The Torch Report

It’s happening.

Today is election day. Americans all across the country are waiting with baited breath to see what the future holds. Will the Republicans take control of Congress? Will the Democrats hold the Senate? Will American democracy survive?

Will the American public accept the elections? Will all hell break loose? Will chaos ensue? Will there be civil unrest? Will there be riots and violence?

Who knows?! The truth is, we are going to have to wait awhile and see.

Already the media is tempering expectations, claiming it will take days or maybe even weeks before we see how this all plays out. The tension is palpable. There are already numerous signs of widespread corruption, which will soon be dismissed as disinformation:

* 'Last Minute Change' Is Already Delaying Vote Counting in Philadelphia

* Why the Liberal Media Think the 2022 Midterms Could Get Hacked

* Michigan pollster says expect a 'red mirage' on election night

* ABC News warns of ‘red mirage’ appearing during midterm elections showing GOP in early artificial lead

* ELECTION DAY Tabulators Across Maricopa County Are NOT WORKING

* TABULATORS IN TEXAS ALSO NOT WORKING! It’s Not Just Arizona!

* Here We Go Again: Dominion Machines in Mercer, NJ Experiencing “Programming Glitch”

* It’s Happening: NYC Polling Station Temporarily Shut Down Due To Pipe Bomb Threat

* "Red Mirage" Will Look Like Big Republican Win, But Vote Count Could Take "Weeks"

* PA Cities And Dem Volunteers Rush To Help Voters Replace Flawed Ballots

* Fetterman Predicts 'Dramatic' Overnight Comeback, Taps Clinton Lawyer To Fight PA Election Law

How’s that for a sampling of insanity?

Here’s what I want to point out: The nervous uncertainty, the suspense, the drama, all of this is psychological warfare. It’s meant to keep people glued to the tube in a perpetual state of heightened suggestibility. You may recall, from TR 200 - How They Hack Your Mind, that “the inducement of nervous excitement” allows tailored information and perspectives to be “firmly implanted in many minds.”

This is brainwashing, in the clinical sense. It’s how mass psychosis is formed. The various techniques have been studied and understood by psychologists for more than a hundred years. It has been used in psychological warfare for much longer than that.

Now add to that everything we’ve learned about AI, sentinel surveillance, and Algorithmic Social Interventions that manipulate public perceptions and behavior, and we’ve arrived at the Mysterious Election Interventions discussed yesterday.

Just to refresh:

They are intensifying surveillance with “systematic social listening” that allows them to target communities with tailored propaganda, crafted with the help of behavioral scientists, in an effort to control any “emerging perceptions” that may hamper the government’s intentional manipulation of public behavior.

Keep that in mind as all of this political theater plays out. It’s not what we see happening on stage that will shape the course of history—it’s what we never see.

You can’t see an algorithm. You don’t know what the search results don’t show. You won’t know the stories that you never hear. You will never really know what happens in the 3,143 different county offices where the election results are verified.

How could you? It’s incomprehensible.

Here’s a little thought experiment to illustrate what I’m getting at:

Say you wanted to personally check-in on county level results. How would you do that? First you’d have to find a list of all the counties, then you’d have to look up the website for each of the 3,143 jurisdictions. Let’s say that only took you two minutes per county, because you are an exceptionally efficient human being…. do a little math… 2 x 3143 = 6,286 minutes. That’s over 104 hours, or more than 13 eight-hour days, just to find the points of contact for each county office.

See what I mean?

We have to trust.

We have to trust our local officials are doing the right thing. If we suspect they are not, we have to investigate. If we find evidence of election interference, we have to hold people accountable. When there is no accountability, public trust is broken and corruption accelerates unabated and emboldened. Just look at the last four years.

Still, we have to trust. There is really no other option. We have to trust that good people are doing the right thing even when no one is watching. At the same time, we must accept that bad people are doing bad things, especially when no one is watching.

All that said, I still believe there are many more good people in the world than there are bad people—BUT, many good people remain unaware of the Great Reset, The Big Lie, and the profoundly important implications of algorithmic social interventions.

In other words, while most people are focused on the midterm elections, wholly unaware of the advanced technological tools and psychological warfare being used against them, the global cabal continues to advance their malicious agenda.

Zoom out.

“The Commies are taking over the world!!!”

And don’t you forget it.

Let’s connect a few dots and move on:

* Macron Urges US, China To Pay Their "Fair Share" For Climate Change

* Woke Pentagon: ‘Climate literacy’ poll distributed to service members

* Not content to just kill coal, Biden issues direct death threat to oil

What does this have to do with midterm elections? It has everything to do with midterm elections. Even as Americans are rejecting the radical climate agenda en masses, casting their votes accordingly, the cabal marches on—with corrupt politicians on both sides of the aisle fully on board with their schemes.

Which brings me back to the One Health Joint Plan of Action—what I call “the one agenda to rule them all”—and what I believe is truly the greatest threat to the future of humanity. The reason I believe the One Health initiative is the greatest threat, is precisely because it establishes a misguided moral imperative to manipulate the masses and capture society in a centralized socialist surveillance state.

But don’t just take my word for it. Here’s how they describe it:

“One Health requires continued institutionalization, supported by appropriate investments for greater awareness among all stakeholders, cross-sectoral competencies and capacities, joint workforce training, career pathways and opportunities, effective governance rooted in transdisciplinary and multisectoral principles and appropriate legislation, stakeholder and community engagement, the integration of the concept into education in related disciplines, and a renewed emphasis, with key interventions and collaborations at all levels, on moving towards a more sustainable, healthier and safer world.”

Translation: “The Commies are taking over the world!”

I have to laugh at the complexity of their language. The full 86 page report (linked above) is equal parts mind-boggling and maddening. They have a very detailed plan for taking control of the world—under the auspice of saving the planet—and they are keen to using all of their spiffy new 21st century tools to pull it off.

They are convinced of the moral imperative and acting with utter conviction. They are trying to save us from ourselves, and in order to do that, they have to control the flow of information, the flow of money, the means of production and consumption, emerging public perceptions, the outcome of elections, etc.

In other words, they have to control everything—otherwise their plan doesn’t work.

Just look at what a mess it’s been trying to get millions of red-blooded liberty loving Americans to agree to their radical agenda. There’s no way they can get all 8 billion people on the planet to go along with it… unless… unless… unless they lie, cheat, steal elections, destroy economies, and literally re-program and brainwash the masses.

And that is exactly what they plan to do. In fact, as we’ve seen, they are already doing it—and make no mistake, no pesky midterm election is going to derail their plan.

They’ve been planning this decade for decades.

The wise will realize what that implies:

While it’s critical we get out and vote, we need to be looking beyond this election!

Don’t forget to share this with a friend!

PS: Don’t forget, now it’s easy to catch up on previous episodes by listening to The Torch Report on iHeart Radio, Spotify, Google Podcasts, or Apple iTunes —enjoy!

The saga continues.

The rapid spread of an exotic sexually transmitted disease—the dreaded monkeypox virus—has had world health officials scrambling and scratching their collective heads for months. Monkeypox is usually only transmitted via close contact and has historically been mostly isolated to parts of Africa—so how, and why, has this virus suddenly been spreading all around the world in such a rapid fashion?

There are many reasons, most of them nefarious, none of them good.

Bear with me here…

Though recent studies indicate that monkeypox is now spreading without symptoms, the truth is that monkeypox will not affect the majority of people—at least not directly. For that reason, this article may seem out of place given the midterm elections and the potential for civil war are looming large over the week.

In reality, deciding the outcome of these elections is going to be drug out for weeks. Every indication is that this election is going to be even more ugly than the 2020 election. At this point, the evil Russian Bots have been reactivated and desperate Democrats are holding out for a November surprise. Meanwhile, more astute analysts are predicting things are about to get so messy that we might not even have a 2024 election, because they believe this election is not going to be accepted by either side.

This is heavy stuff. It’s important. But, it’s not the most important. Like I said, this election drama is going to get drug out for weeks—and they might even arrest Donald Trump! Whatever. MEANWHILE, the invisible hand of the global cabal continues to tighten it’s grip around the neck of humanity, this time under the guise of protecting everyone on the planet from the exotic monkeypox disease.

Zoom out.

On October 22nd, the World Health Organization extended the Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) due to the continuing unprecedented spread of monkeypox all around the globe. In this announcement, the WHO acknowledged that some “progress” has been made in their efforts to institute behavioral interventions—which is where our story begins:

“The Emergency Committee acknowledged that some progress has been made in the global response to the multi-country outbreak of monkeypox since the last meeting, including the emerging information on the effectiveness of behavioral interventions and vaccines.”

To properly frame the importance of this revelation—that they are collecting data on behavioral interventions being directed by unelected officials at the global level—we must first understand the implications. On its face, it may sound like they’re just trying to help make the world a better place—in this case by preventing the spread of monkeypox—but underneath the altruistic overtones lies a much darker reality.

As previously discussed, the WHO is using AI for sentinel surveillance and “social listening” in order to facilitate behavioral change. Why should you consider this to be a major issue? Because these people are manipulating public behavior without people realizing it, and that has MAJOR social and political implications!

Think about it like this: Why are there still people driving all alone in their cars, with the windows down, wearing a mask? This is not normal or natural human behavior.

This is manipulated human behavior. Such unnatural, unhealthy, abnormal and often completely absurd behavior is certainly not in the individual’s best interest—but unfortunately the manipulated individual is incapable of seeing this reality. That’s key.

It is true that politicians and propagandists have been manipulating the public for ages, but the 21st century tools like AI and sentinel surveillance are relatively new. That’s why the WHO’s admission to monitoring the “emerging information on the effectiveness of behavioral interventions” caught my eye. At this point, they have clearly gathered enough data to evaluate the results of manipulating humanity at the global scale.

How successful has the WHO been at manipulating human behavior?

Apparently, better than expected. As countries around the world quickly implemented a “range of public health interventions” that were recommended by the WHO, many countries saw a decline in cases—though notably not in the America’s, where transmission still remains high. This collective response was based on globally coordinated “collaborative surveillance” using the One Health approach.

That’s where it gets interesting. What is this One Health approach? What are these public interventions? And what is this “collaborative surveillance” anyhow?

In a nutshell, this is the framework for the global surveillance state—a socialist surveillance state, mind you—that is intended to monitor and manipulate your behavior, for the rest of your life, whether you’re keen to the “intervention” or not.

May the wise take note:

Soon enough, these mandatory “interventions” will become an inescapable reality.

What do I mean? They are deploying AI to manipulate public perception on a massive scale. As we’ve seen, according to their own reports, this is already having a measurable impact on public behavior. When the public is being manipulated toward unnatural behavior—which is already happening—the outcome affects us all.

We can try to ignore it, to ignore the idiots who are still wearing masks, ignore the morons who keep rushing back to get their booster—since the first five shots were so damn effective—and we can try to ignore the fools who still believe that Biden was the most popular president ever elected, but at the end of the day all of these useful idiots still get to vote, and they will vote to enslave humanity just to feel safe.

We are already dangerously close to mob rule.

When all of these “behavioral interventions” have sufficiently convinced the masses to sacrifice their freedom for the illusion of safety, to sacrifice self sovereignty and individuality for the sake of the collective and the greater good, convinced the majority to accept the socialist precepts that underlie the progressive agenda, then it’s checkmate. Think about it.

At that point—once the majority of people have succumb to the algorithmic social interventions that subversively manipulate their behavior—how will the minority ever be able to persuade masses again? How can we compete with the machines?

Mob rule will ensue, guaranteed, and this time the mob will be under the malicious manipulation of the global cabal. This is precisely why the “battle for democracy” is the first step in the Communist revolution. They use the mob to overthrow all aspects of existing society—and the foundation for all of this is already in place.

Which brings us back to the World Health Organization.

What are they up to?

According to the WHO, in the interest of public health (i.e. the greater good), every country in the world should assume that an explosion in cases could breakout at any moment. Thus, every State Party should “undertake surveillance and be ready” to activate “multi-sectoral coordination mechanisms” within the One Health approach—which is a mouthful of word salad that is meant to conceal their strategy.

What does it all that mean? Reading from the WHO website, here is exactly what “activate or establish health and multi-sectoral coordination mechanisms” means, in their own words:

* “to establish and intensify epidemiological disease surveillance” within “national surveillance and health care systems” (1.c)

* “intensify the detection capacity” (1.d)

* “with the goal of preventing further undetected transmission” (1.b)

Pause: They are intensifying surveillance to prevent undetected transmission? Think about what that means. You don’t know you’re sick. You don’t know you’re spreading disease. That makes you a threat to public health, by default, and the only solution is for you to be monitored, tracked, and surveilled for the rest of your life.

That is why governments everywhere must:

* “Implement all actions necessary to be ready to apply or continue applying the set of Temporary Recommendations enumerated under Outbreak Response” (1.i)

* “Those actions include: targeted risk communication and community engagement, case detection, supported isolation of cases and treatment, contact tracing, and targeted immunization” (2.a.i)

* “Implement response actions with the goal of stopping human-to-human transmission” (2.a.i)

* “Engage with authorities and event organizers of gatherings (large and small)… to promote personal protective measures and behaviors, encourage organizers to apply the WHO-recommended risk-based approach to decision-making regarding the holding of such events.” (2.b.ii)

* “Develop and target risk communication and community engagement interventions, including systematic social listening (e.g., through digital platforms), for emerging perceptions, concerns, and misinformation that might hamper response actions.” (2.b.iii)

* “Engage with representatives of affected communities, non-government organizations, elected officials and civil society, and behavioral scientists to advise on approaches and strategies”

STOP THE TAPE!!!

These devious b******s toss a nice word salad, but did you catch all that?

They are intensifying surveillance with “systematic social listening” that allows them to target communities with tailored propaganda, crafted with the help of behavioral scientists, in an effort to control any “emerging perceptions” that may hamper the government’s intentional manipulation of public behavior.

Beyond controlling what the public thinks, what people believe, and how people behave—which in theory one could try to resist via peaceful noncompliance and seeking out unsanctioned sources—consider their strategy for contact tracing:

* “Conduct contact tracing among individuals in contact with anyone who may be a suspected, probable, or confirmed case” (2.c.vii)

* “…follow-up for 21 days through health monitoring that may be self-directed or supported by public health officers.”

* “Isolate cases for the duration of the infectious period.”

* “…Any adjustment of isolation policies … should entail the mitigation of any residual public health risk.” (2.c.v)

* “Encourage, support and facilitate data gathering and priority research… relevant to behavioral insights… and studies on effectiveness of interventions.” (2.e.iv)

It’s a closed loop. Anyone who is even suspected of being infected is subject to contact tracing and monitoring by public health officers—who, in the interest on public safety, have the right to detain and quarantine people against their will. According to the WHO, governments are justified in isolating people until they’ve decided there is no “residual” risk. They are researching the effectiveness of these so-called “interventions” as we speak, while the AI simultaneously provides behavioral insights on our emerging perceptions. Will we resist? Resist we must!

The point is that the global cabal is casting an inescapable net of surveillance that will blanket every aspect of life as we know it. The language above is coming from the WHO’s declaration of a Public Health Emergency related to monkeypox, but the tools, strategies, and underlying intentions to manipulate humanity are rapidly being normalized and deployed at the global level to advance the Great Reset.

That’s a major problem.

There is little doubt that these very same tools—the AI, sentinel surveillance, social listening, and algorithmic social interventions—are actively being used to interfere with our midterm elections. That’s why the WHO’s response to monkeypox matters, because it demonstrates how these tools are being used to manipulate humanity.

And, unfortunately, they’re just getting started. To grasp the full scope of where they’re going with this we need to dig deeper into the One Health Joint Plan of Action—which is precisely what we’ll do tomorrow in part two!

To be continued…

PS: Don’t forget, now it’s easy to catch up on previous episodes by listening to The Torch Report on iHeart Radio, Spotify, Google Podcasts, or Apple iTunes —enjoy!

(This is the second in a two part series on the Big Lie. Part one is linked below.)

There is something there.

Yesterday’s Torch Report 233 noted that the rhetoric surrounding the strange events at the Pelosi house—that a bus dwelling hammer wielding hippie was actually a “lone right-wing extremist”—seemed to somehow be connected to a “scholar” named Dr. Richard Forno. The language in multiple articles seemed to reflect his sentiment as expressed in the article Political violence in America isn’t going away anytime soon.

Dr. Forno claims to be an Independent, but his writing and his background suggest otherwise. Why did he write that article? Why is this article being used in the circular reference to a DHS bulletin that I still cannot seem to locate? Why does the primary source cited for this mysterious bulletin only appear in liberal outlets? And why does this circle keep leading back to Forno?

There’s something there.

That was my initial sense, and upon further exploration, coincidences abound.

For example, Dr. Forno is a cybersecurity expert who has precisely the skill set necessary to have created the fictitious extremist posts attributed to David DePape. Add to that the fact that Forno has been funded by the NSA, the Department of Defense, and the National Science Foundation, having received over $10 million dollars in federal grants for everything AI and cybersecurity related, and we have every reason to follow the money in search for a motive.

Richard Forno has every appearance of a deep state operative. His article attempts to pin political violence on right-wing extremists, in support of the mainstream narrative ahead of the midterm elections. His description of David DePape as a “lone right-wing extremist” is completely incongruent with reality, which exposes his bias and intent.

But here’s the thing: Forno chose to step in. He chose to write that article. He chose to use those words. WHY? Is he really so shook up by the Pelosi attack that he felt morally compelled to speak out and opine on the cause of all this right-wing violence? Or is he just another state funded operative trying to control the narrative?

I believe this list of his publications and presentations helps to shine light on his underlying motives (emphasis added):

* “America is ‘dropping cyberbombs’ – but how do they work?”

* “Weaponized information seeks a new target in cyberspace: Users’ minds.”

* “Threats remain to US voting system – and voters’ perceptions of reality.”

* “How vulnerable to hacking is the US election cyber infrastructure?”

* “Ransomware can interfere with elections and fuel disinformation”

* “The Dark Side of Data: When Information is Weaponized”

* “Cybersecurity Information Sharing: A New Perspective for Policymakers”

* “Hacktivism, Vigilantism, & Collective Action in a Digital Age”

* “Fourth Generation Warfare”

* “Weaponized Information, crafting reality, and targeting the world’s most exploitable…”

…and on and on…

Clearly the guy is an expert on weaponizing information, crafting reality, and fourth generation warfare—those are his own words, not mine. He’s the government expert. There is a very interesting overlap between his technical niche and his political interest on the impact of disinformation and election interference. The threats to our elections, according to Forno, are directly related to voters’ perceptions of reality—which is the exact target of cyber warfare.

Sound familiar? I spent Monday, Tuesday, & Wednesday sounding the alarm about the use of AI to manipulate public perception and direct the outcome of elections.

Richard Forno knows how to use targeted misinformation to manipulate the outcome of elections, and he’s been informing the government on how to use Fourth Generation Warfare (i.e. AI and algorithmic social interventions) for over a decade. He wrote a propaganda piece that is central in the narrative of political violence that is being pushed ahead of the midterms. Is this just a coincidence?

Is Forno just another concerned citizen, or is there something else going on?

Here are a few more of his keynote presentations that stood out to me:

* “Communicating Risk Across Audiences”

* “Thinking Differently — And Beyond…”

* “The Chaos of Context: Presentation, Perception, and Agency.”

Just look at the words. What is his intent? What is the outcome of communicating risk? Stoking fear. Notably, that presentation was made in 2019 at an international conference on the Design of Communication—just prior to the pandemic.

As a side note, this “Communicating Risk” presentation reminds me of the Great Barrington Declaration, and the scientific assertion that Covid-19 wasn’t a public health crisis—it was a public health messaging crisis. Scientists were sounding the alarm that governments everywhere were “willfully distorting the public health message for political purposes.”

From their website:

“Why are so many people afraid of COVID-19? 

Unfortunately, the public health messaging about COVID-19 around the world has created many misperceptions that have spread fear.

Better public health messaging that does not spread unfounded fears based on anecdotes would help correct this situation.”

For the record, that assessment comes from leading epidemiologists Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Dr. Sunetra Gupta and Dr. Martin Kulldorff, who hold degrees from Stanford University, Oxford University, and Harvard University respectively. These guys are not fringe quacks, they’re highly esteemed scientists who realized that the communication of risk was being weaponized by our very own government.

Let that sink in.

Now let’s consider Forno’s curios words: “Thinking Differently — And Beyond…”

What does that mean? In my mind, those words imply conformity. It translates to “building consensus”—with a cyber twist. It means that even though everyone is prone to developing their own opinions, when the government colludes with Big Tech to target “the world’s most exploitable” in order to manipulate “voter’s perceptions of reality”—now corrupt politicians can leverage this “new perspective for policymakers” to condition the masses to feel the same about hot button issues.

Remember how we learned about “Algorithmic Social Interventions” that are optimally targeting behavioral interventions to achieve specific policy goals?

Remember how government agencies are using Artificial Intelligence to censor the information available to voters ahead of elections?

Remember how the global cabal is using AI to immunize humanity against misinformation by generating narratives that adapt to changing sentiment?

We’ve been digging into this all week.

I was intentionally ignoring the David DePape drama in order to focus on the greater threat of weaponized AI. When I did look into the narrative surrounding the DePape drama, it led me to Richard Forno—and it turns out Forno has been central in the government’s development and application of advance technologies that are capable of controlling the narrative—and the outcome of elections—for over a decade.

Again, there’s something there.

The connection seems too strange to be coincidental.

Connect the dots.

Legacy media lapdogs have been sowing the seeds of political violence for months, ginning up images of a civil war, and pegging the cause of it all on MAGA extremists. They breathlessly shriek about J6 insurrection and point to the show trials as proof. Now they are feigning concern that “perceptions” over election fraud are likely to cause even more violence leading up to and shortly after the elections—that’s the message coming from Forno, CNN, ABC, NPR, and their ilk.

Of course, this is all according to a “joint intelligence” bulletin that I still cannot find.

For all my fellow MAGA types, any “perception” of election fraud is solely based on Russian, Iranian, or Chinese attempts to interfere with our elections. That’s the story.

Where does this story come from? Well, it comes from Google, who just so happens to be under investigation for interfering with U.S. elections. What a coincidence.

I discovered this when numerous outlets started running stories about how China, Russia, and Iran are sowing dissent ahead of the midterm elections. How do all these journalists know this is happening? Because of expert “threat assessment” being provided by an “intelligence organization” called Mandiant.

Google completed the acquisition of Mandiant on September 12th, 2022.

The Big Lie.

According to the liberals, the Big Lie is that the 2020 election was stolen and the government is colluding with tech firms to fleece the American public.

According to conservatives, the Big Lie is that the 2020 election was legitimate and the greatest threat to democracy are Christians and violent right-wing extremists.

According to yours truly, the Big Lie is that Americans are facing a choice between Democrats and Republicans this midterm election. This is a terrible deception.

Don’t get me wrong, I take heart knowing there are some 300 conservative candidates who are openly challenging the established narrative. I am eager to vote for freedom loving constitutional candidates on the Republican ticket. This is a battle between the left and right for the heart and soul of our nation, and I do believe a red wave is coming.

I do believe that the majority of Americans still value life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. I do believe that more and more people are waking up and making a stand. I do believe there is hope for the future and that this election may prove to be one of the most pivotal in American history—so get out and vote and let’s make it happen!

Just don’t lose sight of what we’re up against.

This is just one battle in a much bigger war—us against the machines and the commie b******s behind the scenes who are currently pushing the buttons!

PS: Don’t forget, now it’s easy to catch up on previous episodes by listening to The Torch Report on iHeart Radio, Spotify, Google Podcasts, or Apple iTunes —enjoy!

It’s ridiculous.

Preposterous. Ludicrous. Absurd.

How could anyone believe such things?

Do you ever find yourself feeling that way?

I know I have and often do, as I did this morning when I read a headline suggesting that David DePape—the now infamous underwear assailant—is a mentally unstable illegal immigrant who might just get deported after his trial. Trivial tripe.

Why anyone cares is beyond me. The holes in the narrative are glaringly obvious and the whole story smacks of a politically convenient distraction—just something to point at as the democrats shriek about political violence ahead of the midterms. No effort has been spared in linking this dramatic, almost theatrical storyline to the MAGA extremists who are threatening democracy by their very existence.

Last night, right on cue, “President” Biden issued a stark warning about the “dark forces with a thirst for power” that will threaten democracy this midterm election. He was only talking to 150 or so young Democrats, mere useful idiots, but Biden made it abundantly clear that the attack on Paul Pelosi was caused by MAGA Republicans who refuse to accept the outcome of the 2020 election.

In his own mumbled words:

“American democracy is under attack because the defeated former president of the United States refused to accept the results of the 2020 election. And he's made the big lie, an article of faith in the MAGA Republican Party,” Biden said.

“The great irony about the 2020 election is that it's the most attacked election in our history. And, yet, there's no election in our history that we can be more certain of its results. Every legal challenge that could have been brought was brought. Every recount that could have been undertaken was undertaken. Every recount confirmed the results.”

Speaking of big lies, geesh. This guy is as shameless as he is senile, but as long as he can still stumble over the teleprompter with semi-coherence, he’ll continue to be the most popular president ever elected—especially when he runs for re-election!

It’s ridiculous. Preposterous! Ludicrous! Absurd! How could anyone think that Biden is the best candidate that Democrats can come up with in 2024?! He would be 82 years old on the swearing in of his second term—and yet, according to the tea leaves, millions of American minions, including 26% of Washingtonians, are still convinced that he’s the best guy for the job:

How is that possible? It’s because these idiots have been told that Biden has “done better than most voters think” and they lack the requisite intelligence to realize they are being lied to. These are the very same useful idiots who believe that the 2020 election was the most secure election in history, and that anyone who challenges this fantasy is an angry MAGA extremist who is threatening democracy.

They believe this because the Biden’s handlers are master propagandists:

“This institution, this intimidation, this violence… are the consequence of lies told for power and profit, lies of conspiracy and malice, lies repeated over and over to generate a cycle of anger, hate, vitriol, and even violence.”

As with all good propaganda, there is truth in that statement. As the adage goes, if you tell a lie often enough, many people will eventually believe it. That is a staple strategy in the progressive’s playbook. They play to the useful idiots precisely because there are enough of them out there who are willing to believe anything they’re told—as long as they’re taken care of and kept safe, because that’s the government’s job.

At any rate, after pointing out that at least 300 candidates on the ballot are refusing to say if they will accept the results of the 2020 election, Biden goes on to say: 

“We the people must decide whether we will have fair and free elections, and every vote counts. We the people must decide whether we're going to sustain a republic, where reality's accepted, the law is obeyed, and your vote is truly sacred.”

Just think about it. Think about the subjective nature of these words. Does every vote count? Is your vote truly sacred? Must the law be obeyed? Who’s version of reality are we talking about here? And most importantly: What happens when we disagree?

These questions are too deep for the average Democrat voter. In all fairness, they’re probably too deep for the average Republican voter too—BUT I know, by very virtue of your presence in this audience, that you are far from average—You are exceptional.

So let’s press forth.

For centuries people have interpreted the tea leaves as divine indications of the future. Those who subscribe to this philosophy of divination call it tasseomancy, and those who practice it are called tasseomancers. Fascinating, right?

Here’s a bit of history:

“Europeans built the practice on a foundation of traditions so old even they may not even have known who was ultimately responsible for them. But from seeing patterns in running wax, mapping truth in the stars, or reading the future in animal guts, tasseomancy sought to answer humanity’s most burning question — what does the future have in store?”

That is the burning question, is it not? What does the future have in store?

According to “multiple sources” the future looks violent:

“The bulletin, released by the Department of Homeland Security, FBI, US Capitol Police and National Counterterrorism Center, says that perceptions of election fraud will likely result in heightened threats of violence.”

HERE’S THE THING:

I cannot find this official bulletin anywhere. One article just links to another article:

* Scholar: Political violence in America isn’t going away anytime soon

* “A warning about the threat of political violence heading into the 2022 midterm elections was issued to state and local law enforcement officials by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security on Oct. 28, 2022.”

* One of these links goes to NPR, the other to VOX, neither actually links to the source bulletin. Both articles are referenced below.

* “The bulletin was released the same day that Speaker of the House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi’s husband was hospitalized after a home invasion by a lone right-wing extremist…” that’s how they paint it.

* We’re in a new era of attacks on political leaders

* “The weeks ahead have particular potential for violence: Violence tends to increase around elections because they represent an intense competition over status and leadership. I think we should be expecting it to get a lot worse, both leading up to and after the midterm elections.”

* “Rhetoric on the right is legitimizing political violence.”

* Ahead of Election Day, U.S. agencies warn of potential attacks by extremists

* “U.S. security agencies have issued a heightened threat advisory, warning of potential attacks on political candidates, election officials and others. The alert came Friday, the same day that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's husband was attacked in their San Francisco home.”

* “NPR has obtained the bulletin issued by the Department of Homeland Security, the FBI, the National Counterterrorism Center and the U.S. Capitol Police.”

* Feds warn that domestic violent extremists pose heightened threat to midterm elections

* The warning came from “…a joint intelligence assessment sent to state and local officials and obtained by CNN.”

* “The bulletin, released by the Department of Homeland Security, FBI, US Capitol Police and National Counterterrorism Center, says that perceptions of election fraud will likely result in heightened threats of violence. The bulletin did not list any specific credible threats.”

* Domestic extremists pose 'heightened threat' to 2022 midterms: Law enforcement

* “…following the midterms, "perceptions" of election fraud could cause violence.”

* “...according to a joint intelligence bulletin obtained by ABC News.”

CNN obtained the bulletin. NPR obtained the bulletin. ABC obtained the bulletin.

I wanted to obtain the bulletin too, because I wanted to read the words for myself.

No such luck.

I probably spent waaaay too much time searching for this mysterious bulletin, but no matter how I typed it in—even searching for a .gov version—the only results were circular references. One liberal outlet points to the bulletin as “obtained” by another liberal outlet, and they all use the same language—language that the good professor used—and they all tell the same version of the story:

Besides not being able to find the actual bulletin, I want to point out that the “scholar” who so daftly declared that David DePape was “a lone right-wing extremist”—an assertion that is utterly absurd—this scholar, Professor Richard Forno, has a very impressive and curios resume.

It turns out his specialty is in cyber security (not public policy), which coincidentally would equip him with the perfect skill set to pull off the sort of back-door cyber shenanigans that generated the “numerous anomalies” on David DePape’s websites—including the fact that the progressive nudist hippie who lived in a bus, could not possibly have worked alone…

So many questions, so few answers, and so little time!

We’ll wrap this up tomorrow in part two of The Big Lie.

[Check it out now! TR 234 - The Big Lie (Part 2): Continuing on our journey to expose…]

PS: Don’t forget, now it’s easy to catch up on previous episodes by listening to The Torch Report on iHeart Radio, Spotify, Google Podcasts, or Apple iTunes —enjoy!

Let’s dig deeper.

Yesterday I tossed out some hypothetical coding—two if-then statements—that would effectively censor free speech without triggering a massive revolt against censoring free speech. The point was to demonstrate how easy it would be to create an algorithm that would facilitate “effective and rapid removal” of online content:

IF the content is counter narrative, THEN reduce it’s reach or remove it.

(If you’re curious what the actual coding might look like, click here.)

Today, I want to drill down on the “tipping the scales” aspect of these algorithmic solutions. Those who are controlling the flow of information are not censoring all of the information (which would be too obvious), but instead, they are “throttling” the information they don’t want you to see. Let’s start with this example:

What do you see? Russia, Ukraine, North Korea, South Korea, Seoul, Israel, India, China, Iran, Nigeria… do you see anything that says US elections are less than a week away? Is there any indication of how important this midterm election is?

That is front page news on a major media outlet. For many people, this is the only news they see—and this is just one example. How many people only get their news from Facebook or some other social media platform? How many people only go to a few familiar echo chambers to reinforce their already held beliefs?

The point is that an individual’s perspective on what’s going on in the world—what is important, what is not, and how they should feel about it—is directly shaped by the information they consume. This is true for all of us, which is why I like to scour opposing news sources to tease out the broader narrative and present it here.

With all that in mind, let’s get back to the big picture: The global cabal is actively using Artificial Intelligence to censor political dissent, manipulate public perception, and direct the outcome of elections.

Want proof?

You should, because that sounds like an outrageous claim!

The implications of this little known fact, if it is not immediately brought to light, will lead to nothing less than the enslavement of humanity.

Here’s how it happens:

* Global authorities declare that “misinformation” is a threat to public health and announce strategies to immunize humanity against the so-called “infodemic.”

* See the WHO’s published research agenda for managing infodemics.

* This graphic comes from the WHO’s first “Infodemiology Conference” held June 2020—note the machine learning and AI in the bottom right:

* Now consider this second graphic—from the same conference—and note the “Whole of Society” effort to “Save the Election!” from misinformation, in 2016:

What’s critical to realize is that the “new science of infodemics” launched by the WHO actually originated in political censorship. This graphic shows that MAFINDO has been specifically interfering in the outcome of elections by mobilizing “social agents of change” against hoaxes and hate speech.

According to the USAID backed CounteringDisinformation.Org, MAFINDO is a grassroots “civil society organization” that started back in 2015.

Also according to this state-funded “countering disinformation” initiative, there have been 282 worldwide “interventions” similar to the one in Indonesia. Digging deeper, I also find it fascinating that this Consortium for Elections and Political Process Strengthening (CEPPS), which is funded with taxpayer money, works in cahoots with the National Democratic Institute, the International Republican Institute, and the International Foundation for Electoral Systems—all of which have direct ties to political upheavals all around the globe.

Surely that’s just a coincidence.

Let’s get back to the AI.

The pandemic gave the global cabal a perfect reason to justify their need to censor free speech, to keep people safe from misinformation and save lives. This marked a notable shift toward programming people to accept this censorship as if it was for their own good—hence the use of “algorithmic solutions” to create behavioral change.

More specifically, Algorithmic Social Intervention aims to leverage AI for “optimally targeting and enhancing social and behavioral interventions to achieve policy or community-level goals.” And just in case you think this is some fringe effort, take note of the top search result below:

Just in passing, it’s worth mentioning that this concept of “algorithmic social intervention” has been being developed for at least 15 years, under the watchful eye of Milind Tambe, the Director of "AI for Social Good" at Google Research who has been deploying AI for the sake of public safety and counter terrorism since 2007.

Want to take a guess how he votes?

Tying it all together:

AI and “algorithmic social intervention” is repeatedly touted as a “critical tool” for the government to achieve its policy goals. In plain speak, Big Gov is using Big Tech to get what they want, and most people don’t realize that’s happening.

Today, more news outlets are picking up on the troubling revelations that the Department of Homeland Security has been caught colluding with Big Tech to censor free speech in America. Intelligent people are beginning to realize that these public-private partnerships are how The Narrative is being enforced.

There is no doubt this is directly affecting our elections. Furthermore, every indication is that these algorithms also had an impact on the 2016 and 2020 elections—long before most of the public had ever heard of misinformation or algorithmic solutions. After all, that’s what this AI was originally trained to do.

BUT, while it is great that more people are squawking about the government censoring free speech, don’t miss the bigger picture. The global cabal is actively deploying AI to systematically search and destroy dissenting perspectives and proactively shape public opinion—and this is happening at the global level.

This is being done to advance the UN Sustainable Development Goals (via Global AI and other initiatives), despite the fact that—and here’s the catch—scientists increasingly don’t understand how all this AI works!

In other words, the machines are learning faster than we are. They’ve been trained in behavioral psychology and social intervention. They’ve been given a set of goals. They’re actively censoring our conversations and manipulating public perception to achieve specific political outcomes. Who wrote that code again?

What could go wrong?!

Let me know in the comments below!

PS: Don’t forget, now it’s easy to catch up on previous episodes by listening to The Torch Report on iHeart Radio, Spotify, Google Podcasts, or Apple iTunes —enjoy!

As I was saying…

The threat of AI-enhanced global censorship is the biggest issue that is not being talked about. While everyone is still fretting over who opened the door when the police arrived to find Paul Pelosi wrestling over a hammer with a psychotic hippie (who may or may not have been in his underwear), America’s own ex-officiale Ministry of Truth has been busy convening behind closed doors to collude with Big Tech in a vast scheme to streamline state sponsored censorship.

According to public records brought to light by a lawsuit filed against “President Biden and other top-ranking government officials”—for their collective colluding to “censor free speech, including truthful information related to COVID-19, election integrity, and other topics, under the guise of combating “misinformation”—we now know that our tax dollars are being used to silence free speech.

Digging in, as reported by The Intercept:

“DHS’s mission to fight disinformation, stemming from concerns around Russian influence in the 2016 presidential election, began taking shape during the 2020 election and over efforts to shape discussions around vaccine policy during the coronavirus pandemic. Documents collected by The Intercept from a variety of sources, including current officials and publicly available reports, reveal the evolution of more active measures by DHS.”

So, this is a mission to “fight disinformation” that specifically affects elections. Logically speaking, that would mean that this effort is also directly affecting the elections, does it not? In other words, government agencies are using taxpayer money to censor the information available to voters ahead of elections—and all of this began to really take shape during the 2020 election.

This should really be shocking to anyone who claims to value “free and fair” elections. How are our elections free or fair if public discourse is being manipulated by government censorship, and this effort is being paid for with taxpayer dollars?

Worse yet, as with all government programs, the scope of this state funded operation quickly expanded to include censoring any counter-narrative news about the origins of the Wu Flu, dehumanizing medical mandates, emergency authorization of sketchy genetic injections, and other pandemic related concerns—as well as anything else that might reflect poorly upon the most popular president ever elected:

“According to a draft copy of DHS’s Quadrennial Homeland Security Review, DHS’s capstone report outlining the department’s strategy and priorities in the coming years, the department plans to target “inaccurate information” on a wide range of topics, including “the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic and the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines, racial justice, U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan, and the nature of U.S. support to Ukraine.”

So there you have it. You only get to say what they want you to say—at least some day, if the government continues to have their way, and we let them get away with it.

Hence the importance of sharing the truth with your friends:

It’s good. It’s bad. It’s ugly.

That high profile legal cases are being brought against these authoritarian schemes is indeed good news. The bad news is that the majority of people will never know about it. The masses will remain ignorant to their own manipulation because the mainstream media will not inform them of this ugly truth. Instead, they will continue to peddle the state sanctioned truth and declare that it’s Trusted News.

There are two points that I want to emphasize here:

* This collusion to censor the flow of information using 21st century tools like Artificial Intelligence is already being deployed at the global level.

* This DOES NOT mean that all counter-narrative news will immediately disappear and be taken down—that would be far too obvious.

These people are pernicious, they’re not stupid.

If the global cabal simply removed all public dissent instantly with the single click of a button—which in theory they have the capacity to do—what would happen?

The peasants would get pissed. What the hell is going on here? If they are being so bold in their tyranny, what will they not do? Maybe it’s time we fight back, you know, before they come door-to-door looking for papers, or hammers, or whatever?

No, no, that path might lead to violence. They’d rather win without firing a shot—or at least without getting shot at or threatened with a hammer. Think strategy.

Perhaps we should frame the possibilities this way.

* There is information that exists that counters the approved narrative.

* The more people that view this information, the more people are going to question the narrative.

* The fewer people who view this information, the fewer people are going to question the narrative.

THEREFORE: It is not necessary to completely remove all of this information.

By reducing the spread of this information by some calculated percent—so that the majority of people never see it, for example—they can control public sentiment.

I’m not a coder, but I imagine the programmers setting up the machine learning and algorithmic solutions might code in something like this:

* If 20% of the public is expressing doubt about the narrative, THEN reduce the circulation of “misinformation” by 20%, initiate public reeducation campaigns, and use light censorship until public support for the state narrative improves.

* If 80% of the public is openly challenging the narrative, THEN reduce the circulation of “misinformation” by 80%, launch offensive campaigns to target public influencers, and shadow ban and de-platform repeat offenders.

Of course, those are just two hypothetical scenarios whipped up by an ignorant peasant pecking away at his keyboard. I’m sure the brilliant minds behind the global effort to control the flow of information have a much more sophisticated way of doling out the censorship—like letting the AI decide, for example.

Here’s the thing: To what extent they are already doing this, we will never know. If they shut it all the way down, it would be obvious. But if they are just reducing the number of people who are getting the information, there is really no way of knowing—except we know that they have openly declared their explicit intent to do so.

I believe they have declared this intent to inoculate the masses against any major revolt against state censorship. They are conditioning the masses to believe that this is necessary. Misinformation is dangerous. Disinformation is a threat to democracy. When people believe Russian propaganda, it will interfere with our elections—that’s why our own government is using state-run propaganda to shore up our elections.

You know the drill.

As keen observers have pointed out:

“This is despotic, and in its attempts to marry government to industry to suppress speech, it’s literally fascist. And it is clearly unconstitutional to boot.”

Vote accordingly.

There is no doubt that governments around the world are censoring free speech to manipulate political outcomes. There is no doubt that this means the global cabal is actively installing presidential puppets in positions of power all around the world.

There is no doubt that these initiatives are intended to advance the global socialist agenda and enslave humanity into a dystopian hell—though few put it that way.

What remains in doubt, is whether or not enough people speak out against this insidious plot and motivate our elected leaders to publicly campaign against it.

Time will tell. Today is the 1st of November. The midterm elections are just seven short days away. The big surprise this cycle is that the invisible hand is using taxpayer funded state-sanctioned censorship to tip the political scales in broad daylight—and that the apathetic masses remain completely unaware.

What do we do? We must think strategically.

The best way to combat this plot is to share truthful information in our own circle of influence. Word of mouth, face to face, heart to heart, we must talk about what’s going on. That’s the first step. Seek opportunities to have the conversation. Ask:

* What do you think about the State using our taxes to silence dissent?

* How do you feel about weaponized AI being used to censor public debate?

* Where do you draw the line between disinformation and a dystopian hell?

Conversations like this can catalyze action. When people sense that something’s wrong, and figure out how to put words to it, then it’s time to up the game.

Maybe you write a letter to your state representatives or the local newspaper. Maybe you gather a group of family and friends for the specific purpose of talking about the issue. Maybe you take the uncomfortable step of sharing this with someone you know.

The eradication of free speech is not an issue of left versus right. This shouldn’t be a political football. People need to understand that any attack on “misinformation” is ultimately an attack on public debate. At it’s core, this is nothing less than a compulsive urge to control what you can and cannot say, to control what you think, and ultimately control the way you view the world.

If they succeed, they will be able to control what you believe.

When they control what you believe, they will control your actions, how you behave, and how you vote. This is how they will condition you to be a good human. This is how the masses will lose their humanity and become mental slaves. This is how the global cabal consolidates power and the commies take over the world.

It goes without saying that this is a very bad thing, but it would be wise to speak this truth loud and clear—and spread it far and wide—for as long as we still can!

PS: Don’t forget, now it’s easy to catch up on previous episodes by listening to The Torch Report on iHeart Radio, Spotify, Google Podcasts, or Apple iTunes —enjoy!

Choices abound.

Deciding where to allot our precious time and energy can lead to difficult choices. From practical daily decisions about how to get stuff done, to broader considerations regarding what’s happening in the world at large, there is only so much we can take into consideration. So, what matters most?

Do we talk about the strange circumstances surrounding the attack on Paul Pelosi? Do we talk about the socialist shenanigans in the Brazilian elections? Do we talk about the “terrorist act” and drone attacks on the Russian fleet? Do we talk about the odd collapsing of a pedestrian bridge in India? Do we talk about Twitter?

How about we talk about the Big Red Wave? Maybe we should talk about Republican strategists expecting that Trump will be indicted, just shortly after the election?

Or maybe we don’t talk about any of it. Maybe none of it matters.

Maybe there are more important things.

I saw a rainbow this morning. Not the one flying at the library or proudly displayed in liberal yards all across America. This was an actual rainbow, created by nature, in a spectacular display of what is really real right now: The seasons are changing.

Happy Halloween!

Today is the 31st day of October, and it appears that all of the talk about an October surprise was just misplaced enthusiasm. As we slog toward the midterms, Republicans like Tiffany Smiley seem poised to upset entrenched Democrat candidates. With nearly 80% of Americans feeling like our country is “out of control,” it appears that Independents—those mysterious millions who tend to reject party platforms—are flocking to the Republican ticket.

That’s where it gets interesting to me. Are these independent minded voters actively being persuaded by Republican principles? Or are they just choosing the lesser of two evils? Are they openly rejecting all the liberal lunacy that has been plaguing our nation? Or are they simply voting for some semblance of sanity in the midst of chaos? I guess the underlying question is: Do these people know what we’re up against?

Do they understand that the entrenched political establishment is actively implementing the global socialist agenda? Do they understand what that means? Do they understand the implications of having an AI-driven global surveillance network that censors dissenting perspectives, manipulates public perception, and determines the outcome of elections? Is this level of global tyranny even on their radar?

It’s spooky.

What do the US sock-puppet-president Joe Biden, the fresh UK prime minister Rishi Sunak, the “Evil Russian Tyrant” Vladimir Putin, and China’s Communist party chief Xi Jinping, all have in common?

They all applaud the “stunning political comeback” of socialist Lula da Silva, even as half of Brazilian citizens express valid concerns over election integrity issues.

I guess their unanimous consensus on electing a socialist to power being a good thing could be seen as progress—at least they agree on something—but it strikes me about as odd as two men wrestling over a hammer in their underwear. It’s just strange.

But whatever, I’m sure that’s just a coincidence. Lula has set so many new records in this election, he is on par with the most popular president ever elected—the beloved firebrand Joe Biden, who is now the leader of all 54 states in the USA:

Does having a senile old man pretending to be president concern you?

How about the Chinese connections to the current administration?

Or how about this doozy: China wins Brazilian presidential election!

It’s an interesting pattern, isn’t it? But not many are talking about it.

Zoom out.

There are big patterns at play. While virtually no one is watching, the United Nations has been conducting a high-level forum on “Countering terrorist exploitation of information and communications technologies (ICT) and emerging technologies”.

Operating on the premise that the free exchange of ideas is a threat to the New World Order, this gathering of global progressives have cobbled together a plan that includes:

* “initiatives to facilitate effective and rapid removal of terrorist content online”

* “threat mapping tools and definitional frameworks for terrorism and violent extremism-related content”

* “open-source intelligence (OSINT) practices, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning algorithms and counter-narratives”

* “counter-narratives should be strategically designed with specific target audiences and objectives in mind and be able to adapt to changing sentiment and behaviour of the targets”

* “preemptive action needed to mitigate risks, such as improving social media literacy” and “de-platforming and content blocking and removal”

If the idea of the global cabal actively planning to implement this intentional suppression of dissenting expressions strikes you as a human rights violation, let not your heart be troubled, they’ve clearly taken that into account:

“In addition, they identified several important steps to address human rights concerns, such as mandating oversight of social media platforms, empowering youth and women and promoting alternative narratives that celebrate shared values, diversity and the dignity of all people.”

Shared values? Diversity? The dignity of all people? Sounds great! Let’s do it!

What could go wrong?

They get to define the “definitional frameworks” that inform the AI what exactly constitutes extremism-related content, they are currently deploying this AI to facilitate the “effective and rapid removal” of dissenting opinions, and all this machine learning can now “adapt to changing sentiment” of the various targets of State censorship. What could go wrong? Add to this the World Health Organization’s efforts to immunize humanity against misinformation, Biden’s own proclamations that disinformation is a threat to democracy, and Big Tech actively expanding its use of AI in manipulating the public mindset, and we end up with truly next-level indoctrination.

It feels like the walls are closing in on free speech, but this is really nothing new. Though the seasons are always changing, some things remain the same. I’d like to turn to Radio’s Greatest of All Time for a few encouraging words:

“We conservatives are the ones standing for diversity of thought and honest communication. You do not hear a conservative anywhere suggest that anybody be taken off any radio station, television station, movies, or what have you. We do not urge censorship because we are not afraid of the free flow of ideas. Liberals are…

They want to shut down anybody who doesn’t embrace their ideology, and they want to criminalize those who don’t embrace their ideology. Today it’s the race baiters. Tomorrow it’s going to be some other cause, but liberalism is what it is, and it exists to silence people who don’t agree. They can’t win the debate…

They don’t want debate. They can’t compete in the open marketplace of ideas because their ideas are flawed, and airing those ideas makes it clear that they are flawed.” —Rush Limbaugh, April 12, 2007

Spread this truth far and wide.

The world will be a better place if you do!

PS: Don’t forget, now it’s easy to catch up on previous episodes by listening to The Torch Report on iHeart Radio, Spotify, Google Podcasts, or Apple iTunes —enjoy!

Not a joke.

What’s more important:

* The husband of a prominent politician being bludgeoned with a hammer?

* The mainstream media running a little white lie just days before the elections?

When it comes to raw emotional appeal, there’s really no contest. Violent crimes appeal to a rudimentary urge that compels our curiosity to explore the gore. What happened? Why did it happen? Who did it? What’s going to happen to them?

Resist the urge to misallocate your attention on such sensational headlines.

Realize that the impact of one little white lie can change the course of history.

When a local news station airs the results of an election 12 days before the election is over—what do we call that? A mistake? How about we call it what it is:

Election interference.

In the news today, we learn that Russia! Russia! Russia! is threatening “an untested area of international law” according to so-called “space lawyers.” Apparently the Evil Russia Tyrants might boldly go where no tyrant has gone before—they might blow up some civilian satellites. Are you scared yet?

Also in the news, it has come to light that U.S. taxpayers are funding Drag Queen story hours in Ecuador, much to the chagrin of some Ecuadorian politicians:

“It is disturbing to see that the U.S. is willing to expose young children to such sexualization. It saddens me that the taxes of American families are wasted in perverting values of other countries…

…it seems to be an attack against the values of the great majority of Ecuadorians that the United States is practicing a ‘diplomacy of gender ideology.”

To which the U.S. State Department retorts:

…the program seeks to “promote diversity and inclusion” and provide a space for “cultural exchange and creative expression for adolescents and young adults to promote tolerance.”

Alrighty then. Moving on.

In other news, Canadians are marching straight into an Orwellian hell as their insanely woke government has received $105 million from the WEF to pilot a Known Traveler Digital Identity program that promises to track everyone, everywhere they go. For those curious, this initiative has been being developed by the WEF since 2015, in conjunction with Google, INTERPOL, the UN Counter Terrorism Directorate, US Department of Commerce, and the US Department of Homeland Security.

The original roll out was targeted for the first quarter of 2020. What a coincidence.

Meanwhile, as the Green New Deal continues to strangle the life out of the world’s economy, the United States now has less than 25 days of diesel supply left to keep the country running and Europeans are preparing for rolling energy blackouts during the coldest winter months—losing electricity for up to 45 hours a week, so as to avert a “potential energy crisis that could cripple the country.”

Amusing, isn’t it?

Welcome to Future Earth. If you are interested, you can learn how they create the science to influence policy makers and advance their agenda by checking out the Earth Targets Initiative. You might also enjoy taking a peek at the deep pockets funding this agenda, along with their international consortium of NGO partnerships, by looking into Global Commons Alliance.

What is critical to keep in mind, is that these organizations are using commie tactics to dictate top-down environmental policies. They are specifically promoting centralized control over production and consumption and the eradication of personal property rights in order to “protect the planet.” In other words, they want control.

Total, unmitigated, unrestricted control over every aspect of your life.

“By the year 2030, you will own nothing, eat bugs, and be happy.”

Which brings us back to the upcoming elections, why they matter, and why the Left is so desperate to retain control over the U.S. political establishment—desperate enough to do anything to keep their power and maintain their momentum in this “incredible transition” to Future Earth.

Remember when?

Do you remember in the 2020 presidential election, when Fox News called the election for Biden in lockstep with the rest of the mainstream media? That was on the heels of them calling Arizona for Biden on election night, despite all the ballots not being tallied. As the world looked on, over a week later, as irregularities mounted, there were still several states that had not yet certified their elections—and yet the mainstream media had already declared that Joe Biden was the winner.

Honestly, looking back, it’s still a raw topic. It’s almost too painful to think about. The deceit. The lies. The trickery. Hope dashed against the rock. Wholesale corruption.

Where were the Republican leaders? Why wasn’t there a demand for accountability? Why weren’t more politicians interested in answering the HUGE list of perfectly legitimate questions being raised by the deluge of disturbing revelations?

Maybe just maybe, it’s because many of the people who did rally to demand answers are now locked in solitary confinement, held as political prisoners to this day.

Maybe just maybe, those in the halls of congress knew better than to get cross with the global cabal, they knew the threat of suicide was a very real affliction—a la Epstein.

Or, maybe just maybe, these corrupt political shysters were cut in on the deal and realized it would be easier to play along and get their slice of pie—after all, someone has to rule the peasants and profit from this fundamental transformation.

Who knows?

You know. Somewhere inside you, you know. You know Joe Biden is a sock-puppet. You know our country is under siege. You know our elections have been hijacked and that our political establishment is unabashedly corrupt. You and I and the majority of other red-blooded Americans know that we’ve been cheated and deceived.

But it’s difficult to face these facts. It’s hard to accept what it means. It’s easier to ignore the implications and cling to the hope that we can still vote ourselves out of this mess—and maybe we can. But there is no hope if the media is allowed to continue to interfere with our elections, manipulate public perception, and preemptively pick our political winners. That’s why one little white lie is so profound:

AZ FOX 10 Calls Arizona Governor’s Race For Democrat Katie Hobbs 12 DAYS BEFORE Election on LIVE TV!

Oops!

It was an accident they claim.

The unlikable liberal candidate (Katie Hobbs) had been trailing the people’s constitutional champion (Kari Lake) by 11 points heading into the election. But after a radically unprecedented 18 point swing, the progressive darling stole the hearts and minds of Arizonans and was declared the victor—and 12 days before the elections were even held no less! What an amazing story!!

Doesn’t it sound familiar? That’s right, it’s reminiscent of the remarkable 35 point swing that catapulted the deplorable progressive Pam Anderson into a historic victory in the primaries for Colorado Secretary of State—giving her an edge in the bid to oversee the state’s uber efficient Dominion voting machines. (You can brush up on this and other stories in TR 156 - EXPOSED: Massive Fraud in Midterm Elections!.)

But here’s the dirty little secret—and it’s no white lie: The reason the local news station broadcast the election results twelve days before the election was because of “an error caused by the Associated Press during testing.” Per the announcement:

They promise they are taking steps to make sure this never happens again, because it’s never fun when you get caught cheating—and that makes everything okay.

I suppose we aren’t supposed to notice that the Associated Press “generated” the results and “distributes” them to clients. This is, of course, all part of the Trusted News Initiative, which was formed in 2019 to control the flow of global information.

But, that probably doesn’t matter as much as Paul Pelosi being beaten with a hammer in the crime laden cesspool of San Fransisco. I know it’s a sad story, and sometimes s**t happens, but the timing of this smacks of distraction and strong-arm tactics.

Nevertheless, the real news of the day is that media just tipped their cards. They’ve already decided who will win the elections. The information has already been generated and is set for distribution. They’ve worked out the kinks, and now they’ll be sure to inform the public of the selected winners in a more time appropriate manner.

Elections? Meh. Elections are just to keep people entertained while the global cabal systematically advances their agenda under the cover of their media allies.

Tell me: What do you think about that?

Let me know in the comments below!

PS: Don’t forget, now it’s easy to catch up on previous episodes by listening to The Torch Report on iHeart Radio, Spotify, Google Podcasts, or Apple iTunes —enjoy!

Smile, you’re on camera!

According to two Harvard astronomers, there are some 4,000,000,000,000,000,000 alien spacecraft that may be observing us. That’s 4 quintillion in the common vernacular.

So, maybe starting up the U.S. Space Force wasn’t a bad idea after all, eh?

All silliness aside, as every peasant knows, anyone who works at Harvard is a genius—and even the snarks over at the Grunge understand that Space Force has it’s place:

So, what threats would the US Space Force confront? The biggie is America's not-unimpressive satellite collection, a smorgasbord of orbiting technology upon which just about everything you love depends: smart phones, electronic payment systems, and the always in-vogue services of Sirius XM Radio.

Back in 2007, China killed two birds with one stone by both knocking their own pesky, disused weather satellite out of the sky with a missile strike and proving that they could hit, gosh, anything in orbit that struck their fancy, should the spirit move them.

Here’s a couple things to take note of:

* Reasonable people understand that Space Force has its place and the eggheads at Harvard are not all geniuses—which is something that many liberals fail to grasp.

* China has proven it can destroy our way of life with a strategic missile-to-satellite strike—and that was with war tech from 15 years ago.

Interestingly enough, news out of the Pentagon today informs us that regardless of everything Russia! Russia! Russia!, China is still the top threat to the U.S.

This is important, as it may impact the midterm elections, but before we get into that there is a more pressing point that needs to be made. It appears, quite unfortunately, that our incipient Space Force has either a) been staffed by heavily indoctrinated useful idiots from Ivy League institutions, or b) been infiltrated by the global cabal.

What do I mean? Visit the official website and notice their top of page priorities:

Honestly, I thought the pandemic was over and “reproductive health care” was nothing more than a divisive political issue being used to stir up the liberal base ahead of the elections—which is why seeing this plastered at the top of the page took me by surprise. Why aren’t they promoting something more space-mission related?

Further down the page, the news section spells it out: Space Force top leadership is being directly indoctrinated by the globalists at Johns Hopkins University (i.e. “Intermediate and Senior Developmental Education”). In lockstep, they have also chosen to “amplify” reproductive health care, the Climate Action Plan, and financial incentives to recruit Children and Youth—all of which are initiatives that come nearly verbatim from the globalists’ playbook. In other words, they’re woke:

BUT, despite the fact that the Space Force appears to be fully caught up in the collective delusions of the globalist agenda, and all of the negative implications that that entails, their role in protecting America from 21st century threats is important and may come front and center much sooner than we expect.

Straight to the point:

* Organized cyber threats against the U.S. is in Putin’s playbook

* Putin Is Not Backing Down. He's Pivoting to a New, Dreadful Kind of Warfare

* Cyberattacks And Satellite Sabotage: Putin's Non-Nuclear Escalations

Isn’t that what the Space Force is meant to protect us from?

How might that affect the midterm elections?

Let’s get hypothetical.

There has been a lot of chatter about false-flag events lately. It’s always both sides accusing the other side of staging some horrific, unscrupulous attack against innocent civilians. Either Russia stages the attack and blames it on Ukraine, or the invisible hand stages the attack and blames it on Russia. That’s how the story goes.

Somehow the Chinese seem to be conspicuously left out of this narrative.

The fact that a Putin puppet just claimed that Taiwan was "on schedule" to be returned to China—and the recent sighting of Chinese and Russian warships patrolling together off the coast of Alaska—feels related to me, though it’s difficult to connect the dots with any real certainty. What are these shysters up to?

Whatever it is, it’s probably not going to benefit the good old U.S. of A., right?

Here’s the thing:

I believe that the global cabal is running American politics, pulling the strings on the sock-puppet in the oval office, and planting sympathetic sycophants in positions of political power. This has been going on for years, but their emboldened ranks are burgeoning, and at this point the corruption has become commonplace and flagrant.

Together, this group is rapidly advancing the globalist agenda as established by the UN Agenda 2030. This is all part of the Great Reset that will usher in Future Earth.

Underlying all of this are commie tactics and the evil impulse for total control.

If America experiences another Trump-like speed bump, wherein liberty minded constitutional conservatives are voted into power to rectify the situation, it would be a major setback to the globalist agenda. I can’t imagine they plan to let that happen.

Zoom out… way, way out.

Let’s pretend some globalist stooge planted at the Space Force was secretly planning to zap a few satellites and plunge us all into darkness. Maybe it would be to save the planet, or maybe it would be to start a war. Regardless of the motive, unimaginable chaos would ensue. What would the world do? We would look to our leaders.

We’d look to trusted news sources—but of course, they’d all be offline, except for perhaps the state sanctioned emergency broadcast system and perhaps a handful of hardcore preppers who had their HAM radios stashed in a Faraday cage.

Those who were wholly unprepared would immediately snap into savage survival mode and literally be willing to kill people just to get some toilet paper. Gas pumps wouldn’t be working, so people would be limited in their ability to travel and forage for resources. The big cities would implode into utter carnage overnight…

“...but country boys can survive.”

Interestingly enough, the question of whodunnit wouldn’t be top of mind for quite some time. The majority of people would be too consumed with survival to care whether is was the Russians, or the Chinese, or some rogue Deep State actors from our very own Space Force. At that point, would it even matter?

Yes, it would matter, because chances are high that the beleaguered masses of humanity might very well find themselves seeking salvation from the very same people who pushed the button that plunged the whole world into darkness in the first place. It’s just another example of “cause the problem, provide the solution.”

In reality, though this scenario is possible, it is still unlikely. Pulling a stunt like that, even on a small scale (say like hitting just a couple of cities) would cause ramifications that would harm everyone. Even the elites might not escape the pain, which is why I doubt it will ever happen.

If it were to happen, it would likely be an eco-fanatic with an unshakable conviction that they are sacrificing themselves and the rest of humanity in order to save the planet—you know, for the greater good, just like a suicide bomber.

People are crazy.

Do you really think there are 4 quintillion alien space craft flying through space? People do. I suppose it’s possible, but what’s the point? Plenty of people also believe that Joe Biden is the most popular president ever elected and that his economy is booming. Why do people believe that? Because that’s what they’re being told:

* Biden pushes back on ‘doomsayers’ while touting latest economic growth numbers

* The US economy went back into growth mode in the third quarter of 2022

* White House pivots to closing argument on economy

Nevermind reality.

The midterms are just around the corner.

This time even the aliens will get to vote.

Reports of voter intimidation are pouring in.

The legal challenges have already started.

There will be delays in determining the outcome.

At this point, a Trump-Biden rematch in 2024 is a 99.9% sure thing.

Honestly, I kind of hope the aliens land before then!

PS: Don’t forget, now it’s easy to catch up on previous episodes by listening to The Torch Report on iHeart Radio, Spotify, Google Podcasts, or Apple iTunes —enjoy!

Something’s up.

For the last two weeks I’ve had a nagging sense that there’s something else going on. The media has been reduced to a simmer, just barely bubbling with enough spoon-fed drivel to keep the various narratives alive. Russia is evil. Biden is strong. The economy is fine. The midterms are a toss up. They’re about to catch Trump. You know the drill.

But hey, at least events in the U.K. have really been exciting, right?!

Still, given all the effort to ratchet up a sense of urgency about the winter variants, concerns over nuclear war, global food shortages, and economic collapse—doesn’t it seem like things have quieted down? Doesn’t it seem a little too quiet?

When I read the news, all I see is surface level propaganda. It’s shallow. Things are in a holding pattern. And so I wonder: What are they up to?

Besides deploying AI to assuage the masses, here’s what I’ve found:

* This week, the UN is celebrating it’s 77th anniversary by placing its focus on global disarmament and doubling down “to build a safer, more secure world and to protect people from harm.” This just smacks of moral imperative.

* “Global disarmament” is typically thought of as nuclear disarmament, but in fact, this ties directly to the Agenda 2030 effort to disarm humanity so they can “prevent violence”—or any armed resistance to their schemes.

* Also this week, UNICEF has declared that “the climate crisis is a child rights crisis” because “they are less able to regulate their body temperature compared to adults.” And yet children have been adapting to the climate forever, right?

* This prompted an international call for “urgent and dramatic emissions mitigation measures to contain global heating - and protect lives”.

* Meanwhile, the WHO released its first-ever list of health-threatening fungi. This almost sounds fascinating, until you read the fine print and realize they are paving the way for more bio-weapons research and centralized control over industrial agriculture (aka the food supply):

* “The authors of the report stress the need for more evidence to inform the response to this growing threat – both of disease and antifungal resistance.…” aka, more government funded research and surveillance.

* “Resistance to antifungal medicines is partly driven by inappropriate antifungal use across the One Health spectrum. For example, injudicious use of antifungals in agriculture…” aka, keeping crops from molding.

* Over at NATO, the Secretary General reminds us that “wars are, by nature, unpredictable”—but if we send billions of dollars in more military equipment to Ukraine, they might be able to hold off the evil Russians while NATO conducts their advanced nuclear war games later this week.

* NATO also mentioned that they “now engage directly with the [weapon making] industry to be able to replenish our existing stocks of ammunitions and [military] capabilities.”—aka, they are now even more cozy with MIC.

* Meanwhile, the World Economic Forum is frothing at the mouth over the “threat of climate change” and outlining global actions ahead of the upcoming COP27 event—which is a Convention of Parties (198 countries) who have signed onto the radical environmental demands of last year’s Glasgow Climate Pact.

* UN Climate Change Chief Simon Stiell claims that COP27 is a moment of truth for the international community, stating: “We’ve been unwilling to accept what ‘systemic transformation’ really means.”

* It’s worth noting that COP26 stressed urgency, bumping up the initial targets for national action—on everything from cows, to cars, to coal—up to this year, instead of 2025. Their consensus was that we have to reduce emissions by 45% this decade, or else we are all going to die, just like the polar bears.

Okay, got it.

If you’ve been with me for awhile, you will immediately recognize that there is a united agenda across each of these organizations that is directly rooted in the UN Sustainable Development Goals—aka Agenda 2030.

As stated, they believe they have a moral imperative to build a safe and secure world in order to protect people from harm. Here we must insert a reality check:

* This supposed imperative sounds good to the dupes who want to be protected, but it ultimately is a complete and utter impossibility. The world is not safe, or secure, and a global government cannot protect people from harm—no matter how adamantly they may argue otherwise.

* Having convinced themselves of this morally superior mission, the mission to protect the planet and save humanity from itself, they operate with a completely irrational sense of urgency that ignores personal rights and justifies destroying life as we know it for the sake of achieving arbitrary goals—aka the greater good.

Here’s the thing: This agenda is advancing around the clock. They believe it is important. They are super motivated, organized, and ambitious. They are actively shaping our future in ways that we may not like—and there’s almost nothing we can do about it.

Almost nothing.

We may be facing a global cabal equipped with F-16s, unlimited funding, fancy tools, and weaponized AI, but we sure as hell are not helpless.

Buckle up.

Understanding the global plans helps to put our national politics into context.

Ask yourself: Does the global cabal have a vested interest in America politics?

You bet your ass it does. With that in mind, consider these headlines:

* Midterm elections outlook darkens for Biden's White House

* Midterms Just Bump in the Road for Mainstream Propagandists

* Hillary Clinton Says “Right-Wing Extremists” Have a Plan to “Literally Steal the NEXT Presidential Election”

* FACTS DON’T LIE: Dems Push Big LIE About Potential “Violence and Disruption” Around Upcoming Election

In terms of narrative, what stands out to you?

What stands out to me is the casting of expectations regarding both the midterms and the presidential election in 2024. One headline indicates the midterms may just be a bump in the road for the propaganda machine of the globalist regime, while the other points toward their larger plan.

The ballots are out and the battle for control of congress will be decided in just a couple of weeks. Maybe it will be a red wave. Maybe it will be a hung election. Maybe there will be a false flag interruption. Maybe all hell will break loose. Who knows.

Regardless, their plan marches on.

Here’s a wild question: What if it just so happens that things really do go sideways and get ugly after the midterms—say because of rampant electoral fraud and political corruption—and consequently our country does descend into utter chaos?

What if this coincides with an economic collapse of epic proportion, an unexpected cyber attack on the power grid, and/or potentially some false-flag event?

That would be the worse case scenario, and if that happened, I’d be curious:

Would it be helpful if the UN Security Council already had a multi-national security force deployed to America’s backyard—say like in Haiti—just in case things got out of hand after the election?

Think about it in terms of geopolitical chess and consider what’s happening in the Caribbean right now. The situation in Haiti is spiraling out of control and the besieged Haitian government has officially cried out for international help, requesting for “specialized armed forces” to intervene:

That force would “remove the threat posed by armed gangs and provide immediate protection to critical infrastructure and services,” as well as secure the “free movement of water, fuel, food and medical supplies from main ports and airports to communities and health care facilities.”

The U.S. has already deployed a delegation to assess the situation.

The bigger question we need to be asking ourselves is: Could it happen here?

Are we so much more sophisticated and civil here in America? Are we above falling into depravity and complete societal collapse? If Chicago, San Fransisco, and New York are any indications, I would say we’re barely one step away on a good day!

But what if Americans prove not to be more civil and restrained? Could that lead us into a Haitian situation? Might circumstances arise wherein our government cries out for international intervention to protect critical infrastructure and support the police?

Here’s a thought: What if that was the plan?

Again, who knows. That’s just wild speculation. How could any peasant actually comprehend the vast and expansive strategies being deployed by the global cabal? After all, we’re just hackable animals—in theory they can lead us to think and feel however they’d like.

Right now it seems like they want us to believe that this is just another election. They want us to believe that our votes will bring balance to power. They want us to believe that political accountability is still possible. They want us to believe we can still get back on track and set the record straight.

Make no mistake, they are manipulating our beliefs with targeted precision.

Think about it. What would happen if we didn’t believe these things were possible? What if the majority of people who loved our country believed that it was hopelessly lost? What if the majority of passionate American patriots believed that the federal bureaucracy and political establishment were irredeemably corrupt?

Right now, I believe we are being setup for the next wave of shock and awe. Things are too quiet. Something’s not right. Is this going to be a peaceful, free, and fair election? Or are we headed for more madness and midterm mayhem? Only time will tell.

Patriots take note: In the calm before the storm, it’s wise to batten down the hatches.