
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


0:00-11:00
11:00-20:00
20:00-29:00
22:05 - a transformer explodes on John’s street
29:00 - end
Hegel’s Authoritative Tone (start)
Post-Human Idealism (6:00)
Inversion of Plato’s Idealism (10:15)
¶56 and the Shame of Learning (20:53)
Demand of Metareflection (25:43)
Imperiousness of the Text (34:48)
Textual Auto-Deconstruction (40:44)
Hegel’s Argument about Arguments (47:00)
Difficulty of Philosophical Writing (54:13)
0:00-8:16
8:16-18:40
18:40-30:30
30:30-49:00
49:00-60:00
60:00-end
0:00-5:00
5:00-14:00
14:00-23:00
23:00-30:00
30:00-44:30
44:30-55:00
55:00-67:00
67:00-end
0:00-5:30
5:30–18:10
18:10-24:30
24:30-29:00
29:00-36:00
36:00-45:40
45:40-end
0:00-5:00
5:00-22:20
22:20-34:30
34:30-51:00
51:00-1:01:00
1:01:00-end
The entire episode is engaged in the question of how to read theory, using Hegel as a jumping off point. We discuss philosophy as a matter of "taste" (beginning around minute 5), the "both/and" responses to binaries (around minute 12), as well as the function of critique (what we term "generous reading" vs. "adversarial reading" - around 32). In addition to Hegel, and beginning around 30 minutes in, we use Karen Barad's work and her reception in the field of rhetoric as a recurring example (that concludes around minute 65). We conclude by looking closely at a passage of Hegel that illustrates some of the dynamics we have been discussing throughout (70-end).
0:00-5:00
5:00 - 13:00
13:00-20:00
20:30-30:00
30:00-36:00
36:00-40:00
40:00-49:00
49:00-56:00
56:00-1:00
From the publisher's feed