This letter from Joe Citizen to the Los Angeles Jury Commissioner requests clarification on the juror qualification affidavit. Specifically, he seeks the legal definitions of “citizen of the United States” and “resident of Los Angeles County,” along with the legal basis for requiring a signature under penalty of perjury. Citizen’s inquiry demonstrates a desire to understand his rights and responsibilities before completing the affidavit. His letter is formal and polite, expressing a need for clear legal guidance. The letter highlights concerns over potential legal ramifications of incorrectly completing the affidavit.

https://thinkandactlocally.com/donate/

https://thinkandactlocally.myshopify.com/

Youtube - @ThinkandActLocally

Facebook - @thinkandactlocally

TikTok - @thinkandactlocally

Instagram - @thinkandactlocally

Truth Social - @thinkandactlocally

Rumble - @ThinkandActLocally

X- @ThinkActLocally

LinkedIn - @think-and-act-locally

https://open.spotify.com/show/601vtPzxdHl82EM42Hsulf?si=05017b5b0ace4edc

This legal analysis argues that the INS Form I-9, purportedly mandating employment eligibility verification, is inapplicable to private sector employers in U.S. states. The argument centers on statutory interpretation of Title 8 of the U.S. Code, which focuses on aliens and nationality, finding that the law’s scope is limited to governmental entities and not private citizens. Relevant Supreme Court case law is cited to support the claim that employment is an inalienable right. The text further explains that even if applicable, the law requires “knowing” hiring of unauthorized aliens, and the I-9 serves only as an affirmative defense for employers, not a mandatory requirement. Finally, the analysis concludes that private sector employers in U.S. states are not legally obligated to use Form I-9.

https://thinkandactlocally.com/donate/

https://thinkandactlocally.myshopify.com/

Youtube - @ThinkandActLocally

Facebook - @thinkandactlocally

TikTok - @thinkandactlocally

Instagram - @thinkandactlocally

Truth Social - @thinkandactlocally

Rumble - @ThinkandActLocally

X- @ThinkActLocally

LinkedIn - @think-and-act-locally

https://open.spotify.com/show/601vtPzxdHl82EM42Hsulf?si=05017b5b0ace4edc

This legal analysis examines the constitutional basis of 18 U.S. Code, Chapter 44 (the Federal Firearms Act). It argues that the Act’s jurisdiction is deceptively limited, relying on the federal government’s authority over federal territories rather than broad interstate commerce powers. The author claims that changes in the Act’s codification and wording obscure its true scope, intentionally concealing its limitations on federal power. Furthermore, it alleges that certain provisions, although not explicitly repealed, are no longer readily available in published legal codes, hindering public understanding and potentially leading to unfair prosecutions. The ultimate goal is to expose this alleged legal subterfuge, potentially benefiting the firearms industry and American citizens.

https://thinkandactlocally.com/donate/

https://thinkandactlocally.myshopify.com/

Youtube - @ThinkandActLocally

Facebook - @thinkandactlocally

TikTok - @thinkandactlocally

Instagram - @thinkandactlocally

Truth Social - @thinkandactlocally

Rumble - @ThinkandActLocally

X- @ThinkActLocally

LinkedIn - @think-and-act-locally

https://open.spotify.com/show/601vtPzxdHl82EM42Hsulf?si=05017b5b0ace4edc

This document argues that the IRS’s authority to conduct widespread tax investigations is legally questionable. The author contends that while the President delegated the power to establish internal revenue districts to the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary only defined these districts as limited to customs areas, based on analysis of relevant legal documents, including Executive Order 10289 and the Code of Federal Regulations. This significantly restricts the IRS’s reach beyond customs-related tax matters. The author points out that the executive orders and Treasury orders defining these districts appear to have been rescinded, raising further questions about the IRS’s current authority. The overall purpose is to challenge the IRS’s claimed broad jurisdiction in conducting tax investigations.

https://thinkandactlocally.com/donate/

https://thinkandactlocally.myshopify.com/

Youtube - @ThinkandActLocally

Facebook - @thinkandactlocally

TikTok - @thinkandactlocally

Instagram - @thinkandactlocally

Truth Social - @thinkandactlocally

Rumble - @ThinkandActLocally

X- @ThinkActLocally

LinkedIn - @think-and-act-locally

https://open.spotify.com/show/601vtPzxdHl82EM42Hsulf?si=05017b5b0ace4edc

This legal text explains the complexities of federal jurisdiction in the United States. It details the historical evolution of federal power, particularly focusing on the impact of the 14th Amendment and the interstate commerce clause. The text contrasts federal authority over states and federal territories, highlighting the broader powers Congress holds in the latter. It discusses the differing treatment of citizens and corporations under interstate commerce laws, emphasizing limitations on federal intervention in the private affairs of citizens. Finally, the text argues for greater transparency in Congressional actions, urging Congress to clearly state the constitutional basis for its legislation.

https://thinkandactlocally.com/donate/

https://thinkandactlocally.myshopify.com/

Youtube - @ThinkandActLocally

Facebook - @thinkandactlocally

TikTok - @thinkandactlocally

Instagram - @thinkandactlocally

Truth Social - @thinkandactlocally

Rumble - @ThinkandActLocally

X- @ThinkActLocally

LinkedIn - @think-and-act-locally

https://open.spotify.com/show/601vtPzxdHl82EM42Hsulf?si=05017b5b0ace4edc

The Tenth Amendment Center website promotes the concept of nullification, the power of states to invalidate federal laws deemed unconstitutional. It highlights historical figures like Jefferson and Madison who championed nullification, citing their arguments and actions. The site offers resources such as articles, podcasts, and videos explaining the historical context and practical application of nullification. It emphasizes the Tenth Amendment as the constitutional basis for this power, and advocates for its use to limit federal overreach. The site also encourages support for the organization’s efforts.

https://tenthamendmentcenter.com/nullification-overview/

https://thinkandactlocally.com/donate/

https://thinkandactlocally.myshopify.com/

Youtube - @ThinkandActLocally

Facebook - @thinkandactlocally

TikTok - @thinkandactlocally

Instagram - @thinkandactlocally

Truth Social - @thinkandactlocally

Rumble - @ThinkandActLocally

X- @ThinkActLocally

LinkedIn - @think-and-act-locally

https://open.spotify.com/show/601vtPzxdHl82EM42Hsulf?si=05017b5b0ace4edc

This YouTube video transcript features Aaron Russo investigating the legality of the US income tax system. Russo interviews various experts and ordinary citizens, revealing widespread skepticism about the tax’s legal basis and raising concerns about government overreach. The film highlights numerous court cases and legal opinions suggesting the income tax may be unconstitutional, along with allegations of IRS misconduct and a lack of transparency. Russo connects the income tax to the Federal Reserve system, arguing both are tools used to consolidate power and control the population. The video concludes with warnings about the potential for a police state and loss of individual liberties, advocating for citizen awareness and resistance to governmental overreach.

https://thinkandactlocally.com/donate/

https://thinkandactlocally.myshopify.com/

Youtube - @ThinkandActLocally

Facebook - @thinkandactlocally

TikTok - @thinkandactlocally

Instagram - @thinkandactlocally

Truth Social - @thinkandactlocally

Rumble - @ThinkandActLocally

X- @ThinkActLocally

LinkedIn - @think-and-act-locally

https://open.spotify.com/show/601vtPzxdHl82EM42Hsulf?si=05017b5b0ace4edc

This legal document analyzes federal employment taxes, arguing that Subtitle C of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC), while seemingly imposing taxes on all employers and employees, primarily targets government entities and their workers. The text asserts that Chapter 24, concerning withholding, doesn’t actually impose a tax but rather authorizes withholding of Subtitle A taxes, which are only applicable to those with existing tax liability through contracts with the federal government. Finally, the document suggests that many individuals and businesses unintentionally subject themselves to these taxes by providing their Social Security Numbers (SSNs), creating a legal presumption of tax liability.

https://thinkandactlocally.com/donate/

https://thinkandactlocally.myshopify.com/

Youtube - @ThinkandActLocally

Facebook - @thinkandactlocally

TikTok - @thinkandactlocally

Instagram - @thinkandactlocally

Truth Social - @thinkandactlocally

Rumble - @ThinkandActLocally

X- @ThinkActLocally

LinkedIn - @think-and-act-locally

https://open.spotify.com/show/601vtPzxdHl82EM42Hsulf?si=05017b5b0ace4edc

The text examines the legal definition of “Willful Failure to File” (26 U.S. Code § 7203), arguing that the IRS and media use fear-mongering to pressure tax filing. It asserts that the actual definition of “person” within the statute (26 U.S. Code § 7343) limits prosecution to corporate officers or partnership members with specific duties related to tax compliance. The author suggests that ordinary citizens are wrongly prosecuted under this charge because they are not included in the legal definition of “person” as it applies to tax law. The text uses examples to illustrate how the definition of “includes” in the tax code creates a narrow category of individuals subject to the charge. Finally, the text concludes that many individuals have been unjustly imprisoned under §7203.

https://thinkandactlocally.com/donate/

https://thinkandactlocally.myshopify.com/

Youtube - @ThinkandActLocally

Facebook - @thinkandactlocally

TikTok - @thinkandactlocally

Instagram - @thinkandactlocally

Truth Social - @thinkandactlocally

Rumble - @ThinkandActLocally

X- @ThinkActLocally

LinkedIn - @think-and-act-locally

https://open.spotify.com/show/601vtPzxdHl82EM42Hsulf?si=05017b5b0ace4edc

This text argues that the U.S. federal income tax system is unconstitutionally applied, primarily targeting non-citizens. It claims that the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) applies only to “taxpayers,” defined as those subject to internal revenue taxes, and that most Americans are not subject to these taxes. The document asserts that “income tax” encompasses various taxes, including employment and excise taxes, and that “income tax” under Subtitle A of the IRC only applies to specific forms of income, such as corporate dividends, not ordinary compensation. It contends that providing a tax identification number implies tax liability and that citizens have the right to refuse if they believe a transaction is not taxable. Finally, it alleges that companies improperly demand tax identification numbers due to ignorance or fear, and encourages readers to spread awareness of these claims.

https://thinkandactlocally.com/donate/

https://thinkandactlocally.myshopify.com/

Youtube - @ThinkandActLocally

Facebook - @thinkandactlocally

TikTok - @thinkandactlocally

Instagram - @thinkandactlocally

Truth Social - @thinkandactlocally

Rumble - @ThinkandActLocally

X- @ThinkActLocally

LinkedIn - @think-and-act-locally

https://open.spotify.com/show/601vtPzxdHl82EM42Hsulf?si=05017b5b0ace4edc