Passing Judgment

Unpacking DOJ’s Civil Rights Shake-up: How 70 Percent of Civil Rights Lawyers Left Under Trump with Sam Levine


Listen Later

In this episode of Passing Judgment, we examine sweeping changes in the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division under the Trump administration. Reporter Sam Levine joins host Jessica Levinson to discuss how the division, long tasked with enforcing voting rights and other protections, has seen over 70% of its attorneys depart amid a shift in priorities toward the president’s agenda. The episode explores what this means for civil rights enforcement, voter protections, and whether former DOJ lawyers can fill the gap by taking their expertise into private practice.



Here are three key takeaways you don't want to miss:



The Role and Function of the DOJ Civil Rights Division and Voting Section: The conversation starts with an explanation of what the Civil Rights Division within the Department of Justice (DOJ) does. It is tasked with enforcing America’s civil rights laws—including the Voting Rights Act—and consists of 11 sections dealing with various aspects of civil rights (voting, housing, education, anti-discrimination).



Impact of Administrative Changes on DOJ Priorities: A significant theme is how changes in presidential administrations can redirect the focus and priorities of the DOJ and its sections—especially the Voting Section. While career attorneys (not political appointees) do most of the day-to-day work, political appointees set overarching priorities. Normally, shifts happen between administrations, but under the Trump administration, changes were described as “radical departures,” shifting focus to investigate noncitizen voting and prioritizing policies aligned with the president rather than traditional civil rights enforcement.


Dismissal of Civil Servants and Dismantling of the Voting Section: The episode highlights the mass removal of senior civil servants in the Voting Section under Trump’s administration, replacing experienced managers and ordering the dismissal of all active cases. This unprecedented action is portrayed as a clear signal of political influence overriding apolitical legal work—and is said to undermine the department’s ability to fulfill its civil rights mandate.




Follow Our Host and Guest:

 @LevinsonJessica

@srl


...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

Passing JudgmentBy Jessica Levinson

  • 4.7
  • 4.7
  • 4.7
  • 4.7
  • 4.7

4.7

212 ratings


More shows like Passing Judgment

View all
Political Gabfest by Slate Podcasts

Political Gabfest

8,501 Listeners

Fresh Air by NPR

Fresh Air

38,238 Listeners

The Rachel Maddow Show by Rachel Maddow, MSNBC

The Rachel Maddow Show

36,961 Listeners

Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts by Slate Podcasts

Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick | Law, justice, and the courts

3,458 Listeners

Civics 101 by NHPR

Civics 101

2,502 Listeners

The Daily by The New York Times

The Daily

110,865 Listeners

Radio Atlantic by The Atlantic

Radio Atlantic

2,247 Listeners

Stay Tuned with Preet by Preet Bharara

Stay Tuned with Preet

32,406 Listeners

Deadline: White House by Nicolle Wallace, MSNBC

Deadline: White House

6,801 Listeners

Why Is This Happening? The Chris Hayes Podcast by Chris Hayes, MSNBC & NBCNews THINK

Why Is This Happening? The Chris Hayes Podcast

9,675 Listeners

Interesting Times with Ross Douthat by New York Times Opinion

Interesting Times with Ross Douthat

6,741 Listeners

Talking Feds by Harry Litman

Talking Feds

4,567 Listeners

The Ezra Klein Show by New York Times Opinion

The Ezra Klein Show

15,294 Listeners

The Counsel by CAFE

The Counsel

859 Listeners

The Briefing with Jen Psaki by MSNBC

The Briefing with Jen Psaki

1,232 Listeners