The Spring Street Brief

The Spring Street Brief

By Spring Street Management GroupBusinessInvesting
Download on the App Store

The Spring Street Brief episodes

  • Episode 177: Chicago's 2023 LIHTC Round: 11 of 13 Projects Still Unbuilt

    Thirty months after Chicago announced its 2023 LIHTC awards, only 2 of 13 funded projects have closed and broken ground — a concrete signal that the city's layered approval process is straining one of affordable housing's most important financing tools. With $562M in estimated development costs on the line and construction inflation pushing per-unit costs higher, the stalled pipeline raises urgent questions for investors, syndicators, and developers active in the Chicago market.

    Key Takeaways:

    • Only 2 of 13 projects from Chicago's 2023 LIHTC round have closed and started construction as of mid-September 2026 — 30 months after awards were announced in March 2024.
    • The city estimated $562M in total development costs across the 13 projects in March 2024; cost inflation has pushed that figure higher since.
    • Hub 32, a 51-unit project in Garfield Park, saw per-unit costs rise from ~$732K to ~$796K between 2023 and early 2026.
    • 5 additional projects are expected to close before year-end; 4 more are not expected to close until after 2027; 1 has no closing date, and 1 award has been withdrawn.
    • City-allocated LIHTC projects in Chicago average $519K per unit — 15% more than IHDA-allocated deals at $454K per unit in the same market.
    • Both city and state LIHTC costs in Chicago exceed comparable markets like Houston by more than 50%.
    • Chicago is one of only two municipalities — alongside New York City — with its own direct federal LIHTC allocation, creating a dual-approval structure that adds significant time to deal closings.
    • Illinois has nearly 440,000 low-income renter households but only about 150,000 affordable rental homes available — just 31 affordable units per 100 extremely low-income renters in the Chicago metro.
    • The city's original 18-to-36-month closing window runs through March 2027, meaning the deadline has not yet been formally breached — but four projects are already tracking past it. Mayor Johnson's Cut the Tape initiative has not yet delivered the regulatory acceleration the industry needs. For investors and syndicators with exposure to this round, year-end closings are the near-term stress test. For developers choosing between city and IHDA allocations, the cost and timeline differentials deserve serious underwriting attention heading into the next cycle.

      Subscribe to The Spring Street Brief for daily updates on affordable housing in America.

      5 min
    • Episode 176: HUD Releases 2027 DDA and QCT Designations

      HUD has published its notice designating Difficult Development Areas (DDAs) and Qualified Census Tracts (QCTs) for 2027 LIHTC allocations. The designations carry a 30% eligible basis boost — a figure with direct implications for deal feasibility, equity pricing, and year-end allocation strategy for developers, syndicators, and lenders active in both 9% and 4% bond-financed transactions.

      Key Takeaways:

      • HUD's 2027 DDA and QCT designations are now published and effective for credit allocations made after December 31, 2026.
      • For 4% private activity bond deals, both bond issuance and building placed-in-service must occur after December 31, 2026 for the new designations to apply.
      • DDA or QCT status triggers a 30% boost to eligible basis, directly increasing the total LIHTC a developer can receive.
      • Developers and syndicators should immediately cross-reference active and pipeline sites against the updated HUD maps before year-end allocation deadlines.
      • Sites that gained a new designation in 2027 warrant updated basis calculations and revised equity pricing discussions.
      • Sites that lost a 2026 designation must be flagged for financing teams before the December 31, 2026 cutover.
      • State HFA qualified allocation plans often score DDA/QCT status — newly designated areas may see competitive positioning shift in 2027 funding rounds.
      • With year-end approaching fast, the window to act on these designations is narrow. Teams working 9% competitive deals and 4% bond transactions alike need to reconcile their site lists against the new HUD maps now — not after the holidays. Basis adjustments, equity pricing conversations, and QAP scoring recalibrations all flow downstream from this single publication.

        Subscribe to The Spring Street Brief for daily updates on affordable housing in America.

        3 min
      • Episode 175: Pennsylvania HFA Study: 180K Affordable Units at Risk

        The Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency, in collaboration with the Housing Initiative at Penn, has released a sweeping study — Understanding and Preserving Federally Supported Housing in Pennsylvania — finding that more than 180,000 affordable rental units across the commonwealth face long-term supply and affordability risks. The report maps federally supported rental housing statewide and identifies threats ranging from expiring affordability restrictions to physical deterioration, signaling a potential pivot in PHFA policy priorities.

        Key Takeaways:

        • More than 180,000 federally supported affordable rental units in Pennsylvania are identified in the study as facing long-term risk.
        • The report was produced in collaboration with the Housing Initiative at Penn, lending independent academic credibility to the findings.
        • Risk factors examined include expiring use restrictions, affordability covenant expirations, and property-level deterioration — all key preservation triggers for LIHTC and HUD-assisted stock.
        • State HFA-commissioned studies of this scope typically precede QAP priority shifts, new preservation set-asides, or targeted financing program launches.
        • The full program-by-program breakdown — LIHTC, Section 8 project-based, legacy HUD-assisted — will be the critical data layer for investors assessing the Pennsylvania preservation pipeline.
        • Pennsylvania's scale as a Mid-Atlantic market means risk to this inventory has direct implications for voucher utilization rates, GSE lending volume, and regional LIHTC equity pricing.
        • Developers and owners with aging federally assisted assets in Pennsylvania should engage PHFA proactively, before policy responses are finalized.
        • Pennsylvania HFA studies of this magnitude rarely exist in isolation — they are typically the first step toward concrete policy and financing action. LIHTC investors, syndicators, and preservation developers active in the commonwealth should treat this report as an early signal of where PHFA's QAP and program priorities are heading. Monitoring PHFA's follow-on announcements, and positioning preservation capital now, puts industry participants ahead of what could be a significant shift in how the state allocates credits and deploys financing tools.

          Subscribe to The Spring Street Brief for daily updates on affordable housing in America.

          4 min
        • Episode 174: House Democrats Push for 120-Day CRA Comment Extension

          House Democrats on the House Financial Services Committee, led by ranking member Maxine Waters (D-CA), have formally urged FDIC Chairman Travis Hill and Comptroller of the Currency Jonathan Gould to extend the public comment period on proposed Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) rule changes to at least 120 days. The Affordable Housing Action Coalition (ACTION) has simultaneously mobilized industry stakeholders with template letters and talking points. For LIHTC investors, syndicators, and lenders, the outcome of this rulemaking could directly reshape how banks deploy equity and debt into affordable housing transactions.

          Key Takeaways:

          • Rep. Maxine Waters and House Financial Services Committee Democrats are requesting a minimum 120-day comment period — double the standard 60-day window.
          • Letters were addressed directly to FDIC Chairman Travis Hill and OCC Comptroller Jonathan Gould, the two primary regulators driving this rulemaking.
          • The ACTION coalition has released a template comment letter and talking points to lower the barrier for industry participation in the comment process.
          • CRA assessment framework changes could alter how banks earn credit for LIHTC equity investments, affecting demand dynamics in both 4% and 9% markets.
          • Geographic scoping and activity definitions are among the most consequential open questions — changes here could redirect bank capital away from current affordable housing deal structures.
          • Customized comment letters citing specific deal activity and market data carry more regulatory weight than unmodified template submissions.
          • The FDIC and OCC have not yet announced whether the extended timeline will be granted — that decision sets the deadline for the entire comment mobilization effort.
          • This rulemaking represents one of the most consequential CRA overhauls in the current regulatory cycle. Affordable housing stakeholders who rely on bank CRA motivation to attract equity partners and construction lenders have a direct financial interest in shaping the final rule. The comment period is the primary lever available to the private sector right now. Watch for the regulators' response to the Waters letter — if 120 days is granted, the industry will have a meaningful runway to build a coordinated record. If the standard timeline holds, the clock is already running.

            Subscribe to The Spring Street Brief for daily updates on affordable housing in America.

            4 min
          • Episode 173: Affordable Housing Preservation and Protection Act

            A bipartisan bill — the Affordable Housing Preservation and Protection Act — was introduced last week by Senator Lisa Blunt Rochester (D-DE) and Representatives Shontel Brown (D-OH) and Carlos Gimenez (R-FL). The legislation targets distressed HUD-assisted housing through a new loan program, expanded HUD intervention authority, and stronger community engagement requirements. The National Housing and Rehabilitation Association has endorsed the bill. For LIE-tek investors, syndicators, lenders, and compliance professionals with HUD-assisted assets in their portfolios, the bill's mechanics carry direct implications for preservation financing, asset management, and workout strategies.

            Key Takeaways:

            • The bill creates a new loan program — not grant-based — for qualified owners of distressed HUD-assisted properties to fund long-term renovations and preservation.
            • HUD would receive new intervention tools specifically designed to stabilize mismanaged properties without displacing residents — a significant shift in federal enforcement posture.
            • Resident non-displacement is a codified goal of the new HUD authority, directly addressing a persistent tension in distressed-asset receivership and ownership transfer scenarios.
            • The bill requires strengthened outreach to local stakeholders and residents throughout the preservation process, signaling potential new community engagement requirements for developers.
            • Bipartisan sponsorship — with Republican Rep. Gimenez co-leading on the House side — improves the bill's legislative viability in the current Congress.
            • NH&RA endorsement reflects broad industry alignment and suggests active stakeholder engagement as the bill moves through committee.
            • Loan program terms, eligibility thresholds, and underwriting criteria have not yet been detailed — those specifics will determine the bill's practical impact on preservation deal structures.
            • For investors and lenders holding HUD-assisted housing, this bill could open a new preservation financing channel and reshape how troubled assets are managed before they reach crisis. The key next steps are committee referral, technical drafts on loan program structure, and any amendments that define eligible properties and borrowers. Teams with distressed HUD-assisted assets should begin assessing portfolio exposure now and monitor legislative progress closely.

              Subscribe to The Spring Street Brief for daily updates on affordable housing in America.

              4 min
            • Episode 172: KHC's New Non-Compliant Master List, Effective 2027

              Kentucky Housing Corporation has announced it will publish a public Non-Compliant Master List of multifamily management companies and owners beginning January 1, 2027. Entities named on the list — for failing to meet KHC multifamily compliance policies, HUD/state regulations, or Section 42 requirements — will be barred from KHC funding applications until all issues are resolved. For LIHTC developers, syndicators, investors, and management companies active in Kentucky, this policy creates direct pipeline risk and raises the bar on pre-deal compliance due diligence.

              Key Takeaways:

              • KHC's Non-Compliant Master List goes live January 1, 2027 — teams have roughly one quarter to prepare.
              • Listing triggers full ineligibility for KHC funding applications, including 9% and 4% LIHTC allocations, until all compliance issues are resolved.
              • Triggers include failure to meet KHC multifamily compliance policies, HUD/state regulations, or Section 42 requirements.
              • The list is public, creating reputational exposure for management companies and owners beyond the funding freeze itself.
              • A single management company's listing could affect eligibility across every owner and development it serves in Kentucky.
              • Syndicators and investors underwriting Kentucky LIHTC deals should add KHC compliance list status to management company due diligence checklists.
              • Immediate action: audit all Kentucky portfolios for open findings, unresolved corrective actions, or deferred KHC audit responses before year-end.
              • With the effective date three months out, there is still time to remediate open compliance matters before the list goes live — but that window is closing. Owners and management companies with Kentucky assets should treat this as a priority review cycle. The policy also signals a broader trend of state HFAs moving toward public accountability mechanisms as a compliance enforcement tool, a direction that other agencies may follow.

                Subscribe to The Spring Street Brief for daily updates on affordable housing in America.

                4 min
              • Episode 171: USDA–HUD MOU Targets Rural Housing Deregulation

                USDA and HUD signed a historic Memorandum of Understanding on September 29, 2026, establishing a formal interagency framework to streamline environmental reviews, environmental impact statements, and physical inspections across their overlapping housing portfolios. Mandated by Section 802 of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act (enacted July 11, 2026), the MOU has direct implications for LIHTC developers, syndicators, and lenders working on rural deals that layer USDA Rural Housing Service financing with HUD-backed funding.

                Key Takeaways:

                • The MOU was signed September 29, 2026, by Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins and HUD Secretary Scott Turner; HUD will lead overall interagency coordination.
                • The agreement is statutory — required by Section 802 of the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, signed into law July 11, 2026.
                • A lead-agency designation process will allow environmental impact statements and environmental assessments approved by one department to be adopted by the other, eliminating duplicative review on dually funded projects.
                • Environmental review compliance is locked to the Part 58 / 24 CFR baseline as of January 1, 2025; any changes to categorical exclusions under 24 CFR §58.35 must go through formal rulemaking.
                • The agencies will evaluate a joint physical inspection process — a potential reduction in duplicative compliance burden for rural multifamily deals.
                • USDA Rural Development deployed more than $42 billion in fiscal year 2025; HUD and USDA together represent the largest holder of federal multifamily housing units.
                • Named coordination leads: George Kelly (USDA Rural Housing Service Administrator), Drew McCall and Reid Wilson (HUD Chief of Staff and Deputy Chief of Staff).
                • For LIHTC practitioners active in rural markets — particularly 9% transactions that layer USDA Section 515 or 514 financing — this MOU signals real potential to compress predevelopment timelines and reduce duplicative compliance costs. The next milestones to watch are formal rulemaking on categorical exclusions and a published proposal for the joint inspection framework. Both will have comment periods that give the industry a direct seat at the table.

                  Subscribe to The Spring Street Brief for daily updates on affordable housing in America.

                  4 min
                • Episode 170: Treasury Proposes OZ Reporting Requirements

                  The IRS has published a notice of proposed rulemaking that would impose new reporting requirements on qualified opportunity funds (QOFs) and qualified opportunity zone businesses (QOZBs). The proposal requires QOFs to file information returns with the IRS, furnish statements to investors upon disposition, and requires QOZBs to furnish statements to any QOF holding an interest in them. The rules also clarify the penalty framework for non-compliance and establish formal procedures for QOF self-certification, inadvertent certification revocation, and voluntary decertification — changes that carry direct implications for LIHTC deals that layer OZ equity.

                  Key Takeaways:

                  • QOFs must file information returns with the IRS and furnish statements to investors upon disposition of their investments — a new formal obligation.
                  • QOZBs are now required to furnish statements to QOFs holding interests in them, extending the compliance framework one level deeper into the capital stack.
                  • The proposed rules clarify the penalty structure for failures to file or furnish, removing ambiguity for funds and businesses out of compliance.
                  • A formal procedure for revoking inadvertent certifications or voluntarily decertifying as a QOF is established for the first time.
                  • Comments are due to Treasury by October 16, 2026.
                  • Requests to speak at the public hearing and topic outlines must be submitted by October 9, 2026 — if no outlines are received, the November 5 hearing will be canceled.
                  • The public hearing is scheduled for 10:00 a.m. ET on November 5, 2026, by phone; attendance requests are due by 5:00 p.m. ET on November 3, 2026.
                  • For deal teams structuring LIHTC transactions with OZ equity layering, the business-level reporting requirement for QOZBs is the detail most likely to create new compliance lift. Funds and developers should begin mapping dual reporting obligations now — at both the QOF and QOZB levels — before year-end closing pressure arrives. The October 9 speaker outline deadline is the most time-sensitive action item: miss it, and the industry loses its formal window to shape the final rule at the hearing stage.

                    Subscribe to The Spring Street Brief for daily updates on affordable housing in America.

                    3 min
                  • Episode 169: 21st Century ROAD Act and the Future of HCVs

                    The Bipartisan Policy Center convened a high-profile webinar on September 28, 2026, examining the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act and its consequences for HUD's Housing Choice Voucher program. With HUD Assistant Secretary for Public and Indian Housing Benjamin Hobbs delivering opening remarks alongside panelists from the National Apartment Association, the Public Housing Authorities Directors Association, and Johns Hopkins University, the event signals that implementation — not just legislation — is now the central challenge for the voucher program.

                    Key Takeaways:

                    • HUD Assistant Secretary Benjamin Hobbs participated directly, indicating the department is actively focused on operationalizing the ROAD Act's reforms.
                    • The 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act represents Congress's most significant restructuring of the Housing Choice Voucher program in years, covering administration, landlord engagement, and housing mobility goals.
                    • The National Apartment Association's Greg Brown was on the panel — landlord participation barriers (inspection timelines, payment delays, rent reasonableness) remain a central implementation friction point.
                    • Crystal Wojciechowski of the Public Housing Authorities Directors Association brought the PHA operator perspective, relevant to developers and syndicators who partner with housing authorities on deals.
                    • Voucher utilization rates and landlord participation levels have direct implications for revenue stability in mixed-income LIHTC and Section 8-assisted developments.
                    • Implementation guidance from HUD following this convening will be the determining factor in whether the ROAD Act's statutory intent translates into on-the-ground practice.
                    • Developers and syndicators underwriting deals with significant Section 8 revenue exposure should monitor forthcoming HUD regulatory and administrative guidance closely.
                    • The ROAD Act sets the framework, but the details will be written in HUD's implementation guidance. For LIHTC developers, syndicators, and lenders with voucher-assisted units in their portfolios, the next phase — regulatory rulemaking and PHA-level administrative changes — is where the real impact will be felt. Track HUD's Public and Indian Housing notices and any PHA administrative plan amendments in your target markets.

                      Subscribe to The Spring Street Brief for daily updates on affordable housing in America.

                      3 min
                    • Episode 168: CDFI Fund Opens $5 Billion 2026 NMTC Round

                      The CDFI Fund has officially opened the calendar year 2026 New Markets Tax Credit (NMTC) allocation round, making $5 billion in tax credit authority available to Community Development Entities. With a registration deadline of October 6 and a final application deadline of November 10, the timeline is compressed — and for affordable housing developers, syndicators, and lenders who layer NMTC into LIE-tek deals, missing the early gates means sitting out the round entirely.

                      Key Takeaways:

                      • $5 billion in NMTC allocation authority is available in the CY 2026 round — consistent with recent allocation levels, meaning competition will be high.
                      • AMIS registration deadline is October 6 — a hard gate with no exceptions; unregistered applicants cannot submit.
                      • The CDFI Fund will stop answering application questions after November 6, leaving a narrow four-day buffer before the November 10, 5 p.m. ET submission deadline.
                      • Qualified equity investment (QEI) issuance and QLICI deployment requirements carry a compliance deadline of January 7, 2027 — a key date for post-award structuring timelines.
                      • Awards will be announced in summer 2027, giving the market a visibility window for pipeline planning.
                      • NMTC allocations frequently layer into mixed-use and community facility deals alongside 4% and 9% LIHTC, making this round directly relevant to affordable housing developers and syndicators active in qualified low-income census tracts.
                      • Novogradac is hosting a three-hour application prep webinar on October 5, from 1–4 p.m. ET — the day before the AMIS registration deadline.
                      • For organizations on the fence about applying, the decision window is essentially closed — preparation for a competitive NMTC application requires significant lead time on narrative development, community impact documentation, and financial modeling. Confirm your AMIS registration status immediately. If your pipeline includes projects in qualified low-income census tracts where NMTC could serve as a gap-fill tool alongside LIHTC equity, the CY 2026 round deserves a hard look before October 6.

                        Subscribe to The Spring Street Brief for daily updates on affordable housing in America.

                        4 min

                      About The Spring Street Brief

                      From the publisher's feed

                      The Spring Street Brief is your daily intelligence briefing on affordable housing in America.