A theologian who sparked an intense social media debate when he posited that the Noah's ark narrative was potentially speaking about a regional — and not a global — flood is now speaking out to offer further context on his theory. Gavin Ortlund, president of Truth Unites, told CBN News he made his argument in a recent social media video, detailing his belief the Genesis 6 narrative is "about a regional event that was in a huge area of the Earth, but not all over the globe."

"I just wanted to help people understand some of the arguments for that view — help people understand that there actually are differences within orthodox Christianity," Ortlund said. "Historically, a lot of people are not aware of that." The theologian said the issue of Noah's ark often poses problems for skeptics and those within the Christian community who are scientifically-minded. Ortlund said he's motivated to help people understand arguments for and against some of the more complex and debated issues.

As for Ortlund's own believes, he said he tends to lean toward believing the flood was "local or regional," noting, though, that he doesn't necessarily believe it was particularly small in scope despite potentially being confined, in his view, to one area or location. In the end, he said the debate boils down to how one interprets the story of Noah in Genesis. One of the factors, according to Ortlund, was the confined nature of humanity at that time.

"There really is a good case, actually, that, in its original meaning, the author and the original hearers wouldn't be thinking of ... all of the globe of planet Earth, so this is just a matter of interpreting Scripture," he said. "Humanity, at this point, appears to also have just been regional. This is before the dispersion of human beings that happens after the tower of Babel and Genesis 10 and 11, so all of human beings are in this one portion of the Earth at this point before they had dispersed throughout the world."

Ortlund said his initial video discussing the issue sparked a plethora of responses on YouTube and an overwhelmingly negative reaction on X, formerly known as Twitter. Despite the reaction, he said there have been some traditional Christians in the past who have made similar arguments. While admitting these notions constitute a collective minority view, he added his belief that some people today simply don't realize such claims have historically existed.

Ortlund also pushed back on the notion he's a theological liberal or somehow espousing beliefs not rooted in Scripture. Here's what he had to say.