Part 2 of a two-part episode in which I look at what, if anything, we can glean about the duration of hell from the book of Revelation.

Part 1 of a two-part episode in which I look at what, if anything, we can glean about the duration of hell from the book of Revelation.

This episode and its predecessor are hard to categorize. Very broadly, they deal with issues that lie beneath ethics. The previous episode dealt with the Euthyphro dilemma, and this one deals with works-based soteriology (Pelagianism) in the context of (my understanding of) Christopher Langan's CTMU.

This episode and its sequel are hard to categorize, but they both deal with issues beneath ethics. This first part seeks to resolve the Euthyphro dilemma in the context of (my understanding of) Christopher Langan's CTMU.

In which I again try to make sense of reincarnation (unsuccessfully) and conclude that it might be a confabulation of sorts.

In which I investigate the strength of the biblical warrant for the idea of an eternal hell.

In which I lay out my reasons for self-identifying as Christian. Edit/post-scriptum: For the Christology which I express in this episode, I am heavily indebted to the theologian Oliver Crisp, whom I mentioned in the episode but did not sufficiently credit.

My attempt to deal with the problem of evil.

In which the distinction between pantheism and panentheism is explored, a model of the Trinity is put forward, and speculation is offered on whether "God is love" is true necessarily.

What I take to be the decisive arguments for universalism.