In this episode of Understanding Crypto James Burtt and Paul Abercrombie discuss the most recent developments in the world of cryptocurrency. Celsius, a crypto-based financial institution, is on the verge of filing for bankruptcy, adding to the market's turbulence. Paul laments this development while contemplating on the technology's original purpose. He says, "This technology should only be used if it improves or provides a better option than what is now available." Celsius and several DeFi organisations, on the other hand, are supposed to provide a viable alternative to the centralised banking system, but are essentially banks camouflaged as cryptocurrency exchanges.
Centralisation in Disguise
The cryptocurrency market is incredibly volatile; this is aided by mass liquidation of digital assets by scared investors. “This is a full-on crypto crisis of epic proportions!” Paul laments. Though the decline began with Luna, it has continued and was recently exacerbated by the collapse of Celsius, a cryptocurrency-based financial institution that provides crypto-based loans. The current crash, according to Paul, is the result of two compounded losses experienced by the company with Stakehound, and a hacking issue with the Badger DAO. All accounts have since been frozen, a marker of centralised operation which goes against the tenets of Web3 decentralisation. James states that institutions such as Celsius publicly promote decentralisation by utilising web3 tools to gain access to a different layer of transparency. "The way these organisations are potentially structured,” says Paul, “and the backers of those organisations, the VC backers are most likely financial institutions." Celsius, purportedly created to rebel against mainstream banking systems, approaches a huge centralised bank for assistance, which Paul finds is the ultimate irony. He also warns current investors who are hoping for a payout package that it may not be forthcoming. [Listen from 1:14]
The Crash of Celsius
Though the DeFi institution's ideology and structure is admirable, James points out that real banks provide a level of security that DeFi institutions cannot surpass. Paul argues that, while Celsius did implement safety guidelines, it was their promise of high returns to investors that may have been the real cause of the current crisis. He wonders whether suitable systems were in place to produce the high yields projected. Due to a lack of restrictions in Web3, these institutions continue to deceive investors. While banks are obligated to present tangible documents in order to issue loans, the crypto market's absence of regulations makes this impossible. Presently, Celsius has frozen accounts without declaring bankruptcy and investors remain powerless without regulations protecting their interests. “If you can't access an asset, it's not an asset,” says James. [Listen from 11:08]
Web3 Loyalty
After the slump, only the loyalists have remained devoted to crypto, and their enthusiasm has not waned in the least. However, considering the potential of blockchain technology, Paul and James are mystified as to why these challenges persist. Paul emphasises that DeFi, blockchain and crypto are conceptually different, but they may overlap. He maintains that Celsius' problem is specific to DeFi institutions; this doesn’t negate the fact that blockchain technology is the true Web3 breakthrough. Paul compares blockchain technology to a web2 version of Windows 10, to highlight the intersection between blockchain technology and DeFi institutions. “[In a] decentralised network the computer can run in perpetuity …whereas in a centralised network somebody can stop the system from running,” he explains. Celsius accomplished this by disguising a centralised system as a decentralised one. "DeFi is just one solution that is created on the blockchain, so when people say that crypto is dead, this is wrong, because Defi is only one program that sits on the blockchain," he argues. James uses the developments around their creator coins as an example of how they, too, have been influenced by market instability. He claims that despite the present atmosphere, their coins have maintained their initial value due to the community's dedication. [Listen from: 21:14]
The Way Forward
Because their community has linked technologies, Paul believes they have been impacted by the crisis. He hopes that by implementing technologies in the future, they will be able to protect their community against future repercussions. Paul believes that token gating, which offers members voting access and utility, would be beneficial to their community. They've been using Rally to issue these creator coins for their business, and he adds that if this bridge is burned down, it will have a direct impact on their community. He does admit, though, that risks are unavoidable. In spite of the perceived stagnancy of the market, there are new developments within the space. [Listen from: 28:51]
Key Takeaways
- Regulations are required to protect the rights of investors in DeFi organisations.
- Some DeFi organisations are actually centralised banks masquerading as DeFi.
Resources
James Burtt on Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram | Clubhouse
Paul Abercrombie on Website | Twitter | LinkedIn | Instagram