
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Send us a text
In this episode Major Allen Abrams highlights some SCOTUS petitions that, although not military cases, may have an impact on military justice. He then discusses United States v. Tate, where a gaff on the part of the court reporter resulted in a complete loss of a day of trial. The issue was whether the trial judge's remedy was proper (it wasn't). Major Abrams then walks us through how to lay a foundation for a presence sense impression and distinguishes that hearsay exception from others such as the excited utterance.
By Sam Castanien & Trevor Ward5
1919 ratings
Send us a text
In this episode Major Allen Abrams highlights some SCOTUS petitions that, although not military cases, may have an impact on military justice. He then discusses United States v. Tate, where a gaff on the part of the court reporter resulted in a complete loss of a day of trial. The issue was whether the trial judge's remedy was proper (it wasn't). Major Abrams then walks us through how to lay a foundation for a presence sense impression and distinguishes that hearsay exception from others such as the excited utterance.

112,451 Listeners

56,739 Listeners

14,234 Listeners

15,596 Listeners

29,256 Listeners

16,001 Listeners