On July 17, 2026, HUD's Office of General Counsel (OGC) issued a notice rescinding 13 guidance documents effective September 25, 2025, covering Fair Housing compliance, the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), the Mrs. Murphy exemption, and tenant admittance and eviction standards in federally assisted housing. The action follows a similar withdrawal of FHEO guidance documents in April, signaling a department-wide rollback of interpretive guidance that owners, PHAs, and compliance professionals have relied on for years.

Key Takeaways:

This rollback removes compliance scaffolding that owners and management agents have built procedures around for years. Until replacement guidance — from HUD, state HFAs, or PHAs — arrives, operators of federally assisted housing should treat their VAWA policies, tenant screening criteria, and eviction procedures as requiring immediate legal review. The gap between statutory text and prior agency interpretation is now exposed, and the direction of risk exposure has shifted.

Subscribe to The Spring Street Brief for daily updates on affordable housing in America.

USDA has published a proposed rule to amend its Section 515 Direct Multifamily Housing regulations, expanding the permissible uses of subsequent loans to include property acquisition. For developers, syndicators, and lenders working on rural affordable housing preservation, the change would open a new financing tool in one of the hardest-to-capitalize corners of the affordable housing market. Comments are due August 31, 2026.

Key Takeaways:

Rural multifamily preservation has long been constrained by small deal sizes, scattered geographies, and limited capital tools. If finalized in a workable form, this rule change could meaningfully expand USDA's role as a preservation lender — but the devil is in the drafting. Developers, state HFAs, syndicators, and lenders active in rural markets should review the proposed rule and submit comments before August 31.

Subscribe to The Spring Street Brief for daily updates on affordable housing in America.

Three federal policy developments are colliding this week with direct consequences for LIHTC investors, developers, lenders, and compliance teams. The House is moving toward a continuing resolution instead of full FY appropriations, HUD has withdrawn Federal Housing Administration guidance documents affecting FHA-insured multifamily transactions, and the Department of Homeland Security has finalized a rule rescinding the 2022 public charge ground of inadmissibility — reintroducing chilling effects for immigrant households relying on housing assistance programs.

Key Takeaways:

The combination of a continuing resolution, withdrawn FHA guidance, and a reversed public charge rule represents compounding regulatory headwinds arriving at the same time. Developers and syndicators should stress-test deal timelines against HUD processing delays, lenders should escalate FHA guidance questions to program staff rather than relying on withdrawn documents, and property managers should prepare residents and compliance teams before confusion reaches the lease level. Forward-looking teams will map their exposure across all three vectors now.

Subscribe to The Spring Street Brief for daily updates on affordable housing in America.

Oregon Housing and Community Services (OHCS) is advancing its Qualified Allocation Plan (QAP) update process ahead of the 2027 and 2028 LIHTC award cycles. A public engagement session scheduled for July 27, 2026 will review results from an April 2026 partner survey and open discussion on proposed QAP changes — giving developers, syndicators, lenders, and investors an early look at where Oregon's allocation priorities may shift before draft language is finalized.

Key Takeaways:

Oregon's QAP revision comes as developers across the state are navigating persistent cost and feasibility pressures. OHCS's explicit focus on financial challenges in its survey suggests the agency may be considering meaningful adjustments to how it underwrites or scores projects under current market conditions. Stakeholders with Oregon LIHTC exposure — whether active in competitive 9% deals or bond-financed 4% transactions — should participate in the July 27 session and position their organizations to comment during the fall public process before the QAP is finalized.

Subscribe to The Spring Street Brief for daily updates on affordable housing in America.

Greystone Real Estate Capital has closed its second affordable housing fund, raising $137 million in LIHTC equity from eight institutional investors to support nearly 2,000 affordable housing units across 20 properties in nine states. Combined with the $105 million Fund I close in August 2025, Greystone has now raised $240 million in under 12 months — a signal of accelerating institutional appetite for affordable housing as an asset class.

Key Takeaways:

The Greystone story is worth tracking for what it signals about institutional demand. CRA-motivated investors are increasingly drawn to LIHTC funds as a vehicle for stable, long-term, impact-linked returns — and the repeat investor participation in Fund II suggests that demand is translating into real performance confidence. Developers active in the nine portfolio states should take note of Greystone's deal parameters as a benchmark for where institutional fund capital is pricing and sizing today.

Subscribe to The Spring Street Brief for daily updates on affordable housing in America.

HUD has published its FY 2026 Renewal Funding Inflation Factors (RFIFs) for the Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) program, setting a national per unit cost growth projection of 2.337% and proposing a significant methodology change for FY 2027 that would incorporate local regulatory housing policy as a driver of rent inflation. The notice is effective July 6, with comments due August 5, 2026 — a narrow window for PHAs, syndicators, lenders, and LIHTC stakeholders with PBV exposure to engage.

Key Takeaways:

The FY 2027 methodology proposal is the more consequential development here. HUD explicitly linking local regulatory housing policy to funding inflation factors is a notable shift — one that could affect underwriting assumptions in high-cost, supply-constrained markets and reshape how PHAs and project-based voucher deals are modeled. Stakeholders with active PBV pipelines or PHA advisory relationships should engage the comment process before the August 5 deadline.

Subscribe to The Spring Street Brief for daily updates on affordable housing in America.

HUD has proposed a rule to rescind the Federal Flood Risk Management Standard (FFRMS) final rule and its associated regulations, originally published in April 2024. The proposed rule would restore HUD's Part 55 floodplain management regulations to their pre-April 2024 state — removing the elevated site elevation and freeboard requirements that affected HUD-assisted and HUD-insured projects in or near floodplains. For LIHTC developers relying on FHA-insured debt or other HUD program dollars, the proposal would reduce site selection friction and eliminate costly engineering requirements triggered by the 2024 rule. Comments are due September 8, 2026.

Key Takeaways:

This proposal is a significant policy reversal with real deal-level implications. For teams active in HUD-insured lending or layering HUD grants into LIHTC transactions, now is the time to assess how the FFRMS has affected your underwriting and site selection — and whether the retained flexibilities adequately address floodplain risk management going forward. Engaging in the comment process before September 8 is the clearest way to influence the final outcome.

Subscribe to The Spring Street Brief for daily updates on affordable housing in America.

The Ohio Housing Finance Agency (OHFA) has opened a public comment period on the first draft of its 2026–2027 9% LIHTC Qualified Allocation Plan (QAP) Technical Amendment, alongside updated opportunity area data and maps from the Urban Institute. For developers, syndicators, and investors with active Ohio pipeline, this mid-cycle amendment has direct implications for site scoring, geographic eligibility, and additional credit allocation strategies heading into the next competitive round.

Key Takeaways:

Mid-cycle QAP technical amendments don't happen in a vacuum — when an agency like OHFA updates its underlying opportunity mapping through a partner like the Urban Institute, the ripple effects on deal competitiveness can be significant. Teams with Ohio pipeline should treat this comment period as an active workstream, not a passive notification. Review the maps, assess your sites, and engage with the additional credits policy language if it touches your capital stack. The window is open now.

Subscribe to The Spring Street Brief for daily updates on affordable housing in America.

The 21st Century Road to Housing Act — the ROAD Act — became law on July 11, 2026, without a presidential signature, after Congress passed it on June 23. Described as the most significant federal housing reform in a generation, the nearly 400-page bill includes dozens of provisions touching manufactured housing, zoning, Community Development Block Grants, the Rental Assistance Demonstration program, and bank investment capacity. For LIHTC investors, developers, syndicators, and lenders, several provisions have direct and near-term implications for deal structure, financing capacity, and preservation pipelines.

Key Takeaways:

The ROAD Act's passage required genuine cross-aisle cooperation — Senate Banking Chair Tim Scott and Ranking Member Elizabeth Warren, House Financial Services Chair French Hill and Ranking Member Maxine Waters all had to find common ground. That political signal matters as much as the technical provisions: housing affordability is now a durable bipartisan priority, which sets the table for future, potentially larger reforms. For practitioners, the immediate focus should be on HUD implementation guidance for the CDBG construction flexibility and the Public Welfare Investment Cap increase, and on how state HFAs begin to incorporate the new manufactured housing financing pathways into upcoming QAP cycles.

Subscribe to The Spring Street Brief for daily updates on affordable housing in America.

The Trump administration's effort to eliminate HUD's Restore-Rebuild initiative is now a national story, following a Politico report that highlights the program's cancellation and its cascading effects on public housing authorities and affordable housing developers. The San Diego Housing Commission is walking back plans for 700 units; the Council of Large Public Housing Authorities says the move contradicts HUD's stated mission. For LIHTC investors, developers, and lenders with Restore-Rebuild exposure in their pipelines, the implications are immediate and concrete.

Key Takeaways:

With the fiscal year-end approaching and congressional appropriators still engaged on housing funding, there is a narrow window for legislative intervention. Developers and PHAs with active Restore-Rebuild pipelines should begin stress-testing their financing structures now and engaging state HFAs about potential gap-filling strategies. The program's elimination is not yet finalized in statute, but the administrative intent is clear — waiting is not a strategy.

Subscribe to The Spring Street Brief for daily updates on affordable housing in America.