This week, we look at the future of ethnic studies in California high schools. Earlier this month, the State Board of Education adopted an ethnic studies framework after two years of rewriting and contentious public hearings generating tens of thousands of comments. Though called a model curriculum, it’s not a blueprint or mandate; instead, it consists of principles goals, guides for instruction and sample lessons.
Disagreements remain over how ethnic studies should be taught and what course content should look like, and districts now have the challenge of providing the answers. This week’s guests express strong and contrasting views on what ethnic studies should and should not be in a state as diverse as California.
John Fensterwald and Louis Freedberg are the co-hosts. Guests are:
Manuel Rustin, Pasadena Unified history teacher and chairman, Instructional Quality CommissionTheresa Montaño, professor of Chicana & Chicano Studies, CSU NorthridgeLori Meyers, co-founder, Educators for Excellence in Ethnic StudiesFor background, read these EdSource stories:
After 8 hours, 250-plus speakers, California board adopts ethnic studies model curriculumA final vote, after many rewrites, for California’s controversial ethnic studies curriculumGov. Newsom vetoes requirement for ethnic studies course in high schoolIn addition, check out these related cites:
Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum, as presented to and adopted by State Board of EducationLiberated Ethnic Studies Model Curriculum Coalition Educators for Excellence in Ethnic StudiesManuel Rustin’s’ weekly podcast All of the Above: An Unstandardized Take on Education