
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this episode of the Wills and Estates Transmission Podcast, Tony speaks with Rachael Ryan from de Groots about discretionary testamentary trusts and how proposed tax changes have affected estate planning.
Rachael explains what a testamentary trust is, how it differs from a discretionary family trust established during someone's lifetime, and why testamentary trusts have traditionally offered both asset protection and potential tax advantages.
The discussion looks at the Federal Government's proposed changes to the taxation of discretionary trusts and the uncertainty initially created around whether testamentary trusts would also be affected.
Rachael also explains how de Groots is responding by building greater flexibility into wills, including provisions that may allow beneficiaries to decide whether to receive their inheritance through a testamentary trust or, where appropriate, receive some or all of it directly.
What is a discretionary testamentary trust?
How is it different from a family trust?
What tax changes have been proposed for discretionary trusts?
Why did the announcement create uncertainty for testamentary trusts?
Why asset protection remains an important reason to use a testamentary trust
How trusts can help protect inheritances in the event of divorce, bankruptcy or other financial risks
Why a beneficiary may prefer to receive an inheritance directly
How opt-out provisions can provide greater flexibility
Why estate planning needs to account for changes that may occur decades into the future
Testamentary trusts can still provide significant asset-protection benefits, but tax laws and family circumstances can change.
Building flexibility into a will can allow beneficiaries to assess their circumstances at the time of inheritance and choose the structure that best suits them, rather than trying to predict today what the legal and tax environment may look like many years from now.
In this episode of the Wills and Estates Podcast, Tony speaks with Emma from de Groots about the risks of informal wills and why handwritten notes, text messages or other documents can create serious complications for an estate.
Emma explains the formal requirements for a valid will and what can happen when those requirements are not followed. In some circumstances, a Court may recognise an informal document as a will, but that can create additional uncertainty, cost and delay.
The discussion also covers what can happen when someone writes changes directly onto an existing will and whether those handwritten amendments could be treated as an informal codicil.
An informal document may sometimes be recognised as a will, but relying on that process can create uncertainty and additional legal expense.
If you want to make or change a will, the safer approach is to obtain proper legal advice and ensure the document is prepared and executed correctly.
In This EpisodeKey Takeaway
In this episode of the Wills and Estates Transmission Podcast, Tony speaks with Julia Tutt from de Groots about what can happen when family assumptions, verbal promises and estate planning do not match.
The discussion centres on Tarazi v Paras [2026] NSWSC 369, a New South Wales Supreme Court case involving three daughters and a property in Ashbury.
Two of the daughters claimed their father had verbally promised the property to them. However, his will divided the property between all three daughters.
Julia explains why a family understanding or a single conversation may not be enough to establish a legal entitlement to property. She also discusses proprietary estoppel, the importance of documenting significant arrangements and the responsibilities of executors.
The case also provides a warning for executors who delay administering an estate. Ignoring an estate or waiting for time to pass does not remove the obligation to deal with it properly.
Do not rely on assumptions, informal conversations or family stories about who will inherit a property.
Have the conversation, obtain proper advice and make sure the intended arrangement is clearly documented.
Tarazi v Paras [2026] NSWSC 369
This podcast provides general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Legal advice should be obtained for individual circumstances.
In This EpisodeKey TakeawayCase DiscussedDisclaimer
In this episode of De Groots with DeGroots, Tony Skinner speaks with Elizabeth Lorimer about estrangement in family provision applications.
Elizabeth explains that estrangement is a factor the court may consider, but it is not an automatic barrier to a claim.
The discussion covers how courts assess need, the difference between estrangement and disentitling conduct, why family provision cases are highly fact-specific, and why simply leaving someone out of a will does not guarantee they cannot make a claim.
The episode also looks at practical considerations for will makers, including the importance of documenting reasons for unequal provision and understanding how courts may treat long-term family breakdowns.
Estrangement can be relevant in a family provision application, but it is only one factor among many. The court will still consider the size of the estate, the applicant’s need, competing claims, and the relationship between the applicant and the deceased.
Elizabeth notes that many family provision applications settle at mediation, particularly in Queensland where mediation is mandatory. Even so, lawyers still need to prepare the case as if it may ultimately be heard by the court.
A central issue in family provision law is whether the applicant has been adequately provided for. The applicant’s financial need is often the critical factor. Without need, the court may not have power to make further provision.
Elizabeth explains that estrangement may involve a long breakdown in the relationship, lack of contact, distance, or family conflict. Disentitling conduct is much more serious and may involve violence, serious theft, abuse, or other gross behaviour.
Elizabeth is clear that there is no foolproof way to exclude a child from making a family provision claim. A child’s eligibility remains, even where there has been long-term estrangement. Leaving a reason in the will or a separate document may help provide context, but it is not a guarantee
In this episode of the Wills & Estates Transmission Podcast with de Groots, Tony Skinner speaks with Maree Harris about elder abuse and the important role solicitors can play in identifying warning signs, protecting vulnerable clients, and ensuring estate planning instructions are genuinely coming from the client.
Elder abuse is a growing concern, especially as Australia’s population ages and more families deal with estate planning, powers of attorney, capacity and intergenerational wealth.
Maree explains what elder abuse is, the different forms it can take, and why psychological, emotional and financial abuse are often the most common. She also discusses the importance of meeting elderly clients privately, taking instructions directly from the client, assessing capacity properly, and knowing when warning signs may require further action.
If you suspect elder abuse, you can contact the NSW Ageing and Disability Abuse Helpline on 1800 628 221.
What elder abuse means under the World Health Organization definition
NSW Ageing and Disability Abuse Helpline
1800 628 221
In this episode, Julia Tutt discusses the legal and emotional aspects of funerals, burial rights, and organ donation, emphasising the importance of communication and planning for end-of-life arrangements.
Key topics
In this podcast episode, Tony interviews Margot De Groot about the role and importance of notaries public.
Margot explains what a notary public is, the differences between notaries and justices of the peace, and common misconceptions surrounding notarial services.
She emphasises the trust and fiduciary role of notaries in verifying documents for international use, particularly in estate matters and legal documentation.
The conversation also addresses common questions people have about notaries and provides key takeaways for listeners.takeaways
In this episode, Tony and Isabel Ayoub discuss the critical relationship between marriage and wills, particularly in New South Wales.
They explore how marriage can revoke existing wills unless specific clauses are included, the legal criteria for marriage, and the importance of updating estate planning documents.
The conversation emphasises the need for individuals to consult with estate planning lawyers to ensure their wishes are honored and to avoid complications that may arise from not updating their wills after significant life events such as marriage or divorce.
This is a lighhearted conversation about a serious topic. We are not aiming to offend.
The conversation delves into the Troja case, where a woman was found guilty of manslaughter for killing her husband.
The discussion highlights the implications of the forfeiture rule, which prevented her from inheriting anything from her husband's will, redirecting the inheritance to her mother-in-law instead.
In this episode of the Wills and Transmissions podcast, hostTony speaks with junior lawyer Isabel Ayoub about the critical issue of mental health in the legal profession.
They discuss the unique pressures faced by junior lawyers, the importance of support systems, and the need for a positive approach to well-being.
Isabel shares insights from her experiences and a recent conference on lawyer well-being, emphasising the need for open conversations about mental health and practical strategies for maintaining it in a high-stress environment.
From the publisher's feed