
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode, Josh dives into the history of the Supreme Court and the constitutional framework of checks and balances meant to prevent unelected judges from ruling over the will of the people. He traces the earliest cases of lower court injunctions and draws a direct line to the wave of injunctions currently being used to block President Trump’s agenda. Josh argues that this represents nothing less than a “judicial insurrection” and warns about its consequences for American democracy. He also previews some of the most consequential cases on the Supreme Court’s new docket, offering insights into what they could mean for the future of law and politics in the United States.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
By The Josh Hammer Show4.5
266266 ratings
In this episode, Josh dives into the history of the Supreme Court and the constitutional framework of checks and balances meant to prevent unelected judges from ruling over the will of the people. He traces the earliest cases of lower court injunctions and draws a direct line to the wave of injunctions currently being used to block President Trump’s agenda. Josh argues that this represents nothing less than a “judicial insurrection” and warns about its consequences for American democracy. He also previews some of the most consequential cases on the Supreme Court’s new docket, offering insights into what they could mean for the future of law and politics in the United States.
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

26,203 Listeners

3,311 Listeners

14,226 Listeners

62,894 Listeners

22,738 Listeners

17,038 Listeners

6,572 Listeners

44,108 Listeners

3,153 Listeners

40,400 Listeners

8,769 Listeners

588 Listeners

5,970 Listeners

438 Listeners

55 Listeners

8 Listeners

20 Listeners

0 Listeners

363 Listeners

1,203 Listeners