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (Vienna Convention), Dec. 20, 1988, 1582 U.N.T.S. 95• Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts Against the Safety of Maritime Navigation (SUA Convention), Mar. 10, 1988, 1678 U.N.T.S. 221• United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS), Dec. 10, 1982, 1833 U.N.T.S. 397• United Nations Convention Against Transnational Organized Crime (UNTOC, Palermo Convention), Nov. 15, 2000, 2225 U.N.T.S. 209• United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC), Oct. 31, 2003, 2349 U.N.T.S. 41All content is for educational and commentary purposes only. Copyrighted materials are used under Fair Use (17 U.S. Code § 107). Opinions expressed do not constitute legal advice.