Trade Secret Law Evolution Podcast

In this episode, Jordan discusses two District Court cases that address the issue of trade secret identification at different stages of litigation.

In this episode, Jordan breaks down a Fifth Circuit ruling that requires apportionment of damages in multi-secret cases, and the Seventh Circuit's strict approach to trade secret identification at the summary judgment stage.

This episode is our annual year in review. Jordan and Boston Shareholder Gregory Bombard break down last year's key cases and takeaways.

In this episode, co-host Gregory Bombard joins Jordan to discuss a fascinating case from the Eleventh Circuit, originating from a sunken 16th century French warship and a dispute over artifact excavation 450 years later.

In this episode, Jordan discusses two recent Circuit opinions, one about statute of limitations and how rumors and suspicion can trigger the clock, and the other about deference to juries' damages awards in trade secret cases.

In this episode, Jordan has a wide-ranging conversation with Meta's Head of Patents and Trade Secrets, Micheal Binns.

In this episode, New Jersey Shareholder Galit Kierkut joins Jordan to discuss the latest developments and trends following the FTC's 2024 noncompete ban and resulting litigation.

In this episode, the podcast's 80th, Jordan discusses two cases from Federal Districts in Texas and New York that address the statute of limitations, limited authorization to use trade secrets, and the reasonable measures to maintain secrecy requirement.

In this episode, Jordan Grotzinger and Gregory Bombard discuss the Ninth Circuit's recent decision impacting the most litigated issue in trade secret cases – trade secret identification.

In this episode, Jordan discusses a recent case from the Southern District of New York where an injunction was partially granted on a breach of contract claim but not on the trade secret claim. The Court found the plaintiffs didn't make a sufficient showing on irreparable harm, based on a lack of "danger" that the misappropriator would disclose the trade secrets to someone else.