
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


📌 To Busy to Read This Week's Editorial?
Join us for an AI-powered deep dive into the ethical challenges facing legal professionals in the age of generative AI. 🤖 This episode explores the real-world story that sparked critical questions about professional responsibility: a North Bethesda prank that went wrong and became a legal cautionary tale. We unpack the implications of AI-generated deepfakes for evidence authentication, client confidentiality, and the fundamental duty lawyers owe to the court. Whether you're navigating emerging tech in your practice or learning how to protect yourself from costly bar complaints, this conversation provides actionable insights into ABA Model Rules 1.1, 3.3, and 8.4. 📋
What You'll Learn: ✅ The technology competence imperative for modern attorneys ✅ How deepfake detection connects to ethical obligations ✅ The clash between client confidentiality (Rule 1.6) and candor to the tribunal (Rule 3.3) ✅ Five practical safeguards to implement immediately ✅ Why the "liar's dividend" threatens judicial integrity
⏱️ In Our Conversation, We Cover the Following:
📚 Resources
Connect with Michael D.J. Eisenberg
🌐 Website: https://www.thetechsavvylawyer.com 📧 Email: [email protected] 💼 LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/michaeldjeisenberg/ 📱 Podcast: https://www.thetechsavvylawyer.page/podcast
Mentioned in the Episode
🔹 ABA Model Rule 1.1 – Competence requirement (amended 2012) 🔹 ABA Model Rule 3.3 – Candor toward the tribunal 🔹 ABA Model Rule 8.4 – Misconduct (dishonesty, fraud, deceit, misrepresentation) 🔹 ABA Model Rule 1.6 – Confidentiality of information 🔹 North Bethesda, Maryland Deepfake Incident – October 2025 case study 🔹 Florida CLE Mandate – Three hours of technology-focused continuing legal education every three years 🔹 40 States, D.C. & P.R. – Jurisdictions that have adopted ABA Model Rule 1.1 technology competence language
By Michael D.J. Eisenberg5
1313 ratings
📌 To Busy to Read This Week's Editorial?
Join us for an AI-powered deep dive into the ethical challenges facing legal professionals in the age of generative AI. 🤖 This episode explores the real-world story that sparked critical questions about professional responsibility: a North Bethesda prank that went wrong and became a legal cautionary tale. We unpack the implications of AI-generated deepfakes for evidence authentication, client confidentiality, and the fundamental duty lawyers owe to the court. Whether you're navigating emerging tech in your practice or learning how to protect yourself from costly bar complaints, this conversation provides actionable insights into ABA Model Rules 1.1, 3.3, and 8.4. 📋
What You'll Learn: ✅ The technology competence imperative for modern attorneys ✅ How deepfake detection connects to ethical obligations ✅ The clash between client confidentiality (Rule 1.6) and candor to the tribunal (Rule 3.3) ✅ Five practical safeguards to implement immediately ✅ Why the "liar's dividend" threatens judicial integrity
⏱️ In Our Conversation, We Cover the Following:
📚 Resources
Connect with Michael D.J. Eisenberg
🌐 Website: https://www.thetechsavvylawyer.com 📧 Email: [email protected] 💼 LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/michaeldjeisenberg/ 📱 Podcast: https://www.thetechsavvylawyer.page/podcast
Mentioned in the Episode
🔹 ABA Model Rule 1.1 – Competence requirement (amended 2012) 🔹 ABA Model Rule 3.3 – Candor toward the tribunal 🔹 ABA Model Rule 8.4 – Misconduct (dishonesty, fraud, deceit, misrepresentation) 🔹 ABA Model Rule 1.6 – Confidentiality of information 🔹 North Bethesda, Maryland Deepfake Incident – October 2025 case study 🔹 Florida CLE Mandate – Three hours of technology-focused continuing legal education every three years 🔹 40 States, D.C. & P.R. – Jurisdictions that have adopted ABA Model Rule 1.1 technology competence language

91,097 Listeners

4,366 Listeners

1,288 Listeners

112,765 Listeners

10,267 Listeners

669 Listeners

108 Listeners

4 Listeners