"I only use real sugar" ...but is table sugar actually the safer choice? And are artificial sweeteners really as scary as the headlines make them out to be? In this episode, Aurora breaks down the real science behind sugar, artificial sweeteners, and natural alternatives like stevia and monk fruit. We unpack why "natural" doesn't automatically mean safe, what the WHO's aspartame-cancer classification actually means (spoiler: it's not what the news reported), and why even stevia may not be the clean-slate option we thought. The truth is nuanced, the research is fascinating, and by the end you'll have a much clearer framework for making choices that actually fit your life.

Content is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for individualized advice from a registered dietitian or healthcare provider.

Sources:

IARC Monographs, Vol. 134: Aspartame. WHO, 2023 → iarc.who.int

JECFA Aspartame Evaluation, 96th Meeting. WHO/FAO, 2023 → who.int

Debras C, et al. Artificial sweeteners and cardiovascular disease risk. BMJ. 2022;378:e071204 → doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-071204

Suez J, et al. Non-nutritive sweeteners and the gut microbiome. Cell. 2022;185(18):3307–3328 → doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2022.07.016

Shil A & Chichger H. Stevia and gut bacteria. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(10):5228 → doi.org/10.3390/ijms22105228

Rogers PJ, et al. Low-energy sweeteners and weight management. Int J Obesity. 2016;40(3):381–394 → doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2015.177

American Heart Association. Added Sugars → heart.org