Welcome back to This Day in Scottish History. I’m your host, Colin MacDonald. Today, we delve into a grim chapter in Scotland's legal history—January 29, 2003—when Nat Fraser was found guilty of the murder of his wife, Arlene Fraser, in one of Scotland’s most infamous criminal cases.

The case of Nat and Arlene Fraser is one that gripped the nation for decades, both for its tragic elements and the complexities of the legal proceedings. To fully understand the significance of this verdict, we need to rewind to 1998, the year when Arlene Fraser disappeared from her home in New Elgin, Moray.

Arlene Fraser was last seen alive on the morning of April 28, 1998, after walking her two young children to school. At the time, she was a 33-year-old mother and described by friends and family as a vibrant, caring, and outgoing woman. However, by the afternoon, she had vanished without a trace. There were no signs of a struggle in the house, and her belongings—keys, handbag, and even her wedding ring—had been left behind. It was as if she had simply disappeared into thin air.

Suspicion soon fell on her husband, Nat Fraser. Their marriage had been in turmoil, marked by allegations of infidelity and domestic abuse. At the time of Arlene’s disappearance, the couple was living apart and proceeding with a divorce. In fact, Arlene had told friends she feared for her life and had even taken steps to ensure her safety by changing the locks to her house.

Despite a massive search effort and an intensive police investigation, Arlene’s body was never found. Without any physical remains, the case became one of the most challenging in Scottish legal history. Nevertheless, prosecutors pursued Nat Fraser, convinced that he had orchestrated his wife’s murder.

In 2003, five years after Arlene’s disappearance, Nat Fraser stood trial at the High Court in Edinburgh. The prosecution’s case relied heavily on circumstantial evidence and testimony that painted a chilling picture of Fraser’s actions before and after Arlene went missing. Key to the case was the allegation that Fraser had arranged for someone else to murder Arlene in order to cover his tracks. The prosecution also argued that Fraser had tampered with evidence, such as replacing the rings Arlene always wore with replicas to make it seem as though she had left willingly.

Witness testimony added weight to the case against him. Friends and associates testified to Fraser’s controlling and abusive behavior, as well as comments he had allegedly made that hinted at his intentions. In particular, one friend claimed Fraser had told him, "She’s not going to divorce me; she’s not going to get my money."

On January 29, 2003, the jury found Nat Fraser guilty of murder, and he was sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 25 years. For many, the verdict brought a sense of justice for Arlene, whose body has never been recovered to this day. However, this was far from the end of the story.

Fraser’s conviction was appealed multiple times, leading to years of legal wrangling. In 2011, his conviction was quashed by the UK Supreme Court, which ruled that Fraser had not received a fair trial due to procedural issues. He was retried in 2012 and once again found guilty of Arlene’s murder. During this retrial, the prosecution presented even more damning evidence, including claims that Fraser had hired a hitman to carry out the crime. He was sentenced to life imprisonment once more, reaffirming the original verdict.

The Fraser case is not only remembered for its harrowing details but also for the legal precedent it set in Scotland. It underscored the challenges of prosecuting murder cases without a body and highlighted the importance of ensuring a fair trial. It also served as a reminder of the resilience of Arlene’s family and friends, who fought tirelessly to seek justice on her behalf.

Over two decades later, the question remains: where is Arlene? Her family continues to hope for answers and closure, while Nat Fraser remains behind bars, protesting his innocence.

As we reflect on the events of January 29, 2003, we remember the life of Arlene Fraser and the enduring impact her case has had on Scotland's legal system. It’s a sobering story, but one that serves as a stark reminder of the importance of justice and the ongoing search for truth.

Thank you for joining us today on This Day in Scottish History. I’m Colin MacDonald. Until next time, Haste Ye Back!

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit bagtown.substack.com

Welcome back to "This Day in Scottish History." I’m your host, Colin MacDonald, and today we journey back to a revolutionary moment in the world of technology, one that put Scotland at the forefront of innovation. The date is 28 January 1924, and the scene is Glasgow, where John Logie Baird, a visionary Scottish inventor, achieved a groundbreaking feat—the first private demonstration of his experimental color television system.

Now, to appreciate this moment, we need to step into the context of the early 20th century. The idea of television was still in its infancy. The very concept of transmitting moving images was no more than a dream for many, but John Logie Baird was no ordinary dreamer. Born in Helensburgh in 1888, Baird was a natural tinkerer and inventor, known for his unrelenting curiosity and creative solutions. In fact, before he turned to television, he had dabbled in everything from creating a glass razor to developing pneumatic shoes.

By the early 1920s, Baird had already been experimenting with mechanical television, using spinning disks, lenses, and lights to transmit moving images. His 1924 achievement, however, was a step beyond anything previously imagined—he had managed to create a rudimentary color television system, years ahead of its time. Using a combination of red, green, and blue filters, he successfully demonstrated the transmission of simple colored images.

The demonstration in Glasgow was modest by today’s standards. It wasn’t a public spectacle, but rather a private showing, reflecting the experimental nature of his work. Even so, it was a moment of profound significance. This wasn’t just a technical experiment; it was a bold statement about what the future of communication and entertainment could look like.

It’s important to note that Baird’s color television was not immediately practical or commercialized. The technology of the time was simply not advanced enough to bring his vision to the masses. However, his work laid the foundation for future developments in broadcasting. By 1926, he had conducted the first public demonstration of black-and-white television, and his pioneering work on mechanical scanning systems influenced the evolution of television technology for decades to come.

What makes Baird’s achievement particularly remarkable is the resourcefulness he displayed while pursuing his vision. Working with limited resources, he often resorted to using household items and scrap materials to build his prototypes. For instance, some of his early experiments included the use of a hatbox, scissors, and bicycle lamps. His ingenuity and determination are a testament to the innovative spirit of Scotland, which has been a hallmark of the country’s contributions to science and technology.

The significance of John Logie Baird’s work cannot be overstated. His experiments with color television highlighted the potential for visual storytelling and paved the way for the vibrant, high-definition broadcasts we enjoy today. Moreover, his achievements remind us that some of the greatest breakthroughs come not from vast resources, but from bold ideas and an unwavering commitment to seeing them through.

Today, as we sit in front of modern television screens, streaming countless hours of high-quality content, it’s worth pausing to reflect on the pioneering efforts of inventors like John Logie Baird. His work in Glasgow nearly a century ago set the stage for the incredible visual media landscape we now take for granted.

As Scots, we can take immense pride in the legacy of this visionary inventor, whose contributions changed the way the world communicates and entertains itself.

Thank you for joining us on this exploration of This Day in Scottish History. Tune in tomorrow for another journey into Scotland’s remarkable past. Until then, I’m Colin MacDonald—Haste Ye Back!

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit bagtown.substack.com

Welcome back to "This Day in Scottish History." I'm your host, Colin MacDonald, and today we’re delving into a cornerstone of Scottish journalism. On January 26, 1783, the very first edition of the Glasgow Advertiser was published. This weekly publication would eventually transform into The Herald, which now stands as the longest continually-published daily newspaper in Britain.

To appreciate the significance of this milestone, we need to set the stage. The late 18th century was a time of rapid change across Scotland. Glasgow was emerging as an industrial powerhouse, fueled by its position as a hub for trade and shipbuilding. With this growing influence came the need for a platform to inform and connect a population hungry for news. Enter John Mennons, a visionary printer and journalist who founded the Glasgow Advertiser.

Mennons launched his publication with a clear mission: to provide news, opinions, and practical information to Glasgow’s increasingly literate and engaged population. The paper’s early content reflected the issues of the day—shipping schedules, trade prices, and announcements, interspersed with essays, poetry, and advertisements.

From its first weekly edition, the Glasgow Advertiser steadily grew in reputation and reach. By 1803, under the leadership of Mennons’ son Thomas, the paper took on the name that would become its legacy: The Herald. Its publication frequency increased, moving to a daily format in 1858, cementing its role as a trusted voice for Scotland.

Through the centuries, The Herald chronicled some of the most pivotal moments in history. It reported on the rise of Glasgow as a global industrial leader during the 19th century and the city’s transformation into the "Second City of the Empire." It covered the hardships of two World Wars, providing vital information to its readers during some of the darkest days in history. And as Scotland fought to define its modern identity in the late 20th and early 21st centuries, The Herald was there, offering analysis and commentary on key events such as the devolution referendum and the establishment of the Scottish Parliament.

What makes The Herald remarkable isn’t just its longevity but also its adaptability. It evolved alongside its readership, moving from hand-set printing presses to digital-first journalism. Today, the paper balances its historic legacy with a modern commitment to high-quality reporting, embracing both print and digital platforms to engage a global audience.

The history of The Herald also reflects the broader story of journalism in Scotland—its role in shaping public opinion, holding power to account, and fostering a sense of community. As Scotland’s oldest newspaper, The Herald stands as a testament to the enduring importance of a free and independent press.

So, as we mark this day in 1783, let’s celebrate the visionaries who built The Herald and the countless journalists who’ve upheld its reputation for nearly two and a half centuries. Their work reminds us of the vital role journalism plays in our lives—both as a mirror to our society and a guide to our shared future.

Thank you for joining us on today’s journey through history. Don’t forget to tune in tomorrow for another fascinating story from Scotland’s past. I’m Colin MacDonald, and this has been "This Day in Scottish History." Haste ye back!

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit bagtown.substack.com

Welcome back to This Day in Scottish History! I'm your host, Colin MacDonald, and today we’re traveling back over 700 years to January 26, 1316, a fateful day in the annals of Scotland’s fight for independence—the Battle of Skerries. This lesser-known but significant engagement took place during the Wars of Scottish Independence and played a pivotal role in Robert the Bruce’s consolidation of power across the British Isles.

By 1316, Scotland was in the midst of a fierce struggle to maintain its hard-won independence following Robert the Bruce’s legendary victory at Bannockburn two years earlier. While Bruce’s forces were asserting control in Scotland, his ambitions extended beyond its borders. He aimed to weaken England’s hold over Ireland and Wales, striking at English influence wherever he could. This strategy aligned with the Gaelic alliances of the time, as many Irish chieftains shared a common heritage and a mutual disdain for English domination.

Enter Edward Bruce, Robert’s younger brother and a fierce warrior in his own right. Edward was a bold and ambitious man who sought to expand Bruce power into Ireland by claiming the High Kingship. The Irish clans saw an opportunity for a united front, and Edward’s campaign gained momentum. However, it wasn’t without its challenges—chief among them, securing vital sea routes between Scotland and Ireland. That’s where the Battle of Skerries comes into focus.

The Battle of Skerries, fought off the coast of County Dublin, Ireland, was a naval engagement that highlighted the growing importance of maritime power in medieval warfare. Scotland’s objective was clear: maintain control of the Irish Sea to ensure the flow of supplies and reinforcements to Edward Bruce’s forces in Ireland.

On January 26, 1316, a fleet of Scottish ships, led by the capable Thomas Dun, encountered an English force off the Skerries, a cluster of rocky islets near the Irish coastline. The English, eager to disrupt Scottish ambitions in Ireland, sought to cut off Edward Bruce’s lifeline and weaken his campaign.

The clash was intense and brutal. Records describe ships locking together as Scottish and English warriors fought hand-to-hand on narrow decks, the freezing January wind whipping across the sea. Despite being outnumbered, the Scots proved resilient, their naval tactics honed by years of fighting the Norse and the English in similar conditions.

Ultimately, the Scots emerged victorious. The English fleet was driven off, and Scottish control of the Irish Sea was secured for a crucial period. This victory allowed Edward Bruce to maintain his campaign in Ireland, though his ultimate goal of becoming High King would remain unfulfilled.

While the Battle of Skerries is often overshadowed by larger conflicts like Bannockburn, it was critical in Robert the Bruce’s broader strategy of weakening England’s grip across the British Isles. The victory demonstrated the growing strength of Scottish naval power and highlighted the interconnectedness of Scotland and Ireland during this period.

Moreover, the battle underscores the importance of smaller, less-celebrated engagements in the grand narrative of the Wars of Scottish Independence. Without the ability to control sea routes and ensure the flow of resources, Robert the Bruce’s campaign—and his brother’s ambitions—might have faltered.

The Battle of Skerries reminds us that the struggle for Scottish independence wasn’t confined to the hills and fields of Scotland. It extended across seas and into foreign lands, showcasing the Bruce dynasty’s ambition and resilience. Though Edward Bruce’s campaign in Ireland would ultimately end in 1318 with his death at the Battle of Faughart, the efforts in Ireland distracted English forces and allowed Robert to strengthen his hold on Scotland.

As we reflect on the events of January 26, 1316, let’s remember the bravery of the Scottish sailors and warriors who fought not just for a battle, but for a nation’s survival.

Thank you for joining us on this journey through history. Be sure to tune in tomorrow for another tale from Scotland’s rich past. I’m Colin MacDonald, and as always, haste ye back!

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit bagtown.substack.com

Welcome back to This Day in Scottish History! I’m your host, Colin MacDonald, and today we celebrate one of Scotland’s most iconic figures, a man whose words continue to echo across the centuries. On this day, January 25, 1759, Robert Burns was born in a humble clay cottage in Alloway, Ayrshire. Known affectionately as the Bard of Ayrshire, Burns would go on to become Scotland’s national poet, a cultural icon, and a voice for the common people.

Burns was born the eldest of seven children to William Burnes, a tenant farmer, and Agnes Broun. Life in 18th-century rural Scotland was far from easy, and the Burns family faced their fair share of hardships. The cottage where Robert was born—now a famous landmark—was built by his father with his own hands. Despite their modest means, William was determined that his children receive a good education. This early exposure to literature and a fierce work ethic laid the foundation for Robert’s future success.

The young Burns grew up working long hours on the family farm, but even as he toiled in the fields, his mind was alive with poetry. Inspired by the Scottish oral tradition, he learned the songs, stories, and folklore of his homeland, which would later shape his work. Burns had a natural gift for language and a keen ear for the rhythms of Scottish dialect.

Burns published his first collection of poetry, Poems, Chiefly in the Scottish Dialect, in 1786. Known today as the Kilmarnock Edition, this small book became an instant sensation. Works like To a Mouse and The Cotter’s Saturday Night revealed his remarkable ability to capture the beauty and struggles of everyday life, combining heartfelt emotion with biting social commentary. His use of Scots language, rather than standard English, was a radical choice that endeared him to his countrymen.

What made Burns truly unique was his ability to weave humor, romance, and sharp political insight into his poetry. He championed themes of equality, love, freedom, and humanity—values that resonated far beyond the borders of Scotland. As a farmer-turned-poet, Burns was a voice for the common folk, and his legacy is deeply tied to his ability to articulate their joys and struggles.

Burns’ life, though brilliant, was tragically short. He died in 1796 at the age of just 37, likely due to heart disease exacerbated by hard labor and poverty. Yet, in his short life, he wrote hundreds of poems and songs that would cement his place in literary history. His works include the beloved Auld Lang Syne, sung around the world to bid farewell to the old year and welcome the new, and Ae Fond Kiss, a heart-wrenching ode to love and loss.

Burns’ songs also played a critical role in preserving Scotland’s rich musical heritage. Many of his lyrics were set to traditional Scottish melodies, ensuring that the music of the people would live on.

Every year, on January 25, Scots and admirers of Burns around the world gather to celebrate his life and work with a Burns Supper. The evening typically begins with the Selkirk Grace, a short prayer attributed to Burns, followed by the ceremonial presentation of haggis—the centerpiece of the meal. As the haggis is brought in, it’s accompanied by bagpipes and the recitation of Burns’ famous poem Address to a Haggis.

The event continues with whisky, traditional Scottish dishes, music, and readings of Burns’ poetry. The evening concludes with everyone joining hands to sing Auld Lang Syne, a timeless reminder of fellowship and friendship.

More than two centuries after his death, Burns’ influence remains profound. His advocacy for equality and the dignity of ordinary people continues to inspire, while his love of nature and humanity resonates in a world increasingly disconnected from those ideals. He has been celebrated by figures as diverse as Abraham Lincoln and Bob Dylan, and his work has been translated into languages across the globe.

In Scotland, Burns is not merely a poet but a symbol of national pride. His birthplace in Alloway, now the Robert Burns Birthplace Museum, attracts visitors from around the world eager to walk in the footsteps of the Bard.

As we celebrate the birth of Robert Burns today, we’re reminded of the power of words to uplift, connect, and endure. His poetry reminds us of our shared humanity, our love of freedom, and the simple beauty of life itself. Whether you’re a Scot or simply a fan of great poetry, raise a glass and toast the Bard of Ayrshire today.

Thank you for joining me on This Day in Scottish History. I’m Colin MacDonald. Haste Ye Back!

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit bagtown.substack.com

Welcome back to This Day in Scottish History. I'm your host, Colin MacDonald, and today, we delve into a moment in history that blends politics, power, and bloodshed. Our focus is the Battle of Arbroath, a tragic event that unfolded on January 24, 1446. This wasn’t a clash between nations or clans, but a brutal struggle over a position of authority in one of Scotland's most important religious and political institutions—Arbroath Abbey.

To understand the Battle of Arbroath, we need to start with the Abbey itself. Founded in 1178 by King William the Lion, Arbroath Abbey was one of the most significant religious establishments in medieval Scotland. It was not just a spiritual hub; it was also a center of economic and political power. By the 15th century, its lands and influence stretched across Angus, and its Bailie of the Regality—a position overseeing the Abbey's estates and legal matters—was a coveted role.

Now, in 1446, this coveted position became the spark for deadly conflict. Following the death of the previous bailie, the powerful Lindsay family of Crawford, led by Alexander Lindsay, 4th Earl of Crawford, and the Ogilvy family, led by Alexander Ogilvy of Inverquharity, both laid claim to the role. This wasn’t just a dispute over titles—it was a contest for control of wealth, land, and influence.

The Abbey’s monks favored the Ogilvys, appointing Alexander Ogilvy of Inverquharity to the role. However, the Lindsays contested this decision, believing they had a stronger claim. Unable to resolve the matter peacefully, both families gathered their allies, arming themselves for what should have been an administrative dispute but soon spiraled into open violence.

The fateful confrontation took place outside Arbroath Abbey. What began as a disagreement escalated into a full-blown battle involving hundreds of men on each side. Accounts suggest that the Lindsays and their supporters clashed with the Ogilvys and their allies in a brutal and bloody fight, using swords, spears, and other medieval weaponry.

The battle reportedly lasted several hours, and the scale of violence was extraordinary for what was essentially a civil dispute. Historical records claim as many as 600 people lost their lives in the chaos, making it one of the bloodiest confrontations in local Scottish history. The Lindsays emerged victorious, cementing their power in the region, but the cost was devastating.

The Battle of Arbroath serves as a stark reminder of how deeply political and familial rivalries could divide medieval Scotland. Beyond the immediate loss of life, the battle damaged the reputation of the Abbey and undermined its ability to maintain order in the region. It also highlighted the fragile balance of power among Scotland's noble families, where personal ambition and territorial disputes often exploded into violence.

While Arbroath Abbey eventually regained stability, the battle left a mark on its history. Today, the ruins of the Abbey stand as a silent witness to this and many other chapters of Scotland’s turbulent past. Visitors can still wander its grounds and reflect on the legacy of this once-mighty institution, its role in the Declaration of Arbroath, and the darker moments like the bloodshed of January 24, 1446.

As we look back on the Battle of Arbroath, we’re reminded of the deep connections between Scotland’s religious institutions, its noble families, and the wider struggle for power in medieval society. This was not merely a skirmish over local governance—it was a battle that exemplified the volatility of Scotland in the 15th century.

Thank you for joining me today on This Day in Scottish History. I’m Colin MacDonald, and I hope you’ll tune in tomorrow as we uncover another moment that shaped our nation's past. Until then, Haste Ye Back!

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit bagtown.substack.com

Welcome back to This Day in Scottish History. I’m your host, Colin MacDonald. Today, we delve into a turbulent and often overlooked event that unfolded in Glasgow on January 23, 1919. This was the day of the so-called "Harbour Riot," a violent confrontation between white and black merchant seamen that laid bare the racial and economic tensions simmering in the city during a time of great social upheaval.

Let’s set the stage. Glasgow in 1919 was a city brimming with post-war uncertainties. The First World War had just ended, and while peace had returned to Europe, the social and economic struggles at home were far from resolved. Glasgow was experiencing an influx of workers from across the British Empire, including black and South Asian seamen who had been essential to Britain’s wartime shipping efforts. These men came from as far afield as Africa, the Caribbean, and the Indian subcontinent, often finding work on merchant ships that docked in the River Clyde.

But after the war, as thousands of British servicemen returned home seeking jobs, the competition for employment intensified. Black seamen, who were willing to work for lower wages and were often excluded from trade unions, became easy scapegoats for the frustrations of white workers. Many white sailors and dockworkers accused their black counterparts of "stealing" jobs and driving down wages. These accusations were rooted in both economic anxiety and the racist attitudes prevalent in Britain at the time.

On January 23, 1919, these tensions reached a boiling point. The riot broke out near the docks in Glasgow Harbour, where white and black seamen clashed violently. Reports suggest that the violence was sparked by rumors that local employers were prioritizing black workers for jobs. Angry mobs of white workers attacked black sailors, and the unrest quickly spread, with the violence escalating into pitched battles in the streets.

The response from the authorities was swift and heavily biased. Police forces, reflecting the prejudices of the time, were quick to arrest black seamen, often ignoring the actions of white rioters. Many black sailors were forcibly deported or pressured to leave the city, with no effort made to address the systemic issues underlying the unrest. For those who remained, life became even more precarious, as racist attitudes hardened and opportunities dwindled further.

The Harbour Riot was not an isolated incident. Similar clashes occurred across British port cities during this period, reflecting a broader wave of racial tensions in post-war Britain. These riots reveal the extent to which Britain’s imperial legacy, combined with economic hardship, created a volatile environment for immigrant communities.

In Glasgow, the events of January 1919 also foreshadowed the broader social unrest that would define the year. Just days after the Harbour Riot, Glasgow would witness the Battle of George Square, a massive strike and confrontation between workers and the police that became a pivotal moment in the city’s labor history. Together, these events highlight the deep fractures within Glasgow’s social fabric in the aftermath of the First World War.

Looking back on the Harbour Riot, we’re reminded of the complex interplay of race, class, and economic uncertainty that shaped Glasgow in the early 20th century. It’s a chapter of history that deserves to be remembered, not only as a cautionary tale of the consequences of division and prejudice but also as a testament to the resilience of those who endured and resisted such challenges.

Thank you for joining us on this journey through Scotland’s past. Be sure to tune in tomorrow for another episode of This Day in Scottish History. I’m Colin MacDonald, Haste Ye Back!

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit bagtown.substack.com

Welcome back to "This Day in Scottish History." I'm your host, Colin MacDonald. Today, we journey back to 22 January 1731, a day when the people of Dundee and the surrounding countryside breathed a collective sigh of relief. Why? Because that was the day a notorious highwayman, known as the "Muckle Thief," was finally apprehended.

The "Muckle Thief," as he came to be called, was a shadowy figure whose real name has been lost to history. What we do know is that he earned his nickname from his imposing size and his audacious criminal exploits. For months leading up to his capture, he terrorized travelers on the rural roads around Dundee, targeting merchants, farmers, and even clergy. His preferred method was to ambush unsuspecting victims, demanding money, valuables, or goods under threat of violence.

While highwaymen were not uncommon in 18th-century Scotland, the "Muckle Thief" stood out due to his sheer audacity and the fear he instilled in the community. Stories of his exploits circulated widely. One tale tells of him robbing an entire cartload of grain, leaving a poor farmer destitute. Another claims he once took a prized family heirloom—a brooch—from a woman traveling to market, though he reportedly returned it days later with a note apologizing for his actions. Such accounts, true or exaggerated, only fueled his infamous reputation.

The roads around Dundee were vital arteries for trade and communication, so the "Muckle Thief's" activities had a significant impact on the local economy. Merchants began to travel in groups or hire guards for protection, and some avoided the region altogether. The fear of encountering the thief was so pervasive that local broadsheets frequently warned travelers to exercise caution.

The authorities, of course, were under great pressure to catch him. His ability to evade capture became a source of frustration and embarrassment for local officials. Rumors swirled that he had an uncanny ability to vanish into the forests or hide in the many caves and glens scattered throughout the countryside. Some even suggested he had accomplices who helped him elude justice.

The chase finally ended on 22 January 1731, thanks to the cooperation of local residents and an organized effort by the authorities. A group of determined lawmen, aided by informants, tracked the "Muckle Thief" to a secluded hideout near Dundee. Accounts suggest that a fierce struggle ensued, with the thief reportedly attempting to fight his way free. However, he was ultimately overpowered and taken into custody.

News of his capture spread quickly, with reports appearing in local broadsheets. The people of Dundee were relieved that the roads were finally safe again. The broadsheets noted that his arrest was celebrated with a sense of cautious optimism—after all, while one thief had been caught, the roads were still fraught with danger in an era where law enforcement was limited.

Details about the "Muckle Thief's" fate remain unclear. Some accounts suggest he was tried and executed, a common punishment for highway robbery at the time. Others hint that he may have been transported to the colonies, a practice that was increasingly used as an alternative to the gallows in the 18th century.

Regardless of his ultimate fate, the story of the "Muckle Thief" became a cautionary tale and a part of local lore. His capture was not just a triumph of justice but a moment of relief for a community that had lived in fear for far too long.

As we reflect on the events of 22 January 1731, the story of the "Muckle Thief" reminds us of the challenges faced by communities in maintaining safety and order during a time when resources were scarce, and the wilderness often provided cover for those with ill intent.

Thank you for joining us on this journey through history. Tune in tomorrow for another episode of This Day in Scottish History. I'm Colin MacDonald, Haste Ye Back!

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit bagtown.substack.com

Welcome back to This Day in Scottish History. I'm your host, Colin MacDonald. Today, we explore an ambitious moment in Scotland’s modern history: January 21, 1992, when Glasgow formally discussed the possibility of bidding to host the 1996 Summer Olympics. Though the dream never materialized, it remains a fascinating chapter in the city’s story of transformation and aspiration.

In the early 1990s, Glasgow was undergoing a remarkable evolution. Decades of industrial decline had taken their toll, but the city was beginning to reimagine itself. The success of being named the European City of Culture in 1990 brought international attention, highlighting Glasgow’s vibrant arts scene and renewed energy. Building on that momentum, city leaders saw an opportunity to aim even higher—by exploring a bid for the world’s biggest sporting event.

On January 21, 1992, Glasgow City Council held a special meeting to assess the feasibility of hosting the 1996 Summer Olympics. Local officials, representatives from sports organizations, and international advisors gathered to consider preliminary studies. These studies outlined the immense infrastructure requirements, the financial commitment, and the potential benefits of the Games.

The idea was bold. Hosting the Olympics could provide a significant boost to Glasgow’s economy, create thousands of jobs, and showcase the city to the world. It was also seen as a chance to inspire young Scots, fostering a renewed passion for sport and ambition across the nation. Local newspapers reported on the meeting with cautious optimism, reflecting a mix of excitement and realism about what such an undertaking would mean.

However, the challenges were daunting. Glasgow lacked much of the necessary infrastructure. Venues capable of hosting Olympic-level events were limited, and the city would need substantial upgrades to its transportation and accommodation capacities. Cost estimates ran into billions of pounds—a heavy burden for a city still recovering from economic difficulties.

Additionally, the competition was fierce. By early 1992, other cities such as Atlanta, Athens, Toronto, and Melbourne had already launched well-organized and heavily funded bids. Glasgow’s late start meant it would face significant challenges in catching up. Ultimately, these practical concerns led to the decision to drop the idea.

Despite this, the discussions on January 21 marked an important moment in Glasgow’s development. While the city did not pursue the Olympics, the ambition it sparked helped shape future projects. Glasgow went on to host several high-profile international events, most notably the 2014 Commonwealth Games, which became a landmark achievement for the city. Today, venues like the Emirates Arena and the SSE Hydro stand as testaments to Glasgow’s ability to host global spectacles.

The meeting also highlighted the importance of setting realistic goals. While the Olympic bid was a step too far at the time, it inspired Glasgow to focus on long-term investments in infrastructure and its reputation as a cultural and sporting capital.

Reflecting on the events of January 21, 1992, we see a city unafraid to dream big, even in the face of adversity. Although the Olympic dream faded, the ambition and forward-thinking mindset it represented have continued to define Glasgow’s story.

Thank you for joining us on This Day in Scottish History. Join us tomorrow as we uncover another moment from Scotland’s rich past. I’m Colin MacDonald, and until next time, Haste Ye Back!

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit bagtown.substack.com

Welcome back to "This Day in Scottish History"! I'm your host, Colin MacDonald. Today, we delve into a dramatic and unsettling chapter in Scotland’s past: the Fenian dynamite campaign of the late 19th century. On January 20, 1883, Glasgow was rocked—literally—by a series of explosions that shook the Tradeston Gasworks, Possil Street Bridge, and Buchanan Street railway station. These attacks injured about a dozen people and left the city on edge.

To understand these events, we must first explore the Fenian movement itself. The Fenians, or the Irish Republican Brotherhood, were a militant organization advocating for Irish independence from British rule. By the late 19th century, their frustrations had boiled over into acts of rebellion, particularly targeting symbols of British power and infrastructure. The Fenian dynamite campaign, which began in the early 1880s, marked a shift in tactics. Instead of traditional guerrilla warfare, they embraced explosives as a means to disrupt and destabilize. British cities, including Glasgow, became key targets due to their industrial and strategic importance.

The attacks on January 20, 1883, represented one of the most coordinated assaults of the Fenian dynamite campaign in Scotland. The first explosion occurred at the Tradeston Gasworks, located on the south side of the River Clyde. The gasworks supplied energy to much of Glasgow, and the explosion there aimed to plunge parts of the city into darkness and chaos. Though the blast caused extensive damage, quick action by workers prevented a full-scale disaster. The second target was the Possil Street Bridge, a vital piece of infrastructure connecting various parts of the city. The explosion disrupted traffic and struck fear into residents, though fortunately, no one was seriously injured. Perhaps the most alarming attack was at Buchanan Street railway station, one of Glasgow’s busiest transport hubs at the time. The bombing caused significant structural damage and injured several passengers and staff, spreading panic across the city. The synchronized nature of these attacks demonstrated a new level of planning and coordination by the Fenians, raising concerns about their capabilities.

The bombings sent shockwaves throughout Scotland and the United Kingdom. Authorities intensified their crackdown on Irish nationalist movements, deploying undercover agents and expanding surveillance. Arrests quickly followed, with several suspected Fenians apprehended and tried under strict anti-terrorism laws of the time. The attacks also provoked widespread fear and anger among the Scottish population. Glasgow, as a city with a significant Irish immigrant community, became a focal point for tensions between Irish nationalists and loyalists. This period saw heightened sectarianism, with political and religious divisions deepening in its wake.

The Fenian dynamite campaign ultimately failed to achieve its goals of Irish independence, but it marked an important chapter in the history of revolutionary tactics. It also served as a grim reminder of the destructive potential of modern explosives and the vulnerability of urban infrastructure. For Scotland, these attacks underscored the city of Glasgow’s prominence in the broader political struggles of the United Kingdom. They also highlighted the challenges of maintaining public safety in an era of growing political unrest.

As we look back on this day in 1883, we are reminded of the deep complexities of history. The Fenian bombings of Glasgow were part of a larger story of struggle, resistance, and the enduring fight for national identity. While the methods of the Fenian campaign are widely condemned, the events of that time continue to provoke discussion about the lengths to which people will go in pursuit of their goals.

Thank you for joining us for another fascinating journey into Scotland's past. Be sure to tune in tomorrow for more stories from our nation’s rich and varied history. I'm Colin MacDonald, and as always—Haste Ye Back!

This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit bagtown.substack.com