Employee Survival Guide®

Tom Hayes vs UBS AG: Inside The LIBOR Scapegoat Allegation & $400 Million lawsuit


Listen Later

Comment on the Show by Sending Mark a Text Message.

Tom Hayes v. UBS, Connecticut Superior Court case filed on October 27, 2025 seeking $400 Million (Read Complaint HERE): 

A tiny shift in an interest rate can move oceans of money. We follow that ripple to its breaking point, tracing how Tom Hayes became the public face of LIBOR manipulation, then—years later—won full vindication in both the United States and the United Kingdom. Along the way, we unpack the documents, emails, and internal spreadsheets that allegedly turned “commercially aware” rate submissions into an institutional practice, and the crisis‑era pivot that recast one trader as the perfect fall guy.

We set the stage with a clear explanation of LIBOR’s design, why a bank’s submissions sit within a plausible range, and how that nuance became the hinge of subsequent court decisions. Then we walk through the complaint’s central claims: that UBS policy told staff to consider the bank’s trading positions, that management tracked exposures and directed desired outcomes, and that the bank later secured a non‑prosecution agreement by advancing a narrative of isolated misconduct. The result, according to the lawsuit, was a devastating chain reaction—selective disclosures, missing spreadsheets, and a jury instruction that erased the difference between choosing within a legitimate range and committing fraud.

Hayes’ convictions collapsed after the U.S. Second Circuit and the UK Supreme Court clarified that profit‑motivated choices are not criminal if the submitted rate stays within a genuine range of estimated borrowing costs. With legal ground restored, Hayes now sues UBS for malicious prosecution and indemnification, seeking at least $400 million in damages. We examine the stakes: lifetime earnings lost, health and family fallout, and the broader question of who should bear responsibility when corporate incentives steer behavior and later demand a scapegoat.

If you care about financial regulation, corporate accountability, and how legal narratives are built and unbuilt, this story matters. Listen, share your take, and help us bring more people into the conversation. If this resonated, subscribe, leave a review, and tell a friend what surprised you most.

If you enjoyed this episode of the Employee Survival Guide please like us on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn. We would really appreciate if you could leave a review of this podcast on your favorite podcast player such as Apple Podcasts. Leaving a review will inform other listeners you found the content on this podcast is important in the area of employment law in the United States.

For more information, please contact our employment attorneys at Carey & Associates, P.C. at 203-255-4150, www.capclaw.com.

Disclaimer: For educational use only, not intended to be legal advice.

...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

Employee Survival Guide®By Mark Carey

  • 5
  • 5
  • 5
  • 5
  • 5

5

20 ratings


More shows like Employee Survival Guide®

View all
The Moth by The Moth

The Moth

27,211 Listeners

The Daily by The New York Times

The Daily

112,601 Listeners

Up First from NPR by NPR

Up First from NPR

56,441 Listeners

Today, Explained by Vox

Today, Explained

10,241 Listeners

Dateline NBC by NBC News

Dateline NBC

47,820 Listeners

Two Hot Takes by Morgan Absher

Two Hot Takes

7,878 Listeners

Good Morning, HR by Mike Coffey, SPHR, SHRM-SCP

Good Morning, HR

57 Listeners

Smosh Reads Reddit Stories by Smosh

Smosh Reads Reddit Stories

1,657 Listeners

The HR Investigations Podcast by RPC HR

The HR Investigations Podcast

12 Listeners

Ground Rules: Employment Law Over Your Coffee Break by Pam Howland

Ground Rules: Employment Law Over Your Coffee Break

12 Listeners