
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Send us Fan Mail
In this episode we discuss United States v. Simmons where the CAAF found that, based on the facts of the case, expanding the charged time frame by over nine months was a major change, and therefore prohibited under RCM 603. We also discuss potential strategies for defense counsel when an important witness refuses to sit for an interview with defense counsel.
By Sam Castanien & Trevor Ward5
1919 ratings
Send us Fan Mail
In this episode we discuss United States v. Simmons where the CAAF found that, based on the facts of the case, expanding the charged time frame by over nine months was a major change, and therefore prohibited under RCM 603. We also discuss potential strategies for defense counsel when an important witness refuses to sit for an interview with defense counsel.

113,272 Listeners

56,991 Listeners

14,337 Listeners

15,491 Listeners

29,273 Listeners

16,489 Listeners