
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Rory Daniels, Head of Emerging Technology and Innovation at techUK, joins Thinking On Paper to discuss whether the United Kingdom can remain globally competitive as quantum computing, robotics, photonics, AI, and advanced computing converge.
The UK possesses world-class research institutions, deep technical talent, and globally significant tech startups. However, its recurring bottleneck is scale: promising breakthrough technologies developed in British universities and laboratories are frequently commercialized, acquired, or funded overseas.
Rory argues that the UK's true competitive edge doesn't lie in trying to out-scale Silicon Valley or China in a single isolated industry. Instead, it comes from integrating existing national strengths across deep learning, chip design, specialized robotics, quantum systems, silicon photonics, and 5G/6G connectivity.
In this episode, we discuss:
• What sets the UK robotics industry apart from the US and China
• Why British robotics excels in harsh, specialized environments like nuclear sites, offshore wind turbines, and industrial inspection
• How UK autonomous driving leaders like Wayve combine AI models, sensors, and connectivity
• The delicate balance between autonomous robotaxis and London’s iconic black-cab industry
• Why UK deep tech companies struggle to scale beyond early venture stages due to patient capital gaps
• The critical role of universities, tech-transfer offices, and regional innovation hubs in Coventry, Edinburgh, Milton Keynes, and Barnsley
• Using digital twins and physics-based simulation to train next-gen robotics and AVs
• Why photonics is essential for quantum computing, plus the convergence of neuromorphic and biological computing
• What government, investors, and industry leaders must do to keep British innovation scaling domestically
Please enjoy the show.
Thinking on Paper is a technology podcast exploring AI, space tech, quantum computing, science, and the systems shaping the future.
🏠 Buy us a beer on Substack
📺 Watch on YouTube
🎧 Listen on Apple Podcasts
📷 Clips and outtakes on Instagram
Chapters
(00:00) The UK Technology & Deep Tech Landscape
(03:14) Robotics: A Distinct UK Industry Perspective
(05:54) Autonomous Vehicles & Wayve in the UK
(08:39) Dissecting the UK Innovation Ecosystem
(11:05) Scale-Up Bottlenecks for UK Tech Founders
(13:27) Regional Clusters & Government Innovation Initiatives
(16:33) University Spin-Outs & Tech Transfer Offices
(19:15) Barnsley: A Blueprint for Regional Tech Towns
(21:53) National Policy & Funding Strategy in Robotics
(24:20) Digital Twins & Synthetic Simulation Environments
(27:12) Quantum Computing & Photonics Acceleration
(29:24) STEM Education & Workforce for Emerging Tech
(30:55) Artificial Intelligence, Judgment & Human Wisdom
(38:02) Neuromorphic Computing: The Future of Energy-Efficient AI
(38:23) Deep Tech Convergence: The UK's Multi-Tech Advantage
(42:42) The Human Element & Building Public Trust in AI
#uktech #robotics #quantumcomputing #photonics #deeptech #artificialintelligence #techuk #thinkingonpaper
The Vij brothers join Thinking on Paper to discuss Neo, an autonomous machine learning engineer designed to automate parts of the AI development process.
As demand for AI systems grows, companies and governments are competing for a limited pool of experienced machine learning engineers. The challenge isn’t only access to data or computing power. Many organisations also lack the technical expertise required to build, test and deploy effective models.
Neo uses a multi-agent system to perform tasks normally handled by machine learning engineers, including analysing datasets, selecting modelling approaches, running experiments and evaluating results. The aim is to automate repetitive technical work while allowing human engineers to concentrate on higher-level decisions and more creative problems.
In this episode, we discuss:
What an autonomous machine learning engineer is
How Neo’s multi-agent AI system works
Why skilled machine learning engineers are in such high demand
Which parts of AI development can be automated
How autonomous agents compare with traditional machine learning workflows
Why Kaggle Grandmasters are considered leading practitioners in applied machine learning
Whether AI agents can match expert human performance
How automation could affect machine learning jobs and salaries
The evolution of GPUs from graphics hardware to AI infrastructure
What the Vij brothers learned from working at CERN
How autonomous AI systems could change business, creativity and technical work
Neo is intended to expand access to machine learning expertise rather than simply generate code. Its development raises a wider question: what happens when AI systems can perform the specialised work required to build other AI systems?
This conversation examines the technical capabilities of autonomous machine learning agents, the shortage of experienced AI talent and how automation could reshape the role of engineers
--
Timestamps
(00:00) Why Are There So Few Machine Learning Engineers?(01:54) Meet Gaurav Vij and Saurabh Vij(02:57) Lessons Learned from Working at CERN(04:45) How to Explain The Importance Of A.I. to Your Parents(07:24) The World’s First Autonomous Machine Learning Engineer: What AI Problem Does NEO Solve?(08:17) AI Competitions and Kaggle Grandmasters(11:06) How Many A.I./ML Engineers Do We Need?(17:30) Fixing The A.I. Hallucination Problem(18:09) Hot Buttons: 5 AI Questions In 30 Seconds(18:46) Hollywood: Doomed by A.I, or Reborn?(20:26) AI News: Nvidia Digits Explained(21:51) Moore's Law And Could AI Models Be Motivated by Rewards?(25:42) AI And Quantum Computing(29:45) The Thinking on Paper Carry-Over Question(30:16) After Hours: Backstage Extra
--
Check out NEO: https://heyneo.so/Learn more about the show: www.thinkingonpaper.xyzFollow Thinking On Paper On Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/thinkingonpaperpodcast/
We read NASA’s Moon Base User’s Guide and ask what it would take to establish a sustained human presence on the Moon.
A permanent lunar base requires far more than rockets, landers and astronauts. NASA and its partners would need to build an integrated infrastructure system covering power generation, communications, navigation, habitats, transportation, logistics, robotics and resource extraction.
In this episode, we discuss:
How NASA plans to build a permanent Moon base
Why reliable power is essential for long-term lunar operations
Whether nuclear power will be required on the Moon
How astronauts, vehicles and robots would communicate and navigate
What lunar habitats need to protect crews from radiation and extreme temperatures
How autonomous robots could prepare sites and maintain infrastructure
Why lunar dust creates serious engineering problems
How equipment from different companies and countries could work together
Whether water, oxygen and construction materials can be extracted from lunar resources
What infrastructure must exist before humans can live and work on the Moon continuously
The discussion also examines the gap between NASA’s long-term ambitions and the systems currently available. Many of the technologies exist individually, but they haven’t yet been combined into a reliable, scalable lunar operating environment.
This episode asks whether a permanent Moon base is a realistic extension of human spaceflight or a programme whose infrastructure requirements remain badly underestimated.
--
Chapters
00:00 Executive Summary and Vision
01:17 Phased Approach to Moon Base Development
07:21 Challenges of Lunar Environment
09:06 Interoperability and Coordination in Space
15:13 Economic Incentives and Future of Space Development
17:03 Identifying Gaps in Space Technology
20:23 Functional Gaps and Their Implications
24:01 Dust Challenges and Solutions
29:10 The Moon as a Launchpad for Mars
31:08 Human Factors in Lunar Missions
--
Thinking on Paper is a technology podcast about AI, Space, quantum computing, science, and the systems shaping the future.
🏠 Buy us a beer on Substack
🎧 Take us with you on YouTube
🎧 Remember steve jobs on APPLE
📺 Get the clips and outtakes on Instagram
Sanjay Vijendran of TerraSpark joins Thinking on Paper to explain how space-based solar power could become a practical source of clean energy.
TerraSpark is developing wireless power-transmission systems that could eventually collect solar energy in orbit and beam it to receivers on Earth. The company plans to demonstrate the concept by powering a live music event in Portugal and by testing radio-frequency power transfer aboard Dcube’s Arrakis mission.
In this episode, we discuss:
How space-based solar power works
How energy can be transmitted wirelessly
TerraSpark’s plan to power a concert in Portugal
What its in-orbit power-beaming experiment will test
The differences between radio-frequency and laser power transmission
How near-infrared power beaming works
How much energy is lost during wireless transmission
Whether orbital data centres could use the same infrastructure
How space-based solar could improve energy security
Why spectrum regulation and interference testing matter
What investors and regulators need to see before the technology can scale
Sanjay explains the engineering, regulatory and commercial challenges behind power beaming, including transmission efficiency, safety, spectrum allocation and the cost of placing energy infrastructure in orbit.
This conversation examines whether space-based solar power can move beyond demonstration projects and become a credible alternative to terrestrial energy generation and fossil fuels.
--
Thinking on Paper is a technology podcast about AI, Space, quantum computing, science, and the systems shaping the future.
🏠 Buy us a beer on Substack
🎧Be With Us On YouTube
🎧 Remember steve jobs on APPLE
📺 Get the clips and outtakes on Instagram
--
Chapters
(00:00) Introduction to Space-Based Solar Power
(01:37) Market Trends and Projections
(03:52) Energy Crisis and Global Dependencies
(06:26) The Threat to Power Structures
(07:39) Innovative Demonstrations of Wireless Power
(10:31) Future Plans and Space Missions
(20:41) Scaling Power Transmission from Space
(22:35) Technologies for Space-Based Solar Power
(31:22) Governance and Regulation of Space-Based Solar Power
(49:57) The Future of Space-Based Solar Power
Jennifer Dunn, professor of chemical engineering at Northwestern University, joins Thinking on Paper to explain how lithium and copper mining affect water, ecosystems, local communities and the wider energy transition.
Lithium and copper are essential to electric vehicles, grid storage, renewable energy, drones and data centres. But the environmental consequences of extracting these minerals vary sharply depending on the mine, location, technology and supply chain.
Life cycle assessment offers a way to compare those impacts across different forms of production, from lithium brines and hard-rock mining to copper extraction, refining and recycling.
In this episode, we discuss:
• The environmental impact of lithium mining
• How lithium brine mining compares with hard-rock lithium mining
• Why copper demand is rising
• How mining affects water use and local water stress
• The risks of pollution, biodiversity loss and mining waste
• How life cycle assessment compares mines and supply chains
• Why local conditions matter more than global averages
• The role of mine permitting in the energy transition
• Whether recycling can reduce demand for new mining
• How battery supply chains shift environmental costs between regions
• What responsible critical-mineral production should look like
Jennifer explains why no single measure can capture the full impact of a mine. Carbon emissions matter, but so do water availability, land use, waste, local ecology and the distribution of costs and benefits.
This conversation examines whether clean energy can scale without transferring environmental harm from fossil-fuel systems to the communities that supply lithium, copper and other critical minerals.
Thinking on Paper is a technology podcast about AI, Space, quantum computing, science, and the systems shaping the future.
🏠 Buy us a beer on Substack
🎧 Take us with you on Spotify
🎧 Remember steve jobs on APPLE
📺 Get the clips and outtakes on Instagram
Chapters
(00:00) Disruptors & Curious Minds
(02:10) The Demand for Copper and Lithium
(02:57) Environmental Impact of Mining
(05:59) Water Consumption and Mining Methods
(08:30) Community Concerns and Local Impact
(11:29) Recycling and Wastewater Mining
(14:04) Life Cycle Assessments in Mining
(27:06) Understanding Emissions in Mining
(29:45) Life Cycle Assessment: A Comparative Approach
(34:05) Stakeholder Perspectives on Mining Impacts
(37:42) Technology and Transparency in Mining
(42:42) Consumer Awareness and Ethical
Anders Sandberg examines whether artificial general intelligence could manage the global economy more effectively than human institutions.
A sufficiently capable AI system might coordinate markets, allocate resources, interpret legal rules and respond to complex global problems faster than governments or companies. Greater efficiency, however, wouldn’t necessarily mean greater freedom.
In this short excerpt from a longer Thinking on Paper conversation, Anders discusses:
Whether AGI could manage the global economy
How superintelligence might improve global coordination
Why markets and legal systems are difficult to optimise
Whether AI could make better decisions than human institutions
How highly efficient systems could concentrate power
The challenge of keeping advanced AI under human control
How evolutionary pressures could shape competing software systems
Whether humans could become wealthier while losing political agency
What role people would retain in an AI-managed economy
The central question isn’t simply whether AGI could run economic systems better. It’s whether humans would still control the goals, rules and trade-offs behind those systems.
This is a short from a much longer conversation with Anders Sandberg about superintelligence, governance and the future of human decision-making.
--
Thinking on Paper is a technology podcast about AI, quantum, space and their impacts on society, business and culture. It's very good.
🏠 Buy us a beer on Substack
🎧 Watch on YouTube
🎧 Remember Steve Jobs on APPLE
📺 Get the clips and outtakes on Instagram
NASA scientist Philip Metzger joins Thinking on Paper to explain why Moon dust and rocket exhaust create a major engineering problem for future lunar missions.
When a spacecraft lands on the Moon, its engines can accelerate dust and rocks across the surface at high speed. That material can damage nearby equipment, including solar panels, telescopes, antennas, sensors and thermal-control systems.
The problem becomes more serious as NASA, SpaceX and other organisations plan larger landers, permanent bases and more frequent missions. Every landing could threaten infrastructure already operating on the lunar surface.
In this episode, we discuss:
Why lunar landers throw dust and debris across the Moon
How rocket exhaust interacts with lunar soil
Why larger spacecraft such as Starship increase the risk
How Moon dust can damage solar panels, antennas and scientific instruments
What this means for NASA’s Artemis programme
Why future lunar bases may require dedicated landing pads
How far spacecraft should land from existing equipment
Whether lunar infrastructure needs exclusion zones
How landing rules could affect Moon governance
What engineers still don’t know about repeated lunar landings
Philip explains why lunar dust isn’t a minor operational inconvenience. It’s a systems-level problem that affects spacecraft design, base planning, scientific equipment and the rules governing activity on the Moon.
This conversation examines one of the least visible challenges facing lunar exploration: how to land safely without damaging the infrastructure needed to remain there.
--
Thinking on Paper is a technology podcast about AI, Space, quantum computing, science, and the systems shaping the future.
🏠 Buy us a beer on Substack: https://thinkingonpaperpodcast.substack.com/
🎧 Take us with you on Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/00volKqMsQntToeho35W47
🎧 Remember steve jobs on APPLE: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/thinking-on-paper/id1713227258
📺 Get the clips and outtakes on Instagram https://www.instagram.com/toptechpodcast/
Matthew Weinzierl and Brendan Rosseau, authors of Space to Grow, explain the commercial space economy and the role of NASA, Artemis and commercial space stations.
From space-based data centers, Starlink and GPS to China’s space program, national security, and space governance, we get into the economics, politics and human story of space.The conversation covers how governments, private companies, and investors build, fund, regulate, and compete in space. From microgravity research and launch markets to lunar exploration, space resources, and the economics of commercial space, we explore it all.We also try and re-write the Space Treaty and look at the politics of the space race. Please enjoy the show.
--
Thinking on Paper is a technology podcast about AI, Space, quantum computing, science, and the systems shaping the future. Connect with us.
🏠 Buy us a beer on Substack
🎧 Watch us compete with Lex Fridman on YouTube
🎧 Remember Steve Jobs and listen on APPLE
📺 Watch the clips and shorts on Instagram
Watch a random video from Rick Beato. Because we love him.
--
Chapters
(00:00) Government and Markets in Space
(03:35) Microgravity
(07:43) Economic Incentives
(12:14) Political Cycles in Space Policy
(17:09) International Collaboration
(18:45) National Security in Space
(21:36) Space Exploration
(24:27) The Importance Of GPS
(28:49) Space Investment
(30:37) Space-Based Data Centers
(33:40) Space Resources
(38:26) Governance in Space
(40:55) A New Space Treaty
Scott Crowder, Vice President of IBM Quantum Adoption, joins Thinking on Paper to explain IBM’s approach to quantum-centric supercomputing.
Rather than replacing classical computers, IBM expects quantum processors to work alongside CPUs, GPUs and high-performance computing systems. Each type of hardware handles the parts of a problem it’s best suited to solve.
In this episode, we discuss:
What quantum-centric supercomputing means
How quantum processors, GPUs, CPUs and HPC systems work together
IBM’s roadmap towards fault-tolerant quantum computing
What IBM Starling is designed to achieve by 2029
How superconducting qubits work
Why quantum error correction is essential
The role of Qiskit and open-source quantum software
Which quantum algorithms could deliver practical value
How quantum computing could support chemistry and materials research
IBM and Cleveland Clinic’s work on protein simulation
IBM’s collaboration with RIKEN
How Nvidia GPUs fit into hybrid quantum systems
Why accessibility and real-world adoption matter as much as hardware progress
Scott explains why useful quantum computing will depend on more than increasing qubit counts. It will require reliable hardware, error correction, strong software tools, integration with existing data centres and developers who can apply quantum systems to real problems.
This conversation examines IBM’s plan to move quantum computing from experimental hardware towards fault-tolerant systems that can contribute to scientific and industrial computing.
-
Thinking on Paper is a technology podcast about AI, computing, science, and the systems shaping the future.
🏠 HQ: www.thinkingonpaper.xyz
📺 INSTAGRAM: https://www.instagram.com/thinkingonpaperpodcast/
🎧 Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/00volKqMsQntToeho35W47
🎧 APPLE: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/thinking-on-paper-technology-moves-fast-think-slower/id1713227258
--
Mark x: https://x.com/markfielding99
Jeremy: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jeremygilbertson/
–
Chapters
(00:00) Trailer
(01:20) Quantum computing
(02:40) IBM Reference Architecture
(05:05) Superconducting
(06:47) Algorithmic Discovery
(12:34) Cleveland Clinic
(13:44) IBM's quantum-centric supercomputing architecture
(16:07) Quantum computers today
(17:58) Quantum and classical converge
(22:28) Richard Feynman
(25:25) Data centers
(32:01) Quantum computers in space
(42:19) Qiskit, NVIDIA, and open source
World famous Oxford futurist and philosopher Anders Sandberg joins Thinking on Paper to discuss transhumanism, mind uploading, artificial general intelligence and the technologies humans use to extend their capabilities.
Human augmentation doesn’t begin with brain implants or uploaded minds. Memory systems, smartphones, language models and AI agents already allow people to outsource parts of thinking, communication and decision-making. More advanced systems could extend that process into brain emulation, digital copies of human minds and AI-managed institutions.
Anders explains why transhumanism, AI and space expansion shouldn’t be treated as separate technological futures. Each raises the same underlying questions about agency, identity, power and the boundaries of the human individual.
The conversation moves from personal augmentation to civilizational governance, asking what humans become when intelligence can be extended, copied, redesigned or delegated to machines.
Please enjoy the show.
--
Thinking on Paper is a technology podcast about AI, computing, science, and the systems shaping the future. Connect with us.
🎧 Listen to every podcast
📺 Follow us on Instagram
🏠 Follow us on X
🏠 Follow Jeremy on LinkedIn
To suggest guests or sponsor the show, please email: [email protected]
--
Chapters
(00:00) TRAILER
(08:09) Mobile Technology on Humanity
(11:51) Accountability in AI Agents
(18:25) Empathy
(25:35) AGI vs. Alien Life
(27:36) Consciousness
(35:52) Uploaded Minds
(40:33) Parallel Realities
(45:16) Human Collaboration
(46:24) AGI
(51:23) The Dual Economy
(57:43) Space Ownership
(01:05:18) Human Expansion
(01:17:49) The Space Race
(01:21:43) Space Exploration
(01:24:22) New Forms of Governance
(01:26:18) NASA
(01:28:41) Breakaway Movements in Space
(01:30:16) Space Governance
(01:34:18) Fusion Energy
(01:42:15) Time and Life Extension
(01:48:06) Extended Lifespans
(01:52:03) Technology
From the publisher's feed