Top K

Top K

By Baris Balli and Hubert SiwkinTechnology
Download on the App Store

Top K episodes

  • AI Found a New Enzyme Humans Missed: 950 Claude Agents | Top K Ep. 3

    Anthropic pointed 950 Claude agents at human genetic data and they found an enzyme system
    nobody had described. A real lab then confirmed it exists. This week is the "AI does real
    science" episode: Claude's record-breaking physics calculation, a language model trained on
    DNA, how a biotech picks what to research with AI, Google's search trick that sometimes
    builds on the fifth-best idea, and Google's way to put idle AI agents to sleep.

    00:00 Intro
    00:55 Claude finds a new enzyme system (950 agents)
    08:24 Claude's 9-loop physics record
    10:53 Genomic language models: AI trained on DNA
    17:52 How a biotech uses AI to pick what to research
    19:32 Google ERA: tree search that bets on the fifth-best idea
    24:17 Google AX: putting idle AI agents to sleep

    Top K — the k things in AI that actually mattered, explained properly.

    Every week we take the handful of AI stories worth your attention and go one layer deeper
    than the headline. Not "a new model dropped" — what changed architecturally, what it costs
    to run, and what it means for the code you write on Monday.

    Two engineers. No hype, no takes we can't defend, no reading press releases out loud.

    Also here: deep dives on how this stuff actually works, build logs, and whatever we're
    currently confused about.

    For you if you ship software with LLMs and want to stop treating the model as a black box.

    New episode every Monday.

    Topics: AI for science, AI agents, Claude, Gemini, genomic language models, tree search,
    agent infrastructure, ML engineering.

    📬 [newsletter] · 🎧 Spotify · Apple Podcasts

    Tags / keywords:
    AI news, machine learning, LLM, Top K, AI podcast, AI engineering, AI agents, Claude,
    Anthropic, AI for science, genomic language model, DNA AI, Google ERA, Gemini, AI agent
    infrastructure, tree search

    26 min
  • AI Safety Has a Hole: Splitting One Bad Question Into Ten Good Ones | Top K Ep. 2

    A safety-trained AI will refuse to help build a bomb — unless you ask it as ten separate,
    innocent-looking questions and assemble the answer yourself. This week: a 0.5-second decision
    model, a transformer that "loops" its own thinking, Google's maze-replay search trick, why
    playing a railway board game made an AI better at finance, proof that AI agents barely need
    tools, Claude Code going fully parallel in the cloud, and one frozen model driving robots,
    cars, drones and game characters.

    00:00 Intro
    02:16 Jev — a decision model instead of a text generator
    06:26 Recurrent Looped Transformer — reasoning depth that grows as it runs
    09:35 Dream-RSI — self-improving search without retraining
    13:54 Good Start Labs — does game training transfer to real work?
    20:32 The Harness Tax — bash beats typed tool catalogs
    26:59 Claude Code Projects — parallel cloud threads
    33:48 Odyssey-3 — one backbone, many robot bodies
    41:20 Capability laundering — bypassing AI safety by splitting the task
    47:12 Wrap-up

    Top K — the k things in AI that actually mattered, explained properly.

    Every week we take the handful of AI stories worth your attention and go one layer deeper
    than the headline. Not "a new model dropped" — what changed architecturally, what it costs
    to run, and what it means for the code you write on Monday.

    Two engineers. No hype, no takes we can't defend, no reading press releases out loud.

    Also here: deep dives on how this stuff actually works, build logs, and whatever we're
    currently confused about.

    For you if you ship software with LLMs and want to stop treating the model as a black box.

    New episode every Monday.

    Topics: LLMs, AI agents, agent harnesses, Claude Code, AI safety and alignment, robotics
    world models, reinforcement learning, AI infrastructure, ML engineering.

    📬 [newsletter] · 🎧 Spotify · Apple Podcasts

    48 min
  • OpenAI's 10,000-Agent Math "Proof" Wasn't What It Claimed | Top K Ep. 1

    OpenAI ran 10,000 AI agents for 88 hours to "prove" a famous unsolved math problem — but
    that's not exactly what happened. This week: a cheaper DeepSeek, Claude's split personality,
    GPT-6's first "Critical" risk rating, Shopify's self-improving AI loop, an agent that can't
    leak your password, a model that learned to cheat, and whether we're in an AI bubble.

    00:00 Intro
    01:50 DeepSeek V4.1-Flash — a 4x cheaper, smarter model
    14:37 Claude Fable & Mythos 5.1 — same model, two safety tiers
    17:29 GPT-6 Astra — OpenAI's first "Critical" risk model
    29:35 OpenAI's 10,000-agent Navier-Stokes "proof"
    41:44 Shopify's self-improving AI pipeline
    44:47 Meta Muse — the agent that never sees your password
    49:49 Training a Misaligned Reward Seeker (Anthropic)
    52:07 The AI bubble & OpenAI's position

    ---

    Top K — the k things in AI that actually mattered, explained properly.

    Every week we take the handful of AI stories worth your attention and go one layer deeper
    than the headline. Not "a new model dropped" — what changed architecturally, what it costs
    to run, and what it means for the code you write on Monday.

    Two engineers. No hype, no takes we can't defend, no reading press releases out loud.

    Also here: deep dives on how this stuff actually works, build logs, and whatever we're
    currently confused about.

    For you if you ship software with LLMs and want to stop treating the model as a black box.

    New episode every Monday.

    Topics: LLMs, inference and serving, AI agents, MCP, RAG, fine-tuning, evals, open weights,
    AI infrastructure, ML engineering.

    📬 [newsletter] · 🎧 Spotify · Apple Podcasts

    59 min

About Top K

From the publisher's feed

Top K — the k things in AI that actually mattered, explained properly.

Every week we take the handful of AI stories worth your attention and go one
layer deeper than the headline. Not "a…