0:00-11:00

11:00-20:00

20:00-29:00

22:05 - a transformer explodes on John’s street

29:00 - end

Hegel’s Authoritative Tone (start)

Post-Human Idealism (6:00)

Inversion of Plato’s Idealism (10:15)

¶56 and the Shame of Learning (20:53)

Demand of Metareflection (25:43)

Imperiousness of the Text (34:48)

Textual Auto-Deconstruction (40:44)

Hegel’s Argument about Arguments (47:00)

Difficulty of Philosophical Writing (54:13)

0:00-8:16

8:16-18:40

18:40-30:30

30:30-49:00

49:00-60:00

60:00-end

0:00-5:00

5:00-14:00

14:00-23:00

23:00-30:00

30:00-44:30

44:30-55:00

55:00-67:00

67:00-end

0:00-5:30

5:30–18:10

18:10-24:30

24:30-29:00

29:00-36:00

36:00-45:40

45:40-end

0:00-5:00 

5:00-22:20 

22:20-34:30 

34:30-51:00 

51:00-1:01:00 

1:01:00-end 

The entire episode is engaged in the question of how to read theory, using Hegel as a jumping off point. We discuss philosophy as a matter of "taste" (beginning around minute 5), the "both/and" responses to binaries (around minute 12), as well as the function of critique (what we term "generous reading" vs. "adversarial reading" - around 32). In addition to Hegel, and beginning around 30 minutes in, we use Karen Barad's work and her reception in the field of rhetoric as a recurring example (that concludes around minute 65). We conclude by looking closely at a passage of Hegel that illustrates some of the dynamics we have been discussing throughout (70-end). 

0:00-5:00

5:00 - 13:00

13:00-20:00

20:30-30:00

30:00-36:00

36:00-40:00

40:00-49:00

49:00-56:00

56:00-1:00