
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Send us Fan Mail
In United States v. Willman, the CAAF found that certain evidence could be considered by the CCA for one purpose but that the same evidence was not within the record for any other purpose (the takeaway is to ensure as much as possible gets in the record). The episode then turns to what is often the most enjoyable part of the impeachment with a prior inconsistent statement -- the confrontation step!
By Sam Castanien & Trevor Ward5
1919 ratings
Send us Fan Mail
In United States v. Willman, the CAAF found that certain evidence could be considered by the CCA for one purpose but that the same evidence was not within the record for any other purpose (the takeaway is to ensure as much as possible gets in the record). The episode then turns to what is often the most enjoyable part of the impeachment with a prior inconsistent statement -- the confrontation step!

113,121 Listeners

56,944 Listeners

14,337 Listeners

15,506 Listeners

29,272 Listeners

16,525 Listeners