Welcome to The PLR Podcast, where we navigate the fascinating terrain of legal theory and pluralism. In today's episode, we have the privilege of speaking with Cameron Moss, the author of the illuminating article titled "The Embryology of Legal Systems & Legal Pluralism" published in the Plassey Law Review.

In legal theory, analytical theory has dominated the field over the past few decades, whether rightly or wrongly. However, over the last few years, legal pluralism has been making a steady rise to compete with analytical theory. There have been recent calls for analytical theorists to seriously engage with the criticisms and discoveries of legal pluralism. Cameron Moss offers a captivating exploration of why certain aspects of HLA Hart's theory of legal systems are deserving of greater attention for its ability to dispense with the core aspects of the pluralist challenge.

Listeners gain valuable perspectives on the complexities of legal systems and the need for a nuanced understanding of legal pluralism.

Join us for this engaging conversation as we unravel the embryology of legal systems and explore the dynamic landscape of legal pluralism.

music credits; Music from # Uppbeat (free for creditors): http://uppbeat.io/t/christan-larssen/nostalgic-bossa

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode of the PLR Podcast, we delve into the complex world of administrative law with a special focus on the intriguing article titled "What goes up, must come down… The Rise and Fall of An Bord Pleanála". Annette Cleary has penned this thought-provoking piece for the Plassey Law Review, offering insightful analysis and reflections on the evolution of An Bord Pleanála.

The article sheds light on the trajectory of An Bord Pleanála, the Irish planning appellate body, examining its rise to prominence and subsequent challenges and controversies. As our guest explains, An Bord Pleanála plays a crucial role in the Irish planning system, tasked with making decisions on planning applications and appeals of significant national importance.

Annette provides a comprehensive overview of the factors that contributed to the rise of An Bord Pleanála as a central institution in Irish planning governance. They delve into the legislative framework, institutional structures, and decision-making processes that shaped the board's operations and influence over time. However, the article also critically examines the challenges and controversies that have beset An Bord Pleanála in recent years, leading to a decline in public confidence and trust. Our guest highlights key issues such as transparency, accountability, and procedural fairness, which have come under scrutiny in relation to the board's decisions and practices.

Listeners gain valuable insights into the complexities of administrative law and the dynamics of regulatory governance in Ireland. Annette Cleary offers reflections on the lessons to be learned from the rise and fall of An Bord Pleanála, emphasising the importance of robust governance mechanisms and public oversight in ensuring the integrity and effectiveness of regulatory bodies.

Tune in to this engaging conversation as we explore the fascinating journey of An Bord Pleanála and uncover the lessons learned from its rise and fall in the realm of administrative law.

music credits; Music from # Uppbeat (free for creditors): http://uppbeat.io/t/christan-larssen/nostalgic-bossa

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode of the PLR Podcast, we delve into the intricacies of immunity from suit provided to witnesses in court by analysing the notable case of Jeffery v. The Minister for Justice, Equality, and Defence [2019] IESC 27. Stephy Varghese authored an insightful case note for the Plassey Law Review, offering valuable analysis and perspectives on this significant legal precedent in the context of negligent misstatement.

Stephy Varghese provides a detailed examination of the facts of the case, outlining the legal arguments presented by both parties and the reasoning employed by the court in its decision. Throughout the episode, our guest offers critical insights into the implications of the court's ruling in the case.

Listeners gain a deeper understanding of the complexities surrounding negligent misstatement and the challenges inherent in balancing competing interests and rights. Stephy Varghese concludes the episode by reflecting on the enduring significance of the case and its impact on the evolving landscape of tort law. Tune in to this enlightening conversation as we dissect the legal intricacies of Jeffery v. The Minister for Justice, Equality, and Defence and explore its broader implications.

Music Credits; Music from # Uppbeat (free for creditors): http://uppbeat.io/t/christan-larssen/nostalgic-bossa

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode of the PLR podcast, we delve into the intricacies of the landmark case Powers v. Greymountain [2022] IEHC 599. Our guest, Eve O'Sullivan, has written an insightful case note for the Plassey Law Review, providing valuable analysis and perspectives on this significant legal precedent.

The case of Powers v. Greymountain revolves around the fundamental principle of separate legal personality of a company, a cornerstone of corporate law. Our guest takes us through the facts of the case, where the plaintiffs sought to hold the directors of a company personally liable for the company's actions. The central question examined by the court was whether the company's separate legal personality shielded its directors from personal liability.

Eve O'Sullivan provides a comprehensive overview of the legal reasoning behind the court's decision, shedding light on key legal principles and precedents that influenced the outcome. Drawing from their expertise, they offer critical insights into the implications of the ruling for corporate governance and accountability.

Throughout the discussion, Eve unpacks the broader implications of Powers v. Greymountain for corporate law theory and practice. They explore the tension between the doctrine of separate legal personality and the need for accountability in corporate decision-making, highlighting the challenges and complexities inherent in balancing these competing interests.

Listeners gain a deeper understanding of the nuances surrounding the concept of separate legal personality and its implications for corporate liability, reflecting on the enduring significance of Powers v. Greymountain and its relevance in shaping the evolving landscape of corporate law in Ireland.

Tune in to this insightful conversation as we unravel the intricacies of Powers v. Greymountain and explore its implications for the corporate world.

music credits; Music from # Uppbeat (free for creditors) :http://uppbeat.io/t/christan-larssen/nostalgic-bossa

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.